Peter Dutton coy on what public servant jobs he will slash if he wins election
In a rare press conference at Parliament House on Thursday, the opposition leader provided little information on his plans to get the 'economy back on track' through slashing government jobs and other 'wasteful spending'.
'We'll make announcements in relation to our policies in due course, but I do note that with the 36,000 additional, that brings the public service up to over 200,000,' he said.
'I'm happy to make the announcement at the time, but I've been clear we're not having 36,000 additional public servants in Canberra.'
Dutton claimed the growth under the Albanese government was to 'please the unions' not 'provide a more efficient delivery of service'.
The public service minister, Katy Gallagher, described Dutton's plans as 'reckless and arrogant' and a 'return to worse services, expensive consultants, and the era of robodebt'.
Since the Coalition's 2022-23 budget, the average staffing level for the public service has risen by 35,592 roles, most notably in the frontline services, such as the National Disability Insurance Agency, Services Australia as well as the defence and health departments.
The Australian Public Service Commission's latest State of the Service report showed the number of public servants had risen to more than 185,000 as of June 2024, an 8.9% increase on the previous year.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
In a speech to the Liberal-aligned Menzies Research Centre in January, Dutton foreshadowed the axing of diversity and inclusion positions, along with 'change managers' and 'internal communication specialists'.
'Such positions, as I say, do nothing to improve the lives of everyday Australians,' Dutton claimed.
'They're certainly not frontline service delivery roles that can make a difference to people's lives.'
A number of Dutton's frontbench have responded differently when asked which jobs would be slashed.
Shadow ministers Jane Hume and David Coleman did not address questions this week about whether they would oversee cuts in their own future portfolio departments, if elected.
The Nationals leader, David Littleproud, has previously suggested all 36,000 jobs should be slashed but has softened his language since.
'It's time for us to get out of your life, not put more public servants into it,' he said in Canberra in early February.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
A Coalition reshuffle in January saw the promotion of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to a new Elon Musk-inspired shadow ministry role centring on government efficiency.
Price told The Australian the Coalition 'won't be cutting' the public service workforce, if elected, but would 'halt' its growth.
A few days later, the Country Liberal senator told 2GB diversity and inclusion roles would be on the chopping block.
The Community and Public Sector Union deputy secretary, Rebecca Fawcett, accused the opposition of being deliberately coy to avoid losing support.
'Peter Dutton is not being honest with Australians about what public services he'll cut because he wants you to believe it won't be the ones you use or rely on,' she said.
'Peter Dutton and the Liberals don't want a strong public service that works for mums and dads, veterans, students and pensioners – they want to funnel taxpayer money into the pockets of big consulting firms while leaving everyday Australians to fend for themselves.
'The only people that win from Peter Dutton's plan to slash public services are consultants from places like PwC and KPMG.'
Dutton did not rule out a return to limiting spending on consultants, but said 'if there is wasteful spending taking place, then it should be cut'.
An Albanese government audit in 2023 found the former Morrison government had spent $20.8bn outsourcing more than a third of public service operations.
Nearly 54,000 full-time staff were employed as consultants or service providers for the federal government during the 2021-22 financial year – the equivalent of 37% of the 144,300-employee public service, it found.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Key things to know about Trump's ‘massive' trade deal with Japan
Japan agreed a trade deal that would see the US cut import tariffs on automobiles from the East Asian country from 25 per cent to 15 per cent. The deal is a significant boost to the Japanese automobile industry which sends over a quarter of its total exports to the US market. American president Donald Trump described it as the 'largest TRADE DEAL in history' and an 'exciting time for the United States of America'. Here are the key features of the agreement. Japanese investment in US economy The deal commits Japan to investing $550bn in the US economy. Prime minister Shigeru Ishiba confirmed the deal had been struck on Wednesday, just days after his ruling Liberal Democratic Party suffered a major loss in a key upper house election. Despite facing calls to step down in the wake of the loss, Mr Ishiba vowed to move forward with the agreement, insisting it didn't compromise Japan's agricultural interests. 'This agreement does not sacrifice Japanese agriculture,' he said, adding that US rice imports would remain within existing quotas. American access to Japanese market The agreement expands market access for American goods like automobiles, rice and other agricultural products. The full terms are still to be made public, however. Mr Ishiba said he would closely review the agreement before releasing it, noting his chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, had made eight trips to Washington since April to negotiate with treasury secretary Scott Bessent and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick. Stock and currency market reactions Japanese markets reacted positively to the deal, with Nikkei rising two per cent in early trading, led by automakers. Toyota's shares jumped 10 per cent while Honda gained nine per cent. However, Japanese bond futures fell sharply, with the 10-year benchmark dropping 0.92 yen to its lowest since March. The yen initially surged to a near two-week high before falling amid reports of Mr Ishiba's impending resignation. The dollar index fell for the third consecutive day. 'There's some dovishness infecting the market at the moment around the US dollar,' Michael McCarthy, market strategist at Moomoo Australia, said. Criticism from American auto industry The agreement drew criticism from American carmakers who argued that the deal gave preferential treatment to Japanese imports. 'Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no US content than the tariff imposed on North American-built vehicles… is a bad deal for US industry and US auto workers,' said Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council. Tariffs on vehicles made in North America remain at 25 per cent. Exclusion of metals and defence The new agreement does not address the longstanding issue of 50 per cent American tariff on Japanese steel and aluminium. It also excludes provisions related to defence budgets. Mr Trump, however, indicated that Japan could join a proposed US-backed natural gas pipeline project in Alaska. 'They're all set to make that deal now,' he said during brief remarks at the White House. More deals to follow? Mr Trump said that EU trade negotiators would arrive in Washington on Wednesday, signalling momentum for further deals in the coming days. Mr Bessent suggested that the US was open to extending the tariff negotiation deadline of 1 August if progress was made in talks with partners. The US deal with Japan follows months of tension over trade and may help stabilise economic relations between the allies. In 2024, total two-way trade stood at nearly $230bn, with Japan holding a surplus of approximately $70bn. Japan remains the largest foreign investor in the US, with over $2tn in American assets.
Reuters
12 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan's PM Ishiba denies talk he will quit following election drubbing
TOKYO, July 23 (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba denied talk on Wednesday that he would quit after a source and media reports said he plans to step down following a bruising upper house election defeat. The 68-year-old leader said media reports that he had already decided to resign were "completely unfounded." Ishiba chose not to quit straight after the election to prevent political instability as an August 1 deadline for clinching a trade deal with the U.S. approached, a source close to the prime minister said, asking not to be identified because they are not authorised to talk to the media. Ishiba and Trump unveiled a trade deal on Tuesday that lowers tariffs on imports of Japanese autos and spares Tokyo punishing new levies on other goods. Ishiba will announce his resignation next month, Japanese media reported earlier. If he does go, his departure less than a year after taking office will trigger a succession battle within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party as it contends with challenges from new political parties, particularly on the right, that are stealing its support. Among them is the "Japanese First" Sanseito far-right group which surged in Sunday's vote, growing its representation in the 248-seat upper house to 14 from one. The party has attracted voters with pledges to curb immigration, slash taxes, and provide financial relief to households squeezed by rising prices. Ishiba defeated hardline conservative Sanae Takaichi in a party leadership runoff last year. Whoever succeeds him as head of the LDP would have to govern without a majority in either house of parliament following the government's lower house election defeat in October. Any new leader's immediate priority will be to secure support from enough opposition party lawmakers to win confirmation as prime minister. An incoming leader is unlikely to call a general election straight away, instead holding off on strengthening the party's appeal before seeking a mandate from voters, the source said.
The Guardian
12 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia pays US another $800m for Aukus amid Trump administration review of security pact
Australia made a second $800m payment to America's shipbuilding industry – bringing total payments so far to $1.6bn which was promised before the Trump administration placied the Aukus agreement under review. As part of the Aukus deal – in which Australia would buy nuclear submarines from the US ahead of its own nuclear submarines being built in Adelaide - Australia has agreed to pay about $4.6bn towards boosting US shipbuilding capacity. After decades of under-investment, the US has fewer nuclear submarines than it needs for its own defence, and is building them too slowly to replace its ageing fleet, potentially jeopardising the sale of any submarines to Australia. The office of Australian defence minister Richard Marles has confirmed the second $800m payment was made in the second quarter of 2025 to boost US boat-building, with payments occurring 'in line with Australia's commitment to contribute US$2 billion by the end of 2025'. A further payment is due later this year. 'When the AUKUS pathway was announced in March 2023, Australia was clear that we would make a proportionate contribution to the United States industrial base,' a defence spokesperson said 'Australia's contribution is about accelerating US production rates and maintenance to enable the delivery of Australia's future Virginia class submarines.' Anthony Albanese confirmed the payment was made as part of an agreed schedule, committed to before the US announced its review of Aukus. 'There is a schedule of payments to be made, we have an agreement with the United States as well as with the United Kingdom, it is about increasing the capacity, their industrial capacity, and as part of that, we have Australians on the ground, learning the skills so that when it comes to the SSN Aukus, the submarines being built here in Australia, we have those skills.' Australia is also paying the UK about $4.6bn to assist its shipbuilding industry. In June, US president Donald Trump ordered a review into the Aukus deal signed by his predecessor Joe Biden. The review is being headed by the Pentagon's under secretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby, who has previously declared himself 'skeptical' about the deal, fearing it could leave US sailors exposed and under-resourced. There is speculation the review could demand further financial contributions – or political commitments such as support in a conflict over Taiwan – from Australia in exchange for the sale of nuclear submarines and transfer of nuclear technology. The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has already asked Australia to lift its overall defence spending to 3.5% of GDP, from its current level of 2%. The US has been demanding similar increases from other allies, including Nato countries. One of the most significant concerns over Aukus in the US is the naval superpower's capacity to spare any submarines to sell to Australia: the first sale is forecast for 2032. The Aukus agreement mandates that before any submarine can be sold to Australia, the US commander-in-chief – the president of the day – must certify that America relinquishing a submarine will not diminish the US navy's undersea capability. The US's submarine fleet numbers are currently a quarter below their target and the country is producing boats at half the rate it needs to service its own needs, US government figures show. Marles told parliament in question time that Aukus would deliver Australia a 'long-range submarine capability' required for a more contested region and world. 'We are living in a more volatile world with increasing challenges… we need a defence force which will give pause for thought for any potential adversary which seeks to coerce us.' The head of the Australian Submarine Agency, Vice-Admiral Jonathan Mead, told senate estimates in February this year Australia's funding to the US industrial base was a vital element of the Aukus deal. 'This contribution will help uplift the US submarine industrial base capacity and accelerate sustainment and production to enable the delivery of Virginia class submarines to Australia. 'Australia's contribution to the US submarine industrial base is to benefit both the United States and Australia.'
