Trump goes mum on 'Armenian genocide' after Biden recognition
In an annual message issued by presidents on the tragedy's anniversary, Trump said that the American people "honor the memories of those wonderful souls who suffered in one of the worst disasters of the 20th century."
Biden in 2021 became the first president to recognize the genocide, writing: "The American people honor all those Armenians who perished in the genocide that began 106 years ago today."
Biden, who throughout his political career had a tight relationship with Armenian Americans, used similar formulations throughout his presidency and directly told Erdogan that he would use the term genocide.
Armenian American activists voiced outrage at Trump's language and noted that he had promised to support Armenians, who are overwhelmingly Christian, after Turkish-aligned Azerbaijan seized the Nagorno-Karabakh breakaway enclave dominated by the community in 2023.
"President Trump's retreat from US recognition of the Armenian genocide represents a disgraceful surrender to Turkish threats," said Aram Hamparian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America.
"President Trump's omission is not a diplomatic oversight -- but rather a deliberate retreat from truth and a dangerous signal of US tolerance for ongoing anti-Armenian violence," he said in a statement.
"It mirrors his first administration's shameful record of silence and complicity."
Asked why Trump did not use the term genocide, National Security Council spokesman James Hewitt said: "These horrific events were one of the worst atrocities of the 20th century.
"That is why the US government acknowledges that 1.5 million ethnic Armenians were deported, massacred or marched to their deaths in the final days of the Ottoman Empire," he said.
110-year anniversary
According to Armenia and most mainstream Western historians, up to 1.5 million people died between 1915 and 1916 when the Ottoman authorities, struggling on the battlefield, repressed the Armenian minority which it saw as traitors in league with Russia.
They were either killed or sent on deadly marches into the Syrian desert, deprived of food and water.
Turkey denies that the killings were systematic or genocide. It estimates Armenian deaths at 300,000 to 500,000 and claims that as many Turks died in civil strife after many Armenians sided with invading Russian forces.
Both houses of the US Congress in 2019 nearly unanimously declared that the United States recognizes an Armenian genocide, leading Trump's State Department to issue a statement that the administration's stance "has not changed" against using the term.
Other major countries that recognize an Armenian genocide inlcude France and Russia, which both have close ties with Armenia, and Germany, which has long been sensitive to the issue due to its Nazi past.
Trump administration officials have often accused Biden of jeopardizing US interests by focusing on human rights, instead suggesting to only raise the issue as a cudgel against US adversaries.
At the end of Trump's first term, the State Department declared that China was committing genocide against its mostly Muslim Uyghur minority due to mass incarceration camps, charges strongly denied by Beijing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump: 'Highly unlikely' to fire Fed Chair Powell, but looked into it
US stocks dipped temporarily on Wednesday following rumours that the US President is preparing to fire the Chair of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell. But later, President Donald Trump said that he was 'highly unlikely' to fire Powell. He made the public statement less than 24 hours after suggesting in a private meeting that he was leaning in favour of dismissing the head of the nation's central bank. Trump confirmed in a White House meeting Tuesday night with about a dozen House Republicans, that he had discussed the 'concept' of dismissing Powell, because of his refusal to lower interest rates, as Trump wants. 'Almost every one of them said I should,' Trump said about the lawmakers who had come to talk to him about crypto legislation. He indicated he was leaning in that direction, according to a White House official. During that session, Trump waved a letter about firing Powell, but a person familiar with the matter said it was essentially a prop drafted by someone else and that the Republican president has not drafted such a letter. When asked directly if he was planning to fire Powell, Trump said, 'I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely.' That helped calm the market, and stocks erased their losses, though Trump added that he could still fire Powell if 'he has to leave for fraud.' Trump has been criticising a $2.5 billion (€2.16bn) renovation project of the Fed's headquarters. Why does Trump want to fire the Fed Chair? The Federal Reserve has two main jobs: keeping the job market strong while keeping inflation under control. Trump is unhappy that the Fed has not cut interest rates this year, a move that would have made it easier for US households and businesses to get loans to buy houses, build factories and otherwise boost the economy. Lower interest rates could also help the US government, which is set to borrow and add a lot more to its debt after approving a wide range of tax cuts. But lowering interest rates would also give inflation more fuel when tariffs may be set to push prices for US households higher. That is why Powell has insisted he wants to wait for more data on how Trump's stiff proposed tariffs will affect the economy and inflation before the Fed makes its next move. Removing Fed Chair Jerome Powell might help Wall Street get the lower interest rates that investors love, but it would also risk a weakened Fed unable to make the unpopular moves needed to keep inflation under control. A report on Wednesday said inflation at the wholesale level slowed to 2.3% last month, which was better than economists expected. It's an encouraging signal, but it came a day after another report suggested that Trump's tariffs are pushing up the prices US shoppers are paying for toys, apparel and other imported products. Republican senators caution Trump against firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is gaining some key backing on Capitol Hill from Republican (GOP) senators, some of whom began to speak up and warn that such a move would be a mistake. Trump would potentially obliterate the Fed's independence from political influence and inject uncertainty into the foundations of the US economy if he fires Powell. "If anybody thinks it would be a good idea for the Fed to become another agency in the government subject to the president, they're making a huge mistake," GOP North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis said in a floor speech. The measure of support from GOP members of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs showed how traditional Republicans are carefully navigating a presidency in which Trump often flirts with ideas — like steep tariffs or firing the Fed Chair — that threaten to undermine confidence in the US economy. Tillis, who recently decided not to seek re-election after clashing with Trump, later told The Associated Press that the economic fallout from Powell's firing would mostly hurt "little guys like me that grew up in trailer parks that may have a few thousand dollars in a 401k." He also pointed out that the underlying complaint that Trump has with the Fed — its reluctance to cut interest rates — is not controlled by Powell alone, but instead a 12-member committee. "The markets expect an independent, central bank," said GOP South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds, who cautioned against firing Powell. "And if they thought for a minute that he wasn't independent, it would cast a spell over the forecasts and the integrity of the decisions being made by the bank." Still, plenty of other Republicans think that dismissing Powell is a fine idea. "The most incompetent, worst Federal Reserve chairman in American history should resign," said GOP Ohio Sen. Bernie Moreno. Do presidents have the authority to fire the Fed Chair? House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters that he was "unhappy with the leadership" at the Fed, but added, "I'm honestly not sure whether that executive authority exists" to fire Powell. House Financial Services Committee chair French Hill has underscored that presidents don't have the authority to fire the Fed Chair, yet has also been sympathetic to Trump's complaints about Powell's leadership. He and other Republicans have also noted that Powell's term as chair is ending next year anyway, and Trump will have an opportunity to name a new Chair then. Even those Republicans who argued that the president has grounds to fire Powell, and piled criticism on the central banker, conceded that it would still be a painful step. "That's a decision the president will make, and he's being very deliberate about it," said Moreno, the Ohio senator who called for Powell's resignation. "But I don't think we should put the country through any of that."
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
US senators approve $9 billion of Elon Musk's federal cuts
The upper chamber of Congress green-lit the measure in what was seen as the first test of how easily lawmakers could usher into law savings sought by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) -- in the aftermath of the tech mogul's acrimonious exit from the government. Despite the cutbacks' unpopularity in some sections of both parties, the Republican-led Senate passed the measure with 51 votes for and 48 against in a session that went more than two hours past midnight. The version of the text passed in June by the House of Representatives sought to eliminate $400 million in funding allocated to health programs, including the PEPFAR global AIDS relief fund created by then-president George W. Bush. But defunding PEPFAR -- which has saved an estimated 26 million lives -- was seen as a nonstarter among a handful of moderate Republican senators, and the proposal was dropped. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham told AFP the bill was consistent with Trump's promises to cut spending. "I've been a big fan of the foreign aid accounts... I'm a big hawkish guy, but you need foreign aid. You need soft power," he said. "But when you start spending money on a bunch of junk, and liberal programs disconnected from the purpose of the aid package, it makes it difficult on a guy like me." The bill now goes back to the House for final approval, with lawmakers up against the clock. Congress, which had already allocated the money, has to approve the cuts by Friday or the White House must spend the cash as originally intended. Legislation to claw back money already approved by Congress -- known as a "rescissions package" -- is extremely rare, and no such measure has passed in decades. 'Surrendering powers' Around a dozen Republicans had voiced concerns about allowing the White House to dictate spending cuts, placing them in the crosshairs of Trump, who last week threatened to withhold his endorsements from any rebels. The vote was the first in what Republicans have touted as a potential series of packages codifying the spending cuts made by DOGE. Musk was tapped by Trump to lead the task force after the tech billionaire spent $290 million helping him get elected. The SpaceX and Tesla boss boasted that he would be able to save $2 trillion in federal spending -- but left the White House under a cloud in late May as he feuded with Trump over deficits and spending. DOGE acknowledges that it has saved taxpayers just $190 billion -- and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. The rescissions package slashes around $8 billion in foreign aid, with much of that approved for humanitarian organization USAID, one of DOGE's first targets. Around $1 billion is to be taken back from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), as well as more than 1,500 local radio and television stations. Conservatives often accuse PBS and NPR of bias, and Trump signed an executive order in May to cease federal funding for both networks. Democrats say cutting the funding will not meaningfully reduce the deficit, but instead dismantle a trusted source of information for millions of Americans. "It is yet another example of the spirit and ideals of our Constitution being undermined in a terrible way. We are a nation that believes that (Congress) has a real role," New Jersey Senator Cory Booker told AFP. "And this is a bunch of my colleagues in thrall of the president, surrendering the powers of us, and the urgency for us to work together and do it in a bipartisan way to improve budgets." © 2025 AFP
AFP
4 hours ago
- AFP
Posts accusing Rahul Gandhi of 'insulting Hindu festival' use misleadingly edited speech
"Rahul Gandhi, standing on the soil of Odisha, called the Rath Yatra of Lord Jagannath a 'drama'!" reads part of the Hindi-language caption of a Facebook video shared on July 11, 2025. The video shows Gandhi standing at a podium and saying: "When the Jagannath Yatra takes place in Odisha, the chariot of the Jagannath Yatra comes out, hundreds of thousands of people watch it and follow it and then a drama takes place." It was shared after a deadly stampede marred the annual Rath Yatra festival honouring the Hindu deity Lord Jagannath, which was held in eastern Odisha state (archived link). At least three people were killed and around 50 others injured in the early hours of June 29, with the Times of India reporting that eyewitnesses blamed the chaos on poor planning and arrangements for VIPs (archived link). Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post captured on July 16, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The clip was also shared in similar Facebook, Threads and X posts targeting the opposition Congress party's leader. "The Supreme Court should take cognisance of the insult of the Hindu faith and Lord Jagannath by this heretic and strict action should be taken against this heretic," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "When will action be taken against this corrupt stupid man? How long will he keep roaming around the country and keep talking nonsense, keep playing with the sentiments of Hindu believers?" The video, however, has been misleadingly edited. Clipped video A reverse image search on Google using keyframes from the misleadingly edited video led to a longer version published on the verified YouTube channel of News 18 Odia on July 11 (archived link). Its description states that Gandhi was speaking at Congress' "Save the Constitution" rally in Odisha's Bhubaneswar city, part of a national campaign to bolster support for the opposition party. Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared clip (left) and the News 18 Odia video (right) The segment used in the false posts can be seen at the video's 32-second mark. The falsely shared clip omits Gandhi explaining what he meant by "drama". "When the Jagannath Yatra takes place in Odisha, the chariot of the Jagannath Yatra comes out, hundreds of thousands of people watch it and follow it and then a drama takes place -- the chariots are stopped specifically for Adani and his family," he says, referring to Indian billionaire Gautam Adani. The Adani Group chairman took part in the Rath Yatra with his family on June 28 (archived link). The pulling of giant chariots of Lord Jagannath and his siblings from the Lion's Gate of the Shree Jagannath Temple to the Gundicha Temple 2.5 km (1.5 miles) away -- a key ritual in the Rath Yatra -- had been delayed by a day, according to India's The Telegraph newspaper (archived link). The newspaper said the opposition Congress party accused the Odisha state government, run by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), of deliberately delaying the ritual so the Adani family could take part. In response, Odisha law minister Prithiviraj Harichandan accused the opposition of trying to "politicise the issue". Gandhi goes on to say in his speech: "This alone reveals the true nature of the Odisha government. This is not the Odisha government and it is also not the government of poor people. "It doesn't serve the people of Odisha, but rather a handful of billionaires like Adani. Their aim is to seize your land, your forests, and your future." His remarks were also reported by The Indian Express, The Print, PTI and Times of India (archived here, here, here and here). AFP has debunked other false posts targeting the opposition leader here.
