logo
Pro-Jewish Groups Back Ingrassia's Nomination to Head Office of Special Counsel

Pro-Jewish Groups Back Ingrassia's Nomination to Head Office of Special Counsel

Epoch Times4 hours ago
Three pro-Jewish groups are throwing their support behind President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Office of Special Counsel and urge the Senate to advance his confirmation.
Paul Ingrassia, an attorney and former podcast host who Trump has tapped to investigate federal government wrongdoing, was scheduled to testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee on July 24 before the panel put his hearing on hold.
Ingrassia's nomination has faced scrutiny from opponents over alleged ties to individuals with anti-Semitic beliefs, which Ingrassia has vigorously denied.
The Israeli Heritage Foundation, Combat Antisemitism Movement, and Zionist Organization of America have stepped forward to back Ingrassia for the role, saying they view him as an ally.
'Anyone who knows Paul knows that he can outwork his peers and is a victim of jealousy,' Israeli Heritage Foundation President Stephen Soloway wrote in a letter to committee chairman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Soloway called Ingrassia a 'real 'mensch,'' citing Ingrassia's interest in participating in the organization's speakers' program.
Soloway, also an ambassador of the Israeli Defense and Security Forum, said his letter is 'not an endorsement for a political position or job,' but rather 'a statement regarding the character of this fine man: A true friend of the Jewish people.'
Staffed by about 110 employees, the Office of Special Counsel is an independent federal agency with broad prosecutorial and investigative powers to probe fraud, waste, and abuse in the executive branch. It can access agency records and subpoena witnesses, and plays a crucial role in protecting whistleblowers from retaliation.
Ingrassia pointed to the office's newly-launched investigation into Jack Smith, the Department of Justice special counsel who opened two federal criminal cases against Trump during the Biden administration. The high stakes involved in the new investigation have made the nomination particularly contentious, Ingrassia said in a statement to The Epoch Times.
Morton Klein, leader of the Zionist Organization of America, was cited in a July 9 CNN article as stating he didn't know Ingrassia and hadn't endorsed him. After the article was published, however, Klein clarified his position, saying that while he 'didn't clearly recall endorsing him' at the time, he had in fact done so in late June during a Newsmax interview.
Klein told Paul and ranking member Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) in a July 17 letter that speaking with Ingrassia further had strengthened his support.
He mentioned Ingrassia's 'heartfelt emotion' when the pair spoke about the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attack on Israel. Klein said Ingrassia described it as 'monstrous atrocity of murder, rape and torture against innocent Jews reminiscent of the Nazi Holocaust;' words that Klein said resonated with him, as a child of Holocaust survivors who had lost most of his family.
Some Democratic lawmakers who object to Ingrassia's confirmation have cited his alleged links to Nick Fuentes, a far-right political pundit who has promoted hatred against Jews.
Ingrassia said that while he argued against Fuentes's suspension from X in a Substack article, the point was not to support Fuentes, but rather to advocate 'that no one gets censored' by the platform 'unless they violate the First Amendment.'
'That would include a lot of people who were silenced over the last five years and that was the extent of any sort of connection,' Ingrassia told The Epoch Times.
In their conversation, Klein said Ingrassia condemned Fuentes's views on the Holocaust and Jews and described them as 'abhorrent and despicable.'
Arie Lipnick, who represents the board of governors for the global coalition Combat Antisemitism Movement, said in a letter to Paul that Ingrassia has pledged to provide educational resources on anti-Semitism as part of the effort to stem religious discrimination that Lipnick said has escalated in the United States at an alarming rate.
Lipnick requested that the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee advance Ingrassia 'without delay,' describing 'an urgent priority for the Jewish community to see nominees who will fight against the scourge of antisemitism confirmed to office.'
Klein, in his letter, asked the lawmakers to weigh the nomination on merit.
'His background as an attorney and commentator uniquely qualifies him for this position: a political outsider with a reformist mindset who is unafraid to identify and tackle waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement throughout our federal civil service,' he wrote.
At 30, Ingrassia is one of the youngest nominees for a high office in the administration, a factor that critics have cited when questioning his qualifications.
Since graduating from Cornell Law School in 2022, Ingrassia has twice served as a fellow at the conservative Claremont Institute and became an advisory board member for the New York Young Republican Club. He was a White House intern during Trump's first term and has worked as a law clerk at the McBride Law Firm, which is known for representing Jan. 6 defendants.
Ingrassia was the White House's liaison to the Justice Department at the start of the new administration before becoming the White House liaison to the Department of Homeland Security.
He said he has distinguished himself 'on the campaign trail as the president's go-to source for legal and political commentary.'
'I've written over 200 articles, over a million words over the last 2 years advocating for President Trump and the end of the weaponized justice system, the end of weaponized lawfare, and the president cited me alongside Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley and other prominent legal commentators in court,' he said.
At the Department of Homeland Security, Ingrassia said he has overseen the hiring of more than 200 political appointees, including vetting attorneys and policy specialists in areas ranging from immigration enforcement, cybersecurity, border security, and disaster management.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom's big pivot on Big Oil
Newsom's big pivot on Big Oil

Politico

time3 hours ago

  • Politico

Newsom's big pivot on Big Oil

With help from Camille von Kaenel and Noah Baustin OIL ABOUT-FACE: Gov. Gavin Newsom spent the last four years provoking the Big Oil boogeyman. Now, it's haunting him. Newsom's casting of oil companies as the villain behind the state's perpetually high fuel prices seemingly signaled the industry's waning influence in Sacramento as recently as last year's special session. But then two of the state's nine refineries announced closure plans, leaving the governor and Democratic lawmakers scrambling to boost in-state oil supply and find potential buyers to keep the facilities pumping out gasoline and avert shortages that some experts estimate could drive gas prices up by as much as $1.21 per gallon by next August — just as midterm elections will be heating up. The pivot is emblematic of a national Democratic party course correction on cost-of-living issues in the wake of the presidential election — and provides a real-time demonstration of the political risks of pursuing an aggressive transition away from fossil fuels. 'The reality is, if those refineries close and we have increased gas prices, it's going to be a problem for everybody,' said Andrew Acosta, a veteran California Democratic campaign consultant. 'Not just Gavin Newsom, but every Democrat running for office.' The shift has left groups that thought they had Newsom on the anti-Big Oil train with whiplash. Newsom announced a fracking ban in 2021, spearheaded a lawsuit to hold major oil companies liable for climate change damages and pushed legislation to consider a cap on oil industry profits — all while castigating the industry as a corrupt force fleecing Californians. 'They have been raking in unprecedented profits because they can,' Newsom said in October while signing a bill requiring refiners to store more gas to prevent shortages, a concept the industry warned would backfire. 'They've been screwing you for years and years and years.' Fast forward to June, when Newsom's administration unveiled a suite of proposals to keep refineries solvent, including streamlined permitting for more in-state drilling in Kern County. Newsom's office has since circulated a draft bill mirroring those recommendations. 'Refineries all across the globe are struggling,' Newsom said after the proposals were released. 'We've got some challenges, and so just require some new considerations.' And even some environmentalists are having second thoughts after Phillips 66 announced in October that it would close its Southern California refinery by the end of 2025, followed in April when Valero announced the planned closure of its Northern California facility in 2026. 'I think Democrats sort of failed to read the room, perhaps in a way that, unfortunately, Trump did,' said Katelyn Roedner Sutter, California director for the Environmental Defense Fund. 'If we're not acknowledging people's day-to-day reality and the challenges they face, it's really hard for them to care about the existential threat that is climate change.' Newsom spokespeople pointed to the governor's comments during a press conference last week where he called the approach 'completely consistent' with the state's climate agenda, which has 'always been about finding a just transition.' While recent polling shows California voters still want their leaders to fight climate change, the state faces a unique set of circumstances that make the transition particularly complicated. California has long operated as a fuel island, meaning it doesn't have the infrastructure necessary to pipe in refined gasoline from its neighbor and quickly respond to gas shortages when refineries go offline. That leads to price spikes like in 2022 and 2023, when average prices soared past $5 per gallon. Colin Murphy, deputy director of the University of California, Davis' Policy Institute for Energy, Environment and the Economy, said that isolation has given the handful of oil companies that operate refineries in the state outsize power to control the market, and that California lawmakers underestimated the industry's willingness to wield that power. The oil industry intends to continue pressing its advantage. Andy Walz, Chevron's president of downstream, midstream and chemicals, said California officials have made the state 'uninvestable' for companies like his and is pushing to unwind key pieces of the state's climate agenda, like its cap-and-trade program and rules aimed at reducing emissions from oil tankers and other ships that dock in the state's ports. 'I don't think they believed the industry was in trouble,' Walz said of California officials. 'I think they misread what was really going on, and it took some real action by some competitors to get them woken up.' Newsom's draft bill does include olive branches to environmental justice groups that have been left feeling burned — including a well stimulation ban and a requirement for drillers to plug two wells for every new well they make — but that hasn't dampened their frustration. EJ advocates are preparing to go to the mat in what's setting up to be an end-of-session brawl. 'It seems like a lot of our elected officials are driven above all by a fear that they'll be blamed for high gas prices,' said Bill Magavern, policy director at Coalition for Clean Air. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! REFINING THE LANGUAGE: Environmental justice groups have their counter-offer to Newsom's proposal to bolster in-state oil supply to stop refineries from closing and keep gas prices in check. Fifty environmental and community groups signed onto a Friday letter to Newsom, Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire and Speaker Robert Rivas asking to significantly amend Newsom's draft oil legislation. The groups include the Los Angeles chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility, the Asian Pacific Environmental Network and the VISIÓN Coalition (notably, they do not include major environmental organizations like the Environmental Defense Fund and the Natural Resources Defense Council.) Among their chief asks: if state officials are going to streamline more crude extraction in Kern County, they should cap the number of new wells at 500 (compared to the nearly 3,000 in the local ordinance Kern County adopted earlier this year) and include a 2035 sunset date. They also want to require refiners to disclose more of their business when they tell the state they are considering closing. Faraz Rizvi, APEN's campaign and policy manager, said the goal was to offer a counter-solution to the oil and gas industry's wish list. 'We are trying to hold the line as best as we can to ensure we're protecting communities while also understanding the way the winds are turning,' he said. — CvK CHARGED UP: California's network of batteries installed at peoples' homes is now capable of moving the needle on the state's entire grid, according to a new industry report commissioned by Sunrun and Tesla. A group of virtual power plant aggregators delivered an average of 535 megawatts to the California grid last Tuesday from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m., according to a report from research firm Brattle. The energy came from over 100,000 residential batteries, mostly Tesla-manufactured. It was the most energy Sunrun, the largest aggregator of the group, has dispatched from a single distributed power plant in a night. The deliveries were part of a pre-planned test to assess the performance of virtual power plants ahead of the state's hottest months, when their services are most needed. And to Sunrun execs, it was a success — and a major step toward the dream of having batteries on everyday people's property provide utility-scale value to the grid. 'This is no longer a future thing, this is a now thing,' said Chris Rauscher, Sunrun's VP of grid services and electrification. The state was rocked by blackouts in 2020. That led to a push for increased storage to help keep the lights on during extreme heat. At the time, California had about 245 megawatts of residential battery storage capacity. That figure has climbed seven-fold to 1,829 MW as of this April, according to California Energy Commission data. — NB GRID GAMES: Environmental groups are opening their pocketbooks in a fight over how much control California should have over a proposed regional energy market. EDF Action and NRDC Action Fund — political arms of the Environmental Defense Fund and Natural Resources Defense Council — announced a six-figure ad campaign Monday pushing state lawmakers to amend Sen. Josh Becker's SB 540, which would establish a West-wide energy market. The ad calls on lawmakers to 'fix' the bill by removing language they argue would dissuade other states from joining an expanded regional market, including a proposed regional council that could remove California energy providers from the market. EDF and NRDC, original co-sponsors, pulled their support last month after Becker amended the bill to include the council after pushback from some unions and ratepayer advocates who argue a regional market could allow the Trump administration to hamper the state's climate goals and expose residents to rate hikes. Backers of the original language say giving California officials too much control of the market would 'make it unappealing or even impossible' for regional energy suppliers to join. Newsom and Assembly Speaker Rivas have committed to getting regionalization over the finish line this session, though the governor has made clear that the policy could come through a different vehicle than SB 540. — AN SETTING THE AGENDA: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit: The California Agenda. Come see the Golden State's most prominent political figures — including Sen. Alex Padilla and gubernatorial candidates Katie Porter and Xavier Becerra — share the stage with influential voices in tech, energy, housing and other areas at the forefront of the state's most critical policy debates. The live and streamed event is free, but advance registration is required. Stay tuned for more on speakers and discussion topics, and request an invite here. — NASA will announce plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon, according to documents obtained by POLITICO. — State water regulators told Los Angeles decades ago to take less water from Mono Lake, but the city still hasn't met its requirements. — Are you wondering how tariffs could impact clean energy? Just look at past U.S. solar panel policy.

Palestinians' unrealistic two-state solution: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 5, 2025
Palestinians' unrealistic two-state solution: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 5, 2025

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Palestinians' unrealistic two-state solution: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 5, 2025

The Issue: A two-state solution to the Israel-Hamas war which would establish Palestinian statehood. As Michael Goodwin points out so well, the true and only goal of Palestinians is the destruction of Israel ('Time to abandon '2-state delusion,' ' Aug. 3). The creation of what would be a jihadist state alongside Israel would pose an existential threat. Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas' vision of a two-state solution, including a Judenrein Palestinian state, would end Israel's existence as a Jewish state; this doesn't promise a peaceful Palestinian state that can coexist peacefully with Israel. Advertisement It is time, as Goodwin observed correctly, to bury the two-state delusion. Daniel Trigoboff Williamsville Advertisement It looks like Hamas is the one setting the terms for the end of hostilities. Propaganda pictures, plus media complicity, have the world crying for statehood for Palestinians. Hamas murdered over 1,200 innocents, took over 250 people hostage and people think statehood will make them peaceful. Sylvia Kane Advertisement Brooklyn Is the push by the current leaders of France, Britain and Canada for the establishment of a Palestinian state simply delusional, or is it born out of antisemitism? Gazans elected Hamas to lead them, which has been a total failure. The idea of a Palestinian state is utterly ignorant of history. Advertisement Jack Weinberg Manhattan There are dangers in a two-state solution, especially if there are no adequate military restrictions placed on the Palestinian state. However, opponents of the two-state solution have an obligation to propose an alternative which protects the rights and interests of both Jews and Arabs. In principle, everyone living in the current occupied territories should have equal political and civil rights to Israelis, although they may be expressed through different regional legislatures. Bruce Couchman Toronto, Ontario If I were the leader of a country, and I were asked whether I favor a two-state solution, my response would be: Yes, but don't ask me that question again until you show me proof that both states are willing to recognize the other. Currently, one side has solidified its position that the other state must be wiped off the face of the earth. So, until that has changed, we cannot consider the two-state solution. Advertisement Joseph Carbonaro Saratoga Springs Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The Issue: Ghislaine Maxwell's move to the minimum-security 'Club Fed' prison in Texas. Ghislaine Maxwell's life of privilege continues with a transfer to a minimum security prison in Texas (' 'Max' to minimum,' Aug. 2). Advertisement No reason has been made public, and more importantly, the victims of her crimes were not notified. I hope someone is using the Freedom of Information Act to get more details. Her transfer coincided with a two-day deposition by the Department of Justice, making it even more important to know why it occurred. Is there a quid pro quo? If yes, it had better be a good one. Otherwise, there is no reason to make her life easier than those she damaged forever. Phil Serpico Advertisement Queens Why are President Trump and Justice Department officials doing everything possible to prevent the Epstein files from being released? Why don't they want Ghislaine Maxwell to provide the names of the powerful, very wealthy and influential pedophiles who paid Jeffrey Epstein to arrange for them to have sex with young girls? Advertisement And why was Maxwell quietly moved to the cushy 'Club Fed' prison as she pushed for a deal to tell all about Epstein and his well-known clients? Daniel Robinowitz Dallas, Texas Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

Charlamagne slams ‘The View' for not featuring any conservative guests
Charlamagne slams ‘The View' for not featuring any conservative guests

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Charlamagne slams ‘The View' for not featuring any conservative guests

'The Breakfast Club' host Charlamagne tha God slammed 'The View' on Monday for lacking conservative voices on the show. 'Thank you, Lara Trump, for having me on 'My View.' I enjoyed the conversation. I think it's ridiculous that 'The View' has had … 102 left-leaning guests and zero conservatives,' Charlamagne said on 'The Breakfast Club' on Monday, after appearing on Fox News' 'My View with Lara Trump' on Saturday. Advertisement 'That is ridiculous to have a platform and … only talk to people that you agree with. That makes no sense whatsoever to me,' he said of the liberal ABC daytime talk show, which features Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg, among other hosts. None of the show's six current hosts, including former Donald Trump aide Alyssa Farah Griffin, supported Trump in 2024. Charlamagne appeared on Lara Trump's Fox News show to share his thoughts on who should make a White House run in 2028 and the lack of viewpoint diversity in the media. 3 Charlamagne appeared on Lara Trump's Fox News show to share his thoughts on who should make a White House run in 2028. Getty Images Advertisement The discussion touched on 'The View,' a notoriously anti-Trump show, being the subject of a recent study by the Media Research Center (MRC). The ABC News program continued to display an overwhelming lack of balance during the first seven months of 2025 with 102 left-leaning guests and zero conservatives, according to the MRC. It was unclear how many Republicans or conservatives, if any, had been invited, who may have then declined. The MRC analyzed every episode of 'The View' from January 6, when the program returned from a winter hiatus, through July 25, and found that it failed to book a single right-leaning guest to discuss politics. The watchdog previously found in April that the show booked 63 liberal guests and zero conservatives. 3 None of the show's six current hosts, including former Donald Trump aide Alyssa Farah Griffin, supported Trump in 2024. ABC Advertisement 3 The discussion touched on 'The View,' a notoriously anti-Trump show, being the subject of a recent study by the Media Research Center (MRC). Invision ''The View' is not shy about the fact that what they say and do is all meant to push the agenda of the Democratic Party, whether it's smearing Trump and his allies or specifically elevating Democratic politicians. It's why they've only spoken to liberals about politics on the show so far this year,' NewsBusters associate editor Nicholas Fondacaro told Fox News Digital. Fox News Digital reached out to representatives from 'The View' for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store