If you can't sink the ship, buy it!: Major record labels court AI music startups like Suno and Udio amidst the million dollar copyright lawsuits charged against them.
Universal Music Group,
These
In April 2024, UMG, Sony Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group filed a suit against
The labels are exploring a potential deal that includes licensing fees and equity stakes in Suno and Udio, a move that could lead to lawsuit settlements. Reportedly a deal of such kind would be enough to settle lawsuits between the two sides.
Accepting the Shift: Rather than trying to ban AI or block AI from the music industry, these companies have made peace with the technological shift and have begun to adapt themselves around the potential benefits fostered by AI. 'WMG believes that machine learning and AI technologies have creative potential for artists and songwriters.' The company said in a July 2024 statement regarding AI technologies. 'However, it is imperative that all uses and implementations of machine learning and AI technologies respect the rights of all those involved in the creation, marketing, promotion, and distribution of music.'
While early discussions are still underway, any licensing deal would likely come with its own restrictions. Labels want an assurance that the AI-generated songs will not cause impersonation without consent and distribute content that harms their brand's value into the market. Despite concerns, labels see opportunity in new revenue streams, from marketing jingles and soundtrack content to virtual artists.
Live Events
The silver lining: This lawsuit-driven experiment isn't the first time the music industry has experimented with
Other virtual performers have also gained significant traction in this manner. For instance, in 2023, Warner Music signed the CGI influencer Noonoouri, whose music, created with synthetic vocals and AI-generated lyrics, blurs the boundary between synthetic and human-generated music. This deal symbolized that AI wasn't just remixing soundtracks anymore; it was now producing the next generation of pop stars.
Startups like Suno and Udio, with venture capital support and next-gen generative models as their armor, are creating new boundaries of what AI can do. For example, Suno can create full-fledged songs with vocals, lyrics, and instruments, and all it requires is a single text prompt. Udio, on the other hand, boasts its studio-level audio quality.
The Stake: The talks symbolize a pattern, familiar in the entertainment industry, in the way it did for accepting TikTok; every digital disruption was initially met with resistance before being co-opted. This time, however, the stakes are higher, not just in dollars, for this could potentially undermine artist earnings and intellectual property rights if the AI were to flood the market with convincing fakes and unauthorized pastiches.
Whether these licensing talks culminate in a deal or dissolve amid legal tension, one thing is clear: AI is no longer an invader but a part of the industry's future.
Warner Music Group , and Sony Music Entertainment, amidst the ongoing lawsuit, are in the early-stage discussions to license portions of their vast music catalogs to 'Suno' and 'Udio.' The same firms they are currently suing.These AI music startups were long viewed as threats in the industry with outstanding billion-dollar lawsuits stacked against them; now, however, they are viewed as potential partners in the rapidly evolving music industry. With their ability to generate studio-quality songs from text prompts and dramatically lessened monetary requirements.In April 2024, UMG, Sony Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group filed a suit against Suno and Udio , accusing them of using copyrighted material to develop their model without consent. Although, beneath the tensions remains an undeniable fact: AI is here to stay, and the music industry is adapting. Therefore, negotiations between the two sides could open doors for AI-generated tracks to consensually mimic the styles of popular artists, garnering both the label's approval and commercial benefits.The labels are exploring a potential deal that includes licensing fees and equity stakes in Suno and Udio, a move that could lead to lawsuit settlements. Reportedly a deal of such kind would be enough to settle lawsuits between the two sides.Rather than trying to ban AI or block AI from the music industry, these companies have made peace with the technological shift and have begun to adapt themselves around the potential benefits fostered by AI. 'WMG believes that machine learning and AI technologies have creative potential for artists and songwriters.' The company said in a July 2024 statement regarding AI technologies. 'However, it is imperative that all uses and implementations of machine learning and AI technologies respect the rights of all those involved in the creation, marketing, promotion, and distribution of music.'While early discussions are still underway, any licensing deal would likely come with its own restrictions. Labels want an assurance that the AI-generated songs will not cause impersonation without consent and distribute content that harms their brand's value into the market. Despite concerns, labels see opportunity in new revenue streams, from marketing jingles and soundtrack content to virtual artists.This lawsuit-driven experiment isn't the first time the music industry has experimented with AI-generated music or artists. K-pop label SM Entertainment was notably known for fusing traditional K-pop music with virtual personas since 2020, with the debut of their 4th generation girl group, 'Aespa.' Each of the girl group's members has a hyper-realistic AI avatar counterpart, curated to interact with the fans, participate in videos, and also live in a fictional world called 'KWANGYA.' This fusion reshaped how K-pop marketing worked, for these avatars were not just novelty tools but rather integrated parts of the groups' concepts and marketing strategies, signaling a future where artists can have both a traditional presence and a digital one, the label's creative direction.Other virtual performers have also gained significant traction in this manner. For instance, in 2023, Warner Music signed the CGI influencer Noonoouri, whose music, created with synthetic vocals and AI-generated lyrics, blurs the boundary between synthetic and human-generated music. This deal symbolized that AI wasn't just remixing soundtracks anymore; it was now producing the next generation of pop stars.Startups like Suno and Udio, with venture capital support and next-gen generative models as their armor, are creating new boundaries of what AI can do. For example, Suno can create full-fledged songs with vocals, lyrics, and instruments, and all it requires is a single text prompt. Udio, on the other hand, boasts its studio-level audio quality.The talks symbolize a pattern, familiar in the entertainment industry, in the way it did for accepting TikTok; every digital disruption was initially met with resistance before being co-opted. This time, however, the stakes are higher, not just in dollars, for this could potentially undermine artist earnings and intellectual property rights if the AI were to flood the market with convincing fakes and unauthorized pastiches.Whether these licensing talks culminate in a deal or dissolve amid legal tension, one thing is clear: AI is no longer an invader but a part of the industry's future.
Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Is Kim Kardashian's SKIMS face wrap for ‘snatching the chinny chin chin' just a beauty fad? What to try instead of pricey shapewear
What Is the Face Wrap and What Does It Claim to Do? Real Results or Just a Gimmick? You Might Also Like: Kim Kardashian's fourth wedding? Reality star hints at marriage again amid mystery romance What Actually Works? Is It Hot or Just Hype? A Pretty Price for a Pretty Short-Lived Effect Kim Kardashian's SKIMS brand has reshaped more than just the fashion world — now it's aiming to sculpt your face too. Her latest launch, the Seamless Sculpt Face Wrap, billed as 'a must-have for your nightly routine,' promises an overnight jawline lift with its stretchy, collagen-infused yarn. Retailing for $48 and already sold out in record time, the buzz is real. But so is the Instagram selfies to TikTok tutorials, the face wrap is now the newest trend in at-home contouring. But experts warn: don't expect miracles just because it's shapewear — but for your face. The SKIMS Face Wrap is made of polyamide and elastane, with added 'collagen yarns,' and is secured with Velcro from the crown of the head to the nape of the neck. Available in two SKIMS-neutral tones, Clay and Cocoa, the wrap is designed to support the jaw and neck while you sleep, offering a snatched morning herself claimed, 'It just snatches your little chinny chin chin', in an interview quoted by Buzzfeed. But while the product looks sleek and Insta-ready, dermatologists are cautioning that the claims may not hold to New York Post, four board-certified facial plastic surgeons reviewed the product — and the verdict was consistent: minimal, if any, long-term benefit.'It's really not going to make any long-term structural changes of any kind,' said Dr. Anil Shah, a facial plastic surgeon based in New York and Chicago. 'Don't waste your money on this one.'Similarly, Dr. Jamuna Pai, founder of SkinLab, told media: 'Wearable beauty tools like face wraps can offer a short-term de-puffing effect… but by itself, it can't create lasting structural change.' She added that collagen is best absorbed topically, not through Bindu Sthalekar, Dermatologist and Medical Director at Skin Smart Solutions, echoed these thoughts, noting that any perceived lift is temporary. 'For jawline sagging or double chins, a combination of skincare actives and in-office treatments remains the gold standard,' she wraps like Kardashian's mimic post-surgical compression garments — tools commonly used after facelifts or liposuction to reduce swelling and encourage healing. In those cases, they're medically necessary. But outside of that context, the benefits are mostly aesthetic and Yael Halaas, a facial plastic surgeon quoted in the New York Post, explained that SKIMS' face wrap is nearly identical in design to post-surgical wraps. However, unlike medical-grade versions, it lacks FDA registration, antimicrobial fabric, and moisture-wicking worryingly, using such compression tools incorrectly — or too often — may have side effects. Experts cite risks like skin irritation, puffiness, muscle weakening, and even reflux in sensitive no denying the allure: in a culture obsessed with 'snatching' and 'contouring,' a sleek-looking, celebrity-endorsed face wrap is bound to sell out. And to some extent, the wrap does what it says — it compresses. the takeaway from dermatologists is clear: Don't expect collagen-infused fabric to turn back you're after genuine, long-lasting facial sculpting, experts advise sticking with skincare, healthy habits, facial exercises, and trusted medical Dr. Pai summed up, 'There is no overnight miracle for sculpting — only smart choices and consistency.'At $48, the SKIMS face wrap is a sleek addition to your skincare shelf, but more of a fashion statement than a facial solution. For those already invested in a solid routine and looking for a quick fix before a big day, it might offer a little puff-reducing if you're hoping for a Kardashian-level transformation, collagen yarn might not cut it.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anthropic CEO rejects Nvidia CEO Jensen Haung's AI remarks: ‘That's the most outrageous lie I've ever….'
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has responded to Jensen Huang 's previous remarks, stating his words are 'outrageous'. "I've said nothing that anywhere near resembles the idea that this company should be the only one to build the technology," Amodei said, adding "'[=It's just an incredible and bad faith distortion." Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The feud started in June when the Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said he disagreed with "almost everything" Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said. Speaking at the Viva Tech conference earlier this year, Huang accused Amodei of believing AI is so dangerous that only his company should be allowed to build it — an idea Huang described as unrealistic and monopolistic. "AI is so incredibly powerful that everyone will lose their jobs, which explains why they should be the only company building it," Huang then said of Amodei's thinking. In a latest episode of the "Big Technology" podcast hosted by Alex Kantrowitz, Anthropic CEO said 'I've never said anything like that', adding 'That's the most outrageous lie I've ever heard.' Dario Amodei said that he didn't know where "anyone could ever derive that from anything that I've said." Amodei insisted that in a "race to the bottom," AI companies rush to launch new features without enough safety checks, which puts everyone at risk. In contrast, his approach is a "race to the top," where the most responsible and ethical AI companies lead the way, setting higher standards for the entire industry. "I've said multiple times, and I think Anthropic's actions have shown it, that we're aiming for something we call a race to the top," he added. In a related news, Dario Amodei warned employees against massive salary increases from competitors like Meta, stating it could "destroy" the company's culture. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking on the Big Technology Podcast, Amodei revealed that when Meta and other tech giants began targeting Anthropic engineers with lucrative offers, he sent a clear message to staff: the company would not compromise its compensation principles. "What they are doing is trying to buy something that cannot be bought," Amodei said, explaining that many employees rejected external offers and some "wouldn't even talk to ." The CEO emphasized that Anthropic maintains a level-based compensation system where negotiations aren't permitted, calling it a matter of fairness.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Why is one in three US professionals pretending to use AI in the workplace?
In the new AI-driven economy, success isn't just about what you do—it's about what you appear to do. As artificial intelligence continues its rapid infiltration of modern office culture, a startling behavioral shift is emerging. A growing number of American professionals—estimated to be as many as one in three, according to trends—are pretending to use AI tools at work. This is no harmless bluff. It is a symptom of deep-seated anxiety, professional insecurity, and a rising performance culture where the fear of irrelevance now outpaces the pursuit of actual skills. The data speaks volumes. A recent survey by tech hiring platform reveals that one in six US employees openly admit to lying about using AI at work. But when accounting for those too wary to confess, analysts suggest the real figure could be closer to one in three. The rise of performative AI use : A silent epidemic This isn't about laziness. It's about survival. In many workplaces, appearing to embrace AI has become a proxy for competence. Employees sense that upward mobility and even basic job security may hinge not on how effectively they work—but on how seamlessly they seem to integrate AI into their routines. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unsold 2021 Cars Now Almost Free - Prices May Surprise You Unsold Cars | Search Ads Learn More Undo What began as a technological revolution is rapidly morphing into a psychological one. AI-nxiety in the American workplace Beneath the surface of this behavioral trend lies what experts now term 'AI-nxiety'—a pervasive unease among professionals navigating mixed messages about their future. On the one hand, employers aggressively promote AI adoption as essential for efficiency and innovation. On the other, those same employers often hint—directly or indirectly—that employees who fail to adapt may be phased out. It's no longer just automation threatening jobs. It's peers. Engineers and technically inclined workers, proficient in AI and large language models, are now viewed as the new apex competitors—skilled not only in their core tasks but also in wielding AI to supercharge performance. As one stark online comment put it: 'You may not lose your job to AI—but you'll lose it to someone using it better than you.' The illusion of inclusion: When training lags behind expectations The irony is that while workers are pressured to "get AI-savvy," many are offered little to no structured training. reports that 25% of employees expected to use AI at work receive zero guidance on how to do so. The result? A culture of improvisation, impostor syndrome, and quietly enacted deception. Instead of voicing confusion, many professionals simply mimic AI-literate colleagues—peppering their language with buzzwords, dropping vague references to ChatGPT use, and faking workflows to preserve the illusion of digital fluency. This is not digital transformation. It's digital theatre. Corporate mixed signals : Use AI, but don't look lazy Compounding the confusion is a contradictory workplace ethos. A 2024 Slack Workforce Index survey found that nearly half of desk-based workers worldwide are reluctant to admit AI usage to their managers. The fear? That relying on AI could be perceived as cheating, laziness, or lack of originality. So the same workers pressured to adopt AI quietly downplay its use—even as others lie about using it in the first place. These opposing behaviors speak to a broader institutional failure: companies are championing innovation without redefining the norms of competence. The result? A workforce unsure not only how to use AI—but whether admitting it is even safe. The psychological toll: Between innovation and insecurity Beyond the strategic masquerade lies a toll that is harder to quantify: mental fatigue, professional self-doubt, and the erosion of authentic learning. Employees trapped in this contradictory loop—encouraged to innovate yet shamed for depending on tools—are left emotionally strained, constantly scanning the room to see what 'the competent ones' are doing. In such a climate, genuine upskilling takes a backseat to self-preservation. Pretending to use AI becomes a defense mechanism, not a productivity choice. It's not about AI, it's about leadership The heart of this crisis is not artificial intelligence. It's the absence of honest, inclusive leadership. Companies have failed to scaffold this new era with adequate support, psychological safety, or clarity. By normalizing vague expectations and punishing transparency, they have created a workplace where feigned fluency is safer than actual learning. If the future of work is to be truly intelligent—artificial or not—it must begin with empathy, guidance, and realism. Because when professionals feel compelled to fake their way through innovation, the lie isn't just theirs. It's the system's. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
