Rachel Reeves is about to make huge spending decisions - these could be the winners and losers
It's a foundational moment for this government - and a key to determining the success of this administration.
So, what's going to happen?
The chancellor did boost spending significantly in her first year, and this year there was a modest rise.
However, the uplift to day-to-day spending in the years ahead is more modest - and pared back further in March's spring statement because of adverse financial conditions.
Plus, where will the £113bn of capital - project - spending go?
So, we've done a novel experiment.
We've taken Treasury documents, ministerial statements and reports from the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
We put them all into AI - into the deep research function of ChatGPT - and asked it to write the spending review, calculate the winners and losers and work out what goes where, and why.
It comes with a health warning. We're using experimental technology that is sometimes wrong, and while ChatGPT can access up-to-date data from across the web, it's only trained on information up to October 2023.
There are no answers because discussions are still going on. Think of it like a polling projection - clues about the big picture as things move underneath.
But, critically, the story it tells tallies with the narrative I'm hearing from inside government too.
The winners? Defence, health and transport, with Angela Rayner's housing department up as well.
Everywhere else is down, compared with this year's spending settlement.
The Home Office, justice, culture, and business - facing real terms squeezes from here on in.
The aid budget from the Foreign Office, slashed - the Ministry of Defence the beneficiary. You heard about that this week.
Health - a Labour priority. I heard from sources a settlement of around 3%. This AI model puts it just above.
Transport - a surprise winner. Rachel Reeves thinks this is where her capital budget should go. Projects in the north to help hold voters who live there.
But, could this spell trouble?
Education - down overall. Now this government will protect the schools budget. It will say 'per pupil' funding is up. But adult education is at risk. Is this where they find the savings?
So much else - Home Office down, but is that because asylum costs are going down.
Energy - they're haggling over solar panels versus home insulation.
Justice should get what it wants, I am told. This isn't about exact percentages. But you can see across lots of departments - things are tight.
Even though Rachel Reeves has already set the budgets for last year and this, and only needs to decide spending allocations from 2026 onwards, the graphs the Treasury will produce next week compare what will be spent to the last set of Tory plans.
This means their graphs will include the big spending increases they made last year - and flatter them more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Conor McGregor loses appeal against civil jury's finding he sexually assaulted a woman
Mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor on Thursday lost his legal appeal against a civil court's finding that he sexually assaulted a woman at a Dublin hotel. In November a jury at the High Court in Dublin found McGregor liable for assaulting Nikita Hand, who says he 'brutally raped and battered' her in a hotel penthouse in 2018. He was ordered to pay Hand almost 250,000 euros ($285,000), as well as about 1.3 million euros ($1.5 million) in legal costs. Hand, 35, successfully sued McGregor in civil court after prosecutors declined to bring charges, saying there was insufficient evidence and a conviction was unlikely. The Associated Press generally does not name alleged victims of sexual violence unless they come forward publicly, as Hand has done. McGregor alleged that Hand fabricated the allegations after the two had consensual sex. He launched an appeal, but at a hearing earlier this month his lawyer unexpectedly withdrew a request to introduce new evidence. Three appeals court judges in Dublin on Thursday dismissed the appeal 'in its entirety.' Hand was in court for the ruling, but McGregor was not. The 37-year-old fighter, once the face of the Ultimate Fighting Championship but now past his prime in the ring, has become known for anti-immigration statements and criticism of Irish politicians. He has flirted with the idea of running for president of Ireland. U.S. President Donald Trump, a UFC fan, invited McGregor to the White House to mark St. Patrick's Day in March. McGregor also faces a lawsuit in Florida for allegedly sexually assaulting a woman in the bathroom of the Kaseya Center, home arena of the Miami Heat, during a 2023 NBA finals game with the Denver Nuggets.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car finance mis-selling case deadline revealed as millions could be owed compensation
Millions of motorists may soon be owed major payouts as a key deadline for legal proceedings over widespread mis-selling of car financing is set revealed. The Supreme Court will be delivering a crucial judgement on Friday which could pave the way for a massive redress scheme potentially affecting millions. It will rule on a shock Court of Appeal ruling last autumn that all car finance agreements with hidden commission were unlawful. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has said it will set out exactly how an industry-wide redress scheme will work following the Supreme Court decision. Up to 90 per cent of new cars purchased in the UK are bought using motor finance, meaning millions could potentially be due payouts following the ruling. Anyone who bought a car before January 2021 using a car finance scheme could be eligible for compensation after the FCA found that many 'may have been charged too much' by their lenders. This is because some companies 'discretionary commission arrangements' with brokers, which gave them the power to adjust customers' interest rates on Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) and Hire Purchase agreements. Because these brokers earned more commission on higher rates, this created an incentive to maximise the rate given. An estimated 40 per cent of car finance deals were thought to be affected by the issue. The FCA outlawed this practice from 28 January 2021, but acknowledge that a 'high number' of people have now come forward to claim they had been overcharged before the ban. The financial regulator has confirmed that it will consult on a redress scheme and laid out the factors it will consider. In a statement in March 2025, it said: 'Firms would be responsible for determining whether customers had lost out due to their failings, but the FCA would set rules that firms must follow under the scheme and introduce checks to ensure they do.' However, the FCA is waiting for the upcoming Supreme Court judgement before finalising details, as the outcome of this case could expand the scope of the redress scheme much further. The shock Court of Appeal ruling last autumn found that if a car finance agreement didn't inform customers of all the details of commission, it was likely unlawful. This is a regular practice, with experts predicting 99 per cent of deals are affected by the issue. It is car finance firms Close Brothers and Motonovo are appealing this judgement in the Supreme Court, with the final judgement set to decide how many motorists will be due compensation. The FCA has said it will confirm within six weeks of this judgement if it is launching a compensation scheme. Money expert Martin Lewis said: 'This decision could have ramifications across the economy, far beyond car finance. 'If the Supreme Court doesn't overturn the Court of Appeal decision, the knock-on effects could be substantial on other forms of lending and the economy. It could shake the foundations of consumer lending (meaning less possible available credit for many). 'So much so, I have long said I worry it may do more harm than good for consumers. It's therefore unsurprising there's talk of the Chancellor overruling the decision if the Supreme Court follows the Court of Appeal.' The Money Saving Expert founder and FCA have both advised those who believe they may be affected to hold off on signing up to any claims management or law firms advertising their services over the issue. This is because these services will not be required if payouts are automatic, but may still be able to take payment. The regulator explains: 'Consumers should be aware that by signing up now with a CMC or law firm, they may end up paying for a service they do not need and having to pay up to 30 per cent in fees out of any award they may receive."
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
European Union assumes its faces 15% tariffs in the US from Friday. But a key text still isn't ready
The European Union is working on the assumption that the United States will impose a 15% tariff on most EU exports from Friday, even though the two sides have yet to complete a key document clarifying how the agreement will operate. Last weekend, U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a political agreement that would see 15% duties imposed on around two-thirds of EU produce, worth around 380 billion euros ($434 billion). The tariffs are set to enter force on Friday, but as of Thursday the two sides were still working on a joint statement that would lay out the terms of their understanding, European Commission spokesman Olof Gill said. The document wouldn't be legally binding. 'It is the clear understanding of the European Union that the U.S. will implement the agreed across the board tariff ceiling of 15%,' Gill said. The commission negotiates trade terms on behalf of the the EU's 27 member countries. Carve outs were agreed for a range of 'strategic' goods like aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, some drug generics or natural resources. Gill said that 'it is also our clear understanding that the U.S. will implement the exemptions to the 15% ceiling.' 'The U.S. has made these commitments. Now it's up to the U.S. to implement them. The ball is in their court,' Gill said. European wine and spirits won't escape the 15% levy on Friday, but may do later as negotiations on additional exemptions to the new tariff regime continue, he said. Before Sunday's meeting, Trump had threatened the bloc with 30% tariffs, which the EU's top trade official said would effectively mean the end of trade between them. Over the last three months, the commission drew up retaliatory measures worth tens of billions of euros to enact should the talks fail. Those countermeasures are due to take effect on Aug. 7, but Gill said that 'if everything goes as expected,' they would be frozen. 'If we have reached a deal, we don't need the retaliatory tariffs,' he said.
