Insurance man set off smoke alarm on flight to Dublin
Father of two, William Horn, 29, of Stone Rings Lane, Harrowgate, England, pleaded guilty on Monday to charges under the Air Navigation and Transport Act following his arrest on Sunday at Terminal 1, Dublin Airport.
Advertisement
Airport-based Garda Sandip Shrestha told Dublin District Court he charged the accused with offensive behaviour on the Ryanair flight and setting off the smoke alarm, and the accused replied, 'You are chatting shit'.
Judge John Brennan noted that day-tripper Horn, who came to Ireland for a birthday party, was pleading guilty to the charges.
Garda Shreshta said on June 1st, he received a call from cabin crew about 'a disruptive passenger' on the flight. Garda Shreshta learned that Horn was in the toilet, and 'a plume of smoke set off the smoke alarm inside the plane'.
The captain also confirmed to the garda that the alarm was also activated in the cockpit.
Advertisement
Judge Brennan heard that it started just before taking off in Stansted when the aircraft was taxiing to the runway.
The seatbelts signs were activated but Horn 'ignored the cabin crew's instructions and went to the toilet, and walked by the cabin crew in an aggressive manner'.
Defence solicitor Edward Bradbury told the court his client, who remained silent during the hearing, was pleading guilty and from his perspective, it had been 'somewhat an ordeal and in his own mind a misunderstanding'.
The garda agreed with Mr Bradbury that the aircraft was about to take off when Horn decided to go to the toilet.
Advertisement
The accused had no prior convictions in Ireland.
Mr Bradbury said his client has been 'chastened' by this ordeal, was held in custody overnight, and missed his birthday party.
The court heard there was no evidence of intoxication, and Horn insisted he was not smoking in the toilet. However, the solicitor acknowledged that, at the very least, the issue had a smattering of recklessness all over it.
The solicitor said it happened when the aircraft was taxiing for take-off, which was aggravating circumstances for the flight attendants.
Judge Brennan said it happened in a confined environment where people were vulnerable, but on the scale of these offences, it ranked at the lower end.
He said that if Horn donated €500 to a Dublin charity which has assisted people affected by homelessness and addiction, he would receive the Probation of Offenders Act and be spared a criminal record.
The judge warned that failure to pay would result in recorded convictions and fines totalling €800.
Horn was released on €300 bail and excused from attending when the case resumes next week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Our suburb has been named one of the most gentrified, but it's a complete hellhole! It's 'crack central' and full of rats and chicken shops
Residents living in a London suburb are bemused it has been named as being among the most gentrified parts of the capital - instead insisting it is a 'complete hellhole'. Plumstead, in south east London, has been classed as being among the London neighbourhoods which have gentrified the most rapidly over the last decade, new analysis has found. A study by the Trust for London charity has identified 53 areas where average income has grown by an average of 11 per cent between 2012 and 2020 - compared with a one per cent rise across London. Plumstead High Street is number 38 on the list. The idea of gentrification is typically described as a formerly poor urban area changing in character with wealthier people moving in, an increase in house prices and new businesses being attracted to move in. But residents in the area - both new and old - could not disagree more. Gregory Roberts, 75, who has lived in Plumstead for 52 years, said: 'That's a joke.' He added: 'It's not gentrified, it's abandoned. These surveys are a joke. Why not spend time, effort and money on actually doing something about it rather than just putting labels on things? A study by the Trust for London charity has identified 53 areas where average income has grown by an average of 11 per cent between 2012 and 2020 - Plumstead High Street is number 38 on the list 'It's full of chicken shops, betting shops, corner shops and vape shops. 'There's no hope or opportunity for improvement. All the more traditional shops have gone. The community feeling has gone. 'I don't feel unsafe but it's not great. I'd move if I could.' One resident, who did not want to be named, launched into a passionate tirade against the area. She said: 'It's a rat infested s***hole. It's hell on earth. I hate it. I want to move. It's disgusting. It's dirty. It's a complete hellhole. 'It stinks. There's criminals everywhere. There's crime happening everyday. 'What's gentrified about that? It's crack central. There's drug users and drunks everywhere. 'It's terrible. There's no hope or aspiration. People aren't moving in to better the area. Gentrification means improvement. Nothing has improved.' Shop worker Ahamed Limras, 27, started work at a Premier store in the area on Thursday. On his first day, he said there were four cases of shoplifting in the first six hours. He said: 'Yes, it's been a weird start. I was told to expect shoplifting. But they've just gone mad. They take anything, alcohol, food. 'One was quite a lot. They're very quick. I was warned there would be problems but this has been mad. 'It's a rundown area. It doesn't feel up and coming to me. 'I am not sure what I will do now.' Retired teaching assistant Pat Page, 70, said she does 'not feel safe'. She said: 'I've lived in Plumstead for 45 years. It's as bad as it ever has been. Have the people doing these surveys and analysis actually been here? 'Come and live here for a week, see how gentrified you think it is then. 'In the 1970s it had everything. Now it's chicken shops and corner shops and bookies. 'There used to be 12 pubs, now there's one. That's a decent pub but there used to be 12. They've all gone. It's got worse, so how can someone say it's improving? 'Christ knows what the other areas are like on the list if they think Plumstead is up and coming. It's really, really sad. I used to love it here.' Dinner lady Dianne Lorryman, 70, agreed. She said: 'It's not gentrified. It's dirty for a start. There's no aspiration. 'It's gone right down hill. I don't feel excited about living here. 'It's not good. Look at how run down it is. If people actually put proper effort in to change it and improve, rather than just give it fancy titles, it would help the place a lot more.' Margaret O'Rourke, 81, said: 'Gentrified? That's a joke. There's a lot of crime and anti-social behaviour. There's crackdens everywhere. 'They think having a few high rise buildings will improve property prices and then they can call it gentrified. It certainly isn't that.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Gregg Wallace says 'I am not a flasher' and says he is horrified to be compared to Jimmy Savile and Huw Edwards as he again blames autism for not wearing underwear
Disgraced presenter Gregg Wallace has hit out at critics for comparing him to Jimmy Savile and Huw Edwards, insisting he is 'not a groper, sex pest or a flasher'. The former MasterChef host, 60, tearfully apologised to anyone he had hurt in the wake of dozens of allegations of inappropriate behaviour, including claims that he dropped his trousers in front of staff. In his first interview since being sacked by the BBC in light of the complaints, Wallace broke down in tears as he spoke of the 'hurt' suffered by him and his family, insisting he had been unfairly treated in the media spotlight. He told The Sun that he understood some of his actions may have offended people and 'weren't socially acceptable' but denied being a 'wrong-un'. 'I'm not a groper. People think I've been taking my trousers down and exposing myself - I am not a flasher. People think I'm a sex pest. I am not,' he added. Wallace said that being discussed in the same breath as notorious sex offenders Savile and Edwards was 'horrific' and admitted he was scared to go outside in case people 'abuse' him in the street. Wallace insisted he is 'not trying to play the victim' and claimed his autism diagnosis was partly responsible for some of his alleged behaviour as it means he struggles 'to read people' and can be perceived as 'odd' at times. He also again defended allegations - which he claims have been 'sexualised' - that he would not wear underwear while working on the cooking show, saying it was due to his 'hypersensitivity' as a result of the condition. Wallace stepped down from the hit BBC cooking show after complaints were made about his behaviour and following a report into his conduct, in which 45 of 83 complaints were upheld. In total, 41 people complained. The review concluded that the 'majority of the substantiated allegations against Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour'. It added that 'a smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated', with 'one incident of unwelcome physical contact' also substantiated. The ex Eat Well for Less? presenter told the Sun that while he didn't deny being guilty of some of the claims, he believed things had been 'perceived incorrectly'. Wallace claimed that he had worked with around 4,000 people, meaning that just 0.5% of those he has worked with 'found fault with me'. He said his actions were the result of learned behaviour and workplace culture and claimed that his recent autism diagnosis also played a role. 'I know I am odd. I know I struggle to read people. I know people find me weird. Autism is a disability, a registered disability,' he said. Wallace has faced backlash from autism charities over similar claims, with some accusing him of using autism as an excuse for his alleged inappropriate behaviour. Seema Flower, founder of disabilities consultancy Blind Ambition, told BBC News there was 'no excuse' for being inappropriate to people in society. 'Where does it leave us if we use autism as excuse to behave in whatever way we like?' she asked. Emily Banks, founder of neurodiversity training body Enna, also condemned Wallace. She said: 'To be clear: being autistic is never an excuse for misconduct. It doesn't absolve anyone of responsibility, and it certainly doesn't mean you can't tell the difference between right and wrong.' While Dan Harris, who runs the charity Neurodiversity in Business and is himself autistic, said people like him 'may miss social cues autism is not a free pass for bad behaviour.' 'Comments like this stigmatise us and add an unfortunate negative focus on our community.' Wallace has previously said he felt the BBC failed to provide enough support for his condition during his 20 years working on Masterchef. 'My neurodiversity, now formally diagnosed as autism, was suspected and discussed by colleagues across countless seasons of MasterChef,' Wallace said. 'Yet nothing was done to investigate my disability or protect me from what I now realise was a dangerous environment for over 20 years.' During the interview, Wallace also defended his sacked former co-host John Torode, telling the paper he is 'not a racist'. Torode was the subject of an allegation about using racist language that was upheld as part of a review carried out by law firm Lewis Silkin into the alleged behaviour of co-presenter Wallace. Torode said he had 'no recollection of the incident' and was 'shocked and saddened' by the allegation. Pointing to the allegation against Torode, Wallace told the Sun: 'I've known John for 30 years and he is not a racist.' 'There is no way that man is a racist. No way. And my sympathies go out to John because I don't want anybody to go through what I've been through,' he added. Torode never defended his MasterChef colleague when allegations against him first emerged in December last year. Wallace was said to be 'furious' with his former co-star and unfollowed him and his wife Lisa on Instagram. Wallace admitted that he and Torode 'never really did get on that well', insisting they are 'two very, very different characters'. But he went on to say they had made 'bloody good telly together for 20 years'. Wallace's comments come after it was revealed that the BBC would air its amateur 2025 series of MasterChef. In the nine months since the hit BBC programme finished filming last Autumn there have been questions over whether it would ever be broadcast following allegations of inappropriate behaviour against presenters Wallace and Torode. Now the corporation has revealed that the amateur series of MasterChef filmed last year, before allegations against Gregg and John were upheld, will be broadcast on BBC One and BBC iPlayer from August 6. The MailOnline understand that the BBC have told the MasterChef production company Banijay that the show should reduce Gregg and John's screen time to a minimum in light of the report's findings. A source said: 'The BBC have made it clear that it should limit the amount of airtime the presenters have in the editing of the new series, with a bigger focus on the contestants who are at the heart of the competition.' 'Neither Gregg nor John will appear in BBC iPlayer thumbnails and they will not be doing any promotional activity around the latest series.' 'All of the brilliant new contestants were consulted on whether the series should be broadcast, and no one objected.' 'Everyone involved is very keen to promote the hard work of the contestants and that will be our priority.' The BBC said it had taken the decision to broadcast the unaired series 'after careful consideration and consultation with the contestants'. In a statement, the corporation said: 'MasterChef is an amazing competition which is life-changing for the amateur chefs taking part. The focus of it has always been their skill and their journey.' The BBC also said it had not yet taken a decision on the completed celebrity series and Christmas special, filmed with Torode and food critic Grace Dent. In its statement, the BBC said: 'This has not been an easy decision in the circumstances and we appreciate not everyone will agree with it. 'In showing the series, which was filmed last year, it in no way diminishes our view of the seriousness of the upheld findings against both presenters. We have been very clear on the standards of behaviour that we expect of those who work at the BBC or on shows made for the BBC. 'However, we believe that broadcasting this series is the right thing to do for these cooks who have given so much to the process. We want them to be properly recognised and give the audience the choice to watch the series.' The BBC concluded its statement by describing MasterChef as 'a brilliant, much-loved programme which is bigger than any one individual'.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Oasis ticket scam: ‘My Instagram was hijacked for a £1,400 fraud'
Lauren Jones* was on her way home from a gig when she realised something was wrong. After having no reception all day, her mobile started pinging with message after message containing verifications for her LinkedIn, Vinted and Facebook accounts. Someone was trying to get in and change the contact details. At home she realised the hackers were also trying to take over her Instagram account. She tried to sort it out but it was late, she had work the next day and, she says: 'I thought: 'What damage could they do?'' Within 24 hours she knew the answer: using her account, the hackers advertised tickets to Oasis's Wembley Stadium gig on Saturday 26 July and stole £1,400 from her unsuspecting friends. They then sent a text demanding $100 (£75) to return the Instagram account. All day she was fielding messages from contacts. 'I had about 20 different people text, saying they were about to send over the money and can I hold the tickets for them,' she says. 'The hackers had impersonated me so well that my friends and family genuinely thought they were speaking to me.' Three weeks later, she is still locked out of her account, and Instagram has refused to recognise it as being fraudulent. It has ignored her requests for help. It did not respond to Guardian Money's requests for comment. Jones is a music fan and so the Instagram story offering four tickets to a concert did not seem out of place to her 600 followers – even her sister believed she had tickets to sell. 'I've just returned from Glastonbury and I was away for Bruce Springsteen,' she says. 'It's not as if they'd taken it over and started advertising bitcoin.' The people who responded via Instagram were taken in by the scammers' replies – one friend told her he thought they had been having a good catchup. It was only those who moved the conversation to WhatsApp or texts who found out pretty swiftly that the tickets did not exist. 'They're really impersonating me and it's so invasive,' she says. 'It's distressing not knowing what is being said in my name.' The fraudsters did not just leave the post for Jones's followers to see – they messaged one of her former colleagues and asked them if they would share the posts. They agreed and inadvertently spread the scam more widely. The tickets were realistically priced and the post had good spelling and grammar. Victims were asked to pay into an account held with the online bank Revolut, with the fraudsters explaining that it was in the name of the friend who had originally bought the tickets. Official data shows £1.6m was lost to fraud involving gig tickets last year – more than double the previous year's figure – and Oasis's high-profile reunion tour has been widely used to lure victims. Earlier this year, Lloyds Banking Group (which includes Lloyds, Halifax and Bank of Scotland) said more than 1,000 customers had fallen for scams linked to the Manchester band's eagerly anticipated UK concerts. Lloyds said its data suggested that UK Oasis fans had lost more than £2m to fraudsters by March this year – the total is likely to have risen since. It found that fans lost an average of £436 each – about £200 more than the average amount stolen in a concert ticket scam – and said some had handed over more than £1,700. Chris Ainsley, the head of fraud risk management at the bank Santander, recently saw a Facebook account used for the scam – the post advertised four tickets, again for the 26 July concert, and included details of seat numbers and a WhatsApp number to contact. The scammers used the highlight tool to put it in front of the real account holder's followers – this, Ainsley says, is a way to make a fraud 'grow very quickly'. His team searched Facebook and found multiple other accounts had posted the same message, suggesting the same people had hacked them all. Jake Moore, a cybersecurity expert at ESET, says that by using Instagram and Facebook accounts linked to individuals, scammers give victims a false sense of security. 'It's not an Oasis Facebook group which is completely random – buying tickets there would be a complete gamble. Instead, they're buying from people they know, or friends of friends – they're verified. It's doing exactly what we tell people to do,' he says. 'The scammers can check the messages before and see how you sign off – if it's a kiss or emoji maybe – and replicate that.' Moore says criminals who may be worried about their spelling or grammar giving them away can use AI to craft their messages. 'Even if you take an extra minute to reply, the other person is not going to notice – you can even tell it to sign off each one with a smiley face, for instance.' You might think the criminals would carefully select accounts that give them the best chance of finding victims – Jones's would have appealed because she loves live music – but the experts say that the fraud is not that sophisticated. Ainsley says the account he originally saw compromised had not been used since 2011, so anyone doing some due diligence might have taken that as a red flag. Moore says it is simply a numbers game, with criminals breaking into as many accounts as they can. Jones is not sure how the hackers got into her account but suspects she may have fallen victim to a phishing attack or used an insecure public wifi network. Moore says that often accounts are compromised because people use the same password in more than one place. Criminals will try the details across a range of sites – a practice known as 'credentials stuffing'. In-app attacks are another way for fraudsters to get the details they need, Ainsley says. 'Sometimes you will get a message that makes it look like you have been kicked off Facebook – it will ask for your details to log you back in,' he says. The best way to protect your account is to use the social media website's two-factor authentication or two-step verification settings. 'That extra layer will push the criminals to the next account – you are not the lowest hanging fruit,' Moore says. * Name has been changed
