logo
Can interest rate on PPF fall below 6.5% after repo rate cut of 1% this year?

Can interest rate on PPF fall below 6.5% after repo rate cut of 1% this year?

Economic Times2 days ago

ET Online The government is set to review the interest rates for small savings schemes like the Public Provident Fund (PPF), National Savings Certificate (NSC), Senior Citizens Savings Scheme (SCSS), and more, on June 30, 2025. So far, the interest rates on the Post Office Savings Scheme have stayed the same since the beginning of the year. But that may change now as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has significantly reduced the repo rate by a total of 1% this year. Bond yields have also adjusted to the falling interest rate, and banks have followed the suit by lowering the interest rates on fixed deposits.
PPF is currently offering an interest rate of 7.1% which is very close to the lowest interest rate seen in the last 5 decades. Last time, PPF interest rate was seen below 7% was before August 1974. PPF being one of the most popular small saving schemes for long term investment, where investors have been used to expecting an attractive interest rate, any significant drop in interest rate could take the returns to a historically low level and may leave many disappointed. Let us check out how likely it is.
Also Read: Are PPF, NSC and other small savings scheme interest rate headed for historic lows? How the Government decides PPF interest The interest rate on PPF is based on a formula recommended by the Shyamala Gopinath Committee. Following the committee's suggestions, the PPF interest rate is pegged 25 basis points above the average of a 10-year G-Sec yield for the previous quarter.According to data available on investing.com, the average yield for the 10-year G-Sec was 6.319% between March 25, 2025, and June 25, 2025. When you add those 25 basis points, the PPF interest rate comes out to 6.569%. It is crucial to note that the formula recommended by the committee is not binding on the government. Can the government bring the PPF interest rate below 6.5%? ET Wealth online spoke to experts about whether the government can lower the PPF interest rate below 6.5% if the bond yield continues to fall. Here is what they have to say:
Namrata Mittal, Chief Economist, SBI Mutual Fund, says: Shyamala Gopinath Committee (2010) on Small Savings was tasked to review the interest rate structures and administration of small savings in India, including the PPF. The committee had recommended that interest rates for small savings schemes like PPF, should be linked to market yields of government securities (G-secs) of similar maturity. Specifically for PPF, the rate should be linked to the average yield of 10-year government bonds, with a spread of 25 bps above it, thus allowing the PPF rate to be more adaptable to changing economic conditions. However, the resets haven't truly been in line with the committee's recommendations. They have remained constant at 7.1% since April 2020. The committee has suggested that the government should reset these interest rates annually, aligned with the previous year's G-sec average yields. The average 10-year G-sec in FY25 was approximately 6.8-6.9%. Therefore, the 25 bps of mark-up could maintain the PPF rate at 7.1%. Plus, the small savings collection is moderating. The government collected Rs 4.5 trillion under small savings and PPF (combined) in FY24. It's likely to decrease to Rs 4.3 trillion in FY25 (RE stands at 4.1 trillion) and is projected to further decline to Rs 3.4 trillion in FY26 (according to Budgets). The slowdown in small savings is the combined effect of high base (from investment limits upgrade in Union budget 2024) and better returns in alternate avenues of financial savings (like capital market). In this context, a negative shift in interest rate seems less probable.
Suresh Darak, Founder, Bondbazaar, says: "While we have seen short-term interest rates drop with the latest round of Repo rate and CRR rate cuts, the 10-year G-Sec has continued to trade in a narrow range around 6.5% for the last five years. Since PPF is a long-term investment with a 15-year lock-in, its returns are unlikely to be pegged below 6.5%. Moreover, the returns on PPF investment at 7.1% is already lower compared to other government saving schemes such as Senior Citizens Savings Scheme (8.2%), Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana (8.2%) and Kisan Vikas Patra (7.5%). PPF provides stable long-term financing to the government, unlike G-Sec, which is more susceptible to market forces and geopolitical risks. Lowering the interest rate on PPF from this level may lead to an outflow of funds to other investment avenues. Thus, it is unlikely that there will be a significant cut in PPF rate, and it should not go below 6.5%."
Vineet Agrawal, Cofounder, Jiraaf, a Bond Investment platform, says: The PPF interest rate has held steady at 7.1% for an extended period, despite notable shifts in the interest rate environment. As per the Shyamala Gopinath committee's recommendations, small savings rates-including PPF-should be market-linked and set within a band of 25 to 100 basis points above the yields of government securities with similar maturities. Currently, the 10-year G-sec yield has dropped below 6.5% and is stabilising around 6.3% in response to the 100 basis points repo rate cut seen this year. The growing divergence suggests that the current PPF rate exceeds the recommended spread. With falling G-sec yields, the Finance Ministry will likely move to realign the PPF rate in the coming quarter. While a reduction below 6.5% is technically feasible, any such move would need to weigh alignment with market rates against the political and social sensitivities of lowering returns on a key household savings instrument.
Adhil Shetty, CEO, BankBazaar.com, says: It is important to remember that the formula recommended by the Shyamala Gopinath Committee is indicative and not binding, and the government has frequently deviated from it. The government can reduce the PPF interest rate below 6.5% if G-sec yields fall. However, PPF and other small savings are heavily influenced by political, behavioural, and economic factors. PPF is a household savings favourite, and reducing it to below 6.5% can have a serious impact on middle-class and retirement savers. A sharp cut could push savers to exit formal channels or chase riskier products, thereby undermining financial inclusion goals. The government will be wary of any drastic cuts in small savings rates. However, given the high liquidity and falling repo rates, slow correction over time cannot be ruled out. Has the PPF, since its inception, had an interest rate below 6.5%? According to data available from the National Savings Institute, the interest rate on PPF has dipped below 6.5% on four occasions. Initially, when the PPF was launched, it was offering an interest rate of 4.8% from 1968-69 to 1969-70. Following that, from 1970-71 to 1972-73, the PPF scheme offered 5% interest. In 1973-74, the rate increased to 5.3% and then from April 1, 1974, to July 31, 1974, it rose to 5.8%.
PPF interest rate since inception
YEAR RATE OF INTEREST (%) 1968-69 TO 1969-70 4.8 1970-71 TO 1972-73 5 1973-74 5.3 01.04.1974 TO 31.07.1974 5.8 01.08.1974 TO 31.03.1975 7 1975-76 TO 1976-77 7 1977-78 TO 1979-80 7.5 1980-81 8 1981-82 TO 1982-83 8.5 1983-84 9 1984-85 9.5 1985-86 10 1986-87 TO 1998-99 12 01.04.1999 TO 14.01.2000 12 15.01.2000 TO 28.02.2001 11 01.03.2001 TO 28.02.2002 9.5 01.03.2002 TO 28.02.2003 9 01.03.2003 TO 30.11.2011 8 01.12.2011 TO 31.03.2012 8.6 01.04.2012 TO 31.03.2013 8.8 01.04.2013 TO 31.03.2016 8.7 01.04.2016 TO 30.09.2016 8.1 01.10.2016 TO 31.03.2017 8 01.04.2017 TO 30.06.2017 7.9 01.07.2017 TO 31.12.2017 7.8 01.01.2018 TO 30.09.2018 7.6 01.10.2018 TO 31.06.2019 8 01.07.2019 TO 31.03.2020 7.9 01.04.2020 TO 30.06.2025 7.1 Source: National Savings Institute

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

G-7 countries agree to the ‘Side by Side' tax deal for US companies: Here's what it means
G-7 countries agree to the ‘Side by Side' tax deal for US companies: Here's what it means

Mint

time5 hours ago

  • Mint

G-7 countries agree to the ‘Side by Side' tax deal for US companies: Here's what it means

The US and fellow Group of Seven nations have reached an agreement aimed to prevent a global tax war, by establishing a 'side-by-side' tax system. This new arrangement would exempt US companies from some elements of an existing global agreement. A key component of this deal involved the US officials agreeing to remove Section 899 from President Donald Trump's tax-cut bill, This provision, often referred to as the 'revenge tax' would have increased taxes on the US income of non-US-based businesses and individuals from countries whose tax policies Washington deems discriminatory. The side-by-side system could 'provide greater stability and certainty in the international tax system moving forward,' the G-7 advanced economies said Saturday in a statement. As part of the agreement, the other G-7 members will support the US's stance in ongoing negotiations with the Group of 20 countries and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which has been hosting global talks on corporate taxes, with some proposals drawing opposition from the US. Officials from the G-7 said they look forward to coming up with a solution that is 'acceptable and implementable to all,' according to the statement. While some progress has been made, the issue of 'digital services taxes,' remains only partially addressed. Some countries currently levy these taxes on the profits of US-based technology companies including Meta Platforms Inc. and Inc. The effort to establish a side-by-side system will include a 'constructive dialogue on the taxation of the digital economy and on preserving the tax sovereignty of all countries,' according to the G-7 statement. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday that he had asked Senate and House leadership to remove Section 899 from the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act after securing G-7 backing for the side-by-side system. Senate Republicans deleted the section in the latest version of the tax bill.

SEC updates US court on efforts to serve legal documents in Adani case
SEC updates US court on efforts to serve legal documents in Adani case

The Print

time6 hours ago

  • The Print

SEC updates US court on efforts to serve legal documents in Adani case

The defendants, who are based in India, are yet to be officially served. In a June 27 letter submitted to Magistrate Judge James R Cho of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York (EDNY), the SEC said it is continuing to pursue formal service of the summons and complaint under the provisions of the Hague Service Convention. New York, Jun 27 (PTI) The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a status update with a federal court in New York, detailing its ongoing efforts to serve legal documents to billionaire Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar in connection with a civil securities case filed last year. US SEC has to serve the summons to Adani Group founder and chairman Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar in the alleged USD 265 million payoffs to win lucrative renewable power supply contracts, through proper diplomatic channels as it has no jurisdiction to summon a foreign national directly. The SEC originally filed the complaint on November 20, 2024, alleging that two violated US securities laws by making false and misleading statements related to a September 2021 bond offering by Adani Green Energy Ltd. According to the SEC, Rule 4 (f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs service in foreign jurisdictions and permits the use of international treaties, such as the Hague Convention. The rule does not impose a specific time limit for service, provided reasonable efforts are being made. PTI ANZ BAL BAL This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Indian Govt Is Yet to Serve Summons to Adanis, Says US SEC
Indian Govt Is Yet to Serve Summons to Adanis, Says US SEC

The Wire

time11 hours ago

  • The Wire

Indian Govt Is Yet to Serve Summons to Adanis, Says US SEC

New Delhi: The US Securities and Exchange Commission informed a New York federal court on June 27 that the Indian government has yet to forward the serving of summons to tycoon Gautam and Sagar Adani, nearly six months after being first contacted to do so under an international convention. In a letter dated June 27, the SEC submitted its third status report of the year, following earlier updates in February and April. The agency noted that it had previously sought the assistance of India's Ministry of Law and Justice under Article 5(a) of the Hague convention to serve the summons and complaint on the Adanis in India. It also said it had sent notices of the lawsuit and waiver requests directly to the Adani counsels. However, there has been no confirmation yet that the Indian authorities have delivered the documents. 'Since the April Status Update, the SEC has corresponded with the India MoLJ concerning the efforts of the relevant Indian judicial authorities to serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendants, but the SEC understands that those authorities have not yet effected service,' the SEC wrote in the status report filed to the Eastern District of New York. In its previous update submitted in April, the SEC had said that the Indian Ministry of Law and Justice had acknowledged receipt of the commission's request and had forwarded it to the relevant judicial authorities. The legal proceedings stem from criminal and civil action launched in November last year. The US Department of Justice had then accused Gautam Adani, his nephew Sagar Adani, former Adani Green Energy CEO Vneet Jaain, two former executives of Indian renewables firm Azure Power, and three former officials of the Canadian pension fund Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ) of funnelling over $250 million in bribes to Indian government officials between 2020 and 2024 to secure solar energy contracts. In a parallel civil action, the SEC filed a suit against the Adanis for allegedly violating various anti-fraud provisions of US federal securities laws. Cyril Cabanes, CDPQ's former Asia-Pacific infrastructure head and a former board member of Azure Power, was also named by the SEC for violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Two days after the two indictments were unsealed, the federal court in New York issued summons for the two Adanis in the SEC case on November 22. Two days after the criminal and civil cases were unsealed, the New York federal court issued summons for the two Adanis on November 22. But service of those summons remains pending. Following Donald Trump's return to office, he issued an executive order to suspend enforcement of the FCPA, prompting speculation that this might lead to a settlement between the Adanis and US authorities. While informal discussions may be underway, there has been no public indication of progress so far. The charges faced by the Adanis in the SEC are not related to FCPA, but for wire and securities fraud.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store