
Inside the Texas Children's Hospital trans care whistleblower case: One year of fallout and unanswered questions
It's been exactly one year since nurse Vanessa Sivadge ignited a political and legal firestorm by accusing Texas Children's Hospital—America's largest pediatric care center—of secretly continuing gender transition treatments for minors in violation of state law.
What began as a whistleblower interview has since spiraled into FBI visits, criminal indictments, legislative inquiries, and the quiet departure of a once-revered CEO.
Here's how the case unfolded and what has happened since the revelations came to light.
June 2024: Vanessa Sivadge goes public
On June 23, 2024, the New York Post published an interview with Vanessa Sivadge, 31, a former nurse at Texas Children's Hospital (TCH). In the interview, Sivadge alleged that doctors at TCH continued to perform gender-affirming care on minors despite state law and public assurances that the program had been shut down.
'These doctors are driven by a political agenda, like an ideological agenda,' she told the Post. 'And I truly believe that they think that they're doing the right thing.'
She further alleged that doctors manipulated parents into consenting to medical transition by invoking suicide threats.
'Parents were manipulated by doctors with an ideological agenda to go down this path of medical transition for their child,' she said.
'And I do think that doctors would use manipulative language to suggest that if they didn't do this their child would commit suicide or they would harm themselves.'
According to Sivadge, doctors bypassed Texas' Medicaid restrictions by misdiagnosing minors with hormone deficiencies so that puberty blockers and hormone therapies would be covered.
'There was just no discussion of what are the risks, what are the long-term effects,' she said.
'Many of [the patients] had previous ER visits for attempted suicide, many of them are autistic, many of them are depressed and anxious, and that's really devastating because it's really clear there's something else going on.'
The FBI shows up
Following her public disclosures, Sivadge said she was visited by two FBI agents. Video footage shared by Christopher Rufo on X (formerly Twitter) shows two plainclothes agents at her door.
One agent can be heard saying: 'I'm sure you're aware of some of the things that have been going on at your work lately.'
Sivadge told Rufo, 'They threatened me. They promised they would make life difficult for me if I was trying to protect the leaker. They said I was not safe at work and claimed that someone at my workplace had given my name to the FBI.'
Sivadge's revelations came a year after Dr. Eithan Haim, a surgeon at the hospital, released documents in May 2023 showing that Texas Children's continued providing gender-affirming care after claiming it had ceased operations in March 2022.
Haim was later indicted by the Department of Justice on four federal charges—three of them for HIPAA violations. Haim denied any wrongdoing.
'They wanted to intimidate me into silence using every technique the federal leviathan had at their disposal. But they failed,' Haim said. 'The only way to lose is to submit to corruption. It's time to fight back harder than ever!'
Haim claimed the leaked files did not contain personal health information.
And like Haim, Sivadge also had to pay the price for bringing the truth out in the open. Sivadge in a tweet revealed she had been fired in August 2024, just two months after coming forward. 'I had low expectations when I went public, doubtful and uncertain if anyone would notice or care,' she wrote. 'Imagine my shock when people I had never met overwhelmed my Legal Defense Fund with financial support.'
She added: 'After I was fired in August 2024, these early contributions by generous supporters enabled us to retain [@BurkeLawTweets] as our legal counsel.
They are the most qualified, tenacious group of attorneys I have ever had the privilege of working with.'
However, Sivadge points out that the two journalists she accused,- David Pauls and Dr Richard O Roberts- have since vanished from the scene. Jonathan Choe, a reporter known for investigating gender medicine practices, visited the physicians' listed residences. Despite attempts to make contact, neither doctor was found at home, and no public statement has been issued by them regarding the allegations to date.
Amidst the controversy, the CEO of the Texas hospital, Mark A. Wallace, stepped down after 35 years at the helm. The announcement was delivered without fanfare and did not reference the whistleblower case or ongoing investigations.
Credit: X/Vanessa Sivadge
However, internal memos obtained by reporters showed that Wallace had previously circulated communications stating that the hospital's gender program had been fully shut down following the February 2022 directive from Attorney General Ken Paxton, which categorized gender-affirming care for minors as potential child abuse under Texas law.
Contrary to those assurances, whistleblower claims and leaked documents showed that the program had continued operations in various capacities well into 2023, with medical records indicating the ongoing prescription of puberty blockers and hormones.
The disconnect between internal messaging and actual medical practice is now a focal point in both legal and legislative reviews of the hospital's conduct.
June 2025: One year later, still no closure
The Texas Attorney General's Office, under Ken Paxton, is actively investigating the allegations involving Medicaid fraud and misrepresentation of gender-related diagnoses for billing purposes.
State Rep. Brian Harrison and Sen. Mayes Middleton submitted a joint letter urging Texas Health and Human Services to conduct a full audit of Medicaid/CHIP funds used by Texas Children's Hospital from 2021 onward.
Credit: X/Vanessa Sivadge
In their statement, they wrote: 'There is perhaps no more important responsibility we all share than to be good stewards with tax dollars... If true, not only do the actors involved know they are perpetrating a fraud, but they are doing it to engage in child abuse.'
Meanwhile, federal prosecutors continue their case against Dr. Eithan Haim. He faces four charges—three for alleged HIPAA violations and one for unauthorized access of medical files. Haim maintains that no protected health information was leaked and that his actions were protected whistleblowing under federal law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has since launched an official investigation into the hospital's use of Medicaid funds and the allegations of child abuse. State Rep. Brian Harrison has called for emergency hearings. Meanwhile, Dr. Eithan Haim's legal case continues, as does fundraising for both whistleblowers' legal defenses.
For her part, Vanessa Sivadge remains defiant and resolute. 'They tried to silence me,' she said. 'But if telling the truth costs me everything, I can live with that.'
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
3 days ago
- Mint
Indian-origin doctor in US allegedly offered drugs in exchange for sex
An Indian-origin doctor based in New Jersey, Dr. Ritesh Kalra, 51, is facing serious accusations of soliciting sexual favours from patients in exchange for prescriptions and defrauding New Jersey Medicaid. These allegations have led to his immediate prohibition from practising medicine and prescribing medication, with his medical practice required to shut down while the case is pending. Dr. Kalra is currently under home arrest. According to the US Attorney's office, several of Kalra's former employees reported that female patients complained of sexual touching and demands for sexual favours, including oral sex, to obtain prescriptions. One patient even described being sexually assaulted on multiple occasions, including forced anal sex, during clinical appointments. Further accusations include Dr. Kalra continuing to provide opioid prescriptions to a patient who was incarcerated and had no contact with him. He is also alleged to have billed for in-person visits and counselling sessions that never occurred, the US Attorney's office further reported. US Attorney Alina Habba strongly condemned Kalra's alleged actions, stating, 'Physicians hold a position of profound responsibility—but as alleged, Dr. Kalra used that position to fuel addiction, exploit vulnerable patients for sex, and defraud New Jersey's public healthcare program.' She emphasised that by exchanging prescriptions for sexual favours and billing Medicaid for "ghost appointments," he not only violated the law but also endangered lives. Habba concluded by asserting that their office will "continue to pursue those who turn their medical licenses into tools for personal gain and sexual gratification." "When we seek medical advice and treatment from doctors, we have to assume they have our best interests in mind. This investigation, conducted by the FBI and our partners, illustrates that Dr. Kalra had little regard for actually taking care of his patients. As alleged, he instead used them for his sexual gratification and, in the process, defrauded the state of New Jersey. A patient's relationship and trust in a physician, while at their most vulnerable, is not something to be exploited for personal gain. We are asking anyone who may be a victim or knows someone who was treated by Dr. Kalra to get in touch with our office," stated Special Agent in Charge Stefanie Roddy. If found guilty, Kalra could face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison for each count of illegal drug distribution and up to 10 years for each count of healthcare fraud. The penalties also include fines of up to $1 million for each drug-related charge and at least $250,000 for each fraud-related charge.


News18
3 days ago
- News18
'Exploited Patients For Sex': Indian-Origin Doctor Charged With Medical Fraud, Assault In US
Last Updated: Dr Kalra demanded sexual favours from the female patients, including oral sex, in return for the prescriptions. An Indian-origin doctor in the United States is accused of the unlawful prescribing of opioid medications, and requesting sexual favours from patients in exchange for prescription drugs. Identified as 51-year-old Ritesh Kalra, the man was a resident of Secaucus, New Jersey. He has been placed under home detention following a court hearing in the United States. Prosecutors allege that Ritesh Kalra exploited his medical license to take advantage of patients battling addiction. Court findings reveal that he issued more than 31,000 prescriptions for oxycodone between January 2019 and February 2025 without medical reasons. It is also alleged that Dr Kalra demanded sexual favours from the female patients, including oral sex, in return for the prescriptions. A female patient alleged that she was forced to do anal sex during her medical appointment. 'Physicians hold a position of profound responsibility—but as alleged, Dr Kalra used that position to fuel addiction, exploit vulnerable patients for sex, and defraud New Jersey's public healthcare program," said attorney Alina Habba. 'By allegedly exchanging prescriptions for sexual favors and billing Medicaid for ghost appointments, he not only violated the law but endangered lives," she added. Medical license of Dr Ritesh Kalra has been suspended following the charges. He was released on home arrest with an unsecured $100,000 bond after appearing for a hearing before US magistrate judge André M Espinosa. The court also restricted him from practicing medicine or prescribing medications. Kalra has been ordered to close his medical clinic amid the ongoing legal proceedings. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


India Today
3 days ago
- India Today
3 Democrat-led US states roll back medicaid for undocumented immigrants
For nearly 20 years, Maria would call her sister — a nurse in Mexico — for advice on how to manage her asthma and control her husband's diabetes instead of going to the doctor in didn't have legal status, so she couldn't get health insurance and skipped routine exams, relying instead on home remedies and, at times, getting inhalers from Mexico. She insisted on using only her first name for fear of changed for Maria and many others in recent years when a handful of Democrat-led states opened up their health insurance programs to low-income immigrants regardless of their legal status. Maria and her husband signed up the day the program began last year. 'It changed immensely, like from Earth to the heavens,' Maria said in Spanish of Medi-Cal, California's Medicaid program. 'Having the peace of mind of getting insurance leads me to getting sick less.'At least seven states and the District of Columbia have offered coverage for immigrants since mostly 2020. But three of them have done an about-face, ending or limiting coverage for hundreds of thousands of immigrants who aren't in the U.S. legally in California, Illinois and programs cost way more than officials had projected at a time when the states are facing multibillion-dollar deficits now and in the future. In Illinois, adult immigrants ages 42-64 without legal status have lost their health care to save an estimated $404 million. All adult immigrants in Minnesota no longer have access to the state program, saving nearly $57 million. In California, no one will automatically lose coverage, but new enrollments for adults will stop in 2026 to save more than $3 billion over several in all three states were backed by Democratic governors who once championed expanding health coverage to Trump administration this week shared the home addresses, ethnicities and personal data of all Medicaid recipients with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. Twenty states, including California, Illinois and Minnesota, have care providers told The Associated Press that everything, especially the fear of being arrested or deported, is having a chilling effect on people seeking care. And states may have to spend more money down the road because immigrants will avoid preventive health care and end up needing to go to safety-net hospitals.'I feel like they continue to squeeze you more and more to the point where you'll burst,' Maria said, referencing all the uncertainties for people who are in the U.S. without legal permission.'People are going to die'People who run free and community health clinics in California and Minnesota said patients who got on state Medicaid programs received knee replacements and heart procedures, and were diagnosed for serious conditions like late-stage is one of the nation's largest free clinics, serving many uninsured and underinsured immigrants in the Chicago area who have no other options for treatment. That includes the people who lost coverage July 1 when Illinois ended its Health Benefits for Immigrants Adults Program, which served about 31,500 people ages of CommunityHealth's community outreach workers and care coordinator said Eastern European patients she works with started coming in with questions about what the change meant for them. She said many of the patients also don't speak English and don't have transportation to get to clinics that can treat them. The worker spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity to protect patients' Finders Collective in Minnesota's rural Rice and Steele counties south of Minneapolis serves low-income and underinsured patients, including large populations of Latino immigrants and Somali refugees. Executive director Charlie Mandile said they're seeing patients rushing to squeeze in appointments and procedures before 19,000 people age 18 and older are kicked off of insurance at the end of the and community health clinics in all three states say they will keep serving patients regardless of insurance coverage — but that might get harder after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services decided this month to restrict federally qualified health centers from treating people without legal CEO Stephanie Willding said she always worried about the stability of the program because it was fully state funded, 'but truthfully, we thought that day was much, much further away.''People are going to die. Some people are going to go untreated,' Alicia Hardy, chief executive officer of CommuniCARE+OLE clinics in California, said of the state's Medicaid changes. 'It's hard to see the humanity in the decision-making that's happening right now.'A spokesperson for the Minnesota Department of Health said ending the state's program will decrease MinnesotaCare spending in the short term, but she acknowledged health care costs would rise elsewhere, including uncompensated care at fees, federal policies create barriersState lawmakers said California's Medi-Cal changes stem from budget issues — a $12 billion deficit this year, with larger ones projected ahead. Democratic state leaders last month agreed to stop new enrollment starting in 2026 for all low-income adults without legal status. Those under 60 remaining on the program will have to pay a $30 monthly fee in are also bracing for impact from federal policies. Cuts to Medicaid and other programs in the recently signed massive tax and spending bill include a 10% cut to the federal share of Medicaid expansion costs to states that offer health benefits to immigrants starting October health officials estimate roughly 200,000 people will lose coverage after the first full year of restricted enrollment, though Gov. Gavin Newsom maintains that even with the rollbacks, California provides the most expansive health care coverage for poor new bill requires a shift in Maria's monthly calculations to make ends meet. She believes many people won't be able to afford the $30-a-month premiums and will instead go back to self-medication or skip treatment altogether.'It was a total triumph,' she said of Medi-Cal expansion. 'But now that all of this is coming our way, we're going backwards to a worse place.'Fear and tension about immigration raids are changing patient behavior, too. Providers told the AP that, as immigration raids ramped up, their patients were requesting more virtual appointments, not showing up to routine doctor's visits and not picking up prescriptions for their chronic has the option to keep her coverage. But she is weighing the health of her family against risking what they've built in the U.S.'It's going to be very difficult,' Maria said of her decision to remain on the program. 'If it comes to the point where my husband gets sick and his life is at risk, well then, obviously, we have to choose his life.'- Ends advertisement