Provinces 'hold the key' to building more homes, new report argues
No province earned a grade higher than C+ in the report assembled by the Task Force for Housing and Climate, a non-governmental body that was struck in 2023 with backing from the philanthropic Clean Economy Fund.
The task force's "report card" evaluated governments based on their policies for building homes quickly and sustainably.
It gave the federal government the highest grade in the country — a B — while Alberta ranked at the bottom of the pile with a D+. The rest of the provinces' scores were in the C range.
Mike Moffatt, the report's author and founding director of the Missing Middle Initiative at the University of Ottawa, suggested that the provinces have thus far avoided "scrutiny" for their role in perpetuating the housing crisis, while Ottawa and the cities have taken the heat for red tape and high costs.
"Provinces really hold the key here. They have the most policy levers and, in many cases, they've actually done the least," he said.
The task force is co-chaired by former Edmonton mayor Don Iveson and former deputy leader of the federal Conservatives Lisa Raitt. Prime Minister Mark Carney was one of the group's members before becoming federal Liberal leader.
'Currently, no government is doing enough to get these homes built," said Raitt in a statement accompanying the report.
The task force compiled its report card based on its evaluations of government policies to encourage factory-built housing, fill in market gaps, boost density, map high-risk areas and update building codes.
The report found plenty of variability even within provinces, said He said both Saskatchewan and Ontario are doing well on building away from high-risk areas but are falling short on increasing density.
The report gave British Columbia, Quebec and Prince Edward Island a score of C+ — the highest score received by any province.
Moffat said BC's grade suffered because while it encourages density "on paper," its slow permit approvals and high building costs frustrate development.
While Alberta is doing well on the pace of housing starts alone, he said, that's mostly due to leadership at the municipal level in Calgary and Edmonton — not provincial policy.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said in the provincial legislature in November that the government was "not standing in the way of the private sector to build more affordable housing." She said increasing housing supply would "automatically" bring down costs for Albertans.
Moffatt said Smith's stance is "correct" — lowering barriers to development is critical to expanding the supply of affordable housing — but that's "only part of the story."
He said Alberta has to take "responsibility" for the housing demand it induces through its successful marketing campaign to lure Ontarians to the province.
Moffatt said the province also has to make sure homes are built sustainably and not in the path of wildfires, and can't abdicate its responsibility for filling gaps in social housing.
"We need both. We need a strong, robust private sector to deliver housing, but we also need government to come in and fill in the gaps," he said.
Moffatt said the provinces are falling behind on mapping flood plains and need to take responsibility for provincial legislation that leads to higher development charges.
He noted that the report card was based only on implemented policies and did not capture the impact of proposed legislation such as Ontario's Bill 17, which is meant to speed up permits and approvals, simplify development charges and fast-track infrastructure projects.
The report said the federal government's housing accelerator fund, which encourages municipalities to simplify zoning rules to get more shovels in the ground, has made progress but needs enforcement tools to keep cities accountable after they strike funding deals with Ottawa.
Moffatt said he hopes to use the report card framework to track progress on housing goals in the future, and to work on separate research to evaluate municipalities' housing policies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Albertans drinking way less booze than they used to, lead the country in cannabis sales
Social Sharing It's been well documented by now that Canadians are drinking less than they used to, but no other province has seen a greater reduction than Alberta. You know those giant bottles of vodka you can get at Costco? The 4.5-litre ones? That's how much less booze the average Albertan drank last year, compared to how much they drank in 2008. Put another way: 107 fewer beers, per person, per year. Back at its peak in 2008, Alberta led all provinces in drinking, with 9.7 litres of pure alcohol consumed per person aged 15 and over. It has since relinquished that title to Newfoundland and Labrador, which last year led the country at 8.3 litres per person. Alberta rang in at 7.6 litres per person last year, a decline of 1.9 litres from its peak consumption. That ties it with Saskatchewan for the largest decline from peak in the two decades' worth of data tracked by Statistics Canada. (You might be wondering: Why is age 15 used for the per-capita calculation, instead of 18, the legal drinking age? Statistics Canada has adopted this cutoff as it's the standard used internationally for per-capita alcohol sales.) Sky-high cannabis sales At the same time, cannabis sales in Alberta have been on the rise. They've grown in every year that Statistics Canada has tracked this data. Albertans led the country in legal cannabis consumption by a substantial margin last year, with an average of $248 spent per person of legal age to buy it. The next closest province was Saskatchewan, at $205. Quebec saw the least in cannabis sales, at just $96 per person. It might seem easy to connect the dots here and assume Albertans are drinking less because they're consuming more cannabis instead, but it's not quite so simple to draw a one-to-one connection between the two trends, says Michael Armstrong, a professor at Brock University's Goodman School of Business, whose research has focused on this topic. Looking at the big-picture numbers, he says there "was no obvious, sudden drop" in alcohol consumption once cannabis was legalized in Canada in 2018. "No large number of Canadians suddenly said, 'Hey, I'm going to start smoking joints instead of drinking beer,'" Armstrong said. He believes Alberta's sky-high sales of legal weed is more related to the sheer number of stores in this province. "Alberta was ahead of most other provinces on store openings and also therefore on sales," Armstrong said. "For a while in 2019-2020, it had more stores than all other provinces combined. It currently has the third-largest number of stores per capita, only slightly behind Manitoba and Saskatchewan; it has about 12 times the retail density of Quebec." Armstrong believes the decline in drinking is more complicated. Because alcohol is much more of an established industry, he says it's hard to pinpoint one dominant factor behind the decline. Rather, he says, there are "many individual factors" at play. Culture, health and non-alcoholic options Many of these factors are not unique to Alberta. Young adults, in particular, appear to be drinking less, in part due to the cost of alcohol and in part due to shifting norms in drinking culture. Then there's the recently revamped guidance from the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, which set much lower thresholds for low-risk drinking than had previously been advised by Health Canada. There was a spike in alcohol consumption during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic but, ever since, drinking has generally been on the decline. This has coincided with the wider availability of non-alcoholic beers, wines and "mocktails." A recent report from NielsenIQ, a consumer intelligence firm, found annual sales of non-alcoholic beverages in Canada had surged to $199 million last year year, up from $137 million two years prior. "As consumers increasingly prioritize wellness and moderation in their daily routines, non-alcohol products have become an appealing choice for those seeking to incorporate it into their alcohol-consumption habits," the report reads. That's certainly been a factor for Nikki Guilcher, a Calgary resident who says the quality and diversity of non-alcoholic options has greatly improved. She says both she and her husband have been drinking less traditional beer and more non-alcoholic beer lately, and it's a trend among a group of women she hikes with, as well. "At the top of the mountain we'll have a drink and usually at least half of us have got a non-alcoholic beer," Guilcher said. It's a similar story for Calgarian Kent Vuong. "I'm turning 41 pretty soon and I don't know if it's just an age thing but ... I feel a lot more bloated and it gives me headaches, like after a single drink," he said. "And when I'm out socializing with people, I'll just trend toward having a non-alcoholic beer." Price and future consumers The decline in drinking in Alberta long predates the rise in non-alcoholic options, however. Apart from the pandemic bump in 2020, alcohol consumption has been generally trending downward since its peak in 2008. That's also the year Alberta introduced a mandatory minimum drink price at licensed establishments. The prices may seem quaint by today's standards, but the 2008 law set a floor of $1.75 for a five-ounce glass of wine, $2.75 for a regular-sized can of beer and $3.20 for a pint. Consumers have continued to pay more and more for booze ever since, which Armstrong noted is not the case for cannabis, which began being sold legally in late 2018. From December 2018 to May 2025, he said, alcohol prices in Alberta have grown by 14 per cent, while cannabis prices have actually declined by 38 per cent. Today, he said, "the price of an intoxicated evening" on cannabis is far lower than what it would cost to get a similar buzz from alcohol. And while he said there's no strong evidence to date that people are switching from alcohol to cannabis in large numbers, Armstrong wonders if that will start to change in the future, as children who grew up with both substances being legal enter into adulthood. "I think what we will see is not a big jump of current drinkers switching to cannabis, as much as future consumers choosing cannabis who otherwise would have chosen alcohol," he said.
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
Tale of two cities: Why Edmonton builds homes faster than Toronto
Canada started building only slightly more homes in June than it did in May, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. (CMHC) said on Wednesday. Compared to May, the annual rate of housing starts was largely flat with a 0.4 per cent increase, but it rose 14 per cent compared to this time last year. The national numbers mask stark regional disparities, however. 'Through the first six months of the year, national housing starts have increased marginally compared to 2024, however, new home construction varies significantly across Canada,' said Kevin Hughes, deputy chief economist at CMHC. Over the first six months of 2024, Edmonton started building 8,448 homes. That compares to 10,868 in the first six months this year — a jump of 29 per cent. Calgary also saw a significant improvement in the first six months of this year with a 32 per cent jump in housing starts to 14,712 compared to 11,178 in the first half of 2024. Story continues below advertisement 'Calgary and Edmonton have just been streets ahead of other cities and (especially) a lot of cities in Ontario, for instance, in making their zoning bylaws simpler as well as less restrictive,' said Carolyn Whitzman, senior housing researcher and adjunct professor at University of Toronto School of Cities. One of the biggest laggards when it comes to housing starts is the country's largest city. In the first months of 2024, Toronto started building 22,529 homes. This year, that number has dropped to 12,575 — a 44 per cent decline. 'Edmonton is one of the fastest cities in Canada when it comes to approving new housing and communities in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) are amongst the slowest. And that is certainly playing a role here,' said Mike Moffatt, founding director of the Missing Middle Initiative at the University of Ottawa. 'Toronto doesn't seem to be waking up and smelling the coffee,' Whitzman said, adding that cities such as Calgary and Edmonton end up with more housing starts because they prioritize building 'missing middle' housing. In many Canadian cities, strict zoning laws mean developers can build either single-family homes or condo towers. Homes that are neither — such as sixplexes and fourplexes — are often referred to as the 'missing middle' by advocates and researchers. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Most of the homes that we've built over the last 40 or 50 years have been one of two varieties. They've been either single detached homes or they've been highrise condos. And both of those markets are having problems right now in our more expensive cities,' Moffatt said. Story continues below advertisement He added, 'Single detached homes have become so expensive, (many) middle class families can't afford them. And highrises serve a particular market and that's not really in demand right now.' A large part of Edmonton's success comes down to its approach to zoning, Whitzman said, an issue where Toronto seems to lag. Last week, the city council voted against a zoning bylaw that would limit mid-block infills to a maximum of eight units. 'Toronto is still betting on big, big, big condos that aren't doing well,' she said. 'Last week, a proposal that had been agreed on with the federal government to OK six units as-of-right with no parking minimums got restricted to a relatively small part of the central city. That gives you a sense of different kinds of approaches that different cities are taking.' Whitzman was referring to a Toronto city council decision that allowed the building of sixplexes in only nine city wards, with suburbs having the choice to opt in. In the rest of southern Ontario, the housing starts data is a mixed bag, with cities such as Hamilton and Ottawa building more than they did last year while others are building less., Meanwhile, British Columbia has started building more houses in two of the most expensive markets in the country. Vancouver saw 3,079 housing starts last month, compared to 1,767 in June last year, marking an increase of 74 per cent. Meanwhile, Victoria saw an increase of 187 per cent in housing starts. Whitzman said provincial support for the housing sector can be a major driver of housing starts. Story continues below advertisement B.C. is betting big on prefabricated or modular housing. In September last year, B.C. released a catalogue of pre-approved housing designs for prefab housing. Pre-fabricated housing or prefab construction is a method of building where the bulk of the construction happens off-site, often in a facility like a factory. Either a fully-constructed modular home or parts of a house are then shipped off to the location, where it is assembled and connected to utilities. '[B.C. has] got a much better sense of housing targets (compared to Ontario). It's providing much more funding to non-market developers. Some of the development in B.C., I can say with confidence, is non-market development, assisted by B.C.,' Whitzman said. Next week, Vancouver city council will consider rezoning 4,294 parcels of land in central parts of the city to allow larger buildings, including highrises. 1:58 New realtor trends emerging as housing market cools National picture While the country is building more houses than it did last year, experts still worry it is not nearly enough. Story continues below advertisement 'It's hard to get excited about June's housing starts. They were up 14 per cent year-over-year, which sounds impressive, but it adds up to about 2,700 units. That's not the kind of growth the country can really celebrate at this point,' said Clay Jarvis, mortgage expert at NerdWallet Canada. The slight 0.4 per cent increase compared to last month is meager, he continued. 'Any increase builders can notch in the current economic climate is somewhat of a win, but it's not moving the needle.' Jarvis added that U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war is also going to add more pressure on developers counting costs. 'It's hard to see starts taking a leap while the trade war with the U.S. drags on,' he said. 'Developers were already facing high building costs before Trump's tariffs were announced, and now they don't know how much it'll cost to complete their projects. That's a lot of risk to take on when there are millions of dollars at stake,' Jarvis said.
Edmonton Journal
2 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: Transportation minister needs to stay in his lane
Article content Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen recently wrote to the mayors of both Edmonton and Calgary with 'concerns' about bike lanes. His first letter to Edmonton called for the cancellation of the 132nd Avenue project, but the letter to Calgary was more vague, stating 'we need to seriously consider on how to maintain adequate capacity for motor vehicle traffic flow for current and future traffic needs, not reducing capacity.' Article content Article content If Dreeshen is concerned about the movement of traffic through the city, he should support more transportation options, not fewer. Traffic doesn't just include cars, it includes people who walk, take transit and, yes, ride bikes. Article content Calgary city council has, in fact, been too hesitant in building cycling infrastructure. It has allowed the downtown cycle track to slowly crumble year after year, never making permanent what was built in the pilot project phase. This would be unacceptable if it were a road built for cars. Article content Much of the pathways end abruptly and large swaths of the city, including some of Calgary's lowest-income neighbourhoods, have little to no cycling infrastructure at all. Article content Buying and maintaining a car is a huge financial burden and one that should be optional. Thanks to inflation, people are forced to pay more of their income into their vehicles. If Dreeshen's concern is making life easier for Albertans, he'd make it so we wouldn't need to. Article content Article content Adding more car traffic lanes in cities with limited space isn't going to solve traffic problems. If anything, it forces everything to spread out, which in turn forces us all into cars. It's a vicious cycle that we have been doing for decades, and stretches both municipal and personal budgets. Article content I know Dreeshen supports transportation options. He made it legal to drive golf carts on roads in his home riding last year. So why does he want to constrain options in Alberta's cities? Article content The research is abundant — giving people options to get around not only reduces traffic congestion, but improves quality of life. Article content Additionally, being able to experience the city around you in a way that is impossible to do in a car also feels pretty dang good. Since the initial build out of the downtown cycle track, other factors have induced a boom in people riding for transportation. Bike shops saw a boom during pandemic restrictions, and Calgary streets that were converted to active transportation were well used.
