DC park will close after all for WorldPride weekend
The National Park Service said Friday it would temporarily close the park at the center of Washington's historic LGBTQ neighborhood ahead of the city's annual Pride weekend, moving forward with plans that local officials believed had been scrapped.
The temporary closure of DuPont Circle Park came at the request of the U.S. Park Police (USPP), the Park Service said in an order uploaded Friday to its website approving the installation of anti-scale fencing around the park's perimeter through 6 p.m. Sunday.
'Less restrictive measures will not suffice due to the security-based assessment of the USPP that this park area needs to be kept clear,' the Park Service said.
In a letter dated June 4, Major Frank Hilsher wrote to Kevin Griess, superintendent of National Mall and Memorial Parks, that the USPP's closure request 'is based solely on several previous years of assaultive, destructive and disorderly behavior exhibited in Dupont Circle during the DC Pride weekend.'
'The USPP maintains that a physical barrier effecting a full closure of Dupont Circle is necessary,' Hilsher wrote, to 'secure the park, deter potential violence, reduce the risk of destructive acts and decrease the need for extensive law enforcement presences.'
An earlier letter sent in April to USPP Chief Jessica M.E. Taylor from Pamela A. Smith, chief of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department, recommended that tall no-climb fences be temporarily installed around the park.
'Over the years, DuPont Circle Park has been a popular location for Pride attendees to congregate, despite not being a sanctioned Pride event,' Smith wrote in the letter. 'In the past five years, the Metropolitan Police Department and the United States Park Police have taken proactive steps, including increased police presence and enhanced lighting around the park.'
'However, significant challenges persisted, including unpermitted large gathering with sound equipment, illegal vending and grilling, alcohol use, multiple physical altercation, and vandalism of the historic fountain and statue,' she added.
Smith withdrew MPD's request to temporarily close the park earlier this week 'after hearing from community leaders and residents,' she wrote in a June 3 letter to Taylor.
In the same letter, Smith pointed to specific disruptions that influenced her initial request, including a 2019 arrest in DuPont Circle Park after parkgoers heard gunshots and vandalism during Pride weekend in 2023 that resulted in roughly $175,000 in damage to the park's more than 100-year-old fountain.
The park's closure is another obstacle for those in charge of WorldPride, an international LGBTQ Pride celebration taking place this year in Washington. The Capital Pride Alliance, the organizers of WorldPride DC, have hit several snags related to Trump administration policies that disproportionately affect LGBTQ people.
In April, the group issued a travel advisory for transgender visitors from abroad, citing President Trump's executive order recognizing only two sexes, male and female, and a new State Department policy barring trans, nonbinary and intersex Americans from updating the sex designations on their passports. The same month, the Capital Pride Alliance announced it was moving WorldPride events from the Kennedy Center to 'ensure our entire LGBTQ+ community will be welcome' following Trump's takeover of the cultural institution in February.
In posts on Truth Social, Trump said drag performances at the Kennedy Center 'will stop' under his leadership and called drag, an art form that is deeply rooted in LGBTQ culture and history, 'anti-American propaganda.' The White House has also declined to issue a proclamation for Pride month.
In an emailed statement, the Capital Pride Alliance said it 'is frustrated and disappointed in the National Park Service's decision – again – to close Dupont Circle during the culmination of WorldPride this weekend.'
'This beloved landmark is central to the community that WorldPride intends to celebrate and honor. It's much more than a park, for generations it's been a gathering place for DC's LGBTQ+ community, hosting first amendment assemblies and memorial services for those we lost to the AIDS epidemic and following tragic events like the Pulse nightclub shooting,' the group said. 'This sudden move was made overnight without consultation with the Capital Pride Alliance or other local officials.'
No official WorldPride activities were planned in DuPont Circle Park, the Capital Pride Alliance said, 'thus no events will be impacted.'
D.C. Councilmember Brooke Pinto (D-Ward 2), representing the DuPont Circle neighborhood, said she is 'extremely disappointed and frustrated' that the park will not remain open for Pride weekend.
'This closure is disheartening to me and so many in our community who wanted to celebrate World Pride at this iconic symbol of our city's historic LGBTQ+ community,' Pinto wrote Friday in a post on the social platform X. '. I wish I had better news to share.'
'World Pride will continue this weekend and it will be a time of celebration and commitment to uplift our LGBTQ+ neighbors,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
New York City pride march arrives amid growing national backlash
Advertisement Stacy Lentz, an owner of the Stonewall Inn, where the 1969 riots took place, and the CEO of an affiliated nonprofit, said she thought LGBTQ+ people and their supporters needed 'to get back to the roots of Pride and what happened at Stonewall because our rights are under attack in a way we haven't been in decades.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'I have had young folks ask me, 'What do you think it was like back then? How do you think people felt to be fighting for their rights?'' she said. 'I tell them we've never been closer to that time then we are right now. We all need to pick up the torch.' The New York march is the largest of its kind in the United States, with 75,000 participants and roughly 2 million spectators, according to organizers. It is also broadcast on network television, a testament to how much public support for LGBTQ+ people has grown over a generation. Advertisement But backlash against LGBTQ+ rights has increased since same-sex marriage became legal nationwide almost exactly 10 years ago. The fallout has mainly, though not solely, affected transgender people. 'The gay and lesbian movement succeeded beyond the expectations of the founders,' said David K. Johnson, a professor of history at the University of South Florida. 'But now trans people are the most vulnerable members of the LGBTQ community, which is why I think sometimes using the term LGBTQ actually obscures more than it explains.' Over the past three years, Americans have become more supportive of laws that limit transgender rights, according to the Pew Research Center. A majority of adults now support laws that ban gender-affirming care for minors and require trans people to play on sports teams based on their sex at birth. A poll released by Gallup in May showed that 54% of Americans -- up from 51% four years ago -- said that it was morally wrong to change one's gender. The share of Americans who said that homosexuality was morally wrong had risen much further, from 25% in 2022 to 33% in 2025. 'As my grandma used to say, 'Now we are hustling backward,'' said Sean Ebony Coleman, the founder and CEO of Destination Tomorrow, an LGBTQ+ center in the Bronx. Transgender individuals and their allies have been hit hard by the anti-diversity fervor of the Trump administration, which spent heavily on campaign ads attacking trans people in the months leading up to last year's presidential election. Advertisement Soon after President Donald Trump took office, he issued a series of executive orders seeking to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion programs and limit the rights of transgender individuals. One order barred federal contractors or those that received federal grant money from making use of DEI policies. That set off a confusing scramble in the private sector, leading many corporations to cut back or cancel their donations to Pride events in New York and around the country. Another executive order banned openly transgender people from serving in the military, while another stated that the federal government would recognize only two unchangeable sexes -- male and female -- and banned the use of federal funds for the promotion of 'gender ideology,' a term whose legal definition is unclear. All the orders have been challenged in court, but they have severely harmed the nation's LGBTQ+ organizations, many of which rely on federal grants to provide social services to older adults, young people or those struggling with issues such as substance abuse or homelessness. The administration has also canceled roughly $800 million worth of grants on topics related to LGBTQ+ people, a move that has devastated research programs focused on LGBTQ+ health. The amount of canceled funds was wildly out of proportion to the number of LGBTQ+ people in the United States. Roughly half of all the research funding canceled by the administration was dedicated to the health of LGBTQ+ individuals, who make up about 10% of the population. (BEGIN OPTIONAL TRIM.) The ban on 'gender ideology' and DEI has also led to a number of symbolic affronts. In February, the National Park Service removed references to trans people from the webpages of the Stonewall National Monument. And last week, the U.S. Navy renamed a ship that had honored Harvey Milk, one of the country's first openly gay elected officials, who was assassinated in 1978. Advertisement The LGBTQ+ movement has also suffered a series of Supreme Court defeats in recent weeks. The court ruled that the Trump administration could begin enforcing a ban on transgender troops in the military. It upheld the rights of parents to withdraw their children from public schools when LGBTQ+ themes are discussed. It sided with a heterosexual woman who claimed her gay co-workers had discriminated against her. And it upheld a ban on gender-affirming care for young people. (END OPTIONAL TRIM.) The parade is also the occasion for ideological fights within the movement itself. Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch criticized organizers over their decision to ban the Gay Officers Action League from fully participating in this year's parade. She said that the organizers had refused to allow officers to carry guns, which she said are an integral part of their dress uniform. It is the 'height of hypocrisy to request the security and protection of thousands of armed, uniformed police officers for the march on Sunday and then ban from that event the very officers that proudly represent your community,' Tisch wrote in a letter Saturday that was shared with The New York Times. 'In a year when LGBTQ+ rights are under siege in ways we had thought were behind us, this is the time to stand together, not to splinter.' She and members of the group plan to protest their exclusion at 11 a.m. Eastern near the parade route, according to a department news release. Police and corrections officers had been banned from marching as a group at Pride since 2021 in the aftermath of the George Floyd protests and widespread criticism of violence by law enforcement officers. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
Gov. Healey calls same-sex marriage and abortion access "non-negotiable" in Massachusetts
Ten years after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and three years after it overturned Roe v. Wade, Gov. Maura Healey said both topics are "non-negotiable" in Massachusetts and vowed to protect them. On the 10th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage nationally, one of the nation's most prominent gay politicians, Healey, was asked if she thought that right was secure in the face of a movement among some Republican lawmakers at the state level to ask the court to reverse its position, a possibility mentioned by conservative Justices Thomas and Alito. "Non-issue here in Massachusetts" "It's a non-issue here in Massachusetts," she said. "Marriage is marriage, whether you're gay or not, and that's the law here. It's going to continue to be that way." Healey said the same about abortion rights in Massachusetts. "This is the third anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, and I'll also just say that abortion rights, abortion access, access to reproductive health care, is non-negotiable. In Massachusetts, we're going to continue to protect that right, continue to protect patients, providers and others who need that care," Healey said. Massachusetts energy costs In the meantime, Healey says she's intently focused on curbing the high cost of living in Massachusetts, most recently with legislation aimed at bringing down energy costs. "We need to get as much energy into the region as possible. I've been saying this for years, and I don't really care what form of energy that is, I just want more supply so that we can drive costs down," she says. Does that mean Healey is dropping her past opposition to new gas pipelines? "We already have gas coming in, and I support that. It's very important that we continue to build out solar, that we bring wind in. We need to do everything. There is a reason that the states, you know, the states in this country that are have the fastest growth in wind and solar, Texas, Louisiana, you know, so called red states, because this is where we need to go. Everybody needs energy. We're consuming so much energy now with our devices, with AI coming.... It's why I convened all the New England governors and the state of New York, along with the Canadian premiers recently, to have a discussion about how we can bring more energy into the region from Canada." Antisemitism in Massachusetts Healey also claimed she had "immediately" pressured officials at the Massachusetts Teachers Association to remove antisemitic material from a teacher "resource" section of their website when it became public a few months ago. "I had direct conversations with union officials asking them to remove that from the website. I've also said, because we've seen a rise in antisemitism around this country, and even incidents here in Massachusetts, there is no place for anti-Semitism. I don't tolerate it, and we all need to work together to speak out to denounce that kind of bigotry and hatred and racism and xenophobia in all forms." Healey also discussed tax policy, vowing to revisit raising the amount of wealth exempted from the estate tax and keep an eye on the impact of the income surtax on business. You can watch part one of our two-part interview with the governor here on-demand; join us next Sunday morning at 8:30 a.m. when Healey directly rebuts the criticisms of her potential Republican challengers in the 2026 election, on the Sunday edition of "Keller At Large."
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
John Roberts slams ‘dangerous' rhetoric against courts after SCOTUS handed Trump a major win
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts decried the 'dangerous' hot rhetoric being wielded against judges for simply 'doing his or her job' by interpreting the law — after the court handed President Trump a major win by limiting the power of judges to make sweeping injunctions. Roberts urged politicians to bring down the temperature and warned that the inflammatory attacks on the judiciary can fuel political violence. 'I've been compelled over the past few years to make statements about people on one side of the aisle – their views on judges – and on the other side,' Roberts said during a judges' conference in Charlotte, North Carolina. Advertisement 'It becomes wrapped up in the political dispute that a judge who's doing his or her job is part of the problem,' he added. 'And the danger, of course, is somebody might pick up on that. And we have had, of course, serious threats of violence and murder of judges just simply for doing their work.' 'So, I think the political people on both sides of the aisle need to keep that in mind.' 4 Chief Justice John Roberts argued that judges are merely doing their jobs of interpreting the law. AP Advertisement 4 The Supreme Court has been forced to deal with numerous politically charged cases. AP Roberts' remarks came a day after the high court concluded its term and handed down decisions in hotly contested cases such as ending the lower courts' ability to issue sweeping nationwide injunctions, and giving Maryland parents a win in their quest to opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed storybooks in classrooms. The chief justice refrained from speaking about those major cases during his remarks at the conference in Charlotte. Fears about political violence have been on the rise. Earlier this month, a sicko gunned down former Minnesota state House Speaker Melissa Hortman, her husband and wounded Minnesota state Sen. John Hoffman as well as his wife. Advertisement This prompted lawmakers on Capitol Hill to demand more security. Last year, Congress voted on a measure to spend some $25 million to beef up protection for the nine Supreme Court justices. 4 The Supreme Court wrapped up its term last Friday. REUTERS Back in April, a man who was apprehended outside conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home entered a guilty plea for trying to assassinate him. Roberts also chalked up criticism over the high court's opinions to anger from the losing side and stressed that every case has a losing side. Advertisement 'It's not the judge's fault that a correct interpretation of the law meant that, no, you don't get to do this,' the chief justice said. 'If it's just venting because you lost, then that's not terribly helpful.' Roberts didn't single out any politicians specifically. 4 President Trump has seethed against court rulings that have scuttled his executive actions. AP Earlier this year, he issued a rare statement that seemingly rebuffed President Trump's assertion that certain 'crooked' federal judges should be impeached for ruling against his administration. 'For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,' Roberts hit back in March. During his Saturday conversation, Roberts spoke with the 4th Circuit's Chief Judge Albert Diaz, who noted the high court had six significant decisions on its final day, including the Louisiana redistricting case that it punted until the next term. 'Things were a little crunched toward the end this year,' Roberts admitted, hinting that the Supreme Court may 'try to space it out a little better next year, I suppose.'
