Six months into Trump's second term, John King finds voters ‘All Over the Map'
'The amount of progress he has made over the first six months is unmatched,' said Taylor, a businesswoman in Iowa. She grades the first six months of President Donald Trump's new term a nine out of 10.
Zero was the grade offered by Malinconico, a college professor in Pennsylvania.
'His slashing of government and putting incompetent people in charge is going to harm every aspect of American life,' is Malinconico's take at six months.
Their polar opposite assessments highlight one big takeaway of a check-in with voters participating in CNN's 'All Over the Map' project: The black or white views of Trump that animated the 2024 campaign now carry over to how most voters view his presidency.
Those who voted for Trump remain overwhelmingly loyal, enthusiastically backing his agenda. 'Better,' is how New Hampshire Trump voter Deven McIver described his standard of living since Trump returned to the White House. 'Lower fuel costs. Less job competition from illegals and I feel safer.'
But those who opposed Trump in the campaign are just as fiercely opposed to his governing now. 'Disappointed doesn't come close to what I am feeling,' said Pat Levin, a lifelong Democrat who lives in Pennsylvania. 'Terrified, petrified, horrified come close to describing how I feel about the unraveling of our country and the rule of law.'
Nothing in the responses suggested any give in the polarization of the Trump era. Views on Trump's immigration agenda offer a telling snapshot of that.
'He has turned ICE and CBP into the American gestapo,' said Tonya Rincon, a Michigan Democrat, who criticized ICE tactics as overly aggressive 'with no due process.' Rincon said using tax dollars to send migrants 'to other countries is an abomination reminiscent of the Third Reich.'
On the other side, 'He did what he promised,' Taylor said. 'Trump is making progress and standing up for the rights of those who honor our country and our process.'
These voters helped us track the 2024 campaign. Now, we keep in touch for their assessments of the Trump presidency and other big issues as we inch closer to the 2026 midterm elections.
Other noteworthy points:
►Most of the voters, regardless of their choice last November, said the cost of living remains frustratingly high.
►Many of the Democrats voiced support for Trump's recent decision to do more to help Ukraine get weapons for the war with Russia, though many of them questioned his motives for this shift. Several Trump voters, on the other hand, oppose helping Ukraine.
'Hopefully he realizes the stakes of letting his former friend (Russian President Vladimir) Putin taking over more of Ukraine,' said Darrell Ann Murphy, a Democrat from Pennsylvania.
'He reluctantly came to the conclusion he was getting played by Putin,' said Marvin Boyer, also a Pennsylvania Democrat.
► Trump's handling of the saga over accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was criticized, even ridiculed, by both Trump voters and Democrats who despise him. None of the Trump voters went as far as saying this issue might make them rethink supporting Trump, but many of them were harsh as they voiced suspicion that Trump is hiding something.
'I want to see the truth,' said McIver, a blue-collar Trump voter in New Hampshire. 'I don't believe the administration's claims.'
Pete Burdett, also a New Hampshire Republican, offered high praise of the Trump agenda overall but said he was flummoxed by the change of Trump's tone on Epstein. 'NOT SURE at this point.' Burdett wrote in an email. 'What changed?'
Rachal Kulak, a Christian conservative Trump supporter in Virginia, said the 'Epstein files debacle' was a black mark on an administration she believes is otherwise much more transparent than the Biden administration. 'It may be better to just rip the Band-Aid off and let people see.'
Kulak said 'it may have taken a minute,' but she voiced confidence Trump would ultimately move forward 'with giving the people what they want to see.'
Other respondents brought up a conspiracy theory that Trump's refusal to make all Epstein files public is somehow tied to Israel, a notion that has gained footing among Trump supporters.
The conspiracy theory is unfounded and has been dismissed as without merit by current and former Israeli government officials.
Those who raised the idea in our check-in were troubled by it, but said they still supported the president.
Voters who opposed Trump, meanwhile, expressed other concerns about the Epstein saga.
Joan London is a Pennsylvania attorney and longtime Reagan Republican who switched her registration to independent because of her misgivings about Trump.
'The 'nothing to see here' tone after getting elected by fueling speculation among supporters is suspicious,' London said of the Epstein saga. 'If there is nothing to fear, then the books need to be opened.'
Democrats see the Epstein dustup as Trump finally getting some accountability for his love of conspiracy theories. For years, Trump and his allies suggested Democrats were hiding the Epstein files to protect themselves. Now, Trump calls his own supporters 'weaklings' for demanding the transparency Trump himself repeatedly said was critical.
'Watching him scrambling between explanations is comical,' said Rincon, the Michigan Democrat who is a recently retired union auto worker.
'Fumble,' was the one-word assessment of Walter Robinson, a Michigan Democrat and auto worker.
'Outrageous but predictable' is how Levin, the Pennsylvania Democrat, described Trump's efforts to manage the Epstein blowback. 'Deny, shift responsibility, claim a Democratic conspiracy.'
The voter assessments on the cost of living are worth tracking as we move into the 2026 midterm cycle. Reducing costs was a major Trump and Republican 2024 promise, and Democrats are already arguing the president's unpredictable back-and-forth on tariffs and other policies are hurting consumers.
'Costs are increasing, especially rent,' said Jacob Dials, an Arizona Democrat.
'Currently about the same, perhaps slightly better,' said Kulak, the Virginia Republican.
'The same,' said Democrat Robinson.
'Same, but getting better,' said Taylor, the Iowa Republican.
'Inflation still persists,' said Cynthia Sabatini, a suburban Philadelphia Republican who supports many Trump policies but sees him as lacking character and humility. 'Across the board tariffs are not a good approach.'
Kim Cavaliere, an independent who lives in Georgia, said her standard of living was down since Trump took office.
'Everything he has done so far is for the wealthy,' she said. 'Housing is still way out of reach.'
Cavaliere did offer a dose of humor to close her answers to our questions about Trump at the six-month mark.
'Well, I wish I could predict my lottery numbers the way I predicted Elon Musk and Trump would sever their relationship within a year of him being president,' Cavaliere said. 'LOL.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump weighs in on American Eagle's Sydney Sweeney ad
President Donald Trump is entering the national debate surrounding American Eagle's Sydney Sweeney ad. In a Newsmax interview Friday, Aug. 1 with host Rob Finnerty, Trump was asked about the "Euphoria" actress starring in the clothing retailer's fall 2025 denim ad campaign that some critics saw as a veiled attempt to endorse eugenics. Eugenics is a highly controversial (and discredited) set of beliefs that the human population can improve or advance itself through selective breeding. "Sydney Sweeney, an actress was in an ad for blue jeans. The ad is doing very well, it's very popular. The jeans have sold out. Does America need to see more ads like that and maybe fewer ads with people like Dylan Mulvaney on the cover?" Finnerty asked, referring to the controversial 2023 Bud Light campaign starring the transgender TikTok star which elicited criticism from certain groups. Trump addresses Diddy pardon decision, but questions remain Trump said that "advertising's a very funny thing," telling Finnerty that "I've done ads where I thought they were lousy, and they turned out to be iconic. And then I've done some that I thought were beauties that were going to be fantastic and they weren't so good, so to each his own." Before addressing his thoughts on advertising, Trump told the conservative cable host earlier in the interview that "I think the Dylan Mulvaney ad was perhaps the most unsuccessful ad in history. It knocked $35 billion off the value of a certain company if you know what I'm talking about." Trump continued: "(The Mulvaney ad) was one of the great disasters of all time. I would say that's probably the most unsuccessful ad, worst ad ever." It is unclear what exact $35 billion valuation the president is talking about, but sales for Bud Light – owned by Anheuser-Busch – tanked after the backlash began. American Eagle breaks silence on Sydney Sweeney jeans ad controversy Why is the 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans' ad sparking backlash? The Sweeney ad has been the subject of both online praise and anger for over a week. On July 23, the brand launched the new campaign starring Sweeney, which American Eagle originally described as "a return to essential denim dressing," with Sweeney sporting 1970s-style flare jeans paired with a denim jacket. In one of several videos for the campaign, Sweeney, clad in a denim-on-denim fit, dabbles in some word-play, telling cameras: "Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color." "My jeans are blue," Sweeney said in the video. Each promotional video ends with the tagline, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans." The Trump comments aired the same day that American Eagle broke its silence on the backlash and doubled down in an Instagram post following days of discourse about the Sweeney ad blitz. "'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way," the statement read. "Great jeans look good on everyone." Contributing: Anna Kaufman, Nicole Fallert
29 minutes ago
Office of Special Counsel says it's opened Hatch Act probe of Jack Smith
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel confirmed Saturday that it has opened an investigation into former Special Counsel Jack Smith and whether he violated the Hatch Act through his criminal investigations into President Donald Trump. The investigation follows a referral from Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas earlier this week that asked the OSC to investigate Smith for his investigative and prosecutorial activities prior to the 2024 election which Cotton argued were intended to harm Trump's political prospects. Both Smith and former Attorney General Merrick Garland repeatedly maintained prior to departing office that none of the actions taken in either the classified documents investigation or the probe of Trump's efforts to subvert his 2020 election loss were driven by politics. A spokesperson for Smith's attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment Saturday on the OSC probe. The OSC is an independent agency that is not empowered to investigate criminal matters - it is separate from the Special Counsel post that Smith formerly served in under the Justice Department. OSC primarily operates as an agency to assist government whistleblowers in reporting allegations of waste or wrongdoing, and also enforces the Hatch Act which places restrictions of government employees from engaging in partisan political activities. It's unclear what course of action the OSC would even have to take against Smith if its investigation did determine he violated the Hatch Act, given Smith is no longer a government employee. While it could refer its findings to DOJ, the department has already publicly said that it is investigating Smith and other prosecutors who pursued Trump through its so-called "Weaponization Working Group" that is being led by former interim DC U.S. attorney Ed Martin. The announcement of the investigation also comes as the administration has found itself under increased scrutiny over its handling of the release of filings relating to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — with top officials from across the administration appearing eager to change the subject.
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Agency Scrutinizes Jack Smith After Republican Complaint
An agency that scrutinizes the conduct of federal employees has opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who investigated Donald J. Trump before he returned to office, following a request by a Republican senator. The Office of Special Counsel confirmed on Saturday that it had opened an investigation into Mr. Smith for a possible violation of the Hatch Act, a law that prohibits federal workers from using their government jobs to engage in political activity. Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, had asked the agency to investigate on the premise that some of Mr. Smith's actions, such as seeking quick trial dates in the two criminal cases against Mr. Trump, were designed to influence the 2024 election. The investigation, which was first reported by The New York Post, is unusual in several respects. First, the most severe penalty possible for a Hatch Act violation is dismissal from federal employment, and Mr. Smith left the government at the start of the year. Second, the type of prosecutorial decisions criticized by Mr. Cotton, Mr. Trump and others are far different from the type of cases the O.S.C. typically handles. The office traditionally investigates and addresses violations of federal rules about the civil service. The investigation comes at a time when lawyers representing fired or demoted federal employees have complained that under Mr. Trump, the O.S.C. is not fulfilling its traditional role. In February, the president dismissed the agency's head, Hampton Dellinger, despite a federal law saying that person can only be fired for 'inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.' At the time, Mr. Dellinger had been arguing for the reinstatement of thousands of probationary workers who had been fired by the new administration.
