Thousands protest in Hungary against Russia-style bill targeting media, NGOs
The demonstration in Budapest, one of the largest in recent months, came after a member of Prime Minister Viktor Orban's ruling Fidesz party introduced legislation that would grant the government sweeping powers to investigate, penalize, or even ban media outlets and non-governmental organizations receiving any foreign funding.
Protesters packed Kossuth Square outside Hungary's parliament, denouncing the bill as an attack on civil society and democratic freedoms. Speakers at the rally described the legislation as an authoritarian move designed to silence dissent ahead of national elections next year.
"This bill is nothing more than a threat, a threat against people being able to express their opinions clearly and freely," said Jakab Toth, one of the speakers. "If it doesn't belong to all of us, if not all of us are free, then sovereignty is solely and exclusively the sovereignty of the government."
The proposed law would create a government blacklist of organizations receiving international support and allow intrusive surveillance, large fines, and operational bans. It would be enforced by the Sovereignty Protection Office, a state body established in 2023 that critics say targets independent voices under the guise of national security.
Orban and his allies have accused foreign actors, particularly the United States during previous administrations and Ukraine, of funding independent media and anti-corruption groups to undermine his government. Those organizations deny the claims, saying their work serves the public interest and adheres to professional standards.
Hungary has faced increasing criticism from international watchdogs for eroding press freedom and democratic checks under Orban's 15-year rule. The new legislation, expected to pass in the Fidesz-dominated parliament, is seen by many as the most repressive yet.
In May 2024, a similar foreign agents bill was passed in the Georgian Parliament. The law, backed by the ruling Georgian Dream party, mirrors repressive Russian legislation used to crack down on the Kremlin regime's critics and NGOs in Russia with foreign ties of any kind.
Georgian Dream's repressions against independent media and decisions to distance the country from the EU have prompted mass protests spanning months and violent crackdowns by the police in the country.
Read also: After spying scandal erupts, Orban accuses Ukraine of meddling, cooperating with Hungarian opposition
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
France's prime minister wants to cut 2 public holidays to save money for the indebted economy
PARIS — France's prime minister proposed on Tuesday the elimination of two public holidays from the country's annual calendar — possibly Easter Monday and the day marking the Allied victory over the Nazis — to save money in next year's budget. That's among a raft of spending cuts laid out by Prime Minister Francois Bayrou in a sweeping, and potentially doomed, budget plan. He argued that removing two state holidays would bring in tax revenues generated from economic activity, contributing to around 44 billion euros ($51.3 billion) in overall savings.
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
France's prime minister wants to cut 2 public holidays to save money for the indebted economy
PARIS (AP) — France's prime minister proposed on Tuesday the elimination of two public holidays from the country's annual calendar — possibly Easter Monday and the day marking the Allied victory over the Nazis — to save money in next year's budget. That's among a raft of spending cuts laid out by Prime Minister Francois Bayrou in a sweeping, and potentially doomed, budget plan. He argued that removing two state holidays would bring in tax revenues generated from economic activity, contributing to around 44 billion euros ($51.3 billion) in overall savings. President Emmanuel Macron tasked Bayrou with crafting a budget that shaves costs to bring down France's staggering debt and deficit — while also adding billions in new defense spending to face what Macron says are resurgent threats from Russia and beyond. Bayrou questioned the religious importance of Easter Monday. And Victory Day, celebrated on May 8, comes in a month that has become a 'veritable Gruyere,' or holey cheese, of days off that includes May Day and the Catholic holiday of Ascension, he said. He said that those holidays were just suggestions, and that he was open to other ideas. France currently has 11 official holidays per year. With no parliamentary majority, Macron's centrist grouping must win support from adversaries on the left and right to pass the budget this fall. Bayrou's proposals, which are just a first step in the budget process, were quickly assailed by unions and the far-right National Rally, the largest single party in the lower house of Parliament. Bayrou's job is precarious, and he could be voted out if he fails to reach compromise on the budget.
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Trump tries to rewrite history on being ‘fooled' by Putin
It remains to be seen just how lasting and severe President Donald Trump's turn against Vladimir Putin will be. Trump has criticized the Russian president in unprecedented terms in recent days and signaled he'll send vital weapons to Ukraine. But he's also given Putin plenty more time – 50 days – before really dropping the hammer with economic punishment. To the extent this shift is genuine, though, it's coming with a healthy dose of rewriting history. Repeatedly this week, Trump has suggested he never really trusted Putin. 'He's fooled a lot of people,' Trump said Monday at the White House, adding: 'He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden. He didn't fool me.' The president echoed the point in a new interview with the BBC. Asked whether he trusted Putin, he reportedly paused for a bit. 'I trust almost nobody, to be honest with you,' he eventually responded. That pause would seem instructive. In fact, Trump has repeatedly vouched for Putin over the years and even in recent months, despite all the evidence undermining his credibility. Just five months ago, Trump said he did trust Putin on the most central of issues – whether he wanted peace in Ukraine. Trump now suggests the Russian president isn't serious about that prospect. 'I believe he wants peace,' Trump said February 14, adding: 'I mean, I know him very well. Yeah, I think he wants peace. I think he would tell me if he didn't. … I trust him on this subject.' It was a pretty stunning and full-throated testimonial for the former KGB officer. Two weeks later, Trump was asked about the prospect of Putin violating the terms of any deal that might be reached – something Putin has done plenty of times done before. He dismissed the idea. 'I think he'll keep his word,' Trump said, before suggesting he had an affinity with Putin because both had to endure the Russia investigation during his first term. And asked by Time magazine in April whether Putin could make peace, Trump signaled it was likely. 'I think Putin will' make peace, he said. The US president is singing a very different tune today. In fact, he said Monday that on three or four occasions, he felt they had a deal in place, only for Putin to pull the rug out from beneath them and continue to hit Ukraine hard. (Despite these comments, Trump has opted to give Putin more time before implementing secondary sanctions on countries that buy Russian oil.) The administration's trust in its negotiations with Putin was also what set off February's Oval Office blow-up with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. After Vice President JD Vance signaled the administration preferred 'diplomacy' to chest-thumping, Zelensky interjected to ask Vance whether Putin could be trusted to actually engage faithfully in talks. 'We signed ceasefire' in 2019, Zelensky said. 'Ceasefire. All of them told me that he will never go [into Ukraine]. We signed him with gas contract – gas contract, yes, but after that, he broken the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it.' Zelensky continued: 'What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about?' Vance called it 'disrespectful' for the Ukrainian leader to litigate this issue in front of the media, and things quickly went off the rails. Ultimately, Trump was asked in that meeting what happens if Putin violates the terms of a ceasefire, and he again blanched at the suggestion. ' 'What if' anything?' Trump said. 'What if a bomb drops on your head right now, OK? What if they break it? I don't know. They broke it with Biden because Biden, they didn't respect him. They didn't respect Obama. They respect me.' Four and a half months later, Trump says Putin tells him very nice things during their phone calls but doesn't back that up with actions. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today, and we had a wonderful conversation,' ' Trump said Monday. 'She said, 'Oh really? Another city was just hit.' ' And this is a familiar tale. Trump has often vouched for adversarial foreign strongmen who have very different agendas, and sometimes that's blown up in his face. Early in 2020, Trump repeatedly vouched for China and President Xi Jinping's control over the Covid outbreak. He dismissed the idea that China was covering up the spread and praised its transparency, reportedly rejecting the idea that he should apply more pressure. Trump made these comments despite China's history of covering up such events and internal administration concerns that it was happening again. Soon, when the outbreak took hold in the United States, Trump would turn to blaming China for it. The White House accused China of the same cover-up Trump had cast doubt upon. Trump has also repeatedly defended Putin in the past, particularly his denials of Russian interference in the 2016 US election. He has even sided with Putin over his own intelligence community. During a press conference with Putin in Helsinki, Finland, in 2018, Trump said he didn't 'see any reason why' Russia would have interfered. 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,' Trump said. He later claimed he had misspoken and that he meant to say he didn't see any reason why Russia wouldn't have done this. But the president has gone on to repeatedly cast doubt on the idea that Russia interfered, even as a bipartisan Senate investigation backed up the intelligence community's findings. Another politician might look at all this and ask themselves whether they invested too much faith in Xi and Putin. But Trump instead suggests that it's other American presidents who have been the dupes. If you look closely, though, you can see Trump tacitly acknowledging his own miscalculation. He has repeatedly pointed to how Putin says nice things but then doesn't stand by them. Even in his anecdote about the first lady, Trump cast himself as seemingly too focused on the things Putin says to him rather than actions on the ground. It's normal in diplomacy to say nice things about your counterparts, even if you don't believe them. But usually you do that a lot more with allies than adversaries. On some level, you're lending your credibility and legitimacy to someone who might not reward it. In Putin's case, there was plenty of reason to believe that might ultimately be the case. And here we are.
