Minister planning to table First Nations water bill despite provincial opposition
Environment ministers from Alberta and Ontario sent a letter to their federal counterpart calling on Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to abandon legislation they see as undermining competitiveness and delaying project development.
One of the bills they singled out is C-61, legislation introduced in the last Parliament that sought to ensure First Nations have clean drinking water and are able to protect fresh water sources on their territories.
That bill faced a lengthy committee process but was not passed into law before Parliament was prorogued.
In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty says everyone in Canada should have access to clean water and the government intends to bring the bill back in the fall.
Livi McElrea says provinces and territories share responsibility for reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples and the federal government is calling on all jurisdictions 'to support this critical legislation.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 4, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
31 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Politicians overstating benefits of scrapping internal trade barriers: think tank
OTTAWA – A new report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is dismissing moves by the federal government and Canada's premiers to break down internal trade barriers as little more than 'political theatre.' It lands just ahead of the country's internal trade ministers meeting in Quebec City this week, where they are expected to talk about their next steps as they rush to remove rules hampering cross-provincial trade. Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed throughout the spring election to forge 'one Canadian economy' with the premiers by eliminating internal barriers to trade and labour mobility in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland has pointed to studies that say internal trade barriers amount to a seven per cent tariff that Canada imposes on itself, and that removing them could boost the economy by up to $200 billion. But the left-leaning think tank's report released this morning reviews the steps taken by Ottawa and the provinces to remove red tape and argues they will do little to mitigate the tariff threat or significantly boost the economy. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The study authors say federal and provincial politicians have only been able to point to a handful of examples where getting rid of overlapping regulations could have an impact. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 7, 2025.
Winnipeg Free Press
36 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Elbows up, even when you're holding a book
Opinion Taylor Swift recently made headlines when she purchased back her musical catalogue, after re-recording masters that shot to the top of the Billboard charts. Swifties collectively understand that ownership equals control, and that to be in a position of not having control over your work is somehow sad, and merits economic allyship. These headlines about the popstar coincided with anxieties about 'ownership' north of the border, too, as U.S. President Donald Trump began threatening annexation with his '51st state' comments. 'Canada is not for sale,' declared Prime Minister Mark Carney in a visit to the White House. Canadian book buyers who happily hem and haw over labels at the grocery store seem blissfully unaware of the elephant in the room— that 95 per cent of the Canadian book market is already controlled by foreign-owned multinational publishers. Russell Wangersky / Free Press Trying to keep from buying American products? Consider who is publishing the books you're reading. Mark Carney's Values was published by the Canadian branch of Penguin Random House (headquartered in New York City, themselves a holding of German-owned Bertelsmann), so was Wab Kinew's memoir, The Reason You Walk. I don't blame the authors. Multinational publishing houses offer them a megaphone that amplifies their work a thousandfold. For the biggest names, the most BookTok-worthy titles, and the lucky few who are published by the branch plants, their advances (money offered upon signing a contract, before a book is published) far exceed what Canadian independent publishers can offer. Books published by The Big Five (Penguin Random House, Harper Collins, Simon & Schuster, Hachette and Macmillan) are regular fixtures on awards and bestseller lists, so my quarrel isn't with the books themselves, or with their authors, or even with the people who work on those books in the glass towers of Toronto offices. It's with those Five's complete and utter dominance of the publishing industry. Roughly 115 independent English-language publishers operate in Canada. According to the BookNet report The State of Publishing in Canada 2023, Canadian companies published an average of 35 books in 2023, while multinationals published an average of 752 books — a few token Canadian-authored titles, and a veritable firehose of books authored elsewhere, distributed into Canada, and marketed with budgets that far exceed those of their Canadian-owned and operated 'competitors.' So why, when branch plants exist, are indies important at all? Indies push the envelope. As an industry, we have a collective track record of recognizing cultural and historic value before multinationals recognize the commercial potential of the same authors/topics. Debut authors are risky, while those with an existing platform represent a surer return on investment. University of Manitoba Press published John Milloy's A National Crime in 1999 — years before truth and reconciliation became part of the national discourse. Even working at a small university press, I've seen agents and editors browsing our digital review copies and buying from our website. I met a Big Five editor recently who came to our booth at a conference book fair, no doubt scoping out the university presses to see if any titles held trade-crossover appeal. I don't doubt the intentions of the editors and publishers working for the branch plants. They're doing good work. But at some point, the further up the chain you go, somebody's (likely New York-based) boss cares more about shareholders than readers. In the book business, which teeters on razor-thin margins, and in a country where the total population is roughly the size of a single U.S. state (California) — that's a dangerous problem. To be a branch is to be vulnerable. As any arborist will tell you, you don't make cuts from the trunk. To be sure, fears over foreign ownership are long-lived and perhaps easy to dismiss as nationalistic pearl clutching, but I question whether the C-suite has any sort of genuine concern for the cultural value of stories from Canada. Valuations are more central to their philosophies. The Big Five all have far-right imprints under their domain, suggesting that the corporate powers-that-be are equal opportunists when it comes to ideology. Just look at the websites of imprints Forum, Signal or Broadside Books: their author lists read like a veritable who's-who of American conservatism. If book buyers seek out a Canadian-authored book published by a branch plant — in the same spirit of 'sticking it to the man,' that one might select a Canadian alternative to Cheez-Its — I'm afraid they are putting their loonies far closer to the regime most of us are trying to resist than if they had indulged their cravings at the grocery store. I spent much of my 20s working in the Toronto office of an American-owned multinational education publisher. During my years of service, I watched that company shrink as subsequent restructurings designed to 'optimize' and 'introduce efficiency' shuttered first the warehouse, then the trade division, then accounting, then the Higher Ed Division's Canadian editorial department, and eventually closed the office leaving a handful of sales reps scattered across the country, whose job is now mostly to sell American textbooks to Canadian students. Talk to anyone at a multinational publisher — education or otherwise — you'd be hard pressed to find a branch plant that hasn't been restructured in the last decade. The once venerable bastion of Canadian literature, McClelland and Stewart — copyright holders of the works of Margaret Atwood, Leonard Cohen, Michael Ondaatje and Mordecai Richler (to name but a few) is now an imprint of Penguin Random House. They continue their rich tradition of publishing great Canadian writers, but they're doing so in much smaller numbers than they once did. Weekday Mornings A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day. Where once they published a list of more than 100 books per year and were leaders in publishing new Canadian voices, their fall catalogue boasts 17 currently announced Canadian-authored titles — nine of which are by Margaret Atwood. For the C-suite, valuations proceed values — and they always will. That imprint recently announced an exciting forthcoming title Elbows Up, ostensibly a collection of reflections about Canadian sovereignty from a collection of well-known Canadians (including Margaret Atwood — so make that 10/17). The irony of a multinational publisher issuing this work was lost on all who excitedly commented on the social media announcement, pledging their Canadian pride and promising to order a copy. Canadians do not own the bulk of their cultural output. Our stories are not our own. To be sure, the Big Five are unlikely to exit the Canadian marketplace any time soon. Their books (Canadian-authored and otherwise) will continue to dominate Indigo shelves, media coverage and bestseller lists. Indie publishers will continue to do the important work of lifting debut and midlist authors, and doing so in a marketplace that does them no favours. But if mention of the 51st state churns your stomach enough that you make choices at the grocery or liquor store, consider adding an independently published book to your summer reading list. Stephanie Paddey is the sales and marketing supervisor at University of Manitoba Press.
Globe and Mail
9 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Environment group warns against repealing federal EV mandate
An environmental think tank is warning the federal government against repealing its electric vehicle mandate, instead suggesting that politicians should be helping to put more EVs on the road. In a statement published Friday, Clean Energy Canada gave three recommendations to the federal government to help deliver affordable EVs to Canadians for less than $40,000. The group, based out of Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, said Ottawa should retool its EV mandate by revisiting its near-term targets to help the auto sector 'weather this temporary storm' of slumping EV sales. 'Any additional flexibility added in the regulation should be designed to achieve other EV-related goals, such as delivering more affordable EVs and building out Canada's charging network,' says the statement by executive director Rachel Doran and director of public affairs Joanna Kyriazis. The plea comes on the heels of auto manufacturing leaders meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney last week, in which the CEOs repeated their calls for the mandate to be repealed. Starting next year, the mandate would require 20 per cent of all new light-duty vehicles sold in Canada to be zero-emission vehicles. Those also include plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. The target rises annually to 100 per cent by 2035. Recent data from Statistics Canada suggests EVs accounted for 7.53 per cent of all new vehicles sold in April. Following the meeting, the head of an organization representing Ford Canada, GM Canada and Stellantis said he was 'cautiously optimistic' the government would take action on the mandate. Clean Energy Canada also called on Ottawa to re-fund the EV incentive program, but to be clearer as to when the program will be phased out. The government launched the Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles program in 2019, which gave car buyers up to $5,000 toward the cost of an electric vehicle. The program was abruptly suspended back in January when its funding ran out. It has left many dealerships on the hook for the rebate if they hadn't already sent in their claim before the program ended. The federal government put nearly $3 billion into the program during its lifespan. 'The rebate should start at $5,000 and decline by $1,000 each year, providing consumers and automakers with a well-communicated phaseout that avoids periods of artificially lowered EV sales as buyers await the return of rebates or at least clarity,' Clean Energy Canada says. A similar policy is in place in Quebec. Federal ministers have said in recent months that the government was working toward bringing back consumer incentives on EVs. Opinion: Ottawa, bring back Canada's EV incentive program Those promises faced criticism from automakers themselves because, without implementing a rebate, EV sales are slumping further, as buyers wait for the rebates to come back. Clean Energy Canada also called on the federal government to reconsider its approach to cheaper EVs from China, which are subject to a 100 per cent tariff which took effect in October. Ottawa is scheduled to review the measure later this year. 'Allowing in a limited quota of these affordable vehicles while also recognizing EU-approved vehicles … would open Canada's vehicle market to fill important market gaps, drive innovation and ultimately make our auto sector more competitive,' the group says.
