I've lost 5.5 stone on Mounjaro but still eat chocolate & get takeaways every week – the truth everyone needs to hear
La Hauser, from the UK, took to social media to share why you shouldn't be losing weight too quickly on the weight loss jab.
2
La revealed that she was losing 2.7lbs a week on the jab, but was still seeing people online call it a slow loss.
But she reckons she has found the key to success on the injection, and it still allows her to eat takeaways.
She wrote: "I started in January and have lost an average of 2.7lbs per week.
"I've lost 5 and a half stone in total. I still have a few stone to lose to be at the weight of my preference.
"There are so many posts where people are saying they are disappointed they have only lost 3 pounds and their mate lost 3 stone in the first week."
Instead, La said those on their weight loss journey should concentrate on being consistent, rather than how much they are losing.
She even revealed that by going for a slower approach, she was still able to enjoy sweet treats and takeaways while shifting the weight.
She continued: "Don't compare to others. Focus on your journey. Focus on what makes you feel joy.
"I eat a takeaway/restaurant meal every week. I eat chocolate every day, but I track every calorie so I know I'm still focused even when it's an unhealthy option."
The less is more approach is obviously more sustainable than depriving yourself of everything, like a crash diet, so you stay consistent even without the drug.
"Don't deprive yourself as you're in it for the long haul, make it sustainable, make it enjoyable," she added.
The post was shared on the Facebook group, mounjaro ozempic wegovy weight loss support, and was a hit with other members.
One person wrote: "I totally agree! Keep up the good work - been on for almost 2 months - lost 16. I'm pleased."
Another commented: "Well said and well done."
"Great advice," penned a third.
What to do if you lose too much weight too quickly whilst on Mounjaro
IF you're losing too much weight too quickly while on Mounjaro, it's important to take action to avoid potential health risks like muscle loss, malnutrition, dehydration, and fatigue. Here's what you can do:
Evaluate Your Caloric Intake
Mounjaro reduces appetite, which can make it easy to eat too little. If you're losing weight too fast (more than two to three lbs per week after the initial adjustment period), try:
Tracking your food intake to ensure you're eating enough calories (apps like MyFitnessPal can help).
Increasing protein intake to preserve muscle mass (aim for 0.6–1g per pound of body weight).
Adding healthy fats and complex carbs (e.g., avocados, nuts, whole grains) for balanced energy.
Adjust Your Dosage (With Doctor's Approval)
If your weight loss is too rapid or causing side effects, your doctor may:
Pause dose increases or lower your dosage.
Adjust your treatment plan to stabilise your weight loss.
Strength Training & Exercise
To prevent muscle loss:
Incorporate resistance training at least two to three times per week.
Stay active with low-impact exercises like walking or yoga.
Hydrate & Manage Electrolytes
Drink enough water (Mounjaro can reduce thirst).
Electrolytes matter - Consider adding magnesium, sodium, and potassium if you feel weak or fatigued.
Monitor for Malnutrition & Deficiencies
Rapid weight loss can cause vitamin/mineral deficiencies (especially B12, iron, and electrolytes). If you experience:
Fatigue, hair loss, or dizziness, ask your doctor about supplements.
Consider Further Medical Guidance
If your weight loss is excessive or causing health concerns, speak with your healthcare provider.
They might adjust your dosage, diet, or exercise plan to help stabilise your weight loss.
Meanwhile a fourth said: "Totally agree."
"Well done, looking great,' claimed a fifth
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Vaccine plea to pregnant women as deadly virus surges
The UK is preparing for a potential surge in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cases, following a record number of infections in Australia, which often predicts viral spread in England. NHS England has observed a steady increase in RSV cases since early 2025 and is urging pregnant women to get vaccinated to protect their babies. RSV is a significant health concern, being a leading cause of death among babies and the primary reason for hospital admissions for children, though it typically causes mild, cold-like symptoms in most adults. Pregnant women can receive the RSV jab from 28 weeks of pregnancy, and older adults aged 75-79 will also be invited for vaccination in the coming weeks. Data from the UK Health Security Agency indicates the vaccine is highly effective, preventing 72 per cent of hospital admissions for babies and 82 per cent for older adults. Urgent warning over virus dangerous to newborns as cases surge abroad
The Sun
7 minutes ago
- The Sun
Inside the terrifying rise of anti-sun cream myths being spread by celebs & influencers – & why lies could cost lives
WE all know how important it is to slap on sunblock to protect our skin - don't we? Apparently not. A worrying trend is gripping social media platforms, flooding sites like TikTok with dangerous anti-sunscreen views, often repeated by influencers and celebrities with huge followings, experts warn. 8 8 Last week, Samantha Faiers, of TOWIE fame, was forced to hit back after coming under fire for revealing that her kids don't wear sun cream. Admitting she is not a medical expert, the reality star, 34, wrote on Instagram that she believes SPF is 'pretty harmful and full of toxic ingredients', adding that her family has 'built a tolerance' to the sun. It came after The Hills actress Kristin Cavallari, 37, said on her podcast, Let's Be Honest: 'I don't wear sunscreen and anytime I do an interview, I get a lot of s*** when I admit that I don't.' Other celebs including Kelsey Parker and Lauryn Goodman have told their followers they ignore NHS advice to wear at least SPF30. They are not alone in falling for and repeating misinformation online. Sunscreen sceptics believe the products contain toxic, cancer-causing chemicals and are to blame for rising rates of skin cancer. But leading doctors and scientists say huge scientific advances, greater awareness of the symptoms is fuelling better diagnosis, while an ageing population and more people holidaying abroad, are also driving rates up. The increase in sunbed use, tanning trends and misinformation, plus people ignoring advice, is 'also sadly fuelling the rapid rise in cases', says Marie Tudor of skin cancer charity SKCIN. She says the spike in anti-SPF sentiment is 'incredibly sad to witness', adding: 'The rise in anti-SPF supporters, driven by misinformation on social media, is a mammoth concern. 'Largely promoted by TikTok, this damaging content is influencing a younger generation who are highly susceptible to sun damage and is further fuelled by tanning trends and products. 'Sadly, such misinformation is without doubt going to cost lives.' Consultant clinical oncologist Dr James Wilson, who specialises in skin and lung cancers, agrees. 'Everybody thinks it's not going to happen to them,' he adds. 'I've got young people in my clinic who presented with metastatic [advanced] melanoma. 'I've had a number who have died, leaving young children behind. 'That's got to be avoided at all costs. 'Rumours of a risk should not put you off doing a behaviour that we know is protective.' 8 Melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer that can spread throughout the body, kills more than 2,000 people a year in the UK. Nine in 10 cases could be prevented by staying safe in the sun and avoiding sunbeds, according to Cancer Research UK. 'Your lifetime risk of melanoma is correlated with the number of times you've had sunburn in your life,' says Dr Wilson. 'SPF stops you from getting sunburned.' A child's skin is thinner, burns more easily and lets UV rays penetrate deeper. Dr Leonor Chen, skin ageing and aesthetics expert Samantha, 34, who is mum to Paul, 5, Rosie, 5, and three-year-old Edward, was asked on Instagram, where she has 2.5million followers, what sunscreen she uses. Sharing her experience, she replied: 'So this is always a bit of a controversial one, but honestly, me and my whole family don't actually wear sunscreen. 'Over the years, the kids have built up a really good tolerance to being in the sun.' Rather, she says, she takes other steps to protect her children - including mineral SPFs and staying out of the midday sun. 'I think SPF swimwear is such a good and safer option,' she added. 'But also, don't be afraid of the sun! Early in the morning or later in the afternoon when [the sun is] not as strong, I love letting the kids run around and soak it up. It's so good for them. 'That said, I do always bring a Tallow Zine SPF with me when I go away, just in case. 'And hats or caps are a must! Especially for us ladies, because no one wants extra sun damage.' Fans' fury Her response baffled followers and experts alike. One follower responded: 'You need to delete your story about not wearing sunscreen, I don't think you understand the damage you can do to your followers by promoting this.' PROTECT YOUR SKIN TO protect yourself against the sun's rays, the NHS says to: Marie says: 'The use of SPF 30+ broad spectrum sunscreen when the UV Index is 3 or above, is a critical prevention method.' Dr Wilson says: 'There's enough variety in the market and information on the packaging for you to find one that agrees with you.' Don't forget the star rating for UVA - the NHS recommends a minimum of 4-star UVA protection. Meanwhile, Bruce Green, chartered chemist, scientist and founder of SOS Serum Skincare, says there is 'no such thing as 'building tolerance' to UV rays'. 'Skin damage from UV exposure is cumulative and largely irreversible,' he stresses. Research shows that your chance of melanoma skin cancer doubles if you have had five or more sunburns, or one blistering sunburn in childhood or adolescence, according to Melanoma Focus. London-based Dr Leonor Chen, a skin ageing and aesthetics expert, tells Sun Health: 'A child's skin is thinner, burns more easily and lets UV rays penetrate deeper. 'They also have less melanin - the pigment that helps protect against UV - and what little they do make takes time to build up. 'In other words, they burn before their tan appears. 'Their immune systems are also less developed, meaning their skin can't repair DNA damage as effectively.' 8 8 While celebs and influencers sharing their own experiences may not intend to do harm, experts warn that with millions of followers comes a responsibility. Kimberley Medd, clinic lead at Face the Future, tells Sun Health: "Even well-intentioned comments can lead to real-world harm if they downplay established medical guidance. 'Paediatricians and dermatologists worldwide recommend sunscreen for children over six months. 'For infants under six months, sun avoidance and protective clothing are preferred.' Mr Green adds: 'While I appreciate Sam Faiers' emphasis on shade, sun avoidance during peak hours and protective clothing, it's important to address the misinformation surrounding sunscreen that was shared in her statement. 'SPF swimwear and hats are excellent tools, but they should complement, not replace proper sunscreen use - especially when skin is directly exposed.' Dangerous misinformation So where does misinformation like this stem from? We spoke to Roberta Whitney, 52, a former model with 21,000 Instagram followers, who believes we should 'embrace the sun'. She told us: '[She believes] lots of SPFs have chemicals in them that are endocrine disruptors, and I feel we should embrace the sun rather than this fear-based marketing that surrounds SPF.' Roberta believes many SPF formulas have 'chemical filters or stabilisers' that can be 'cancer-causing' or 'block the skin's pores'. Most of the damaging rumours about SPF are based on concerns around a common ingredient called oxybenzone. Dr Wilson says: 'When rats have been fed a high dose of oxybenzone, there have been some hormonal changes observed. 'To say that that would happen in humans massively underestimates the complexity of cell signaling and metabolism in humans compared to a rat. 'It also suggests that the amount of oxybenzone you absorb through the skin is the same as the circulating levels of oxybenzone in a rat that's been eating it. 'The evidence is really, really scant, and the people who shout loudly about it never seem to shout loudly about things where the evidence is really concrete and solid.' For those worried about chemical sunscreens - in spite of the lack of evidence supporting those fears - Dr Chen says there are alternatives. 'For those concerned about chemical sunscreens — whether due to skin sensitivity or personal preference — mineral options like zinc oxide or titanium dioxide are a good alternative,' she adds. 'They're well tolerated, effective, and especially suitable for young or sensitive skin.' Roberta is CEO of a beauty brand, BioBeauty, which doesn't sell SPF. But she says it's 'not anti-SPF', but 'pro-awareness'. She says: 'I believe people should make smart decisions about whether or not they want to use it [SPF]. 'Sunlight isn't the enemy. Burning is. That's what we want to avoid.' 8 Meanwhile, some so-called 'sun-nutritionists' also claim that sunscreen blocks us from experiencing the benefits of sunlight, particularly vitamin D, which we need for healthy bones. 'I don't think there's any real strong case for that,' says Dr Wilson. 'You do need natural light to generate vitamin D. In the British summer, being outside for somewhere between 15 and 30 minutes is enough to get you all the vitamin D you need.' It can be achieved outside of peak UV hours, too, and in winter, the NHS advises taking a daily vitamin D supplement. 'You can also get vitamin D from your diet in things like oily fish and eggs, so there are ways you can supplement it very easily,' says Dr Wilson. It's not just melanoma that SPF is scientifically proven to help protect you from, but non-melanoma types of skin cancer too - the most common cancer in the UK, with 156,000 cases each year. 'We've got concrete evidence that SPF can reduce your incidence of squamous cell carcinoma,' says Dr Wilson. 'People die of squamous cell carcinoma. 'It can invade deeply into the skin and even into the structures of the face, head and skull, and it can spread through the body to the lymph nodes and distant organs like the lungs.' Meanwhile, basal cell carcinoma is very rarely deadly. 'But it's incredibly disfiguring depending on where it is on the body,' says Dr Wilson. 'I've got a patient who has basal cell carcinoma that is essentially destroying his eye because it's growing into the bones around it - he's now lost the function of his right eye. 'These skin cancers are not just trivial things you can chop off.' What is confusing for many experts is the fact that many sharing anti-SPF views work in the beauty sphere - much of which is geared towards anti-ageing. 'The TikTok generation are more likely to get prophylactic (preventative) Botox to stop them getting wrinkles than they are to wear sunscreen potentially,' says Dr Wilson. 'That makes no sense whatsoever. An amateur TikTok warrior isn't the same as the Government, NHS or your doctor's advice. Dr Wilson 'The best way to stop yourself from getting wrinkles and having premature ageing is wearing a good, high-quality SPF on your face.' Dr Chen agrees: 'UV radiation doesn't just raise cancer risk - it permanently damages the skin. 'It breaks down collagen and destroys elastic fibres. So every bit of unprotected exposure quietly accelerates ageing too.' If you come across something deemed controversial on social media, Dr Wilson urges everyone to think twice. 'You need to look at the message and the messenger,' he says. 'An amateur TikTok warrior isn't the same as the Government, NHS or your doctor's advice. 'It's very easy to whip up a frenzy for likes and attention on social media.' The good news is there are tonnes of products out there to suit different needs; SPFs for sensitive, oily, dry and dark skin. What the experts are clear on is that your skin, and potentially your life, depends on that little bottle of SPF. 'USING SPF WOULD HAVE SAVED ME' 8 8 Lisa Costello, 43, has battled melanoma twice after being 'addicted to tanning' for years – and never applying SPF to protect her skin. The driving instructor, from Essex, says it is a 'bad mistake' to not use suncream – and blames not wearing it herself as the cause of her melanoma diagnosis. 'I 100% regret not using SPF,' she said. 'If I had used SPF, it would have prevented me from getting skin cancer. 'As a child, I remember getting quite burnt and blistering in the sun. 'When I was older, I used tanning oils instead of protective sun cream.' The first of Lisa's cancerous moles was found in 2018, and a second in 2021. Her dad died of melanoma cancer in 2015 after being diagnosed in 2011. But Lisa has had tests and the results found no genetic link. In the past, Lisa used sunbeds and felt 'desperate' to be tanned. Now, she says: 'After what I've been through, I now wear SPF every single day. 'I apply it again at the hottest point during the day, and if I go abroad, I re-apply it every two hours. 'I put it on my kids on a regular basis, too – sun protection has to start at a very young age.' Responding to those who share misinformation about suncream online, Lisa warned: 'I hope they never get affected by skin cancer because it's absolutely awful. 'Not wearing SPF is a very risky thing to do - and something you may live to regret.'
BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nurses punched in face at Swindon hospital violent children's unit
Nurses have been assaulted and "punched in the face" amid violent behavioural problems at a hospital's children's unit, staff have told the April, nurses at the Great Western Hospital (GWH) in Swindon say a series of troubled teenagers have assaulted nurses, hit another child and verbally abused very young patients and their incidents have included a patient who "ripped a TV" from a wall and broke a sink. Numerous staff are now taking sick leave.A spokesperson for the GWH said: "Our children's ward is often the only place available locally for vulnerable children and young people up to the age of 18 with complex medical and mental health needs." Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership closed the Riverside adolescent mental health unit as a "temporary measure" in February its continued closure means GWH has to do its best to cope with teenagers suffering form psychiatric conditions. The unit provides care to children up to the age of 18 and the hospitals does not have an adolescent mental health ward as an alternative. Statistics obtained by the BBC show that in the spring there were around 20 incidents relating to the behaviour of inpatients that involved harming themselves or that time, 10 staff, other patients or family members were assaulted. 'Nothing has changed' The BBC has spoken to several nurses from the unit who say up to 15 members of staff have been off work because of said one nurse who remains off work was left seriously injured after being assaulted two years ago and has suffered ever since with hearing loss and PTSD. The nurses all want to remain said: "We kept saying what is it going to take? Still nothing has changed."Is it going to take for a child to get hurt. We then had a child hurt on the ward."The nurse added that the stats were likely lower than the real number because staff find it difficult to find time to report them. The nurse described how she felt some incidents were not being dealt with seriously enough."It is often put to us these children are unwell so in terms of reporting to the police we are made to feel we are doing wrong against the child."We are a secure ward and have to buzz people in and out."It's restrictions like that and some of the mental health patients we have to remove ligatures such as a hoody they then don't like because we are stopping them from hurting themselves."The biggest trouble is we do go up to 18. Most children's wards go to 16. it almost feels like people run scared because it is children." 'Punched in face' Another nurse said: "A lot of children are medically fit to go home. No one wants to take them because of their escalating behaviour. "It has caused a lot of holes in walls, damaged pipes and lots of staff being hit with people being punched in face."The nurse went on to describe how four registered mental health nurses were unable to restrain one teenage girl who was also verbally abusing staff."It is having a massive impact on patients and parents."She added: "One of my colleagues went off sick as this girl was smacking her head against the wall. The registered mental health nurses were just nurse said they have an "assessment unit for children to be assessed" which was then closed. This has left the hospital unit dealing with these cases."One teenager was ripping TVs off the wall, she broke a sink. The whole wall has had to be replaced it has ... led to probably at least 15 staff being off sick," the nurse nurse said that managers had done very little to address the situation apart from introducing a 'safe room' which has not been opened yet. Another nurse said: "We had a young person who was with us because she had taken an overdose and her behaviour escalated to the point that she was being looked after by three registered mental health agency nurses . "Her behaviour escalated and she assaulted nurses and security staff. She punched quite a few people." An NHS report in 2024 highlighted the difficulties of nursing teenagers on hospital wards alongside younger South West director of the Royal College of Nursing, Susan Masters, said it is a national problem, adding: "This trust (GWH) is the local provision. There isn't another provision anywhere else for these young people to go which is why its very difficult here."Children with physical health difficulties, young people with illnesses and procedures need a bright, distracting fun environment."Children and young people with mental health distress need the opposite-very calming very sombre. The other issue of course is specialist nursing staff."So currently these children are being cared for in an acute unit with children's' nurses that are not necessarily trained in specialist mental health services."A statement from GWH trust said: "We have individual rooms providing privacy and division between age groups, alongside two dedicated rooms for patients experiencing a mental health crisis."Many of the children and young people we care for need specialised care and we are planning to recruit specialist mental health nurses so that we have the expertise to better support children and young people with severe mental health needs."It's unacceptable that NHS staff face violence and abuse and we do all we can to keep our staff, patients and visitors safe."This is a national issue, however these incidents can be extremely distressing, and we offer a package of mental health support to our staff, which includes de-briefing sessions and counselling services."Our Never OK campaign, in partnership with Wiltshire Police, encourages staff to report all incidents and the police regularly visit the hospital and support our own security team."
