They served their time, so why can't they leave prison behind?
For many felons, prison ends, but the damage doesn't. They struggle with post-incarceration syndrome — a PTSD-like condition that makes rebuilding their lives an uphill battle.
Without the right support, many battle anxiety, depression and the weight of their past. That struggle often leads to joblessness, addiction and ending up back in prison.
Some lawmakers and civil rights groups are pushing for better research and more support. In 2023, U.S. Reps. Ayanna Pressley and Grace Napolitano urged the National Institute of Mental Health to study post-incarceration syndrome and its consequences, highlighting how carceral environments lead to lasting mental health damage.
The NAACP says nearly 2.3 million people are locked up in the U.S., yet most don't get treatment for PTSD.
Without help, people bring that trauma home to their families and neighborhoods. As such, the NAACP has called for trauma-informed care for former prisoners.
Holyoke City Councilor Israel Rivera has a recurring dream that he's back in prison.
'I still wake up in hot sweats, stressed out, wanting to cry, because I got a family now,' Rivera said in a recent interview at the Holyoke office where he works as a regional manager for Families First, a nonprofit that supports parents throughout Massachusetts.
In the early 2000s, law enforcement officers raided a home Rivera was in. Rivera was arrested and served five years on drug-related charges. He was not far from adolescence, having just turned 21.
Since getting out, he's struggled to leave prison behind. As an example, he told the story of a dinner party where he introduced himself as an 'ex-felon.'
A woman asked, 'Why do you do that?'
He hadn't thought about it. In part, he wants to humanize other felons. He wants to let people know that they are people like him. He uses his presence to challenge prejudices.
'But then I was like, damn, it's been over 10 years since I came out of jail. Why am I still saying that?' Rivera said.
He's not sure why, but he knows prison is still inside him. 'It is still in my head,' he said. 'I'm keeping myself in a kind of box. That's PTSD.'
In prison, Rivera dreamed of home. But when he woke up, the bars were still there.
Now that he's home, his dreams have reversed. 'Now I dream I'm still in prison,' he said.
Rivera's story is far from unique. A lot of people in prison were struggling kids first — kids who never got the help they needed.
'If we don't reach young people early and help them heal, they'll carry that trauma into adulthood — filling our prisons instead of reaching their potential,' said Leon Smith, executive director of Citizens for Juvenile Justice.
For 30 years, the Boston nonprofit has worked to reform the juvenile justice system in Massachusetts, advocating for policies that address the root causes of criminal behavior.
Smith said Massachusetts has made strides in this area. A recent MassINC and Boston Indicators report found that since Massachusetts passed criminal justice reform legislation in 2018, incarceration rates have dropped nearly 50%.
The sharpest reductions have come in the last five years, driven by investments in prevention, treatment and reentry support in the Commonwealth.
'Which largely avoided the major spikes in crime experienced in other cities and states during the pandemic,' the report stated.
While these improvements are promising, Smith warns that the decline in incarceration has slowed. Between 2022 and 2023, Massachusetts' prison population dropped by only 166 people, according to the Massachusetts Department of Corrections.
The real fix, Smith said, is making sure every young person has access to mental health care.
'I have professional friends who are parents and are having a difficult time getting mental health support for their kids,' he said. 'Now consider what it's like when you are at the intersection of race and poverty in our commonwealth. Those parents are having an even more difficult time.'
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maria Scruggs files to run for St. Petersburg mayor
Maria Scruggs, a former president of the St. Petersburg branch of the NAACP and longtime community activist, has filed to run for St. Petersburg mayor in 2026. Scruggs, 67, filed paperwork with the city clerk's office Friday, becoming the first mayoral candidate to do so. She will presumably challenge Mayor Ken Welch, who said last year he would seek reelection but has not filed to run yet. 'I believe that the city of St. Petersburg can be going in a different direction,' Scruggs told the Tampa Bay Times. 'While I think we have made some strides forward, our conversations throughout the community is an overall dissatisfaction with the way the city is going.' Scruggs said she consistently hears concerns on five issues: The pros and cons that come with potentially losing the Tampa Bay Rays, cost of living, affordable housing, flooding and the handling of the aftermath of hurricanes. 'I certainly believe that the preparation through training, through certification, through education, has certainly prepared me to become the mayor of St. Petersburg,' she said. Scruggs entered the state's deferred retirement program after 19 years with Orange County Corrections Department. This is Scruggs' sixth time seeking public office. She ran unsuccessfully for St. Petersburg City Council in 2017 and 2005 and for Pinellas County Commission in 2020 and 2004. She has run for St. Petersburg mayor once before in 2001. She supported Welch's bid for mayor in 2021. Welch declined to comment through a city spokesperson. He opened a new political action committee in January after the state in November revoked his old one, Pelican PAC, for failing to file reports. The new Pelican Political Action Committee has raised $87,175 since April. Scruggs' official campaign kickoff will take place Sept. 27 at Black Leaf Cigar and Wine Lounge downtown. Four City Council seats are also on the ballot next year. Two candidates have filed for the downtown and southeast seat, District 6: Children's Network of Hillsborough CEO Terri Balliet and public health practitioner Linsey Grove. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Republican primaries for two state Senate seats set for Tuesday, Aug. 5. What to know
A special election set for Tuesday, Aug. 5, in the Hattiesburg area will bring voters to the polls to choose a candidate in two of the Pine Belt's state Senate races. The Republican primary elections will be held for Senate Districts 42 and 44. The candidates in the remaining districts on the Nov. 4 ballot are either running unopposed or have no party challengers. The legislative election held in 2023 was based on district lines drawn in 2021, following the 2020 Census. Those districts were challenged in 2022, and a federal court agreed, that they diluted the Black vote in Mississippi. State lawmakers were ordered to go back to the drawing board to create new district lines in three areas of the state, with two centered on Senate districts and the third on the House of Representatives. The new plan was approved in May and an election was scheduled for November with party primaries to be held in August. Election Day: Where to vote in Forrest County The NAACP, which had filed the lawsuit challenging the redistricting, did not agree with the plans submitted for the Senate in DeSoto County nor the House of Representatives in the Golden Triangle, and appealed the three-judge panel ruling. The new plan for redistricting in the Hattiesburg area was not challenged, and the election will go ahead as planned. Three Republicans are seeking the Senate District 42 seat. If a candidate receives 50% of the vote plus one in the primary election, that person will be unopposed on the November ballot. If a majority is not reached, a runoff election will be held Sept. 2. Then the winner of the runoff would move on to the November election, but the race will already be decided since the winning candidate will run unopposed. Election Day: Where to vote in Lamar County Candidates running for District 42 include: Incumbent Robin Robinson RJ Robinson Don Hartness Two Republicans are hoping to win the primary election for Senate District 44. The winner of that race will face Democratic challenger Shakita Taylor in November. Candidates on the Aug. 5 ballot for the District 44 Republican primary include: Patrick Lott Chris Johnson, who is the current senator of District 45, will be seeking a return to office in District 44. Although Johnson was elected to a four-year term in 2023, he must run again because the new plan places his residence in a different district. In addition to Senate Districts 42 and 44, the following races will also be on the November ballot: Incumbent Sen. Juan Barnett, D-Heidelberg, is running unopposed in District 34. Incumbent Sen. Joey Fillingane, R-Sumrall, is running unopposed in District 41. Hattiesburg attorney Anna Rush, a Republican, and former Hattiesburg mayor Johnny DuPree, a Democrat, are seeking the Senate District 45 seat. Lici Beveridge is a reporter for the Hattiesburg American and Clarion Ledger. Contact her at lbeveridge@ Follow her on X @licibev or Facebook at This article originally appeared on Hattiesburg American: Two Republican primaries set for Hattiesburg, Pine Belt on Aug. 5
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court halts ruling that limits Voting Rights Act enforcement
The Supreme Court on Thursday halted an appeals ruling that prevents private groups from challenging election maps under the Voting Rights Act in seven states. Neither the majority nor the three public dissenters — conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — explained their reasoning. The case arose from a lawsuit brought by two Native American tribes, who argue that North Dakota's state legislative map denied them an equal opportunity to elect their candidates of choice. The tribes are represented by Campaign Legal Center, Native American Rights Fund and two other law offices. The case entered the national spotlight after an 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled 2-1 that the tribes and other private parties have no legal right to enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It mimicked an earlier 8th Circuit ruling concerning a redistricting case in Arkansas. The Supreme Court's emergency ruling lifts the 8th Circuit's ruling until any appeals are resolved. It does not reflect the court's final decision on the matter. It comes as the justices prepare to rehear a major redistricting case in Louisiana next term, which legal observers have closely watched as several conservative justices signal a desire to make it more difficult to bring Voting Rights Act lawsuits. The high court has not yet announced the legal question it will consider when it rehears the case. The tribes, backed by the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, argued the 8th Circuit's recent decision is at odds with decades of history and takes away a key pathway to challenge discrimination in the seven states the 8th Circuit covers. 'They likewise contradict every circuit court and three-judge district court—all unanimous unlike the divided decision below—ever to have considered the question of private enforcement of Section 2,' the tribes wrote in court filings. North Dakota urged the justices to turn away the appeal, stressing the tribes' 'assumptions are not holdings.' 'And the fact that Section 2's private enforceability was not previously challenged does not mean Congress spoke with the clarity needed to create a privately enforceable right, as members of the Court have recognized,' the state wrote in court filings. In statements Thursday, the tribes' legal representation celebrated the decision. 'For decades, Tribes and Native Americans in North Dakota have fought for the rights of reservation voters,' said Lenny Powell, a staff attorney at Native American Rights Fund. 'Today is another victory in that fight.' Updated July 25 at 10:55 a.m. EDT. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword