logo
NASA Cuts: What We Know as Trump Appoints Sean Duffy to Run Agency

NASA Cuts: What We Know as Trump Appoints Sean Duffy to Run Agency

Miami Herald10-07-2025
President Donald Trump has named Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy as the interim administrator of NASA, following his decision to withdraw the nomination of tech billionaire Jared Isaacman.
Duffy's appointment comes as the agency faces the prospect of significant budget cuts that could reshape NASA's priorities in the months ahead.
NASA's leadership change comes at a pivotal moment for the agency, which is already bracing for potentially severe funding cuts that could delay missions, scale back research, and limit partnerships with the private space sector.
It comes on the heels of a proposed White House budget for 2026 that would slash the agency's funding by 25 percent and eliminate more than 5,000 staff — cuts that, if enacted, would reduce the agency's budget and workforce to their smallest levels since the early 1960s.
Meanwhile, the appointment of Duffy — who has no direct experience in space policy — raises questions about the future direction of America's space program just as competition with China and other nations intensifies. The move also highlights growing tensions between Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, whose company SpaceX plays a critical role in U.S. space launches.
Trump announced Duffy's appointment in a social media post on Wednesday.
"Sean is doing a TREMENDOUS job in handling our Country's Transportation Affairs, including creating a state-of-the-art Air Traffic Control systems, while at the same time rebuilding our roads and bridges, making them efficient, and beautiful, again. He will be a fantastic leader of the ever more important Space Agency, even if only for a short period of time. Congratulations, and thank you, Sean," the president wrote in a post on Truth Social.
Shortly after the president's post, Duffy wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "Honored to accept this mission. Time to take over space. Let's launch."
Trump pulled the nomination of Isaacman - a private astronaut with close ties to Musk - on May 31, just days before the Senate had been set to vote on his nomination, and shortly after Musk's department from the government was announced.
Isaacman had made previous donations to Democrats; Trump said his decision came after a "thorough review of prior associations" as well as growing concern over "corporate entanglements." The president added that he would replace Isaacman with someone who was "[m]ission aligned."
The president defended his decision again over the weekend, saying it would have been "inappropriate" for someone so closely connected to Musk — and the private space industry — to oversee an agency that is central to Musk's business empire.
Musk, once a key Trump ally and head of the Department of Government Efficiency, left the administration amid a falling-out with the president over parts of Trump's agenda. Tensions between Duffy and Musk reportedly flared during a March cabinet meeting over alleged efforts to fire air traffic controllers as part of Musk's aggressive cost-cutting strategy.
Duffy will now take charge of the $25 billion NASA budget at a moment when the agency is bracing for deep cuts — a belt-tightening push that echoes some of the controversial cost-cutting measures Musk championed before his departure.
At least 2,145 senior-ranking NASA employees are set to depart as part of a sweeping push to shrink the agency's workforce — a move that could seriously disrupt White House space policy and drain NASA of decades of institutional expertise, experts suggest. According to documents obtained by Politico, the employees leaving include those in GS-13 to GS-15 positions — senior civil service grades typically reserved for staff with specialized skills or key management roles.
The departures are heavily concentrated at the top, with 875 GS-15 employees expected to exit. In total, the 2,145 senior staff make up the bulk of the 2,694 civil servants who have agreed to leave NASA through early retirements, buyouts, or deferred resignation offers — part of a wider administration effort to pare down the federal workforce.
Many of these departing employees are directly involved in NASA's core mission areas like science, human spaceflight, and deep space exploration. Of the total, 1,818 work on mission-related projects, while the rest handle critical support roles such as IT, facilities, or financial management.
The cuts have sparked backlash online. Democrat Senator Mark Kelly warned that forcing out more than 2,000 senior NASA staff could cripple America's ability to compete with China in space, comparing it to what might have happened if NASA had lost key leaders before the original moon landing.
"What would've happened if 2,000+ senior NASA leaders were pushed out before the moon landing? We would've lost the space race to the Soviets. And now we risk losing the next space race to China," he wrote on X.
Casey Dreier of The Planetary Society echoed that concern, saying the cuts stripped the agency of critical management and technical expertise and questioning what goal the administration hoped to achieve.
"You're losing the managerial and core technical expertise of the agency. What's the strategy and what do we hope to achieve here?" Dreier told Politico.
The losses are spread across all ten of NASA's regional centers, with Maryland's Goddard Space Flight Center being the hardest hit as it is set to cut 607 employees. Johnson Space Center in Texas will lose 366 staff, Kennedy Space Center in Florida will lose 311 and NASA headquarters in Washington will lose 307. Other key hubs, including Langley, Marshall, and Glenn Research Center, will also see steep reductions.
While some cuts align with the administration's goals — such as significant staff reductions at Goddard, a hub for climate and earth science missions the White House aims to scale back — analysts suggest other losses could undercut major priority areas, including plans to send astronauts back to the moon by 2027 and eventually to Mars.
So far, only about half the total workforce reductions the White House wants have been achieved, raising the possibility of forced layoffs if more employees don't opt in to the voluntary departure program before it closes on July 25.
Ultimately, the proposed cuts to NASA's staff and budget still need congressional approval — and lawmakers could push back. In March, the Senate Commerce Committee signaled its intent to protect the agency's workforce in its own budget blueprint, setting the stage for a potential clash over the future of America's space program.
NASA told Politico it remains committed to its core missions and is working with the White House to keep America at the forefront of space exploration, including plans for the Moon and Mars, despite the more constrained budget.
"NASA remains committed to our mission as we work within a more prioritized budget," said NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens. "We are working closely with the Administration to ensure that America continues to lead the way in space exploration, advancing progress on key goals, including the Moon and Mars."
On May 2, the Trump administration released its 2026 "skinny budget" request, outlining its funding plans for the next fiscal year — including a proposal to slash NASA's science budget by 47 percent to $3.9 billion.
According to new documents, the cuts would cancel several major missions and research efforts. The Mars Sample Return project, which aims to bring back material collected by the Perseverance rover, would be scrapped entirely. The New Horizons mission — which famously flew by Pluto in 2015 and is now studying the outer solar system — would also be cancelled, along with Juno, the probe that has been orbiting Jupiter since 2016.
Projects involving long-running Mars orbiters like Mars Odyssey and MAVEN would be terminated, and NASA's planned collaboration on the European Space Agency's Rosalind Franklin rover, set to launch in 2028 to search for signs of life, would be shelved.
"In total, this budget aims to cancel 41 science projects — fully a third of NASA's science portfolio," The Planetary Society said in a statement about the new budget documents. "These are unique projects that would require billions of new spending to replace."
Last week, seven former heads of NASA's Science Mission Directorate issued a joint letter to Congress condemning the White House's proposed 47 percent cuts. They urged the House appropriations committee "to preserve US leadership in space exploration and reject the unprecedented cuts to space science concocted by the White House's Budget Director, Russ Vought."
"The economics of these proposed cuts ignore a fundamental truth: investments in NASA science have been and are a powerful driver of the U.S. economy and technological leadership," the letter read.
The former officials pointed to past breakthroughs, writing: "In our former roles leading NASA's space science enterprise, we consistently saw skilled teams innovate in the face of seemingly impossible goals, including landing a car-sized rover on Mars with pinpoint precision, build a massive telescope that can unfold in the vacuum of space to unravel the mysteries of the cosmos, design and operate a spacecraft hardy enough to survive temperatures of many thousands of degrees at the Sun, inspiring young and old alike worldwide by the stunning images from the Hubble Space Telescope, and pioneering the use of small satellites for science."
They also warned the cuts could be to Beijing's advantage. "Global space competition extends far past Moon and Mars exploration," they wrote. "The Chinese space science program is aggressive, ambitious, and well-funded. It is proposing missions to return samples from Mars, explore Neptune, monitor climate change for the benefit of the Chinese industry and population, and peer into the universe – all activities that the FY 2026 NASA budget proposal indicates the US will abandon."
The administration is yet to announce its next choice for a permanent NASA administrator, but Duffy will replace Janet Petro, a veteran NASA executive, who was appointed acting head of the agency by the Trump administration in January.
Duffy's move to NASA is not the only example of Cabinet reshuffling under Trump. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, for example, currently holds two extra roles - acting national security adviser and interim national archivist.
Related Articles
Trump's Transportation Secretary Gets Additional Job TitleSatellite Image Shows 'Optical Phenomenon' Captured by NASA Over Peru LakeISS Astronauts Look Out Over the US-Can't Believe What They SeeNASA Detects Visitor From Outside Solar System
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress sends bill codifying $9B in DOGE cuts to Trump's desk
Congress sends bill codifying $9B in DOGE cuts to Trump's desk

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Congress sends bill codifying $9B in DOGE cuts to Trump's desk

House Republicans late Thursday night approved the first batch of cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), sending the $9 billion package to President Trump's desk in a big victory for the GOP. The legislation — which claws back already-approved federal funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting — cleared the chamber in a mostly party-line 216-213 vote less than one day after the Senate passed the measure. Trump is expected to sign the bill soon, as Republicans face a Friday deadline to enact the cuts or release the funds to the organizations they were appropriated for. The package takes aim at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS — two outlets that Republicans have labeled as biased — as well as the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which DOGE targeted early in the Trump administration. Republicans see the bill as a critical 'test run' for the party, as Trump administration officials have already indicated they aim to send multiple special requests to Congress to claw back more funding if the first package makes it through. The request initially sent by the White House, known as a rescissions package, called for $9.4 billion in cuts to federal funding previously approved by Congress, including $8.3 billion for USAID and foreign aid, as well as more than $1 billion in public broadcasting funds. But the White House ended up agreeing to exempt the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which was established under former President George W. Bush in 2003 and totaled about $400 million, after those cuts became a critical point of contention for moderate GOP lawmakers. Republicans said they also reached a deal with the administration seeking to shield tribal stations from cuts to the Corporation For Public Broadcasting. Republicans in both chambers have voiced strong support for the overall package and say the cuts are overdue. Many in the party have long scrutinized the scope of funding for foreign aid and accused public radio and television of political bias. But the proposal also saw some resistance from Senate GOP appropriators earlier this week. The skeptics scolded the administration for trying to make an end run around the normal appropriations process and complained the request didn't have enough information, particularly when compared to the last rescissions request approved by Congress under former President George H. W. Bush. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) specifically singled out a proposed $2.5 billion in cuts to the Development Assistance account. She noted in a statement that the account 'covers everything from basic education, to water and sanitation, to food security,' but said lawmakers still lacked key details as to how those programs would be affected. White House budget chief Russell Vought told reporters on Thursday that the administration 'gave the same amount of detail and information that previous rescissions packages had.' 'This is the same level of detail that appropriators do when they provide a bill,' he argued. 'They say this is the amount that we're providing, or they have a rescission, and they put the amount of rescission, same thing that they do.' He added that he respected people 'who are making the argument,' but he disagreed, noting the Office of Budget and Management worked with House appropriators while crafting the request. Some Republicans have also warned the president's use of the rare tool to secure cuts to funding previously approved by Congress risks further eroding trust between both parties as lawmakers ramp up their annual funding work. Vought said Thursday that another rescissions package is 'likely to come soon,' though he stopped short of offering specifics as to what programs could be on the chopping block. Senate Democrats have warned the passage of this rescissions package and further efforts by the Trump administration to claw back funding with GOP-only votes threaten already fragile bipartisan negotiations to hash out full-year government funding bills. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) earlier this month said passage of the rescissions package 'would be an affront to the bipartisan appropriations process.' 'That's why a number of Senate Republicans know it is absurd for them to expect Democrats to act as business as usual and engage in a bipartisan appropriations process to fund the government, while they concurrently plot to pass a purely partisan rescissions bill to defund those same programs negotiated on a bipartisan basis behind the scenes,' he continued, later adding: 'This is beyond a bait and switch – it is a bait and poison-to-kill.' At the same time, Vought also told reporters Thursday that the annual appropriations process 'has to be less bipartisan.' He added that the power of the purse remains with Congress, but he continued: 'It's a ceiling. It is not a floor. It is not the notion that you have to spend every last dollar of that.' Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, told The Hill shortly after his comments that Vought was 'absolutely wrong.' 'We have the power of the purse here, and we are not going to stand back and let the administration erode that.' With less than 20 legislative days on the calendar ahead of a Sept. 30 government shutdown deadline, both chambers are running behind in marking up and pushing their annual funding bills across the floor — increasing the likelihood that Congress will have to resort to a stopgap measure to keep the lights on and buy time for lawmakers to finish their funding work. But it remains an open question as to what that stopgap could look like. Asked if House GOP leadership has begun discussing plans for a short-term funding patch, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) told The Hill on Wednesday: 'No, we haven't talked about that.' 'We want the appropriations process to work and ultimately to get an agreement in a negotiation with the Senate, as the Senate finally starts passing bills,' he said.

House passes Trump's cuts to public broadcasting, foreign aid; next stop president's desk
House passes Trump's cuts to public broadcasting, foreign aid; next stop president's desk

USA Today

time10 minutes ago

  • USA Today

House passes Trump's cuts to public broadcasting, foreign aid; next stop president's desk

The GOP-led House gave final approval to the spending bill just ahead of a Friday midnight deadline otherwise the money under the law must be spent. WASHINGTON − President Donald Trump's push for $9 billion in spending cuts − slicing into public broadcasting stations PBS and NPR, as well as the United States' foreign aid efforts − crossed the Congressional finish line just after midnight on July 18 and soon will hit the Republican's desk for signature into law. The House approved the measure, in response to Trump's official request, in a 216-213 party line vote. Two Republicans voted no on the second-term president's plan, which represents just a fraction of the almost $200 billion that Trump's Department of Government Efficiency claims to have saved the federal government. A bulk of the cuts in the legislation strips away funding authorized by a previous law for foreign aid, including peacekeeping efforts and global health initiatives. More: Elmo and AIDS prevention: What is Congress targeting in their spending cuts? Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought said the amounts being slashed represent "wasteful and unnecessary spending," in the White House's formal request to Congress. Around $1 million will be taken from public broadcasting, including PBS and NPR. Local stations, which are much more reliant on federal grants than their national counterparts, are expected to bear the brunt of that lost funding. Congress barely met their July 18 midnight deadline to get the bill approved, otherwise the current funding would remains in place. The Senate passed its version of the spending cut bill earlier in the week after Republicans including Sen. Susan Collins successfully saved funding grants for AIDS prevention .

House passes public media, foreign aid clawbacks after Epstein scramble
House passes public media, foreign aid clawbacks after Epstein scramble

Politico

time11 minutes ago

  • Politico

House passes public media, foreign aid clawbacks after Epstein scramble

The president's budget director said Trump is likely to send more cutbacks requests to Congress 'soon.' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) walks to a vote at the U.S. Capitol July 2, 2025. (Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images) | AP By Katherine Tully-McManus and Jennifer Scholtes 07/18/2025 12:07 AM EDT Six months into Donald Trump's presidency, Congress finally codified a small piece of the hundreds of billions of dollars his Department of Government Efficiency pinpointed as 'waste.' House Republicans gave final approval just after midnight Friday to Trump's proposal to claw back $9 billion in public media and foreign assistance, greenlighting the Senate's changes to the measure that will bake in proposed DOGE cuts to public media and foreign aid. The package now heads to the president's desk. The House's 216-213 vote to clear the Senate-amended package comes less than 24 hours after the Senate voted to tweak the administration's original proposal that would have cut an additional $400 million from the global AIDS fighting program, PEPFAR. Senate Republicans also added language vowing that certain food assistance programs would be protected, and staved off impacts to other food aid, maternal health, malaria and tuberculosis-related initiatives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store