
Happy Canada Day, from Donald Trump
Or what you'll be asked to give up. Or what, if anything, the U.S. President will offer in return. Or what will set him off, or calm him down. Or whether he's put rocks in the Turtles. Or if you make a deal, whether he'll rip it up before the ink is dry.
Late Sunday evening, Ottawa abandoned its digital services tax, just hours before it was to go into effect, after Mr. Trump said he was ending all trade talks until Canada scrapped it. The levy has been in the works for years, but the White House has long opposed it, going back to when Joe Biden was president.
The tax is, or was, a 3-per-cent levy on income earned in Canada by major players on the web. The theory behind it is that foreign (mostly American) companies making money in Canada through the sale of digital services do so without facing taxation on earnings in this country.
Washington was always going to push for the elimination of the tax as part of a broader trade deal. And Canada, it is fair to bet, was going to be willing to give in to that demand, if it unlocked a deal.
The digital services tax was bad policy, but killing it now makes us look terribly weak
A guide to The Globe's Canada Day coverage
Was Canada threatening to start collecting money on June 30 partly as a bargaining tactic? Had the tax become the kind of irritant you put in the window precisely because the other side wants it removed it, thereby kicking off some horse trading?
The tax was expected to bring in about $900-million a year. That's small change. It's like a car salesman throwing in a free bottle of Turtle Wax.
Mr. Trump publicly halting negotiations until Canada dropped something it was going to drop in those negotiations may be a way for the President to look like the big man who made an opponent bend to his will. It may open the door to a trade deal, which the Trump administration will be able to sell not only as one of the promised '90 deals in 90 days,' but a victory.
The Canadian concession is small. But if there's a trade agreement in the coming weeks, it could allow the MAGA mediasphere to proclaim that Mr. Trump has once again demonstrated his unparalleled negotiating genius and power, and used it for the benefit of an American industry.
That's the best version of how this story ends. Canada gets what it wants, which is a trade deal that largely maintains the one agreed under the last Trump administration: the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). And Mr. Trump gets what he wants, which is the appearance of dominance and the impression that he won something.
But negotiating with Mr. Trump is like a bottomless box of chocolates: There's always something else. And something else after that.
Canada made a concession that it was almost certainly prepared to concede, but what did it get in return? Are there more demands that Mr. Trump will pull out of his hat, as he's been doing since before his inauguration?
We've faced tariffs based on an imaginary flood of cross-border fentanyl; demands for more military spending; tariffs on autos, steel and aluminum; and now this insistence that Canada rewrite domestic tax law. Any more bonbons down there?
The President was on Fox News on Sunday, once again railing against supply management, and claiming that Canada is 'very nasty to deal with' and that 'they cheat' on the USMCA. And of course we should be the 51st state because 'Canada relies entirely on the United States.'
Until a few years ago, retailer L.L. Bean had a lifetime return policy: You could return anything, forever. Like the customers who abused that policy until it had to be ended, Mr. Trump has taken this approach to the USMCA: I signed on the dotted line, but I can un-sign at any time.
With threats and tariffs that violate the terms of the agreement, he has started ripping it up. And he has given every sign that he wants some tariffs to remain, even in a post-USMCA deal.
The best Canada can do is what Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is trying to do: Keep calm and carry on. Focus on the things we control, like our own economy, our own ability to get things built, our own capacity to strengthen relationships with more reliable partners.
Meanwhile, it's Canada Day – the day when the United Province of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick joined together in Confederation. Canada was not created in 1867. It was expanded and improved. Improvement and expansion continued in the years and decades after.
We've had an evolving and continually progressing political system, unbroken by successful domestic revolution or foreign invasion, since 1763. Ours is one of the world's oldest and most stable polities.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, people and businesses in Quebec put up signs that read: Ça va bien aller. It'll all work out. Even with that guy in the White House, ça va bien aller. We always find a way. Happy Canada Day.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
30 minutes ago
- CTV News
ADVERTISEMENT Watch ‘A big, complicated relationship': Robertson on Canada negotiating with Trump's government Former Canadian diplomat Colin Robertson says he doesn't believe Canada and the U.S. will reach a deal by July 21.
Watch Former Canadian diplomat Colin Robertson says he doesn't believe Canada and the U.S. will reach a deal by July 21.


CTV News
33 minutes ago
- CTV News
Tesla shares take a hit as feud between Trump and Musk reaches a boil
Elon Musk attends a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) Shares of electric vehicle maker Tesla, which is headed by Elon Musk, slumped Tuesday as the war of words between billionaire and President Donald Trump over the big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts heats up again, with Musk saying he may form a new political party. Shares of Tesla have already tumbled more than 20% this year as sales of the company's vehicles erode amid a backlash against Musk and his association with the Trump administration. Tesla sales are plummeting in Europe and China as well. Tesla's stock fell nearly 6% in early trading. The resumption of hostilities between Trump and Musk, also the CEO of SpaceX, is always bad news for investors in Musk's companies. 'This BFF situation has now turned into a soap opera that remains an overhang on Tesla's stock with investors fearing that the Trump Administration will be more hawkish and show scrutiny around Musk related US government spending related to Tesla/SpaceX and most importantly the autonomous future with the regulatory environment key to the future of Robotaxis and Cybercabs,' wrote Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives on Tuesday. 'We would expect the stock to be weak to kick off trading this morning as the Street will show concern that the Trump and Musk once BFF relationship now backfires and turns into a junior high school friendship gone bad into an enemy.' The most prominent divide in the relationship between Musk and Trump is the president's big bill. Musk ramped up his criticism of the bill over the weekend, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries. Musk posted on X on Saturday that the bill would be 'political suicide for the Republican Party.' With the Senate working its way through a tense overnight session that dragged into Tuesday, Musk suggested he will work to get members of Congress who vote for the bill out of their seats next year. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame,' he wrote on X. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The post was viewed 26 million times on the social media platform. A few hours later, Musk followed up with a post claiming he will create a new political party if the bill passes. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' he wrote. 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE.' Musk's post about the America Party was viewed 32 million times on X. Trump focused some of his criticisms of Musk on EV mandates and subsidies. In a post on Truth Social early Tuesday, Trump said Musk has known that he's against an EV mandate and that people should not be forced to own electric vehicles. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump wrote. Trump also suggested that the U.S. could cut back on spending by targeting segments of the economy in which Musk plays a significant roll. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' Trump posted, alluding to the cost-cutting entity that until recently, was headed by Musk. Several hours later, while standing on the White House lawn before heading to Florida, Trump continued to take shots at Musk and what he believes to be his biggest grievance, the billionaire's displeasure over potentially losing EV subsidies. 'He's very upset. You know, he can lose a lot more than that, I'll tell you right now,' Trump said. 'Elon can lose a lot more than that.' When asked by a reporter if he was going to deport Musk, Trump warned that the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, could come back to hurt the billionaire. 'We'll have to take a look,' Trump said. 'We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible? He gets a lot of subsidies.' Musk responded on X by saying he would refrain from escalating the conflict, but he took another shot at Trump and Republicans anyway. 'What good is Doge saving $160B when this bill increases the debt ceiling by $5T? It makes mockery of the work,' he wrote. Michelle Chapman, The Associated Press


Edmonton Journal
33 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
Trump joked migrants would need to know 'how to run away from an alligator' to flee Florida facility
Article content President Donald Trump will turn a new immigration detention center in a remote area of the Florida Everglades into a symbol of his border crackdown when he visits on Tuesday. The facility, assembled on a remote airstrip with tents and trailers that are normally used after a natural disaster, has been given the nickname 'Alligator Alcatraz,' a moniker that has alarmed immigrant activists but appeals to the Republican president's aggressive approach to deportations. Article content Article content Trump will 'take a look' at deporting Musk: 'We might have to put DOGE on Elon' 'This is not a nice business,' Trump said while leaving the White House in the morning. Then he joked that 'we're going to teach them how to run away from an alligator if they escape prison.' 'Don't run in a straight line. Run like this,' he said, as he moved his hand in a zigzag motion. 'And you know what? Your chances go up about 1%.' That doesn't seem to be sound advice, though. It's best to dash in one direction in the rare situation when an alligator gives chase, according to a website run by the University of Florida. Ahead of Trump's arrival, local authorities were positioned by the entrance of the airstrip. Media vans and other vehicles were parked along the highway lined by cypress trees. Protestors have often gathered near the facility, which is about 50 miles (80.47 kilometers) west of Miami and could house 5,000 detainees. They've criticized the potential impact on a delicate ecosystem and say Trump is trying to send a cruel message to immigrants — while some Native American leaders have also opposed construction, saying the land is sacred. Article content Article content 'I have a lot of immigrants I have been working with. They are fine people. They do not deserve to be incarcerated here,' said Phyllis Andrews, a retired teacher who drove from Naples, Florida, to protest Trump's visit on Tuesday. 'It's terrible that there's a bounty on their head.' The president's supporters showed up as well. One wore a hat saying, 'Trump was right about everything.' A key selling point for the Trump administration is the site's remoteness — and the fact that it is in swampland filled with mosquitoes, pythons and alligators. The White House hopes that conveys a message to detainees and the rest of the world that repercussions will be severe if the immigration laws of the United States are not followed. 'There's only one road leading in, and the only way out is a one-way flight,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday. 'It is isolated, and it is surrounded by dangerous wildlife and unforgiving terrain.' Article content Crackdowns on the U.S.-Mexico border and harsh immigration policies have long been a centerpiece of Trump's political brand. During his first term in 2019, Trump denied reports that he floated the idea of building a moat filled with alligators at the southern border. 'I may be tough on Border Security, but not that tough,' he said at the time. In his second term, Trump has suggested that his administration could move to reopen Alcatraz, the notorious and hard-to-reach island prison off San Francisco. The White House has similarly promoted the political shock value of sending some immigrants awaiting deportation from the U.S. to a detention lockup in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and others to a megaprison in El Salvador. Some of the ideas have been impractical. For example, transforming Alcatraz from a tourist attraction into a prison would be very costly, and Guantanamo Bay is being used less often than administration officials originally envisioned. Article content However, the new detention center in the Everglades came together very quickly. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem recently told the Associated Press that she felt some contractors were charging the government too much to run facilities, 'so I went directly to states and to ask them if they could do a better job providing this service.' Florida officials 'were willing to build it and do it much quicker than what some of the other vendors were,' she said. 'And it was a real solution that we'll be able to utilize if we need to.' Former U.S. Rep. David Jolly of Florida, a former Republican who is now running for governor as a Democrat, called the facility a 'callous political stunt.' U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees are generally held for reasons like entering the country illegally or overstaying a visa. They are either waiting for ICE to put them on the next flight or bus ride home, or they're fighting their removal in immigration court. Article content If an immigrant is accused of or has committed a violent crime, he or she is tried and held in state or federal criminal jurisdiction, separate from the immigration system. In those cases, they may be transferred to ICE for deportation after completing their criminal sentences. State officials are spearheading construction of the Florida facility, but much of the cost is being covered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which is best known for responding to hurricanes and other natural disasters. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, whom Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has credited as the architect of the Everglades plan, first debuted the proposal with a slickly produced video, complete with custom graphics featuring red-eyed alligators and a hard rock soundtrack. The Department of Homeland Security posted an image of alligators wearing ICE hats and sitting in front of a fenced-in compound ringed with barbed wire. Latest National Stories