Harvard cautions foreign students over US airports, social media
BOSTON - Harvard University staff advised international students to be cautious about social media posts and warned some groups against arriving at Boston's Logan International Airport.
Representatives from Harvard's international office and a Harvard Law School immigration support group held a call on July 3 to provide guidance to foreign students after the university won a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's efforts to block its ability to enrol such individuals.
The Harvard administrators cautioned students that State Department officials have the ability to review social media accounts for student visa applicants, while US Customs and Border Protection can examine personal electronic devices and reject entry based on their contents, according to students who participated, asking not to be identified because the call was private.
The Harvard representatives said it's not clear whether this assessment is done by people or artificial intelligence and what exactly constitutes a red flag, although pro-Palestinian, anti-Semitic or posts derogatory of the US appear to be a focus, according to the students.
Previous interactions with law enforcement, including minor infractions, will also attract attention. The Harvard representatives cautioned that wiping devices clean risks inviting suspicion, according to the students.
The hosts of the call included Ms Maureen Martin, Harvard's director of immigration services, and Mr Jason Corral, a staff attorney at Harvard Law School's immigration and refugee clinic, the students said. A representative for Harvard's international office declined to comment.
The Harvard representatives advised Iranians and Chinese nationals studying in particular fields – including science, technology, engineering and mathematics as well as anything related to AI – to exercise particular caution when travelling, according to the students.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Seller's stamp duty rates for private homes raised; holding period increased from 3 years to 4
Asia Japan urges evacuation of small island as 1,000 quakes hit region
World Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending Bill wins congressional approval
World US Treasury chief sees 100 countries getting 10% reciprocal tariff
Sport A true fans' player – Liverpool supporters in Singapore pay tribute to late Diogo Jota
Singapore Universities like NUS need to be open, to become a sanctuary for global talent: Vivian Balakrishnan
Singapore 193ha of land off Changi to be reclaimed for aviation park; area reduced to save seagrass meadow
Business More Singapore residents met CPF Required Retirement Sum when they turned 55 in 2024
Iranians specifically have faced more scrutiny at Logan Airport and should fly into New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport instead, Mr Corral said on the call, according to the students.
It's not clear if other international students would face smoother immigration processes at other airports but several participants said they walked away from the call with the understanding that JFK, Chicago's O'Hare International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport may be better options than Boston.
Ms Kseniia Petrova, a Russian-born Harvard researcher, was stopped by immigration officials at Logan Airport in February on her return from France and
accused of attempting to smuggle frog embryos into the country . She was released on bail from federal custody by a Boston judge in June after spending four months in detention but indicted on additional charges later that month.
A representative for the Massachusetts Port Authority, which oversees Logan Airport, referred all questions to Harvard.
The White House has made Harvard its primary target in its mission to reshape higher education. In addition to the attempted crackdown on international student enrollment, the Trump administration has cancelled more than US$2.6 billion (S$3.2 billion) in research funding for Harvard and threatened its tax-exempt status.
The government initially accused the school of fostering anti-Semitism, but the attack has since broadened to include accusations of political bias and criticism of diversity initiatives in hiring and admissions.
It's not clear if Harvard students are being treated differently than those at other universities. The Trump administration is appealing the injunction over its ban on Harvard's international student enrolment. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
19 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Ong Beng Seng's new pre-trial conference date set on July 23
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox According to the court system, Ong's July 8 hearing was adjourned for parties to file revised papers. SINGAPORE - Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng will have his case heard in court again on July 23 in a pre-trial conference. This comes after his pre-trial conference on July 8, in a case linked to former transport minister S. Iswaran. According to the court system, Ong's July 8 hearing was adjourned for parties to file revised papers. Details were not provided. Ong, 79, had previously been scheduled to plead guilty on July 3. But this was adjourned one day before the hearing as the prosecution and defence needed more time to file further submissions on sentencing. Ong was first set to plead guilty on April 2, but this was postponed after his lawyers asked for an extension to obtain his medical reports. The billionaire was charged on Oct 4, 2024, with abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and abetting the obstruction of justice. Under Section 165, it is an offence for a public servant to accept anything of value from anyone with whom he is involved in an official capacity without payment or with inadequate payment. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World 25% on Japan and Malaysia, 40% on Laos: Trump's tariff letters to Asia add pressure for deals by Aug 1 Business Asia markets edge up as Trump signals still open to tariff talks Singapore MRT services resume on 5-station stretch of North-South Line after track fault Multimedia 'I suspect he's cheating': She finds proof when spouses stray Asia Thai authorities vow crackdown on cannabis-infused products after toddler hospitalised World Netanyahu says he nominated Trump for Nobel Peace Prize Opinion Singapore at 60: Home truly is an idea that never stands still Singapore Fastest charger to be added to Singapore's EV charging network by Q4 in 2025 According to court documents, the businessman had in December 2022 allegedly arranged for Mr Iswaran to fly on Ong's private plane from Singapore to Doha. The flight was valued at US$7,700 (S$10,400). Ong also allegedly arranged for Mr Iswaran a one-night stay at Four Seasons Hotel Doha, valued at $4,737.63, and a business-class flight from Doha to Singapore, valued at $5,700. Court documents showed Ong allegedly alerted Mr Iswaran that the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau had seized the flight manifest for the December 2022 trip. It prompted Mr Iswaran to ask the tycoon to bill him for the flight to avoid investigations. For this alleged offence, Ong was charged with the abetment of obstruction of justice. The businessman is known as the man who brought Formula One (F1) to Singapore in 2008 – the first night race in the sport's history. Mr Iswaran was chairman of the F1 steering committee and the Government's chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters related to the race. The two men had worked in the mid-2000s to convince then Formula One Group chief executive Bernie Ecclestone to make Singapore the venue for that first race.
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China risks global heavy rare-earth supply to stop Myanmar rebel victory
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: A combination image shows a satellite image and a Google Earth image of an area in Bhamo town in northern Myanmar, which has seen months of fighting between the country's ruling junta and the Kachin Independence Army, an ethnic armed group since December 2024, in Bhamo, Myanmar, Decemeber 12, 2024 (L) and May 20, 2025 (R). 2025 Planet Labs PBC, Google/Airbus/Handout via REUTERS/File photo The global supply of heavy rare earths hinges in part on the outcome of a months-long battle between a rebel army and the Chinese-backed military junta in the hills of northern Myanmar. The Kachin Independence Army since December has been battling the junta over the town of Bhamo, less than 100 km (62 miles) from the Chinese border, as part of the civil war that erupted after the military's 2021 coup. Nearly half the world's supply of heavy rare earths is extracted from mines in Kachin state, including those north of Bhamo, a strategically-vital garrison town. They are then shipped to China for processing into magnets that power electronic vehicles and wind turbines. China, which has a near-monopoly over the processing of heavy rare earths, has threatened to halt buying the minerals mined in KIA-controlled territory unless the militia stops trying to seize full control of Bhamo, according to three people familiar with the matter. The ultimatum issued by Chinese officials to the KIA in a meeting earlier this year, which is reported by Reuters for the first time, underscores how Beijing is wielding its control of the minerals to further its geopolitical aims. One of the people, a KIA official, said the Chinese demand was made in May, without detailing where the discussions took place. Another person, a KIA commander, said Beijing was represented by foreign ministry officials at the talks. Reuters could not determine whether China had carried out its threat. Fighting in the region has restricted mining operations and rare-earth exports from Myanmar have plunged this year. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World 25% on Japan and Malaysia, 40% on Laos: Trump's tariff letters to Asia add pressure for deals by Aug 1 Business Asia markets edge up as Trump signals still open to tariff talks Singapore MRT train services resume on 5-station stretch of North-South Line after track fault Multimedia 'I suspect he's cheating': She finds proof when spouses stray Asia Thai authorities vow crackdown on cannabis-infused products after toddler hospitalised World Netanyahu says he nominated Trump for Nobel Peace Prize Opinion Singapore at 60: Home truly is an idea that never stands still Singapore Fastest charger to be added to Singapore's EV charging network by Q4 in 2025 China spooked global supply chains this spring when it restricted exports of the minerals in retaliation against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. It is now using its dominance to shore up Myanmar's beleaguered junta, which China sees as a guarantor of its economic interests in its backyard. China's foreign ministry said in response to Reuters' questions that it was not aware of the specifics of deliberations with the KIA. "An early ceasefire and peace talks between the Myanmar military and the Kachin Independence Army are in the common interests of China and Myanmar as well as their people," a ministry spokesperson said. A senior KIA general did not respond to a request for comment. The KIA official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Beijing also offered a carrot: greater cross-border trade with KIA-controlled territories if the militia abandoned efforts to seize Bhamo, a logistics hub for the junta that's home to some 166,000 people. "And if we did not accept, they would block exports from Kachin State, including rare-earth minerals," said the official, who did not elaborate on the consequences of an economic blockade. Beijing is not seeking to resolve the wider civil war but it wants fighting to subside in order to advance its economic interests, said David Mathieson, an independent Myanmar-focused analyst. "China's pressure is a more general approach to calming down the conflict." DEFYING CHINA The battle for Bhamo began soon after the KIA wrested control of the main rare-earths belt in Kachin last October. After its takeover, the KIA raised taxes on miners and throttled production of dysprosium and terbium, sending prices of the latter skyrocketing. Supply has been squeezed, with Beijing importing 12,944 metric tons of rare-earth oxides and metals from Myanmar in the first five months of 2025, according to Chinese customs data. That is down half from the same period last year, though exports rose more than 20% between April and May. The KIA, which analysts estimate has over 15,000 personnel, was founded in 1961 to fight for the autonomy of Myanmar's Kachin minority. Battle-hardened through decades of combat and funded by a combination of local taxation and natural resources, it is among the strongest of Myanmar's rebel groups. The militia is confident of its ability to seize Bhamo and believes Beijing won't ultimately carry out its threat to stop exports due to its thirst for the minerals, two of the people said. Myanmar has been in crisis since the military overthrew a democratically-elected government in 2021, violently quashing protests and sparking a nationwide armed rebellion. Swathes of territory were subsequently seized by anti-junta forces, but the rebels have come under Chinese pressure to make concessions to the military. Beijing has also sent jets and drones to the junta, which is increasingly reliant on airpower, according to the U.S.-based Stimson Centre think-tank. China, which has major investments in Myanmar, last year brokered a ceasefire for the junta to return to Lashio, a northeastern town housing a regional military command. More than 200 km to the north, some 5,000 KIA and allied personnel have been involved in the offensive for Bhamo, according to a KIA commander with direct knowledge of the fighting. Losing Bhamo would cut off the military's land and river access to parts of Kachin and neighbouring region, isolating its troops housed at military bases there and weakening its control over northern trade routes, according to Maj. Naung Yoe, who defected from the junta after the coup. The junta spokesperson's office told Reuters that China may have held talks with the KIA, but it did not respond to a question about whether it had asked Beijing to threaten a blockade. "China may have been exerted pressure and offered incentives to the KIA," it said in a statement. Beijing first advised the rebels to pull back from Bhamo during negotiations in early December, according to the KIA official. Instead of withdrawing from Bhamo after those talks, the KIA doubled down, according to the commander and the official. The International Institute for Strategic Studies think-tank said in a May briefing that the battle for Bhamo had cost the KIA significant resources and hundreds of casualties. Beijing became more confrontational during further discussions that took place in spring, when its representatives threatened to stop rare-earth purchases, the official said. A disruption in the movement of heavy rare earths from Kachin could lead to a deficit in the global market by the end of the year, said Neha Mukherjee of U.K.-based consultancy Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. Supplies of the critical minerals outside China were already constrained, she said: "In the short term, during the brief disruption period, prices outside of China could shoot up higher." BATTLE FOR BHAMO The KIA has pushed junta troops into a handful of isolated pockets, according to the commander. But the junta retains air superiority and has devastated large parts of Bhamo with relentless airstrikes, according to the KIA official, the commander and a former resident of the town. The junta spokesperson's office said it was permitted to strike such sites because the KIA had been using them for military purposes, though it did not provide evidence. Nathan Ruser, an analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute think-tank who has reviewed satellite imagery of Bhamo, said much of the damage across the town appeared to be from airstrikes. Airstrikes have killed civilians including children and destroyed schools and places of worship, according to Khon Ja, a Kachin activist from Bhamo who said her home had been bombed. "I don't know for how long that the revolutionary groups will be able to resist Chinese pressure," she said, adding that existing border restrictions had led to shortages of petrol and medicine in Kachin. Despite the obstacles, KIA leaders believe capturing Bhamo would shift momentum in their favour and strengthen public support. If the ethnic army were to take control of the entire state, then Beijing would have no option but to negotiate and sideline the junta, the commander and the official said. "China, which needs rare earths, can only tolerate this for a limited time," the commander said. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Timeline of Trump's remarks on Palestinian displacement, Gaza takeover
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a bilateral dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (not pictured), at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 7, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump proposed a U.S. takeover of Gaza in remarks in early February while also suggesting a permanent displacement of Palestinians from the enclave. The plan was condemned globally, with Palestinians, Arab nations, the U.N. and rights experts saying it was tantamount to "ethnic cleansing." Following is a timeline showing how Trump's comments have evolved since he first proposed displacing Palestinians on January 25: JANUARY 25: FIRST SUGGESTION OF PALESTINIAN DISPLACEMENT Five days after becoming president, Trump said Jordan and Egypt should take in Palestinians from Gaza while suggesting openness to this being a long-term plan. "I'd like Egypt to take people, and I'd like Jordan to take people (from Gaza)," Trump said, adding he spoke that day with Jordan's King Abdullah. "It's literally a demolition site ... so I'd rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing at a different location where they (Palestinians) can maybe live in peace for a change," Trump said, adding: "We just clean out that whole thing." THREE REITERATIONS IN FOLLOWING WEEK Trump reiterated this plan on January 27, 30 and 31, and added that he expected Egypt and Jordan to agree to it, even as they rejected the proposal. "I think he (Egypt's president) would do it, and I think the king of Jordan would do it, too," Trump said on January 27. FEBRUARY 4 AFTERNOON: SUGGESTION OF PERMANENT DISPLACEMENT Before his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington on February 4, Trump suggested permanently displacing Palestinians from Gaza, saying people there had no alternative but to leave the enclave devastated by U.S. ally Israel's military assault that has caused a dire humanitarian situation and killed tens of thousands. "I think they (Gazans) should get a good, fresh, beautiful piece of land, and we get some people to put up the money to build it," Trump told reporters. "I don't know how they could want to stay (in Gaza)," he said. Forced displacement is illegal under international law. FEBRUARY 4 EVENING: U.S. TAKEOVER PROPOSAL In a press conference with Netanyahu, Trump proposed a U.S. takeover of Gaza, saying: "The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip. ... We'll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site." He said Washington will ask neighboring countries with "humanitarian hearts" and "great wealth" to take in Palestinians. He said those countries will pay for rebuilding Gaza and housing displaced Palestinians. When asked if U.S. troops will be sent, Trump said: "If it's necessary, we'll do that." When asked who will live in Gaza, Trump said: "I envision world people living there, ... Palestinians also." FEBRUARY 5: TRUMP AIDES WALK BACK SOME OF HIS STATEMENTS While defending Trump's proposal, his top aides walked back some of his words about permanently displacing Palestinians and using the U.S. military. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Palestinians should be "temporarily relocated" while Gaza is rebuilt and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Palestinians will leave Gaza for an "interim" period. Leavitt said Trump had not committed to putting "boots on the ground." FEBRUARY 6: TRUMP SAYS NO U.S. SOLDIERS NEEDED IN GAZA Trump posted on social media: "The Gaza Strip would be turned over to the United States by Israel at the conclusion of fighting. The Palestinians ... would have already been resettled in far safer and more beautiful communities, with new and modern homes, in the region." He added: "No soldiers by the U.S. would be needed!" FEBRUARY 10: TRUMP SAYS PALESTINIANS HAVE NO RIGHT OF RETURN In a Fox News interview with anchor Bret Baier, Trump was asked if Palestinians will have a right of return under his plan. He replied: "No, they wouldn't because they're going to have much better housing." He added: "I'm talking about building a permanent place for them." FEBRUARY 11: TRUMP MEETS JORDAN'S KING "We will have Gaza. No reason to buy. There is nothing to buy. It's Gaza. It's a war-torn area. We're going to take it. We're going to hold it. We're going to cherish it," Trump said on the day he met Jordan's king in Washington. The king reiterated his opposition. On the same day, Trump was asked if he was going to withhold aid to Egypt and Jordan, which both rely on Washington for economic and military assistance. He said: "You know, I think we'll do something. I don't have to threaten with money ... I do believe we're above that." APRIL 7: TRUMP'S SECOND U.S. MEETING WITH NETANYAHU "I think it's an incredible piece of important real estate," Trump said about Gaza when he met Netanyahu again at the White House, more than two months after his initial Gaza takeover proposal. "And I think it's something that we would be involved in, but you know having a peace force like the United States there, controlling and owning the Gaza Strip, would be a good thing." He said: "And if you take the people, the Palestinians, and move them around to different countries, and you have plenty of countries that will do that." Trump added: "A lot of people like my concept. But you know, there are other concepts that I like too and there are some concepts I don't like." Arab leaders in March adopted a $53 billion Egyptian reconstruction plan that would avoid displacing Palestinians from Gaza. Trump and Israel rejected it at the time. JULY 7: TRUMP'S THIRD U.S. MEETING WITH ISRAELI PM When asked about displacing Palestinians, Trump initially demurred to Netanyahu and said the countries around Israel were helping out. "We've had great cooperation from ... surrounding countries. ... So something good will happen," Trump said. Netanyahu himself said Israel was working with Washington to find other countries to agree to such a plan. "If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave," Netanyahu said. "We're working with the United States very closely about finding countries that will seek to realize what they always say, that they wanted to give the Palestinians a better future. I think we're getting close to finding several countries." Washington has for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians to create a state for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. Trump said, "I don't know" when he was asked if that solution was possible and referred the question to Netanyahu. Netanyahu said: "I think the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us. That means a sovereign power, like overall security, will always remain in our hands." REUTERS
