Couple at war with council over plans to BULLDOZE £640k house to build dream home near Glasgow
DREAMS DASHED Couple at war with council over plans to BULLDOZE £640k house to build dream home near Glasgow
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A COUPLE have been blocked from bulldozing a £640,000 bungalow and replacing it with their dream 'green' home.
Lewis and Kathryn Black bought Oak Lodge in Newton Mearns, East Renfrewshire, before seeking approval to flatten it.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
2
Lewis and Kathryn Black bought Oak Lodge in Newton Mearns
Credit: Pressteam Scotland
2
They want to replace it with a stunning architect designed mansion
Credit: Pressteam Scotland
They paid £637,500 in 2023 for the detached house and want to replace it with a stunning architect designed mansion.
The new luxury villa includes three bedrooms, an outdoor balcony, a pantry, TV room and a dog house.
They have claimed demolishing the existing 'substandard' 1950s property is the only option that is financially viable to them.
But they are now locked in a planning battle after East Renfrewshire Council refused permission and said the scheme went against regulations.
The Blacks have now turned to the Scottish Government in a bid to have the decision overturned.
An appeal document said: "It is not considered that the existing 1950s dwelling makes 'positive contribution' to the character of the Upper Whitecraigs Conservation Area.
"Given this it should not therefore be necessary to then have to demonstrate that its condition prevents its retention at a 'reasonable cost'.
"However, and without prejudice, the submitted feasibility appraisals clearly demonstrate that the only financially viable option will be the demolition of the existing substandard dwelling, and the erection of a modern new replacement dwelling on the appeal site."
A design statement from their architect said: "The applicants intend to create a multi generational home for themselves and their growing family including dogs.
"The existing house and facilities are dilapidated and in a relatively poor quality making adapting modern living and thermal comfort
increasingly difficult.
Incredible moment crowd gathers as Glasgow tower blocks are DEMOLISHED
"The design is influenced by both the existing topography and the wider context of the site. The proposal of a new house, together with the form and materiality of the proposed dwelling, are designed to adopt a contemporary interpretation of nearby properties.
"The existing dwelling is of a traditional construction, and has poor levels of insulation and it is considered that improving the construction quality of these buildings, whilst improving services, energy efficiency, heating, etc, would be impractical and financially imprudent when considering the likely value which could be attained."
A neighbour objected to the Black's plans and claimed Oak Lodge was 'suitable for renovation' and should be maintained as a family home.
They said: "The property was always maintained to a high standard and is suitable for renovation and improvements to make it a modern and efficient family home, which blends into the local natural and built environment."
The local community council adopted a neutral stance but noted the house had been empty for a 'considerable period' of time which had led to a 'deterioration of its integrity'.
Rejecting the move, the council said: "It has not been demonstrated that the structural condition of the building prevents its retention at a reasonable cost nor has it been demonstrated that reasonable efforts have been made to retain, repair and reuse the building.
"The demolition of the existing house is contrary to the adopted local development plan as there is no acceptable replacement development proposal in place because the replacement scheme applied for will not preserve and enhance the special character of the conservation area."
A government reporter is expected to issue a decision in due course.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
40 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Public funding row bus firm Alexander Dennis may get more
The development comes amidst a public funding row which saw ADL receive tens of millions from the public purse even after it embarked on a plan to axe a third of its Scottish workforce five years ago. ADL has been warned by the Scottish Government that some of the millions could be subject to clawback if goes ahead with the move to England. The Scottish Government's Scottish Enterprise agency has said in a briefing from July 18 that in its most recent review in December, "no risks had been identified that would preclude continued funding". Scottish Enterprise says that that a joint UK working group involving themselves and the UK and Scottish governments are identifying solutions that they say "support continued investment and employment at ADL's Scottish sites". It has said that no funding has been paid out since the company announcement but that any support was subject to "rigorous monitoring and safeguarding measures". Scottish Enterprise chief executive Adrian Gillespie said: "We will continue to work closely with all partners to explore all avenues to retain jobs and secure long-term investment". Alba Party leader Kenny MacAskill said all further [[pub]]lic funding of ADL should cease unless there is a commitment to remain in Scotland and that millions should be clawed back if ADL departed. Last month, Alexander Dennis began consultations on a plan to close its Falkirk operations and cease manufacturing at its Larbert base with the loss of 400 on site jobs. Manufacturing would be centralised at its Scarborough operation which has the capacity to produce around 1,200 buses a year. The agency analysis came in response to a group of MSPs seeking a clear outline of the actions Scottish Enterprise is taking now, in coordination with the Scottish Government and other partners, to support continued manufacturing and investment at the Scottish sites. Unite Scotland estimates that up to 1,600 jobs could be at risk when supply chain roles are included and has warned of a 'devastating' impact on communities already reeling from the Grangemouth oil refinery closure. Ministers have confirmed that should Alexander Dennis go ahead with exiting Scotland, the financial assistance paid may be subject to "clawback". They have said that it will be down to Scottish Enterprise to decide on how to proceed. Kenny MacAskill According to Scottish Government records, ADL received £58m of public 'subsidy' for green vehicles since 2020 under two schemes aimed at transitioning Scotland to green buses - despite the company having embarked on a 2020 plan to axe a third of its Scottish workforce. And some £30m of jobs grants for research and development over 10 years has come from the Scottish Government's economic development agency Scottish Enterprise. Some £11.2m of those jobs grants from Scottish Enterprise came in 2023, three years after concerns were raised over ADL embarking on major job cuts. By the time the 2020 jobs cut was in place, ADL had already received over £8m in 'job securing' taxpayer funding which was promoted as supporting building a new greener business in Scotland. The Herald revealed that ADL warned the First Minister it was "'reconsidering' its 'entire investment' in Scotland — a year before announcing plans to relocate to England. He was also told they had already been 'forced' to offshore certain manufacturing functions to China. The First Minister intervened after learning of potential redundancies at the firm, suggesting 'further capital support' and advising Scottish Enterprise to 'exhaust all options to support the business'. Finance secretary Shona Robison has said that Scottish Enterprise "is continuing to work closely with ADL to try to find a positive solution". ADL has allowed an extra fortnight for efforts to save the jobs of workers in Falkirk and Larbert. A deadline for a consultation is now set for August 15. SNP's Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon once set out the economic case for Scottish Independence from an Alexander Dennis depot (Image: Newsquest) Mr MacAskill, who said the job losses were "unacceptable", said ADL "must be held to account if they choose to relocate south of the border". And he said any further financial support given must contain firm guarantees that ADL is staying in Scotland and that funds can be recouped if there is any change of mind. He said: "Falkirk and Larbert have served them well over the years and Scottish Governments and agencies have supported them handsomely. Closure is bad enough but relocation rubs salt into the wound. "Any funds that can be clawed back absolutely must be. The workers community and Scotland deserve no less. READ MORE from Martin Williams: How buying Chinese sparked public funding row over Scots bus jobs going to England? Swinney got year-long warning England-bound bus firm was 'reconsidering' Scotland FM in funding row as £90m public cash for Scots jobs given to firm going to England Union says 1600 Scots jobs at risk if government doesn't act in 'national interest' "Workers are entitled to loyalty from their governments as well as their employers. Public funds are for public good." Ministers have said they are working with bus operators to drum up interest for much-needed orders for ADL. The company has previously said that it would need to see a significant rise in bus orders – between 70 and 100 by the end of the year and 300-400 next year – to remain open. In a briefing, Scottish Enterprise chief executive Adrian Gillespie said that it remained "fully committed to supporting ADL and safeguarding Scotland's strategic manufacturing capabilities". He added: "We will continue to work closely with all partners to explore all avenues to retain jobs and secure long-term investment." Adrian Gillespie (Image: SE) The agency has said that past funding typically include obligations such as job creation or retention, matched funding from the company involved. And while it said that while the specific terms agreed with ADL are "commercially sensitive" it "rigorously monitors all funded projects to "ensure compliance and value for public investment". "Monitoring includes regular reporting on technical progress, milestone achievements, and any deviations from the original project plan. Risks are assessed prior to each payment," said Mr Gillespie. "As of the most recent review, no risks had been identified that would preclude continued funding. Scottish Enterprise's grant conditions include key safeguards and the option to claw back funding." He added that "we remain fully committed to supporting ADL and safeguarding Scotland's strategic manufacturing capabilities. "Scottish Enterprise is working closely with ADL, the Scottish Government, and UK partners to exploit all viable options to retain ADL operations and employment in Scotland." Ministers say there is a commitment from ADL to consider keeping chassis manufacture as well as the possibility of single deck bus manufacture in Scotland. And they say action is being taken to liaise with commercial bus operators and local transport authorities to establish the current demand for double deck buses in Scotland and were working alongside the UK Government to identify demand in other parts of the UK. But there remains concerns that UK subsidy rules which has curbed [[Scottish Government]] action in providing a direct contract award to its own Inverclyde shipyard firm Ferguson Marine is hindering attempts to give [[pub]]licly funded support for ADL to try and keep the company in Scotland. But Ms Robison has said it was for the UK Government to make any changes to the Subsidy Control Act which might benefit Scottish businesses. She has told MSPs that the government was committed to looking at "all viable options" and are working with private bus companies. 'I agree about the importance of securing a short-term pipeline of orders,' she said. 'Please be assured that we are therefore liaising with commercial bus operators and local transport authorities to establish the current demand for double-deck buses in Scotland and are working alongside UK Government to identify demand in other parts of the UK," she said in a briefing. 'I am in full agreement with you about the importance of Alexander Dennis to Scotland and of retaining the jobs of the highly-skilled workers. 'That is why we are continuing to work at pace with Scottish Enterprise and UK Government, and alongside the company and trade unions, to explore all viable options to support ADL to retain bus manufacturing in Scotland.' Kate Forbes (Image: Colin Mearns) Deputy first minister Kate Forbes said: 'Our absolute focus continues to be on exploring all viable options to support Alexander Dennis Ltd, its workforce and the families and communities they support. 'The [[Scottish Government]] continues to work in close collaboration with the company, trade unions, Scottish Enterprise, Transport Scotland and the [[UK Government]] during the consultation period. 'This work includes discussions on potential support for a company furlough scheme and urgently examining options to provide greater confidence regarding short-term demand for bus manufacturing in Scotland. "
Scotsman
43 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Remove roadblocks that delay new housing
UK governments must act on housing crisis, says Caroline Maciver Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland and other parts of Britain face a serious housing crisis. Think-tank Centre of Cities says there is a backlog of 4.3 million homes missing from the UK's national housing market. Both the Scottish and UK governments have made housebuilding a key policy commitment, but there are a number of developing legislative issues as well as major challenges facing the construction industry which stand in the way of addressing the need for new homes successfully. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In June, the Scottish Government appointed Màiri McAllan as Cabinet Secretary for Housing and pledged £3.5 billion to deliver 110,000 affordable homes by 2032. South of the border, Housing Secretary Angela Rayner set out plans to build 1.5 million new houses in England by 2029. As part of the UK Government spending review announced in June, £39bn was pledged over 10 years for social and affordable housing in England. hy While this additional investment is essential and very welcome, new regulations on construction products will likely mean further challenges for home-builders and, in some cases, could present a barrier to progress. The Scottish Government's plans to introduce a new role of Compliance Plan Manager for residential buildings over 11 metres high could, like many new schemes, also create initial bedding-in delays for housebuilders. Meanwhile, the UK Government's Construction Products Reform Green Paper, which puts a strong focus on more third-party testing and certification to ensure product safety and reliability, creates further uncertainty for builders who are unclear how these reforms will work in practice. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The current progress of the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) in England underlines the potentially detrimental impact of new regulation on housing projects. Set up to ensure high-rise buildings are fully compliant with fire safety issues, the BSR's initial 13-week approval timetable has more than doubled, creating a significant backlog in proposed new builds. Following action in England, the Scottish Government is implementing new measures through the Housing (Scotland) Bill around Awaab's Law, which aims to tackle damp and mould in social housing. While this is well-intended legislation, it will place a greater burden on social landlords to investigate and address disrepair and could set back their timetable for building much-needed new social housing across Scotland. Regulatory reform is undoubtedly important in the post-Grenfell era. It is, however, essential for governments to give clear guidance to the construction industry on new measures and ensure prompt timelines are met in the approval of new building applications. More broadly, the Scottish and UK governments must provide wider support to the construction sector to ensure it has the capacity required to build the thousands of homes needed. With 140,000 construction vacancies currently unfilled in the UK and a further 750,000 employees expected to retire in 2026, the government can help the industry to facilitate more workers it needs, including 240,000 new apprentices required over the next decade. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are also geographical challenges such as a lack of accommodation for contractors in some areas, including in the North of Scotland. Governments can support the sector through the planning system and potential tax incentives to drive home-building in regions of high demand. If the Scottish and UK governments are to address the housing crisis and achieve their ambitious targets, they need to ensure they are a key part of the solution, not a roadblock to progress.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Row over £17.6m of public cash spent on Glen Prosen sporting estate
It comes amidst continuing concerns over whether [[Scottish Government]] is investing enough millions into its own shipyard company Ferguson Marine to keep it functioning after it delivers the last of two much delayed and wildly overbudget ferries Glen Rosa. There has been criticism that after 32 months there has been no management plan for the site. Under new Land Reform legislation a failure to produce such a plan would result in a substantial fine. READ MORE: 'Justice in the dock': UN probes Scots judge-led body's 'breach' of international law Enough is enough: 50 Scots councils seek ministers summit on green energy 'wild west' 'Appalling': Hundreds of Scots evicted from council homes despite ScotGov ban The Scottish Government hoped that the legislation would provide communities with more say on decisions relating to the ownership of land. It came as concerns had been growing over the rise of the phenomenon known as Green Lairds. This new generation of landowners are accused of inflating the market and pricing out community groups in the rush to offset damaging emissions. The bill as amended which is still to be passed details a maximum £40,000 fine for failure to comply with community engagement obligations for large land holdings, which includes land management plans. Among other things, the plan is meant to set out what the long term vision is for the land and how it contributes to achieving the net-zero emissions target, including increasing or sustaining biodiversity. FLS bought the 8,700 acres of land with ten estate buildings using the Scottish Government's fund for woodland creation. When the estate, north of Kirriemuir which sits in one of the five highland glens of Angus, was bought it ceased to be run as a sporting estate having previously offered grouse-shooting, deer stalking and salmon fishing. Owner Robin Batchelor approached several potential buyers after deciding to offer it for sale. And the Scottish Government admitted that 'off-market and confidentiality arrangements imposed by the seller' meant FLS could not consult with the local community before the deal was done. Ministers said after being quizzed in September, last year - two years after the purchase - that there was an intention to set out a management plan and that the acquisition provided opportunities for landscape restoration. It was stated that there were plans to create new woodland and montane scrub, restore peatlands and rivers, improving biodiversity and ensuring resilience to climate change. They said last year that had been 20 months of preparatory work including carrying out ecological surveys to better understand the landscape and that a land management plan would eventually be produced. Edward Mountain (Image: George Munro) Among the critics is Conservative Highlands and Islands MSP Edward Mountain who is also convener of the parliamentary net zero, energy and transport committee who says that the purchase has been "veiled in a the cloak of 'commercial confidentiality' with every attempt to winkle out the details of the purchase rebuffed". He says all that they have been told is that the justification for the purchase "was because the land was of strategic importance". He has called on ministers to present the justification that was made for the purchase of the estate so that it could be understood what 'strategic importance' was. He said: 'All we know is that the purchase is 'strategically' important, and that the monies came from the Scottish Government's fund for woodland creation. "It is unacceptable that, 32 months later, there has been no justification of the purchase. "Under the proposed new Land Reform legislation – as introduced by the [[Scottish Government]] – the fact that the estate has not yet produced a management plan would be considered unacceptable, and Forestry and Land Scotland would be subject to a substantial fine. I believe this to be fundamentally hypocritical. 'I have asked the Scottish Government to provide me with details regarding the purchase and future of Glen Prosen. I very much look forward to receiving this information, and hope that it might clarify the true intention behind the purchase of 3,500 hectares of land.' The Scottish Government said that consultation on a land management plan for all the iconic Angus glens, including Glen Prosen closed in April with the final version due to be submitted for approval in the Autumn. Ministers say it will set out plans for "extensive new native woodland creation, peatland and river restoration to help recover wildlife, lock up carbon and create landscapes that people can enjoy and benefit from". Three years ago an analysis by the Scottish Land Commission, an official body set up to reform land ownership found that the majority of Highland estates that changed hands in one year were sold in secret, and nearly half went to absentee owners rushing to buy rural land for environmental reasons. It found almost two-thirds of the deals were done in secret and half of the estates were sold to corporate bodies, investment funds or charitable trusts. Nick KempeNick Kempe, of campaign group Parkwatch Scotland has said that the purchase was initially unheralded with no news release on their plans to let people know what was going on. "It isn't a particularly special place. There are more important areas of land to buy," he said. "The Scottish Government hasn't given a justification for this. "The most important thing they could have done is reduce deer numbers and they aren't doing that. "There does not seem to be a coherent strategy. From a land perspective, it doesn't make sense. "It has been one total farce. They have no idea after all this time or sensible plans over what to do with it. "Without that, why would you buy it?" Land reform secretary Mairi Gougeon said FLS was working closely with the Farming Opportunities for New Entrants Group to look at opening more land up to new farmers – including opportunities in the Angus Glens – adding to the 4,000 hectares already provided on land it manages. Mairi Gougeon (Image: Alan Peebles) She said: "FLS acquired Glen Prosen to demonstrate how land in public ownership can help us tackle the key challenges of climate change and nature loss, whilst critically encouraging access to land and creating new jobs and opportunities. New native woodland will be created, peatland will be restored, helping to recover wildlife, reduce flood risk and create landscapes that people can enjoy and benefit from.' FLS says that its broad aims on purchasing the estate were "in line with the Scottish Government's commitment to nature recovery, climate resilience and people's health and wellbeing". They say that it forms the centre of approximately 26,000 acres of public land, giving them the opportunity "to work with other public bodies and neighbouring landowners to achieve landscape-scale habitat restoration in the Cairngorms National Park".
