North Sydney Council to introduce ticketed access to New Year's Eve observation spot
North Sydney councillors on Monday night decided to implement 'ticketed access' to Blues Point, a popular vantage point that fronts Sydney Harbour and the Harbour Bridge.
It was a decision that councillors say was made 'with a heavy heart', Mayor Zoe Baker said, citing already high New Year's Eve expenditure and a poor budget position as decisive factors in the decision.
'I share your principle on this and have and every year that I've been on this council, I've always voted to keep public open space free and access free,' Ms Baker told the council meeting.
'But unfortunately, we as a council and a governing body have inherited a really precarious financial position that has not been relieved … And so it is with an exceptionally heavy heart that I find myself supporting the motion for one year only.'
'Councillors every year that I've been on the council (17), have written to state governments of varying political persuasions to the same response, which is no.
'I'm hopeful that this Labor state government, who are committed to public access to the foreshore for the fireworks, may be persuaded to provide us, even if it were with the amount that we're seeking to recover, so that we don't have to proceed with the closing of Blue's Point Reserve.'
Ms Baker pointed out the ticketed area was one location in a local government area 'blessed with foreshore access and vantage points'.
'So if you cannot afford a ticket for Blues Point, then I'd urge you to go to Bradfield Park to Mary Booth Lookout to Kurraba Point, to Crem Point, to Waverton, to Carradeh Park, and every other vantage point … to see the fireworks on public land for free.'
The council area boasts three renowned vantage points for the show, namely Bradfield Park, Lavender Bay and Blues Point, with thousands of punters descending on the spots on December 31 to take in the party.
The council is looking to sell 8000 tickets for $50 each.
Councillor Nicole Antonini said the cost to the council of hosting New Year's Eve celebrations was already over a million dollars and the implementation of the paid zone would reduce the cost to council by around $300,000 alone.
'Unfortunately … we're in a difficult position. This is not ideal, it's certainly not the preference of most of this council, but in our current financial situation, we have little choice, and for this year only, I support the recommendation of ticketing for this one site.'
The report to North Sydney Council outlined three options for the 2025-26 event.
Option 1 involved ticketing across all three spots to achieve 'full cost recovery'.
Option 2 involved 'partial cost recovery', with ticketing limited to Blues Point, and Option 3 involved continuing with 'free managed access'.
The motion to endorse option 2 was carried.
Local resident Davie MacDonald said he 'heartily opposed' the idea but if it had to happen, wanted to see an amendment allowing local residents continued access to the area.
'The cost imposed onto young families of being able to go and enjoy the fireworks, especially because there is special fireworks on before 9 o'clock, and I think that impulse against young families, and even for local residents is something that I think you need to take a careful consideration,' Mr MacDonald said.
'I especially look to the progressive people in this chamber, my Labor friends here, and my green friend there, Councillor Hoy, that you must consider very carefully how this impacts on working people.
'Let me tell you, I'm here begging for this, and I never go to a New Year's Eve fireworks display, I actually think it's a waste of money and a terrible waste in that respect, but I ask you to at least, if you're going to accept having a fee there, that there's some kind of modification (for locals).'
Previously access to all three sites was free.
Council costs for the event include providing toilets and bins and crowd and traffic management.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
9 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Uncertain future after state's snap poll
The Liberals and Labor have kept the same number of seats in Tasmania, as two weeks of counting wrapped up in the state's snap election. Eighteen seats were needed to form a majority government but both parties fell short, the incumbent government secured 14 seats, Labor won 10 and the Greens five and other parties getting six. The final count played out on Saturday in the electorate of Bass in a race between Labor candidate Geoff Lyons and independent George Razay, seeing the independent take the final seat by 674 votes. Opposition leader Dean Winter introduced a motion of no confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockcliff in June, sparking a second state election within 16 months. NewsWire / Richard Jupe Credit: News Corp Australia It was the second time Tasmanians voted within 16 months, after a no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff introduced by Labor leader Dean Winter passed 18-17 in June. Mr Winter claimed the botched roll out of new Spirit of Tasmania vessels, the state of the budget and the controversial Macquarie Point Stadium project were examples of Mr Rockliff's failed leadership. Instead of resigning, Mr Rockliff remained Premier, requesting a snap poll be held to determine his fate instead. Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff was criticised over the budget and controversial plans to sell public owned companies which he scrapped in June. NCA NewsWire/ Nikki Davis-Jones Credit: News Corp Australia Tasmanian Governor Barbara Baker approved the request, deciding there would be no alternative as the Opposition leader refused to put together a minority coalition of his own and the Liberal Party room 'unanimously' supported Premier Rockliff continue in his role. Following the election, the embattled Liberal government won most of the seats but fell short of the 18 required to form a majority government. Party leaders now need support from crossbenchers to form a minority Liberal Party needs support from four crossbenchers to remain in government, while Labor requires support from The Greens and two crossbenchers to form a minority.
News.com.au
34 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Tasmania election counting ends with major parties retaining the same number of seats
The Liberals and Labor have kept the same number of seats in Tasmania, as two weeks of counting wrapped up in the state's snap election. Eighteen seats were needed to form a majority government but both parties fell short, the incumbent government secured 14 seats, Labor won 10 and the Greens five and other parties getting six. The final count played out on Saturday in the electorate of Bass in a race between Labor candidate Geoff Lyons and independent George Razay, seeing the independent take the final seat by 674 votes. It was the second time Tasmanians voted within 16 months, after a no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff introduced by Labor leader Dean Winter passed 18-17 in June. Mr Winter claimed the botched roll out of new Spirit of Tasmania vessels, the state of the budget and the controversial Macquarie Point Stadium project were examples of Mr Rockliff's failed leadership. Instead of resigning, Mr Rockliff remained Premier, requesting a snap poll be held to determine his fate instead. Tasmanian Governor Barbara Baker approved the request, deciding there would be no alternative as the Opposition leader refused to put together a minority coalition of his own and the Liberal Party room 'unanimously' supported Premier Rockliff continue in his role. Following the election, the embattled Liberal government won most of the seats but fell short of the 18 required to form a majority government. Party leaders now need support from crossbenchers to form a minority government. The Liberal Party needs support from four crossbenchers to remain in government, while Labor requires support from The Greens and two crossbenchers to form a minority.
The Advertiser
4 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
