logo
This Minnesota couple was charged with running a $15M medical fraud scheme out of their suburban home

This Minnesota couple was charged with running a $15M medical fraud scheme out of their suburban home

Yahoo22-04-2025
After a six-year investigation, a Minnesota couple has been charged in a $15 million fraud scheme that has left the community of Eden Prairie reeling.
The pair, 39-year-old Gabriel Luthor and 42-year-old Elizabeth Brown, allegedly defrauded Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers out of millions through a neurofeedback therapy business.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
"The whole thing, you couldn't make it up," neighbor Sue Donkersgoed, who lives across the street from Luthor and Brown, told KARE 11 News.
Luthor and Brown were reported to have lived an extravagant lifestyle that involved wild parties at their 9,000-square-foot home. Neighbor complaints got law enforcement's attention, which led them to dig deeper.
It turned out that Luthor and Brown, who ran a business called Golden Victory Medical, providing neurofeedback therapy and other medical services, had allegedly been overbilling insurers and pocketing the difference since 2018.
Brown, the company's founder, at one point claimed to serve more than 451 patients a day, according to one search warrant, reports KARE 11.
Golden Victory also allegedly submitted claims repeatedly to insurers using medical codes that did not cover the neurofeedback services the company provided. According to court documents, the business also combined billing codes that could not be combined and used codes indicating that patients were treated for a longer period of time than they actually were.
In addition to wild parties, neighbors say Luthor and Brown drove luxury cars, all paid for by the fraudulent funds they collected, according to an analysis by KARE 11 of hundreds of pages of search warrants recently made public. Those warrants also showed that in just one month, Luthor spent almost $100,000 at various nightclubs in the Minneapolis area. He also spent more than $32,000 at restaurants during that same month-long period.
Luthor did share the wealth a bit — but in the form of allegedly sending about $5,000 during that same month to various women on Tinder.
Luthor and Brown are also alleged to have used some of the fraudulent $15 million they collected to purchase their Eden Prairie mansion and cover the living expenses of other girlfriends of Luthor's who lived with the couple and, according to the indictment, helped them carry out the fraud scheme by submitting insurance claims. However, they didn't benefit financially from it and therefore haven't been charged.
As KARE 11 reports, Luthor also has a criminal past, having been convicted of credit card fraud 15 years ago under a different name. He was later allowed to legally change his name.
Luthor and Brown were arrested in Las Vegas and released on bond. The couple is scheduled to appear in federal court on April 30.
Read more: The US stock market's 'fear gauge' has exploded — but this 1 'shockproof' asset is up 14% and helping American retirees stay calm. Here's how to own it ASAP
Health care fraud is problematic on the basis of it being illegal. But the issue here goes beyond that. The other problem is that when medical providers defraud insurers, everyone loses out.
'Defrauding critical healthcare [sic] programs like Medicaid and Medicare burden systems designed to serve patients and puts them at risk,' said Special Agent in Charge Alvin M. Winston Sr. of FBI Minneapolis in a press release.
'The FBI and our partners will not tolerate those who abuse the healthcare [sic] system for personal gain and will pursue justice on behalf of taxpayers and patients.'
The FBI reports that health care fraud can take on different forms. It can mean double billing, billing for services not provided, submitting multiple bills for the same services or billing for more expensive procedures than what patients actually receive.
The United States Sentencing Commission says that, in 2023, 9.2% of fraud cases were health care fraud. The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA), meanwhile, estimates that financial losses from health care fraud amount to tens of billions of dollars each year.
The more criminals that are able to get away with health care fraud, the more it's apt to cost Americans on a whole in the form of higher insurance premiums. Plus, health care fraud has the potential to put patients' health at risk. Providers might subject patients to needless, and in some cases, risky, procedures just to inflate their bills and receive more money from insurers.
That's why it's important for patients to be vigilant about health care fraud, and to loop their insurers in if they suspect it. Reviewing all health care bills carefully and questioning procedures or billing codes that don't look right could open the door to further investigation. Patients can also report health care fraud individually and flag issues to their insurance companies.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's on a roll. Why isn't he smiling? Answer: Jeffrey Epstein
Trump's on a roll. Why isn't he smiling? Answer: Jeffrey Epstein

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump's on a roll. Why isn't he smiling? Answer: Jeffrey Epstein

Congress last week handed over the power of the purse to President Donald Trump without even a thank-you-for-your-service in return as the Supreme Court cleared the way for him to slash the workforce at the Education Department and, presumably, elsewhere. So why isn't the president smiling? Answer: Jeffrey Epstein. After continuing to amass unprecedented power in the White House, steamrolling a compliant Congress and being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by world leaders more eager to flatter than confront him, Trump finds himself flummoxed by the case of a disgraced financier who died in a jail cell six years ago. Epstein's ghost is beginning to haunt the White House. The very tools that helped win Trump two terms − the openness to conspiracy, the distrust of elites, the eruption of a viral moment − have now turned to bedevil him. In this case, the assertion this month by the Justice Department and the FBI that the Epstein case was over and done with was met by derision and disbelief among some of the president's most loyal supporters. After all, such influential MAGA voices as Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon had been insisting for years that Epstein's suicide was suspicious and his powerful associates hidden. A week ago, Trump told his supporters to "not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about." He followed up by denouncing his supporters who were upset with the case as "weaklings" who had "bought into this bulls***, hook, line and sinker." Those instructions didn't sway many in his political base. Then he directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to release the investigation's grand-jury testimony, a step that can only be ordered by a judge. Now Trump has filed a lawsuit for libel and slander against the Wall Street Journal, its publisher, two of its reporters, and News Corp founder and former friend Rupert Murdoch. At issue is its story that Trump sent a "bawdy" 50th-birthday letter to Epstein in 2003, decorated with a crude drawing of a woman's naked body that used his distinctive signature to suggest pubic hair. More: Trump: Epstein grand jury records unlikely to satisfy critics "Happy Birthday − and may every day be another wonderful secret," it reportedly said. Trump called the article "false" and demanded damages "not to be less than $10 billion." But he acknowledged on the social-media platform Truth Social that the release of grand-jury testimony isn't likely to settle things. [N]othing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request," he railed. "It will always be more, more, more. MAGA!" A furor that swamps Medicaid cuts and Elmo's future A purported "Epstein client list" and the dark suspicion that powerful people are being protected has created a political firestorm stronger than the prospect of cutting an estimated 12 million people off Medicaid or the proposal to end federal funding for Elmo. The cuts in health care for the poor were part of the "Big Beautiful Bill" that Congress passed July 3 −, extending Trump's first-term tax cuts, increasing spending on border security and slashing funds for Medicaid, food stamps and green energy. On Friday, July 18, Congress approved $9 billion in spending cuts in foreign aid and public broadcasting, Muppets included. The so-called recission package deleted funding Congress had previously approved and reflected the Capitol's voluntary retreat from its constitutional power to decide how tax money should be spent. In the past, the tactic has rarely succeeded. In the future, the White House budget office said more such cuts would be on their way. But that consequential debate got less ink and fueled less furor than the Epstein saga. Trump's attempt to convince Americans that there is nothing to see here is likely to be an uphill battle. In a Reuters/Ipsos Poll, 69% of Americans said they thought the federal government was hiding details about Epstein's clients. Only 6% said information wasn't being hidden. The rest weren't sure. The poll, taken July 15-16, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3% for all adults and 6% for subgroups. Those who see a conspiracy afoot included a 55% majority of Republicans. Only about a third of those in the GOP, 35%, approved of how Trump is handling the issue. Overall, just 17% approved, his lowest rating on any issue. The long lifespans of conspiracy theories One lesson of Trump's political career is this: Once you've persuaded people there's fire behind the smoke, it's hard to convince them that the air has been cleared. When Barack Obama ran for the White House in 2008, Trump repeated debunked allegations that the Illinois senator had been born in Kenya and wasn't eligible to be elected president. After Obama had served two terms in the White House, a Morning Consult poll found a third of Republicans still believed that falsehood. Since the 2020 election that Trump lost, he has repeated disproven allegations that the election was rigged against him. When the 2024 campaign was getting underway, a CNN poll found that 69% of Republicans and those who "leaned" to the GOP believed Joe Biden's win wasn't legitimate, that the election had been stolen. And Epstein? Welcome or not, he may be sticking around for a while.

Exclusive: Democrat on Bipartisan Push to Undo Part of 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Exclusive: Democrat on Bipartisan Push to Undo Part of 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Exclusive: Democrat on Bipartisan Push to Undo Part of 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Dina Titus, a Nevada Democrat, has introduced legislation that would restore the 100 percent deduction for gambling losses that Senate Republicans reduced to 90 percent late in the passing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB). Titus spoke with Newsweek about her Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation (FAIR BET) Act, which she says so far has garnered "10 times the response" from constituents in her state and beyond compared to other aspects of the OBBB. Republican Representatives including Troy Nehls of Texas and Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, also support Titus' bill. Why It Matters The roughly 900-page bill passed by Congress included a provision inserted by Senate Republicans without consent of the House that imposed a tax increase on Americans who gamble, reducing from 100 percent to 90 percent the amount of losses they can deduct from gambling winnings for their income taxes. The new provision, added by the Senate Finance Committee late in the legislative process ahead of the July 4 bill signing by President Donald Trump, means that gambling losses that have traditionally been fully deductible would no longer be so and gamblers could owe taxes even if they ended up with net losses in a year. For example, someone winning $100,000 and then losing that same amount may still owe $10,000 in taxes on that income—even though they broke even. What To Know Titus, in an exclusive interview, said the issue has drawn more widespread attention on the OBBB compared to other scrutinized portions of the legislation, such as Medicaid and food stamp cuts. "We've certainly heard from the industry, they've all kind of now gotten on board," Titus said. "But I can tell you that we put out a lot of messages about that big, bad BS bill and we talked about Medicaid, we talked about food stamps, we talked about renewable energy, but this issue has gotten 10 times the response than any of those have." The congresswoman continued: "I think it's people who are on the internet, I think it's young people who found an issue that they can kind of identify with. And I don't think it's just limited to the people directly impacted by gaming in Nevada. It's a national issue because now everybody can gamble on their phone, and so they're writing in, they're texting in, they're calling in to say, 'We should fix this.'" Titus said she "found it hard to believe" that some Republican senators were unaware of this provision in the bill's final version. She doesn't believe it was inserted from an ideological or partisan standpoint, however, but rather based on tax policy. "Let's just make it clear these are not just high rollers, these are not just the big professional poker players who itemize," she said. "Think how many people bet on a football game or bet on their phone, and how much they advertise some of the sports betting apps. These are just ordinary people who bet." Titus added: "It's not fair...I don't think people are going to say, 'I'm not going to gamble,' but what they may say is, 'Why would I itemize? Why would I turn this in if I'm going to have to pay tax on losses?'" Gambling losses up to the amount of one's winnings can be claimed but only if one itemizes their deductions. However, most don't do that because they opt for the standard deduction and better tax break. Titus also has a front-row seat to the benefits of the gaming industry, noting how cities like Las Vegas are important economically. People travel to gamble, spend on dining and shows, or just to watch poker championships—the "full ambiance" as she described. "They're going to go gamble on unregulated sources, whether it's offshore or the black market or the predictions market that's coming on so strong," Titus said. "Those entities don't pay taxes to the state, they don't invest in brick and mortar, they don't hire good union labor. In that sense it also hurts industry and a community's economy." Representative Dina Titus, a Nevada Democrat, tells Newsweek why she introduced the FAIR BET Act to restore the 100 percent deduction for gambling losses that Senate Republicans reduced to 90 percent in the One Big... Representative Dina Titus, a Nevada Democrat, tells Newsweek why she introduced the FAIR BET Act to restore the 100 percent deduction for gambling losses that Senate Republicans reduced to 90 percent in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. More Americans Overwhelmingly Support Gambling In its August 2024 report on Americans' attitudes towards gambling, the American Gaming Association (AGA) said than half of all American adults (55 percent) participated in some form of gambling in the previous 12 months. Roughly 122 million adult Americans, or 49 percent of the population, visited a casino for gambling or other entertainment purposes in that span—the highest level of casino visitation on record. Nearly nine-in-10 (88 percent) Americans find casino gambling to be acceptable for themselves or others, the research found, with 59 percent of Americans finding gambling personally acceptable—another an all-time high. The AGA represents major trade partners including Churchill Downs, DraftKings, MGM Resorts International and other big companies online and in casinos. A gaming industry source told Newsweek that there is support for Titus' legislation, adding that lawmakers or the Trump administration did not convey why this provision was included in the final bill. "This could potentially have a very direct impact on a professional gambler or a very high-volume recreational gambler who chooses to itemize committed to working with Representative Titus, as well as her co-sponsors in the House," the source said. Asked if Titus' bill is unsuccessful, the source said there's time to make legislative fixes between now and the spring of 2027 when people go to file their taxes for their prior calendar year. "We're motivated to get this done," they said. Financial Hit to Nevada Efforts in the Senate, led by Democratic Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, sought unanimous consent to restore the full deduction for gambling losses. That was unsuccessful. Cortez Masto told Newsweek that she will continue to explore all options available to restore the 100 percent dedication for gambling losses and protect Nevada's gaming and hospitality industries. "Republicans' hastily put-together bill is full of provisions that are completely counterproductive and harmful to Americans," the senator said. "The provision limiting the wagering loss deduction will have a negative impact on Nevada, and it's one of the many reasons I voted no." What People Are Saying Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, in a statement to Newsweek: "The Republican budget would kneecap sports and gambling by making Americans pay taxes on gambling losses. This is deeply unfair. I'm proud to introduce the FAIR BET Act with Rep. Titus to restore the 100 percent tax deduction for gaming losses." Professional poker player Daniel Negreanu told "I'm going to do everything I can to help make sure this isn't a reality or a problem. And when I say everything, I mean everything. This law would be, as I understand good at all. I'm going to reach out to people who are smarter than me on this. And then take measures to see if I can help in any way. And hopefully I can." Rufus Peabody, a professional sports bettor, told The Wall Street Journal: "More likely than not, I would owe more money in taxes than I actually made in 2026 if I continue betting. And so, as it stands, it becomes untenable to be a professional gambler." Phil Galfond, a professional poker player, wrote on social media: "This new amendment to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would end professional gambling in the US and hurt casual gamblers, too," "You could pay more in tax than you won." What Happens Next The tax deduction change is going into effect on January 1, 2026, unless modified sooner by Congress. It won't affect Americans' tax returns until after that date. Titus said the timeframe provides "a little bit of breathing room" for changes to take hold.

The biggest political fights over Trump's megabill are converging in Nevada
The biggest political fights over Trump's megabill are converging in Nevada

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The biggest political fights over Trump's megabill are converging in Nevada

When it comes to President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' few places could be impacted more significantly than Nevada — one of the country's most closely divided swing states. For starters, Nevada is expecting the law's changes to Medicaid and food assistance to boot hundreds of thousands of residents from crucial social safety net programs. Like other states in similar predicaments, lawmakers will have to scramble to figure out how to find money in the state budget to keep many of those people covered. But the impacts of the law on that budget and the state's broader finances could be even more significant than in many others because Nevada has no state income tax, and therefore is extremely limited in how it can find new revenues. Then there are the new law's tax provisions related to tipped employees and gamblers that will have an outsize effect on a state whose economy relies almost exclusively on casinos and hospitality. The implementation of the new law in the coming months and years will occur as Nevada is set to play a key role in the next midterm and presidential elections. In 2026, Gov. Joe Lombardo — who has walked a fine line between offering praise for certain aspects of the megabill while pushing back against others — is seen as the most vulnerable Republican governor up for re-election. And Nevada's battleground 3rd District, represented by Democratic Rep. Susie Lee, will be a key race in the fight for the House majority. And in 2028, Nevada will likely again host critical contests for the White House and Senate. Democrats are already eager to go on offense against the law. State Rep. Steve Yeager, the Democratic speaker of the state Assembly, said he's already been contacted by many constituents who have expressed 'concern about what this bill might mean for them' and how they could be impacted by its changes to Medicaid, food assistance, energy credits, taxes on tips and gambling. Yeager added he was going 'to make sure that every single voter who goes to the ballot box here next year in 2026 knows about this bill and knows about the impact.' 'A low-revenue state' Approximately 1 in 3 Nevadans are on Medicaid, according to data from the state and KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group, due in part to a massive expansion of the program back in 2013 by then-Gov. Brian Sandoval, one of the first Republican governors to embark on Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Trump's law will institute steep cuts to Medicaid and food aid benefits mostly by establishing new work requirements, restrict state-levied fees on health care providers that are mostly used to fund Medicaid, and preclude the federal government from being responsible for reimbursing states any longer. In Nevada, as many as 100,000 people could fall off Medicaid as a result, according to the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. But unlike some other states, which may be able to shift funds around in their budgets to build financial support for affected residents, Nevada's hands are largely tied. It has no state income tax and has a state constitutional provision requiring a two-thirds majority to raise revenue. 'We don't have the funds to be able to fill these critical gaps,' Yeager said. 'We're a low-revenue state. … We're in a really tough place.' Nevada is also likely to be uniquely impacted by a pair of tax provisions. Starting in 2026, gamblers will have to pay more taxes under the GOP's new law. That's because the law will limit what gamblers can deduct from their yearly taxes to 90% of their losses. Bettors can currently deduct the entirety of their losses — up until their winnings. Bettors have expressed concerns that the provision could cause professional gambling in the U.S. to fold. And Nevada Democrats say it's all but certain to impact the bustling and crucial industry in the casino-laden state. 'This means if someone wins a big jackpot in Las Vegas and then loses that one jackpot later on, they would still be liable for 10% in taxes on gaming 'income,' even though they had not brought home anything,' Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., said last week on the chamber floor. 'That's not just bad math, it's bad policy.' Meanwhile, Trump and Republicans have boasted of the law's provision that they call 'no tax on tips.' Trump unveiled the concept during a 2024 campaign event in Nevada, which is among the states with the highest concentration of service workers who rely on tips. 'If you're a restaurant worker, a server, a valet, a bellhop, a bartender, one of my caddies … your tips will be 100% yours,' Trump said of the policy idea during a January visit to Las Vegas shortly after he was sworn in for his second term. The law allows for a deduction on federal taxes of up to $25,000 in tipped income. At first glance, it appears it could be a boon for workers who rely heavily on tips. But economists at the Yale Budget Lab have written that 37% of all tipped workers don't earn enough money to even pay federal income tax, meaning that these people wouldn't gain from the new deduction. In addition, critics note the cap is relatively small and that it phases out once workers enter a higher income bracket ($150,000 per year). Plus, the provision only runs through 2028. Democrats also note that the law froze nearly all of the clean energy funds the state had received under President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. Nevada, where scorching temperatures have led to soaring energy costs for voters and businesses, was among the states that claimed the most IRA funds used to incentivize clean energy investments and jobs, as well as home energy rebates. As those funds dry up, so too could financial relief for residents and businesses. 'With the undoing of some of the Inflation Reduction Act, losing monies that were in the bill, we're going to lose solar jobs — and I am confident that our power bills are going to increase,' Yeager said. A key gubernatorial race Those impacts will loom particularly large in next year's governor's race in Nevada. Even before Trump enacted the law, Lombardo, who won his 2022 election over Democrat Steve Sisolak by just 1.5 percentage points, was the only Republican governor up for re-election next year whose race was rated by the nonpartisan Cook Political Report as a 'toss-up.' Nevada Democrats have already aggressively sought to link Lombardo to the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'Lombardo will have to reckon with the damage done to Nevadans' lives and livelihoods because he was too cowardly to stand up to Trump,' said Nevada Democratic Party Chair Daniele Monroe-Moreno. Lombardo, for his part, has praised some of the tax provisions in the law, but he also warned Congress not to make changes to Medicaid funding ahead of its passage. 'While my administration continues to assess this bill as it moves to get signed into law, Nevadans should be excited about the potential impacts of tax cuts, investments in small businesses and American manufacturing, and efforts to help secure our border,' Lombardo wrote on X the day before Trump signed it into law. A spokesperson for Lombardo declined to comment for this story but referred to that post on X, in which Lombardo also lauded the law's 'no tax on tips' provision. The spokesperson also referred to the letters Lombardo wrote to Congress and state legislators expressing his concerns about the bill's impact on Medicaid, plus a letter he wrote to Trump urging him to reconsider the gambling losses provision. Lombardo was also among just seven Republican governors who did not sign a May letter in support of Trump's proposed 'big, beautiful bill.' That tension underscores the bind many Republican incumbents are likely to find themselves in during next year's midterms as they seek to take credit for some of the tax-saving mechanisms of the bill while distancing themselves from the cuts that Democrats are already hammering them on — all while trying to avoid running afoul of Trump. Responding to questions about the political impacts of the law, John Burke, a spokesperson for the Lombardo-supporting Better Nevada state PAC, said in an email, 'Under Governor Lombardo's leadership, Nevada is finally getting back on track, and the people of our state are seeing results.' He pointed specifically to accomplishments on affordable housing and education. 'The Governor has been vocal about his support for eliminating taxes on tips and supports a return to previous law on gambling losses,' Burke added. State Attorney General Aaron Ford, who is so far the only Democrat who's entered the race against Lombardo, slammed the law for its impacts on health care and food assistance. He said 'servers and bartenders and hospitality workers are going to be getting played' by Republicans' 'no tax on tips' claims. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store