logo
RM35.4 million worth of frozen food seized in massive operation across Sabah

RM35.4 million worth of frozen food seized in massive operation across Sabah

Borneo Post2 days ago
Abdul Rani (left) explains the details of 'Ops Taring Chiller' during a press conference at the Sabah Brigade PGA headquarters in Kinarut.
PAPAR (July 16): The Sabah Brigade General Operations Force (GOF seized various types of frozen food worth over RM35.4 million during a large-scale operation conducted simultaneously across 10 districts in Sabah on Tuesday.
Sabah Brigade GOF Commander Datuk Abdul Rani Alias said the 9am to 8pm operation — codenamed 'Ops Taring Chiller' — also led to the arrest of 29 individuals during raids on several storage warehouses and major distribution centres suspected of operating without valid permits and violating multiple food safety and management regulations.
The operation involved the Sabah Veterinary Services Department, the Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOH) and the Sabah Agriculture Department.
'A total of 29 individuals, including seven women aged between 20 and 60, were detained during the raids at 15 premises across Kota Kinabalu, Penampang, Papar, Sandakan, Tawau, Kunak, Semporna, Lahad Datu, Tenom and Keningau,' Abdul Rani said at a press conference held at the Sabah Brigade PGA headquarters in Kinarut on Wednesday.
Various frozen food products including chicken, meat, seafood, french fries and meatballs were seized, along with logistics equipment such as cold storage rooms, industrial refrigerators, meat-cutting machines and refrigerated lorries.
The total value of the seized items was estimated at RM35,452,000, with Kota Kinabalu accounting for the largest seizure — more than RM12 million.
Among the offences detected were operating without a valid business licence and violations of several laws, including Section 15(1) of the Animal Welfare Enactment 2015, the Food Act 1983, Sections 102 and 103 of the Local Government Act 1976, the Trade Licensing Ordinance 1948, Regulation 10(1) of the Supply Control Regulations 1974, and Section 21 of the Supply Control Act 1961.
Further inspections revealed that most of the seized frozen products were locally sourced but had been repackaged without proper labels — a tactic believed to be used to evade detection by the authorities.
Abdul Rani emphasized that the operation focused on storage warehouses and distribution centres rather than retail outlets or sales stores.
'Intelligence and surveillance were conducted for two to three weeks before the raids commenced. We moved in as the premises began operations early in the morning,' he said, noting that most of those arrested were warehouse workers and premises owners.
He added that similar operations will be conducted to curb activities that breach food safety standards and misuse distribution permits.
'The main objective of this operation is to protect consumer rights, ensure a safe and quality food supply, and eliminate fraud within the national food supply chain,' Abdul Rani stressed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

F&B worker claims trial to charge of allowing bank account to be used by third party
F&B worker claims trial to charge of allowing bank account to be used by third party

The Star

time16 minutes ago

  • The Star

F&B worker claims trial to charge of allowing bank account to be used by third party

SEREMBAN: A 27-year-old man pleaded not guilty at a Magistrate's Court here to a charge of allowing his bank account to be used by a third party. Lee Shin Nam, who works in a food and beverage outlet, claimed trial after the charge was read to him before Magistrate Saiful Sayoti. He was charged with committing the offence at 4.51pm on March 26 at a bank in Taman Semarak, Nilai. The accused was charged under Section 424B of the Penal Code which carries a fine of between RM10,000 and RM100,000 or imprisonment of up to seven years or both upon conviction. Section 424B of the Penal Code in Malaysia addresses the offence of giving possession or control of a bank account to another person without lawful authority or purpose. In most instances, these accounts are then used as mule accounts and to carry out scams. Deputy Public Prosecutor Nik Nur 'Aqilah Syarfa Nik Zaidi then offered the accused bail of RM6,000 pending mention. However, his lawyer from the Legal Aid Department, Chrysandy Lai asked for a lower amount as the accused would be bailed by his lorry driver father who earned about RM2,000 a month. Saiful then set bail at RM3,000 with one surety and fixed Aug 21 for mention.

Siti Kasim awarded RM160,000 in damages over unlawful arrest by Jawi
Siti Kasim awarded RM160,000 in damages over unlawful arrest by Jawi

Sinar Daily

time44 minutes ago

  • Sinar Daily

Siti Kasim awarded RM160,000 in damages over unlawful arrest by Jawi

In his judgment, High Court Judge Su Tiang Joo ordered the defendants to pay RM100,000 in exemplary damages, RM60,000 in aggravated damages, and RM100,000 in legal costs to the plaintiff (Siti Kasim). 18 Jul 2025 03:55pm The court held that Siti Kasim, whose full name is Siti Zabedah Kasim, had proven on the balance of probabilities that she was wrongfully arrested and falsely imprisoned by two Jawi officers after exiting the ballroom of the hotel where the event was held. - Photo taken from Siti Kasim's Facebook KUALA LUMPUR - The High Court has awarded lawyer and activist Siti Kasim RM160,000 in damages after allowing her civil suit against the Federal Territories Islamic Religious Department (Jawi), 15 of its officers, and seven others over her unlawful arrest and detention during a private fundraising event in 2016. In his judgment, High Court Judge Su Tiang Joo ordered the defendants to pay RM100,000 in exemplary damages, RM60,000 in aggravated damages, and RM100,000 in legal costs to the plaintiff (Siti Kasim). The court held that Siti Kasim, whose full name is Siti Zabedah Kasim, had proven on the balance of probabilities that she was wrongfully arrested and falsely imprisoned by two Jawi officers after exiting the ballroom of the hotel where the event was held. "In my considered view, there was misfeasance in public office by the defendants in conducting a raid and apprehending a participant at a state event, without ensuring the lawful exercise of their powers, thereby causing unnecessary fear and discomfort,' the judge said. Siti Kasim filed the suit in September 2019, claiming false imprisonment, misfeasance in public office, and a violation of her constitutional right to personal liberty under the Federal Constitution. She maintained that she had not obstructed any officer and was merely discharging her duties as a legal practitioner at the time of the incident. On August 21, 2020, the Magistrates' Court here acquitted and discharged Siti Kasim of the charge of obstructing public servants, ruling that the prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case under Section 186 of the Penal Code. - BERNAMA

Siti Kasim awarded RM160,000 in damages over unlawful arrest by Jawi
Siti Kasim awarded RM160,000 in damages over unlawful arrest by Jawi

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

Siti Kasim awarded RM160,000 in damages over unlawful arrest by Jawi

KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court has awarded lawyer and activist Siti Kasim RM160,000 in damages after allowing her civil suit against the Federal Territories Islamic Religious Department (Jawi), 15 of its officers, and seven others over her unlawful arrest and detention during a private fundraising event in 2016. In his judgment, High Court Judge Su Tiang Joo ordered the defendants to pay RM100,000 in exemplary damages, RM60,000 in aggravated damages, and RM100,000 in legal costs to the plaintiff (Siti Kasim). The court held that Siti Kasim, whose full name is Siti Zabedah Kasim, had proven on the balance of probabilities that she was wrongfully arrested and falsely imprisoned by two Jawi officers after exiting the ballroom of the hotel where the event was held. "In my considered view, there was misfeasance in public office by the defendants in conducting a raid and apprehending a participant at a state event, without ensuring the lawful exercise of their powers, thereby causing unnecessary fear and discomfort," the judge said. Siti Kasim filed the suit in September 2019, claiming false imprisonment, misfeasance in public office, and a violation of her constitutional right to personal liberty under the Federal Constitution. She maintained that she had not obstructed any officer and was merely discharging her duties as a legal practitioner at the time of the incident. On August 21, 2020, the magistrates' court here acquitted and discharged Siti Kasim of the charge of obstructing public servants, ruling that the prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case under Section 186 of the Penal Code. – Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store