Fact check: Viral Durban video misrepresents South Africa – DW – 07/30/2025
Claim: A post on X featuring a video allegedly showing recent lootings in South Africa, and captured: "This is Durban, South Africa," is currently going viral. The post was published by Alex Jones, a US-based far-right radio host known for promoting conspiracy theories. He claims: "This is what removing 'White Oppression' and replacing it with Soros NGO systems looks like. A glimpse into the future of ALL Western countries if changes are not made fast as already seen in the SH!T HOLE blue city's [sic] across America." The post had 1.6 million views at the time of publication.
DW Fact check: Misleading
The video posted on X does not show a recent situation in Durban, a city in the east of South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal province. While the footage does show a shopping street in central Durban, as the geolocation of the scene indicates, it was not recorded recently. A reverse image search by DW Fact check revealed that the video had already circulated on X and Facebook in 2021. Comparisons with official agency photos from that time confirm that the footage dates back to July 2021.
The video captures a moment during a period of unrest in South Africa, when parts of the country were engulfed in riots and widespread looting — sparked by the imprisonment of former President Jacob Zuma. He had been sentenced to 15 months in prison for failing to comply with a Constitutional Court order to testify before a commission investigating corruption during his presidency. His arrest triggered protests, particularly in his home province of KwaZulu-Natal, which includes Durban — the city featured in the video.
Zuma's supporters viewed his arrest as unjust and rallied to demand his release, criticizing the judiciary. However, Zuma's imprisonment was only one of several triggers for the unrest. Underlying causes included economic hardship, high youth unemployment, political disillusionment with the African National Congress (ANC), and opportunistic criminal activity. The riots ultimately left more than 300 people dead.
Since 2021, the video has resurfaced repeatedly across various social media platforms and in multiple languages. A similar claim using the same footage went viral again in March of this year.
Dhanaraj Thakur, a researcher at the Center for Democracy and Technology, sees this as part of a broader strategy, "a larger campaign with many different actors sharing similar kinds of messages," he told DW. "Some of these actors have an intent to create misunderstanding and promote this kind of racist narrative."
The 2021 unrest has been exploited by several accounts known for spreading discriminatory content and disinformation. This is unsurprising, given that the claim implies that alleged current lootings in Durban are a direct consequence of the end of apartheid, — the system of institutionalized racial segregation that governed South Africa from 1948 to the early 1990s.
In doing so, it reinforces racist and discriminatory narratives that link post-apartheid governance to urban collapse, looting and chaos.
"We see an undercurrent of racial tensions and a glorification of the apartheid system," said Juliet Nanfuka, a digital rights researcher at the Collaboration on International ICT Policy in East and Southern Africa (CIPESA). 'This is deeply concerning."
Similar forms of disinformation continue to be amplified by people including US President Donald Trump. Earlier this year, Trump claimed that a genocide was taking place against white farmers in South Africa — a statement that lacks any credible evidence or reliable data, as DW Fact check also found at the time.
Billionaire tech entrepreneur Elon Musk also echoed these claims on X , where his post received more than 11 million views. Musk, who was born in South Africa, appeals to a US audience that, according to Nanfuka, is "ready to believe negative narratives about Africa."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Other fact-checking organizations like AfricaCheck have also reported on several videos or publicationsthat were taken out of context from the 2021 unrest.
"All countries experience political protests and disruptive events from time to time," said Keegan Leech, a fact-checker at Africa Check. "It's easy to misrepresent South Africa because many international audiences don't know much about the country."
In the viral post, Durban is presented as a cautionary tale — a warning that Western countries could face similar chaos if they undergo comparable political or social changes.
In the US context, Thakur explains, "it's about the politics around immigration, and the idea that certain groups are supposedly incapable of governing or managing public services — and that similar outcomes will follow if they are included in society."
According to him, such narratives exploit existing societal fears, "especially during times of economic uncertainty."
This type of disinformation follows a familiar playbook: Reuse old footage, strip it of context, and pair it with a sensational caption to provoke outrage or boost engagement. According to Thakur, this is part of a broader social media business model.
"That includes content people react to — like racist or misogynistic posts," he said.
In this case, some versions of the post suggest that South Africa is controlled by a network of NGOs funded by George Soros. The billionaire investor and philanthropist is known for funding progressive and democratic causes worldwide through his Open Society Foundations.
He is also frequently invoked in right-wing global conspiracy theories, representing supposed globalist threats. "Soros has become a code word — a symbol to represent everything they're against," Thakur said.
The viral video recycles falsehoods and fuels anti-immigration rhetoric and conspiracy theories. However, it has not gone unchallenged.
"It was promising to see quite a big pushback in the comments that followed," said Juliet Nanfuka. "South Africans and non-South Africans trying to correct the narrative."
Still, she warns, such messages don't spread by accident — and they don't target just one country.
DW Fact check saw similar narratives pushed against people of color and religious minorities living in Europe last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Australia To Buy 11 Advanced Warships From Japan
Australia will upgrade its navy with 11 Mogami-class frigates built by Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Tuesday. Australia is in the midst of a major military restructuring announced in 2023, turning towards long-range strike capabilities to better respond to China's naval might. It is striving to expand its fleet of major warships from 11 to 26 over the next 10 years. "This is clearly the biggest defence-industry agreement that has ever been struck between Japan and Australia," Marles said, touting the US$6 billion (Aus$10 billion) deal. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries was awarded the tender over Germany's ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems. "This decision was made based on what was the best capability for Australia," Marles said. "We do have a very close strategic alignment with Japan." Mogami-class warships are advanced stealth frigates equipped with a potent array of weapons. Marles said they would replace Australia's ageing fleet of Anzac-class vessels, with the first Mogami-class ship to be in service by 2030. "The Mogami-class frigate is the best frigate for Australia," said Marles. "It is a next-generation vessel. It is stealthy. It has 32 vertical launch cells capable of launching long-range missiles." Defence industry minister Pat Conroy said the frigates were capable of launching long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles. "The acquisition of these stealth frigates will make our navy a bigger navy, and a more lethal navy," he said. The first three Mogami-class frigates will be built overseas, Conroy said, with shipbuilding yards in Western Australia expected to produce the rest. Australia announced a deal to acquire US-designed nuclear-powered submarines in 2021, scrapping a years-long plan to develop non-nuclear subs from France. Under the tripartite AUKUS pact with the United States and the United Kingdom, the Australian navy plans to acquire at least three Virginia-class submarines within 15 years. The AUKUS submarine programme alone could cost the country up to US$235 billion over the next 30 years, according to Australian government forecasts, a price tag that has stoked criticism of the strategy. Major defence projects in Australia have long suffered from cost overruns, government U-turns, policy changes and project plans that make more sense for local job creation than defence. Australia plans to gradually increase its defence spending to 2.4 percent of gross domestic product -- above the two percent target set by its NATO allies, but well short of US demands for 3.5 percent. Australia is in the midst of a major military restructuring and plans to replace its ageing fleet of Anzac-class vessels AFP Infographic showing a US Virginia-class nuclear submarine, plus a delivery schedule to Australia under the 2021 AUKUS agreement AFP
Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
NGOs Caught Between Juntas And Jihadists In Turbulent Sahel
NGOs in the violence-wracked Sahel region are dangerously caught between military juntas who accuse them of being spies, and jihadists who view them as symbols of Western influence. In the world terror epicentre, nearly 30 million people rely on humanitarian aid provided by non-governmental organisations and international bodies. "The need is mostly concentrated in the central Sahel" in junta-led Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger where assistance is critical to nearly 15 million people, according to the United Nations humanitarian agency, OCHA. Since seizing power, the juntas have made sovereignty and the fight against jihadists their priority, leaving NGOs and organisations that receive funding from abroad under increased pressure. In Burkina Faso, 21 NGOs had their permits to operate in the country revoked in the space of just one month between June and July, for what the authorities said were administrative reasons. Ten other associations were suspended for three months. "It's a tough blow but we are working to comply with legal requirements. For now, our activities are suspended," a member of one of the associations told AFP. In neighbouring Mali, NGOs financed or supported by former colonial power France, with whom the junta has cut ties, have been suspended since 2022. The military-led authorities also plan to impose a 10-percent levy on funding for NGOs and associations to use for Mali's "economic, social, environmental and cultural development", according to a draft law seen by AFP. Niger's junta has ordered NGOs to align their activities with its priorities, which it says are bolstering security, developing production centres to boost the economy and promoting good governance. In November, it withdrew the operating licences for French aid group Acted and a local association, Action for Wellbeing (ABPE). Interior Minister General Mohamed Toumba declared two months later that "many NGOs" in Niger were carrying out "subversion missions" through "support they often provide to terrorists". Then in February, the International Committee of the Red Cross was ordered to leave the west African country, where it had worked since 1990, accused of "collusion with terrorists". As they come under pressure from the juntas, NGOs must also contend with attacks by jihadist groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda or the Islamic State group, who see them as a threat to their power and ideology. The Sahel region was the epicentre of global "terrorism" for the second straight year in 2024, accounting for more than half of deaths put down to terror attacks worldwide, according to the Global Terrorism Index. At least 26 humanitarian workers were killed in the Sahel last year and many more wounded and kidnapped in 116 security incidents, OCHA said. "Our operations are now limited to a few cities. To transport staff or supplies, for example, we prefer air transport, which generates extra costs at a time when we are struggling to mobilise resources," a Burkinabe humanitarian worker, speaking on condition of anonymity due to security concerns, told AFP. "Many NGOs are now present on the ground thanks to their local staff, which minimises risks," a Nigerien NGO worker said. In October, Doctors Without Borders (MSF) stopped working in the large northern Burkinabe town of Djibo, which is surrounded by jihadists, following attacks targeting its health centres and offices. A few years earlier the medical charity had been forced to leave the southeast Nigerien town of Maine Soroa near the border with Nigeria due to raids by Boko Haram jihadists in August 2020. "NGOs are targeted because extremist groups are seeking to establish themselves as legitimate alternative authorities," said Charlie Werb, an analyst at risk advisory company Alert:24. "They want to supplant the state, which means not only pushing out the state itself from territory, but also organisations deemed to be providing services on its behalf," he told AFP. The Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims, known by its Arabic initials JNIM, an Islamist outfit affiliated with Al-Qaeda that is active in Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, "has stated that it will only allow NGOs to operate in areas under its control so long as they don't carry out activity that goes against their religious principles", Werb said. NGOs have had armed escorts imposed on them by the juntas purportedly to ensure their safety, but humanitarian workers believe the move is mostly designed to keep track of their activities. "Conducting our activities under military escort can hinder our actions and expose us to one of the belligerents," the Burkinabe aid worker said. Juntas in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have made the fight against jihadists one of their priorities AFP Infographic with map of Western and Central Africa showing instances of political violence by Islamic State groups and Al-Qaeda-affiliated Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM), according to ACLED data for one year up to June 6, 2025 AFP
DW
7 hours ago
- DW
India brushes off Trump tariff threat over Russian oil – DW – 08/04/2025
India has pushed back against US President Donald Trump's threat to impose higher tariffs on Indian goods. New Delhi condemned Western criticism of its buying oil from Moscow, vowing to protect its national interests. India on Monday denounced as unfair the mounting pressure from the United States and European Union over its continued purchases of Russian oil. Foreign Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said the country would safeguard its economic interests amid threats of steep tariffs from President Donald Trump. "The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable," said Jaiswal, asserting the country's sovereign right to secure energy supplies in line with its needs. "Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security," he added. Jaiswal also argued that India's imports began only after Western countries diverted traditional supplies to Europe following the outbreak of the Ukraine war. He also accused both the EU and the US of hypocrisy. "It is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia," Jaiswal said. "Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Jaiswal pointed to ongoing Europe-Russia trade involving fertilizers, chemicals, iron and steel, machinery, and transport equipment. He also noted that the US continues to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for electric vehicles, and other industrial goods. US President Donald Trump has threatened to sharply increase tariffs on Indian goods, accusing New Delhi of profiting from discounted Russian oil while failing to support efforts to end the war in Ukraine. While Trump did not specify the exact rate, an existing 10% tariff on Indian products is expected to rise to 25% starting Thursday. The move, he said, was in response to India "buying massive amounts of Russian oil" and reselling it for profit, which he claimed fuels Moscow's war on Ukraine. "They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump wrote on Truth Social. The move adds strain to a key trade relationship. The US is India's largest trading partner, with Indian exports to the US totaling $87.4 billion in 2024. India recorded a nearly $46 billion trade surplus with the US the same year. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
