logo
Oh please, the right is reviving a tired trope about women

Oh please, the right is reviving a tired trope about women

Los Angeles Times10 hours ago
Here we go again.
A bunch of successful, conservative professional women are telling young women they don't need careers to have fulfilling lives. All they need to do is avoid college (or better yet, just use it to find a husband), get married, have babies, stay home and live happily ever after.
Perhaps you've noticed the proliferation of 'tradwife' (i.e. traditional wife) influencers on various forms of social media, or the coverage of conferences like the woefully misnamed Young Women's Leadership Summit that recently took place in Dallas. A project of Charlie Kirk's conservative student organization, Turning Point USA, the summit promised to focus on 'foundational aspects of womanhood' such as 'faith, femininity and well-being.'
The conference drew 3,000 women who, according to reports, were mostly college students or young professionals. They sported pins that read 'My favorite season is the fall of feminism' and 'Dump your socialist boyfriend,' and they were told by Kirk, 'We should bring back the celebration of the Mrs. degree.'
'The left wants women to feel angry and like victims, and like your rights are being taken away,' a 31-year-old influencer named Arynne Wexler told a reporter for New York magazine. Not to put too fine a point on it, but in fact her rights are being taken away. Perhaps she has forgotten that the Supreme Court overturned the right to abortion in 2022?
Anyway, there is absolutely nothing new here. A certain subset of women — straight, white, conservative, religious — has always fought against gender equality for their own reasons, but mostly I'd say because it threatens their own privileged status and proximity to male power.
Nearly half a century before Wexler bemoaned 'the left,' Phyllis Schlafly, lawyer, author and anti-feminist crusader, said basically the same thing: 'The feminist movement taught women to see themselves as victims of an oppressive patriarchy. Self-imposed victimhood is not a recipe for happiness.'
Hmmm. I'm pretty sure it was oppressive patriarchy that prevented women from owning property, having their own credit cards and bank accounts, from earning equal pay, accessing legal birth control and abortion, serving on juries and holding public office. Until second wave feminism came along in the 1960s and 1970s, I'm pretty sure, too, that oppressive patriarchy allowed employers to fire women once they married or got pregnant, and that domestic violence, marital rape and sexual harassment were not treated as crimes. Oh, and it was feminists who pushed for Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, which addressed gender inequality in education, including, crucially, in sports.
Attacking feminism because you've never experienced a time when women were not, for the most part, legally equal to men springs from the same ignorant well as believing measles vaccines are unnecessary because you've never experienced the (largely vaccine-eliminated) disease for yourself.
Indeed, reciting the accomplishments of feminism reminds me of that classic scene in the 1979 black comedy 'Monty Python's Life of Brian.' You may recall it: What have the Romans ever given us? (Just sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system and public health.)
A consistent thread in the argument against gender equality is that feminism makes women feel bad for staying home with their kids and not pursuing careers.
In Dallas last month, young conference-goers told the New York Times 'that it was feminism and career ambition making them unhappy, not the broader stress of puzzle-piecing together the responsibilities of modern life.'
In 1994, then-First Lady Barbara Bush said she had experienced a period of depression and partly attributed it to 'the women's movement,' which, as she told NPR, 'sort of made women who stayed home feel inadequate.' I get that. But in response, I would paraphrase Eleanor Roosevelt: No one can make you feel inadequate without your consent. If you are lucky enough to be able to stay home with your children and do not feel compelled to carve out a career, more power to you.
Alex Clark, a popular podcaster and influencer who headlined the Young Women's Leadership Conference, offered the crowd her Make America Healthy Again formula: 'Less Prozac and more protein. Less burnout, more babies, less feminism, more femininity.'
But having lots of babies is stressful — having one baby is stressful — and can certainly lead to its own kind of burnout.
One of the most popular tradwives in the country, Hannah Neeleman, is a Mormon mother of eight young children. She is married to a rancher who is the son of the founder of Jet Blue, has more than 9 million social media followers and, as a former professional ballerina, posts under the handle Ballerina Farm.
Last summer, in a profile published by the Times of London, she was dubbed the 'queen of tradwives.' We learned that she does all the food shopping, makes all the meals and has no help with childcare. I would submit that she is a career woman as well, since she runs popular social media accounts that generate millions of dollars a year in income. In a stunning admission, her husband told the London Times reporter that his wife 'sometimes gets so ill from exhaustion that she can't get out of bed for a week.'
I could not help but think of Mormon housewives in the state of Utah, which has led the nation in antidepressant prescriptions for decades. 'Most men here would just as soon their wives take pills than bother to delve into the problems, and maybe find out they might have something to do with the problems,' a Mormon mom told the Los Angeles Times in 2002, the year the prescription study was released.
Dana Loesch, a conservative commentator, radio host and author who once shilled for the National Rifle Assn., was one of the speakers in Dallas whose reality contradicts her rhetoric.
'I'll tell you this, ladies,' she told the crowd. 'You cannot have it all, at the same time. Something will suffer.'
Oh please. Loesch has it all — a career, marriage and kids.
So why can't they?
@rabcarian.bsky.social @rabcarian.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trump administration has begun garnishing wages of student loan borrowers in default. These are the benefits businesses can offer employees to help with their debt
The Trump administration has begun garnishing wages of student loan borrowers in default. These are the benefits businesses can offer employees to help with their debt

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Trump administration has begun garnishing wages of student loan borrowers in default. These are the benefits businesses can offer employees to help with their debt

A few years ago, it seemed like the dream of widespread student debt forgiveness was alive and well. And although the hopes of millions of borrowers across the country have since been dashed, there are moves that employers can make to help workers toiling under the burden of defaulted loans and garnished wages. Student loan borrowers were able to take advantage of a repayments pause when the COVID pandemic began in 2020, but that expired in September of 2023. That same year, the Supreme Court struck down then-President Biden's decision to cancel up to $20,000 in debt for qualified borrowers. And in May of 2025, a five-year reprieve for student loan borrowers who were in default on their loans expired. That means that collections are now in play, and the Department of Education can garnish wages, tax refunds, and federal benefits. 'Resuming collections protects taxpayers from shouldering the cost of federal student loans that borrowers willingly undertook to finance their postsecondary education,' the Department of Education (DOE) wrote in a statement late April. 'There will not be any mass loan forgiveness.' This isn't just a problem for an unlucky few. Around 20.5% of student loan borrowers have a payment that's past due by 90 days or more, according to a TransUnion analysis. And around 5.3 million defaulted borrowers will get a notice from the Treasury Department that their wages could potentially be garnished, according to a May statement from the DOE. Workers of all ages have already been struggling for years with student loan repayment. But the latest move from the Trump administration has made the issue even more urgent. There are several different ways that employers can help their workers with student loan repayments, including through retirement benefits, educational assistant programs, and paid time off exchanges. Fortune sat down with benefits experts, who say that while offering these benefits do come with challenges, they can go a long way toward improving employee financial wellbeing. 'Business leaders can't ignore this financial pressure anymore,' says Jeremy Yonan, VP of total rewards at job site Indeed. 'Student loan debt isn't just a personal challenge, it's actually a business imperative because the ripple effect comes up in every corner of the workplace.' Many workers burdened by student loans face a tough financial tradeoff: either reduce their debt or invest in their future. That means they often miss out on contributing to their retirement plans, and their employer's valuable contributions. The Secure 2.0 Act of 2022 aimed to fix that problem. Companies can take the funds they'd use to match employee retirement contributions and instead use them to help them pay off student loans. 'When companies offer a contribution into retirement savings in connection with their student loan payments, they are helping to protect the financial future of those employees who are largely sidelined and sitting out of their primary benefit that they offer, which is the retirement match,' says Laurel Taylor, CEO of Candidly, a financial wellness company. Financially, this process is easy for employers because the money is essentially repurposed so it doesn't cost businesses extra to provide the benefit. But few employers are currently taking advantage of it because of the administrative burden. Only 11% of Candidly customers have launched the student loan retirement match in connection with secure 2.0. Benefit, according to Taylor. Goldman Sachs Ayco, an arm of the bank that specializes in workplace financial planning, says that while 31% of their corporate clients offer student loan assistance, only 10% do so through retirement. As the student loan crisis becomes more dire, however, we might see more businesses offer the benefit to their workforce. 'When employees start to see their wages garnished, it might lead some companies to accelerate adoption on the 401(K) side if participation is high enough,' says Kris Battistoni, VP of compensation and benefits solutions at Goldman Sachs Ayco. Companies that offer employees a certain number of days of paid-time off may want to consider a program that allows workers to exchange their unused time and dedicate those funds towards paying off student loan debt. The benefit is that it costs the employer itself very little, as they have already budgeted that time into their balance sheet. The drawback is that it can come with administrative burdens, because HR managers have to comply with a variety of state laws around what employees can and can't do with their PTO. There are, however, a variety of B2B businesses out there tailored to handle services like these. Businesses should also be aware that critics of these PTO exchanges argue that they incentivize employees to disregard work-life balance, which could lead to additional stress and burnout. The program also won't work for companies with flexible or unlimited PTO. 'The PTO model is interesting, because the biggest criticism that we've seen and heard and had had conversations with employers about is it sort of diminishes quality of life,' Stacey MacPhetres, senior director of education finance for EdAssist by Bright Horizons, which helps employers manage education benefits, tells Fortune. One of the easiest and most impactful ways to provide help to people with student loans is offering them financial counseling services. Student loan borrowers often have more than one loan in play at a time, with different interest rates and timelines. That can make it hard to figure out exactly how much of one's paycheck should be allocated toward paying off the debt, and which loans should be prioritized, says MacPhetres. 'It's incredibly beneficial to offer, not just the monetary contribution, but expert coaching behind the scenes to make sure that those funds are being applied in the most expedient way, based on what the employee wants to accomplish,' she says. Student loan education is just as important as the ability to pay off the debt, experts say, especially if planners can help employees refinance their loans to get a better interest rate. That kind of personalized assistance can not only help with student loans, but also ease worker anxiety around their finances. 'From recent grads and mid-career professionals to parents helping get through college, having that personalized care for different life stages can provide real short term relief,' says Yonan. 'It's not just about the case investment, it's also about education.' Employers have long been able to help workers fund their education through educational assistance programs. Businesses are allowed to contribute $5,250 per employee per year towards tuition, books, or supplies, or courses. But in 2020, the program was expanded to include the ability for companies to put this money towards paying off student loan debt, according to the IRS. Many employers have questions about how they can make sure the money is being used as intended. That's because employees mostly self-certify that they've spent the money on loans, and businesses need to find an efficient way to verify that without invading privacy in the process, says Jonathan Barber, VP head of compensation and benefits solutions, at Goldman Sachs Ayco. 'I think companies thus far are uncomfortable with it because they want to verify that they're actually doing something to pay off the debt and not just giving employees funds.' Under current law, the program is set to expire at the end of 2025, according to the IRS. But experts that Fortune spoke with are confident that the program will be made permanent through legislation later this year. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Judge briefly blocks immigrants' deportation to South Sudan, but legal path eventually cleared
Judge briefly blocks immigrants' deportation to South Sudan, but legal path eventually cleared

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Judge briefly blocks immigrants' deportation to South Sudan, but legal path eventually cleared

Despite a federal judge briefly halting deportations of eight immigrants to war-torn South Sudan, he and a second judge eventually cleared the way for the Trump administration to relocate the immigrants the day after the Supreme Court greenlighted their removal. The unusually-busy Fourth of July court schedule began with District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington, D.C., putting a temporary hold on the deportations while he evaluated a last-ditch appeal by the immigrants' lawyers. In an afternoon hearing, he decided he was powerless to halt their removals and that the person best positioned to rule on the request was Brian Murphy, the federal judge in Boston whose rulings led to the initial halt of the administration's effort to begin deportations to the eastern African country. But on Friday evening, Murphy issued a brief ruling concluding that the Supreme Court had tied his hands. 'This Court interprets these Supreme Court orders as binding on this new petition, as Petitioners are now raising substantially similar claims, and therefore Petitioners motion is denied,' Murphy wrote. The administration had earlier said it intended Friday to move the immigrants from the U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where they and their guards have lingered for weeks as their case has ricocheted through the courts, to South Sudan. The administration has been trying to deport the immigrants for weeks. None are from South Sudan, which is enmeshed in civil war and where the U.S. government has advised against travel. The government flew them to Djibouti but couldn't move them further because Murphy had ruled no immigrant could be sent to a new country without a chance to have a court hearing. The Supreme Court vacated that decision last month, then issued a new order Thursday night clarifying that it meant the immigrants could be moved to South Sudan. Lawyers for the immigrants, who hail from Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and other countries, filed the ultimately unsuccessful emergency request to halt their removal later that night. The temporary stay was first reported by legal journalist Chris Geidner.

US supreme court to weigh transgender student sports bans in key rights case
US supreme court to weigh transgender student sports bans in key rights case

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

US supreme court to weigh transgender student sports bans in key rights case

The US supreme court announced on Thursday that it will consider a bid by West Virginia and Idaho to enforce their state laws banning transgender athletes from female sports teams at public sector schools. The decision means the court is prepared to take up another civil rights challenge to Republican-backed restrictions on transgender people. The justices took up the state appeals of lower court decisions siding with a transgender students who sued. The students argued that the laws discriminate based on sex and transgender status in violation of the US constitution's 14th amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law as well as the Title IX civil rights law that bars sex-based discrimination in education. The supreme court is expected to hear arguments on the matter during its next term, which begins in October. A total of 27 states, most of them Republican-governed, have passed laws in recent years restricting participation in sports by transgender people. The Idaho and West Virginia laws designate sports teams at public schools according to 'biological sex' and bar 'students of the male sex' from female athletic teams. The issue of transgender rights is a flashpoint in what has become a culture war in the US. Donald Trump, upon taking back the White House, has signed executive orders declaring that the federal government will officially recognize only two sexes – male and female – as well as attempting to exclude transgender girls and women from female sports. Trump also rescinded orders by his predecessor, Joe Biden, combating discrimination against gay and transgender people. The supreme court in a major ruling in June upheld a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors. The 6-3 ruling powered by the court's conservative majority found that the ban does not violate the US constitution's 14th amendment promise of equal protection, as challengers to the law had argued. The challengers had argued that the measure unlawfully discriminated against these adolescents based on their sex or transgender status. The supreme court's three liberal justices dissented. The supreme court in May also allowed Trump's ban on transgender people serving in the military to take effect. The challenge to the West Virginia law was brought by Becky Pepper-Jackson and the student's mother in 2021 after Pepper-Jackson's middle school barred her from joining the girls' cross-country and track teams due to the state's ban. A federal judge ruled in Pepper-Jackson's favor at an early stage of the case, but later reversed course and sided with the state. The supreme court in 2023 refused the state's bid to enforce the law as litigation proceeded. The Richmond, Virginia-based fourth US circuit court of appeals in April threw out the judge's decision, ruling that the law's exclusion of Pepper-Jackson from girls' teams violates the Title IX law. The state law treats transgender girls differently from other girls, 'which is - literally - the definition of gender identity discrimination', the fourth circuit ruling stated, adding that this is also discrimination on the basis of sex under Title IX. The Idaho challenge was brought by Lindsay Hecox, a transgender Boise State University student who had sought to join the women's track and cross-country teams, but failed to qualify. Hecox has instead participated in sports clubs, including soccer and running, at the public university. A federal judge blocked Idaho's law in 2020, finding that Idaho's law likely violates the constitutional equal protection guarantee. The San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals upheld the judge's action in 2023 and, in an amended ruling, in 2024. The measure unlawfully discriminates based on sex and transgender status, the ninth circuit concluded. Reuters contributed reporting

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store