
Idiotic ‘cap-and-invest' program hurt California — and it may be coming NY next
On Tuesday, the campaign team of Republican candidate for governor Steve Hilton posted a picture of the especially high prices at a Chevron station in Los Angeles. 'Downtown L.A. – almost $8 a gallon!' they wrote.
One reason could be the latest update of California's 'Low Carbon Fuel Standard,' a carbon credit trading program, which kicked in on July 1. The update had been estimated to add 65 cents per gallon to the cost of gasoline.
5 Sky-high gas prices across California are not just about the cost of gas — but the added cost of state policies such as the cap-and-invest scheme.
Getty Images
But that's only part of the state's war on petroleum products. There's also the 'cap-and-trade' program. It drives the cost of energy — and the cost of living — higher in California by requiring refineries, utilities and manufacturers to buy 'allowances' to emit greenhouse gases.
The revenue from auctioning the allowances goes into the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, conveniently located in the state treasury. The legislature spends the money on projects that supposedly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Currently, 25% of the revenue is spent to build California's high-speed rail boondoggle.
The state has raised tens of billions of dollars by selling these permits and has thrown hundreds of millions of dollars at such things as 'equitable building decarbonization' and an 'alternative manure management program.' More than $6 billion has gone to the high-speed rail project. Billions more have gone out in grants to various governments, agencies, authorities, commissions, districts and developers.
California's cap-and-trade program is set to expire in 2030, which would immediately lower prices statewide, but Gov. Gavin Newsom now says he intends to extend the newly renamed 'cap-and-invest' program through 2045, with $1 billion per year designated for the high-speed rail project.
All of this, minus the bullet train, could be coming to New York.
In 2019, New York enacted The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. It created a 'Climate Action Council' to determine how the state would reduce greenhouse gas emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, and then achieve 'carbon neutrality' by 2050.
5 Despite the added costs and regulation, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has made clear he will extends the program's lifespan.
AP
The Climate Action Council spent two years formulating targets for slashing the number of homes using natural gas water heaters and furnaces, replacing gasoline-powered cars with electric vehicles, and generating 70% of the state's electricity from 'renewables.' The mechanism to make this happen? A 'cap-and-invest' program.
The idea of these programs is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by charging 'polluters' a lot of money for a gradually declining number of 'allowances' to operate their businesses. Then the money raised can be spent on projects that further reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
But higher energy costs drive up the price of everything that's made or transported in the state, including food. According to the Census Bureau, California has the highest poverty rate in the nation when the cost of living is considered.
5 New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has put (some of) the brakes on her state's potential cap-and-invest initiative, but the plan could still come to fruition.
Matt Roberts/Shutterstock
In a confession that this drives up energy prices to the consumer, California's cap-and-trade program reserves some of its funds to give state residents an annual credit on their energy bills to partially compensate for the higher costs.
Is it worth the cost? All of California accounts for only about 1% of global greenhouse gas emissions, but state officials maintain that California must show global leadership.
Who's following, and how is it going?
On January 1, 2023, the state of Washington became the only other state to implement an economy-wide 'cap-and-invest' program. Less than six months later on June 21, the Seattle Times headlined, 'WA gas prices now highest in U.S.; some experts point to new climate legislation.'
5 Some 25% of California's cap-and-invest revenue is being used to fund the state's high-speed rail system.
AP
One of those experts was Severin Borenstein, University of California Berkeley professor of business administration and public policy, who was invited by state lawmakers to explain the jump in fuel prices. He said there was no question that the cap-and-invest program was raising gas prices in Washington. He calculated that if carbon allowances cost $50 per metric ton of greenhouse gases, 'the price of gasoline goes up about 50 cents per gallon.' The Oil Price Information Service reached the same conclusion.
In Canada, Quebec and Ontario adopted cap-and-trade programs, but Ontario bailed out in 2018. 'It was costly, it was ineffective, it was killing jobs, it's gone today,' said Environment Minister Rod Phillips.
There are signs that Gov. Hochul has cold feet about going forward with the cap-and-invest program that has been in the works for New York. In March, the Department of Environmental Conservation issued proposed regulations for the state's 'Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program' revealing that even this preliminary step would not begin until June 1, 2027. That puts the start of higher gas prices safely past the next election.
5 University of California Professor Severin Borenstein says there is no doubt that California's cap-and-invest scheme has helped make the state among the costliest in the nation.
Berkeley
It's transparently evident that cap-and-invest programs are just a hidden tax on energy to fill up slush funds for politicians to spend on the kinds of things that people choose not to buy with their own hard-earned money.
Fair warning, New York.
Susan Shelley is a columnist and editorial writer with the Southern California News Group, and VP of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. On X: @Susan_Shelley.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump says he's going to reduce Putin's 50 day deadline to end Ukraine war
WASHINGTON — President Trump said Monday he's looking to reduce the 50-day deadline he gave Russian President Vladimir Putin to stop the war in Ukraine. 'I'm disappointed in President Putin, very disappointed at him,' the president said ahead of his meeting with UK President Keir Starmer in Scotland. 'So we're going to have to look, and I'm going to reduce that 50 days — that I gave him — to a lesser number, because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen.' 3 Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. Getty Images 3 A Ukrainian rescuer works to extinguish a fire at the site of an aerial attack in Kharkiv on July 24, 2025, amid the Russian invasion in Ukraine. AFP via Getty Images Trump had threatened Putin on July 14 to negotiate a cease-fire with Ukraine in 50 days — or face brutal secondary sanctions that could ravage Russia's economy even more. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been open to meeting Putin to negotiate the end of the three-year war, but the Kremlin has been tepid about sending the Russian president to meet for direct talks, choosing to engage with lower staff first. The three Ukraine-Russia delegation meetings held in Turkey in the past few months have not successfully established a cease-fire, but have led to prisoner swaps. 3 Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, speaks with Vladimir Vladimirov, the governor of Stavropol Territory, during their meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Monday, July 28, 2025. AP Meanwhile, Trump has phoned Putin directly and has tried to be a mediator in the war between him in Zelensky. He's said that Putin tells him he wants to end the war, only to go on directing missiles strikes on Ukraine. 'We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever. You have bodies lying all over the street,' Trump went on in Scotland. 'And I say that's not the way to do it. So we'll see what happens with that.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WATCH: Gabbard's Obama bombshell has GOP demanding accountability while Dems question timing as 'distraction'
After reports that top officials from the Obama administration allegedly orchestrated a coordinated attempt to sabotage President Donald Trump's 2016 election victory, GOP lawmakers are calling for transparency and accountability, while their Democratic colleagues are questioning the timing and credibility of the new claims. Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, released a trove of intelligence documents beginning last week that Gabbard has said show former President Barack Obama and some of his closest advisors promoted a "contrived narrative" that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to sabotage Trump. However, Democrats have insisted that congressional investigations already prove that Russia did help Trump in the 2016 election, while also questioning the timing of the allegations due to pressure on Trump to release more Epstein files. "It is profoundly dishonest, and it's dangerous," Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz told Fox News Digital, in reference to the allegations from Gabbard. "What I have urged the administration to do is engage in radical transparency, make it all public and expose just how much the Obama administration knew what they were doing – that they knew they were lying. I think anybody that violated the law needs to be held accountable." Dni Gabbard Claims 'Deep State Actors' Didn't Want Trump-russia Information To 'See The Light Of Day' But Democratic California Sen. Adam Schiff told Fox News Digital he thinks the allegations are moot, pointing to former FBI Director Robert Mueller's 2019 report, which he said "documented Russia's efforts to help denigrate Hillary Clinton, which gave a boost to the Trump campaign. Read On The Fox News App "I think what Gabbard and her staff are doing is dishonest," he added. However, Republican Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford argued it has "long been established" that the Steele dossier was "clearly a Clinton plant" and that the Clinton campaign was actually "cooperating with the Russians to be able to actually use the Russians to be able to interfere with President Trump's campaign." "What Tulsi Gabbard is pulling out is to say, 'How deep did this go into the White House that they knew about the Steele Dossier, they knew it was a Clinton document. When did they start pushing this out, and what official resources were they using to try to add validity to this to be able to undercut the election?'" Lankford said. "We got a long way to go still, but it's good to be able to get all information out, to be able to pull it out there and to say, 'Let's let everybody look at it and let the chips fall where they may.'" Obama-era Officials Mum On Allegations Of 'Manufactured' Intelligence Launching Trump-russia Probe Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., said he believed Gabbard was doing the right thing, also expressing hope for extreme transparency amid the alarming allegations. "Part of what this election was about, it was about transparency and government accountability. And that's exactly what [Gabbard] is trying to do, and that's exactly what the Trump administration is trying to do," Scott said. "Let's get the people the facts. Let's follow where the facts are. If somebody's done anything, we'll hold them accountable. So, i think the right process is what's happening." Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., a former CIA analyst, questioned the timing of Gabbard's release of the information, saying even her 10-year-old nephew understood the move as "a dodge and a distraction" to get eyes off the ongoing Epstein controversy. Amid Gabbard's document release at the beginning of last week, Trump has been facing calls from within the GOP for the release of more documents and information pertaining to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. "President Trump had four years in his first term, and all the time since then, to go after this issue, and he picks the same day that his name appears in the Epstein files to talk about Barack Obama," Slotkin told Fox News Digital. "American people are not dumb. Like, we get it. Trump wanted to talk about something different. I have to see these reports, and see how they're sourced. … I like to read and make my own assessment. But the timing can't be missed. The president is trying to dodge and distract you." While partisan affiliation may play a part in how lawmakers and the broader public view the Obama allegations released by Gabbard, Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., said he thinks the issue "transcends" party affiliation. "Republican, Democrat, I mean, you know, this is something that transcends all that. This is really important," Boozman told Fox News Digital. "Hopefully we'll have open transparency so people will understand what's going on. And whatever it is, I'm sure Congress will be involved, and certainly the Justice Department is involved. So, I think these are all good things."Original article source: WATCH: Gabbard's Obama bombshell has GOP demanding accountability while Dems question timing as 'distraction'


Politico
41 minutes ago
- Politico
Capitol agenda: John Thune's pre-recess game plan
Senators are racing the clock to make a dent in both the government funding process and President Donald Trump's backlog of nominees before heading home for August recess. Senate Majority Leader John Thune is hoping to get the first appropriations package through the chamber by the end of this week, with lawmakers on the hook for landing a deal to avoid a shutdown come Sept. 30. To that end, GOP leaders are negotiating with members of their conference over a 'minibus' of three bills that would, collectively, fund the departments of Commerce, Justice, Agriculture and Veterans Affairs, as well as key military construction projects and the FDA. Sen. John Kennedy's (R-La.) opposition to including legislation that would fund congressional operations will likely force leadership to postpone debating a fourth bill at this time. The pending package will require senators to run out two, 30-hour debate clocks; the ability to move faster will require buy-in from all 100 senators. It will also take time for lawmakers of both parties to agree on amendments and then hold votes, and Democrats are still deliberating their strategy, according to a person granted anonymity to share private negotiations. Republican leadership still believes it can pass the mini-bus before leaving town, according to a second person granted anonymity. But one potential fallback option, according to two people granted anonymity, could be for the Senate to schedule a final passage vote before they leave town for the first week back in September. Senate Republicans are also under pressure from Trump to confirm more of his nominees before heading home for recess. Thune has warned his members to prepare to vote at least through this weekend after the president urged senators to stay in Washington through August to wrap up the work, though many lawmakers aren't pleased with that idea. They're eager, instead, to get back to their home states, especially as they look to counter Democratic messaging against the freshly-passed GOP megabill. Other Senate Republicans say they're ready to give Trump what he's after. Over the weekend, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) repeatedly urged his colleagues to either work through August to advance nominations or cancel all pro-forma sessions over the next month to allow Trump to make recess appointments. 'The Senate can't have it both ways,' Lee said in a post on X. Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley also said he's on board with the president's call for the Senate to stick around to vote on nominations through August, writing on X, 'Trump needs his administration in place.' Republicans have typically been unenthused by the idea of recess appointments, though, and it's unlikely they'd go along with that plan. And while Thune is threatening to keep the Senate in session deeper into August, many lawmakers view it as just that: a threat to get Democrats to cut a deals on nominations to get out of town. 'I think it's fair to say that we're going keep the pressure on the Democrats to, you know, stay here until either they cooperate or we're just going to grind it out and do it the old fashioned way,' Thune told POLITICO. What else we're watching: — What lawmakers do about Gaza: As the U.S. pulls out of ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza deepens, GOP leaders say Hamas' inability to cooperate is damaging any hopes of progress in the region. Democratic leaders, meanwhile, are sending dire warnings to Israel — and telling Trump his administration needs to take urgent action. — Johnson's Epstein headache persists: Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) are determined to finish collecting the 218 necessary signatures to force a floor vote compelling the release of more Jeffrey Epstein files. Their bill will be eligible for a floor vote upon the House's return in September.