Poilievre says he lost Ottawa riding for being 'honest' about plan to cut public sector jobs
Poilievre had held the Ottawa riding of Carleton for two decades until the April 28 election, when he was defeated by Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy by 4,500 votes.
The loss was a major setback for the leader, who before the new year had been favoured to become prime minister.
Poilievre no longer has a seat in the House of Commons, but he's hoping to regain one in the rural Alberta riding of Battle River–Crowfoot on Aug. 18 — after former Conservative MP Damien Kurek offered up his spot in what is one of the safest Conservative seats in the country.
In an interview with CBC's The House that airs on Saturday, Poilievre said his campaign was transparent about his intention to cut public service jobs if his party won the election.
"And it's an Ottawa riding with a lot of federal public servants who disagreed with that approach," Poilievre said. "They ran a very aggressive campaign, particularly the public sector unions did, to defeat me on that basis."
The leader said his voice as a representative for Canadians across the country took precedence over pleasing the 124,000 or so people in the riding — which happens to border Prime Minister Mark Carney's riding of Nepean.
But Poilievre continues to want to highlight his party's successes in the election under his leadership, including the two and a half million more votes it garnered than in the 2021 federal election, as well as adding 25 seats in Parliament.
He will be undergoing a mandatory leadership review in January, which the Conservative Party's constitution calls for if a leader does not resign following an election loss.
"Some people might say, 'Well, it wasn't the best idea to run on a smaller federal public service when you're an Ottawa MP,' but I had an entire country to represent," Poilievre said. "I had to be honest with people."
He said the Liberals didn't do the same.
"I guess I could've done what the Liberals did, which is hide their plans," Poilievre said.
WATCH | Why Pierre Poilievre thinks he lost his riding of 2 decades:
Last week, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne asked fellow cabinet ministers to come up with "ambitious savings proposals" to get a handle on public sector spending.
During the election campaign, Carney did share his intention to rein in federal operational spending, saying he would "spend less, so Canada can invest more."
At the time, he said he would cap the size of the public service and try to make government operations more efficient by "leveraging AI and machine learning."
"The voice that I bring represents those eight million-plus people who believed in my message of fighting inflation, of getting affordable homes built, of locking up criminals, defeating drugs, unleashing our resources," Poilievre told Catherine Cullen, host of The House.
When it comes to cutting the federal public service, he said, "that's the only way you bring down taxes and deficits, and I was honest about that, and the people in that particular constituency voted accordingly."Poilievre is running against Liberal candidate Darcy Spady in Battle River–Crowfoot. Kurek first won the riding's seat in 2019 and was re-elected in April with almost 82 per cent of the vote. The young Conservative has said he plans to run in the riding again in the next federal election.
The Conservative leader said he wants to continue challenging the government in the House of Commons, as he's well known for doing during question period.
"If you look at how the debate has changed in Canada as a result of the arguments and the causes that I've taken on, that voice has been very important to countless people, and it's a voice I want to amplify," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
First Nations call off talks on forestry bill, say Quebec disrespecting rights
MONTREAL — First Nations in Quebec are suspending consultations with the government on its planned forestry reform because they say the province is not respecting their rights. The Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador says in an open letter that Quebec's minister of natural resources has failed to recognize the status of its members as Indigenous governments. The Quebec government tabled a bill last spring that would divide public forests into three zones, including one that would prioritize forestry. But the assembly says the zoning approach paves the way for a form of land privatization, and it accuses the government of refusing to engage on the issue. The group, which represents 43 First Nations communities, had agreed to consultations with the government after the bill was tabled in April. The minister has said the legislation is intended to protect communities that rely on the forest industry in an uncertain economic time. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 22, 2025. The Canadian Press
Entrepreneur
24 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
A Program That Helped Build 144,000 Jobs Gets Slashed by Budget Cuts — What Happens Next Is Pivotal for Small Business Support
The agency is facing elimination. But this could be an opportunity. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. SCORE, the nonprofit that has supported small businesses for over six decades, recently faced a major setback: the latest tax and spending bill eliminated about 60% of its federal funding — a core part of its budget. For an organization that offers free mentoring to hundreds of thousands of entrepreneurs annually, this looks like a serious blow. But what if this funding cut is not the end of SCORE — but a new beginning? With a vast network of 10,000 volunteer mentors and a proven track record of economic impact — including helping start 58,000 new businesses and creating 144,000 jobs in 2024 alone — SCORE has always been a vital lifeline for small business owners. However, without reliable federal support, SCORE faces a crossroads: continue to rely on uncertain government appropriations or reinvent itself as a self-sustaining business. Related: 3 Solutions That Help Alleviate Everyday Pressures Small Business Owners Face The real impact behind SCORE's numbers According to SCORE, every federal dollar invested generated $45 in economic benefits. This was achieved through four million mentoring hours across 200 chapters, advising over 300,000 entrepreneurs annually. These numbers show that SCORE's work isn't just a feel-good story — it's an economic engine. Yet, despite these impressive results, the realities of federal budget cuts have forced SCORE's leadership to confront a difficult question: How can SCORE continue fulfilling its mission without government backing? Facing tough realities: the bigger budget picture As an advocate and advisor for small businesses in this country, it pains me to see great organizations like this lose their support. SCORE is clearly a valuable agency that has helped countless small businesses in the more than 60 years since its founding in 1964. But I'm also a realist. The reality is that, regardless of what we want, there are limitations to what we can afford. Yes, I'd like free education, free healthcare, clean water, safe highways and strong defense. I also appreciate all the research done by so many government agencies and academic institutions that received federal support. But I, like many business owners, also see a $2 trillion annual deficit and a $36 trillion national debt and don't know how we and our children and grandchildren can sustain that level of liabilities. Some things have to be cut. Some things have to go. And it looks like SCORE, like many other good programs the Federal government funds, is one of those things. Government spending must be prioritized and trimmed where possible. Unfortunately, this means good programs sometimes lose funding — even those with proven results. It's painful for advocates and advisors to see a respected organization like SCORE face these challenges. But the truth is, many federally funded programs will need to find new models to survive. A bold proposal: what if SCORE became a business? SCORE's greatest asset isn't just its volunteers or history — it's its infrastructure, leadership and brand recognition. These assets could enable SCORE to spin off from government support and operate as a private, self-sustaining entity. It already has the foundation — a trusted name in the small business community, a robust volunteer network and experienced leadership. With the right strategy, SCORE could attract investors, lenders or equity partners who see the value in its proven return on investment. And that ROI can be translated into real dollars. Imagine SCORE charging a sliding scale of fees based on a business's ability to pay — allowing startups and small enterprises with limited resources to still receive help, while those who can afford it contribute. Or consider raising funds from corporate sponsors who already invest heavily in small business programs, redirecting those dollars toward SCORE's mission. SCORE could also contract its expertise to consulting firms or financial institutions — creating new revenue streams while expanding its impact. Why change is necessary SCORE's traditional model — volunteer consultants supported by government-paid staff — has its limitations. Volunteers vary in quality and motivation, and government employees don't operate under typical business incentives that reward customer satisfaction and performance. For SCORE to thrive in a post-funding world, it must adopt a model that encourages accountability, quality and sustainability. The opportunity ahead If SCORE were to disappear, would more small businesses fail? Would the economy suffer? Probably not dramatically — other organizations and market forces would fill some gaps. But SCORE has a unique opportunity to redefine itself — not just as a nonprofit supporter of small business but as a business itself, accountable for its outcomes and financially self-sufficient. Like the entrepreneurs it helps, SCORE can pivot, adapt and innovate. Related: How to Secure a Small Business Grant in 5 Easy Steps Final thoughts Brigett Weston, SCORE's CEO, recently said, "Without federal support, this incredibly efficient and effective program is at serious risk of no longer fulfilling its mission." That risk is real. But it's also a chance. SCORE can lead the way in demonstrating how public support programs might evolve to meet today's financial realities — continuing to empower entrepreneurs and build our economy, but on its own terms. This is not just a story about funding cuts; it's about resilience, reinvention and the future of small business support in America. Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan premiers unify in push for energy independence amid U.S. tariff threats. Here's what Canadians should know
Conservative premiers in Ontario, Saskatchewan and Alberta have set their sights on a pipeline from Alberta to Ontario to boost Canada's energy independence and reduce the country's reliance on the United States. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on Tuesday, July 22, aiming to expand Canadian energy markets and make it easier to ship exports to global markets. Canada's premiers are meeting at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ont., this week, to discuss interprovincial trade and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The premiers are also meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday to discuss energy independence and nation-building projects. Today, I'll be meeting with the premiers in Huntsville to talk about building up our industries and getting big, nation-building projects off the ground. Together, we're moving from reliance to resilience, and building one strong, Canadian economy. Posting to X on Tuesday, Carney noted, 'Together, we're moving from reliance to resilience, and building one strong, Canadian economy.' Ford said the MOU between Ontario, Saskatchewan and Alberta sends a clear message that Canada is ready to build pipelines and other energy infrastructure to ship crude oil, critical minerals and natural gas across the country while reducing Canada's reliance on the U.S. Canada currently lacks domestic pipeline capacity to process its own crude oil and sends the bulk of its Alberta crude to refineries in Texas. An analysis by the C.D. Howe Institute found Canada shipped US$100 billion in oil and gas to the United States in 2023. Crude oil exports to the U.S. increased in 2024. 'This new agreement will help move western oil and gas to new and existing refineries in southern Ontario and to northern tidewater, in deep sea port, in James Bay,' said Ford. 'It will connect Ontario's critical minerals in the Ring of Fire region to new ports in Western Canada, helping to build a true, end-to-end critical mineral supply chain.' The Ring of Fire is a 500-square-kilometre area northeast of Thunder Bay that includes critical minerals such as nickel, cobalt, copper, platinum group elements and refined uranium. Smith said the agreement aims to cut red tape and expand Canada's export capabilities with global trade partners. 'This agreement will see our three provinces advance pipelines and pathways to boost exports of homegrown energy, potash, critical minerals and agricultural products to markets across Canada and across the world,' she said. Smith called upon the federal government and Carney to remove 'federal barriers' for pipelines, rail lines and other infrastructure projects. The Alberta premier listed Bill C-69, the oil and gas emissions cap, the tanker ban, the net-zero vehicle and net-zero electricity mandates. 'Removing these anti-resource, anti-development laws will allow Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario to attract the investment and project partners we need to get shovels in the ground, grow industries and create jobs,' said Smith. Citing Trump's trade war and his threat to impose 35 per cent tariffs on Canadian imports starting Aug. 1, Ford said the U.S. can no longer be relied on to refine Canadian crude oil. 'We have to start diversifying. We need to unleash every tool in our Canadian tool box,' Ford said. Moe compared Canada's energy dependence on the U.S. to the European Union's reliance on gas from Russia. According to the European Commission , the EU has dropped its share of Russian gas imports from 45 per cent to 19 per cent and has developed a road map to ensure it fully ends its dependency on Russian energy. Moe said Canada should also distance itself from U.S. energy. 'To the oil industry, from an economic perspective, that is the priority,' he said. 'We need to have Canadian access to the refineries in Eastern Canada and I think that would be important to those that live in central and Eastern Canada as well, so that we have that energy security as a country.' In a news release , the provincial government said Ontario exported $183.9 billion worth of goods and services to other provinces and territories in 2023 and imported $142.7 billion, resulting in two-way trade of $326.6 billion and a trade surplus of $41.2 billion. On Monday, July 21, Ford joined B.C. Premier David Eby Yukon Premier Mike Pemberton, Northwest Territories Premier R.J. Simpson and Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok to sign an MOU that aims to boost internal trade, improve labour mobility and remove trade barriers. Tuesday's media briefing was available on the Premier of Ontario YouTube channel . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
