Trump tariff on Indian goods will hike essential drugs costs in US: Pharmexcil
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
New Delhi: Pharmaceuticals Export Promotion Council of India (Pharmexcil) on Thursday said President Donald Trump's imposition of a 25 per cent tariff plus unspecified penalty on all goods coming from India starting August 1, will result in increased costs for essential drugs in the US, ultimately harming consumers and healthcare systems in the country in the long term.The US market, heavily reliant on India for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) and low-cost generics, faces a daunting challenge in finding alternative sources that can match the scale, quality, and affordability that India offers, Pharmexcil Chairman Namit Joshi said in a statement.President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment.Reacting to the development, Joshi said India has long been a cornerstone of the global supply chain for affordable, high-quality medicines, particularly in the generic drug market, where it supplies nearly 47 per cent of the pharmaceutical needs of the US. Indian pharmaceutical companies play a vital role in ensuring the affordability and availability of essential medications, including life-saving oncology drugs, antibiotics, and chronic disease treatments," he asserted.Joshi further said, "Any disruption to this supply chain will inevitably lead to shortages and escalating prices, ultimately harming US consumers and healthcare systems."While the immediate consequences of these tariffs will likely result in increased costs for essential drugs, he said, "The long-term impact will be even more severe. The US market, heavily reliant on India for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) and low-cost generics, faces a daunting challenge in finding alternative sources that can match the scale, quality, and affordability that India offers."Moreover, he said, "Efforts to transition pharmaceutical manufacturing and API production to other countries or domestic sources in the US are projected to take several years, at a minimum of 3-5 years, before meaningful capacity can be established."Joshi said Pharmexcil remained committed to advocating for the interests of Indian pharmaceutical exporters and the global healthcare community."We continue to engage with policymakers to emphasise the importance of affordable access to medicines and the indispensable role Indian pharmaceutical companies play in meeting the growing global demand for essential drugs," he noted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
MEA dials down Trump noise: India, US weathered challenges, focus on future
OVER 30 remarks crediting himself for the India-Pakistan ceasefire, referring to India as a 'dead economy,' dropping the 25% tariff bombshell and a Russia penalty even as talks are on — US President Donald Trump's diatribe was met Friday by diplomatic pragmatism from the Ministry of External Affairs. Underlining that the India-US partnership has 'weathered several transitions and challenges,' the MEA said that New Delhi will remain 'focused on the substantive agenda' even as it flagged that its friendship with Russia was 'time-tested.' This response came the day Trump unveiled sweeping new tariffs on dozens of countries including 25 per cent for goods from India. Responding to a question, MEA's official spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said Friday: 'India and the United States share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties. This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges. We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.' Asked about India-US defence ties in the wake of reports of India refusing to consider F-35 fighter jets, the MEA spokesperson said, 'We have a strong defence partnership with the U.S. which has been strengthening over the last several years. There is potential for this partnership to grow further under the India-US COMPACT for the 21st century.' Responding to Trump's talk of a penalty on India for buying energy from Russia, Jaiswal said: 'In securing our energy needs, we are guided by what is on offer in the markets, and by the prevailing global circumstances.' Incidentally, this has been Delhi's position for the last three years, since the war in Ukraine broke out after the Russian invasion in February 2022. On Trump's tirade against India-Russia ties and that they are both 'dead economies', the MEA spokesperson said: 'Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership.' On Trump's anger at India buying Russian defence equipment, he said, 'The sourcing of our defence requirements is determined solely by our national security imperatives and strategic assessments.' While India does depend on Russia for the defence supplies, much of it is because of the legacy from the Soviet Union era. Although the dependency is about 60 to 70 per cent, India has, in the past few years, steadily diversified its defence purchases from countries including the US. Yet, the framing by Trump — 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care' — has been seen as offensive by many. While his criticism of India putting high tariffs has been a pet grievance from his first term — when he called India a 'tariff king' — the US President's latest statement described India's trade policies as 'most strenuous and obnoxious'. Trump's remarks deepen Delhi's diplomatic challenge when India and the US are negotiating a bilateral trade deal. There are two possible impulses that guide Trump's responses, according to Delhi's analysis. First, his negotiating style to browbeat and bully the adversary by imposing high tariffs and try and get the deal on his own terms. This has been seen with China, where he imposed 145 per cent tariffs and then dialled down to 35 – after talks in Geneva. Second, some in the Indian establishment feel that the US President has not taken very kindly to Delhi fact-checking Trump's claims on brokering a ceasefire. Not only has PM Narendra Modi conveyed this in the phone call with Trump on June 17, but Indian ministers and officials have repeatedly denied the claim. Despite not stating that President Trump is a 'liar' — as demanded by Congress leader and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi — the Indian government has forcefully contradicted the US President. But New Delhi feels that Trump's remarks threaten to undo the hard work made by the two countries as 'strategic partners' in a relationship that was framed as the 'defining partnership of the 21st century' by US President Barack Obama. South Block is, however, trying to not get drawn into an emotional and angry response, and is projecting restraint amid the US President's verbal tirade and social media blitzkrieg of epithets directed at India. While the Commerce ministry said it has 'taken note' of Trump's statement on bilateral trade and the Government is studying its implications, sources said that any response had to be shorn of emotion. 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective,' the Commerce ministry statement had said. Sources said that negotiators from both sides are in touch and they have to be immune from the noise. The diplomatic challenge is three-fold, sources said: how long can Delhi stand its ground against the US; whether India can engage with Trump's inner circle; and whether they can overcome the distrust fuelled by the Trump's comments in the long term. 'We will not get drawn into the tit-for-tat response with the US President, and our negotiators have been asked to not pay attention to Trump's unique style of public negotiations. Those are best left to be done away from the public gaze,' a source said. Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
With US their key market, worried apparel exporters seek Govt help
With President Donald Trump setting a higher tariff on India (at 25 per cent) than on over 50 other countries — including Bangladesh and Vietnam, which, together with China, are among the top apparel exporters to the United States — domestic apparel exporters have expressed concern and sought government intervention. The new tariffs are set to come into effect from August 7. 'We request immediate government intervention to offset this huge setback. Exporters have their back against the wall and will have to sell below cost to keep their factories running and avoid mass layoffs,' Sudhir Sekhri, Chairman, Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC), said in a statement. The Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI), New Delhi based-industry chambers of the textile and clothing sector, also said that the latest US tariff announcement has added to the challenges that India's textile and apparel exporters were already grappling with. 'The latest US tariff announcement, following which the tariff rates have been substantially reduced for many countries including Bangladesh, against whom we are competing for a larger share of the US market, will compound the difficulties for India's textile and apparel exporters as we will be handicapped by a severe duty disadvantage,' CITI Chairman Rakesh Mehra said. Seeking government intervention for easier availability of raw materials, CITI said while the tariff rate for India has been set at 25 per cent, the rate for competing countries such as Bangladesh is 20 per cent, Indonesia and Cambodia are 19 per cent each and Vietnam is 20 per cent. While China continues to be the top exporter of textile and apparel items in the US, its market share has come down from 27.4 per cent in 2020 to 21.9 per cent in 2024. However, India's market share has been rising. The US is a key market for Indian Ready-Made Garments (RMG) exports; its share in India's total garment exports in 2024 stood at 33 per cent, AEPC said. India's presence in the US garment import market increased from 4.5 per cent in 2020 to 5.8 per cent in 2024. India ranks fourth among the top RMG exporters to the US, it said. 'Top three most exported products by India to US: cotton T-shirts (9.71 per cent); women's or girls' dresses of cotton (6.52 per cent); babies' garments of cotton (5.46 per cent), etc. The top three exports of India to the US hold 10, 36, and 20 per cent share, respectively, in the US total imports of these products globally,' the export promotion council said. The Ministry of Textiles on Friday said that the overall exports from the sectors including handicrafts has grown 5 per cent during FY25, at $37.7 billion, compared to $35.8 billion during the previous financial year. The Ministry also said that it has implemented the Scheme for Integrated Textile Park (SITP) to provide support for setting up textile parks with world-class, state-of-the-art infrastructure in textile hubs across the country. The government has finalised setting up of PM Mega Integrated Textile Region and Apparel (PM-MITRA) parks at seven sites – Tamil Nadu (Virudhnagar), Telangana (Warangal), Gujarat (Navasari), Karnataka (Kalaburagi), Madhya Pradesh (Dhar), Uttar Pradesh (Lucknow) and Maharashtra (Amravati) with an outlay of Rs 4,445 crore for a period of seven years up to 2027-28. While the in-person India-US trade negotiations are expected to continue after the second half of August, the deal is stuck over sensitive sectors such as agriculture and automobiles. The Indian Express had reported last week that India is unlikely to agree to the US demands to accept genetically modified (GM) agricultural products such as corn and soya. This assumes significance as agriculture remains one of the contentious issues between the two countries, and the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has previously flagged restrictions on its GM products by countries as discriminatory. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
As Trump deploys nuclear submarines after Putin aide Medvedev's warning of war, here's a look at US and Russian navy submarine capabilities
Synopsis President Trump responded to Dmitry Medvedev's provocative statements by ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines. Medvedev's remarks, which included threats of war between the U.S. and Russia, prompted Trump's action as a precautionary measure. The U.S. Navy boasts a fleet of 71 submarines, while the Russian Navy operates 64 vessels, both undergoing modernization efforts. President Donald Trump has taken a bold step by ordering the deployment of two U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia, following aggressive nuclear threats from Russian official Dmitry Medvedev. This unexpected move, announced on August 1, 2025, has sent shockwaves through global capitals and triggered urgent responses from NATO allies. As the war in Ukraine drags on and nuclear rhetoric escalates, Trump's action signals a high-stakes moment in international diplomacy. In a sharp response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, days after he made 'provocative statements' and threatened war between the US and Russia, President Donald Trump said Friday he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of the country's former president, Dmitry Medvedev. Currently, Medvedev is serving as deputy chairman of Russia's National Security US president, in a social media post, stated that based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Medvedev, he had "ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' the president further stated.'Based on the highly provocative statements of the former president of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!,' Trump said on Truth in his post on X on Monday (July 28, 2025), said, 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10… He should remember 2 things.' '1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war,' Medvedev wrote. 'Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don't go down the Sleepy Joe road!' Medvedev stated, referring to former President Joe President Trump hits back at Russia over Medvedev's war threats, here's a look at US and Russian naval submarines: The United States submarine force consists of four operational classes: Ohio, Los Angeles, Seawolf, and Virginia, all of which are nuclear-powered, according to (Nuclear Threat Initiative website, The Ohio class includes 14 SSBNs that make up the sea-based part of the U.S. nuclear triad. Four more Ohio-class submarines have been converted to SSGNs, equipped for both strike missions and Special Forces other three active classes—Virginia, Seawolf, and Los Angeles—consist of SSN attack submarines designed for targeting enemy ships, supporting operations ashore and carrier groups, and conducting surveillance. Total Submarines in Fleet: 71 Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs): 14Nuclear-Powered attack submarines (SSNs): 53Guided Missile Submarines (SSGN): 4Diesel-electric attack submarines (SSKs): 0Air-independent propulsion submarines (AIPs): 0The Russian Navy operates one of the world's largest submarine fleets, with an estimated 64 vessels. Its 16 nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) are a core part of Russia's strategic deterrent. Despite financial challenges after the Soviet Union's collapse, Russia has made major upgrades to its submarine force in recent years. Total Submarines in Fleet: 64 Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs): 16Nuclear-Powered attack submarines (SSNs): 14Nuclear-powered cruise missile submarines (SSGNs): 11Diesel-electric attack submarines (SSKs): 23After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia took up several projects to boost its submarine fleet. In 1993, Russia started the construction of a Yasen-class submarine, the Severodvinsk (K-885). The country, however, did not commission it until Russian Navy is planning to replace both its SSNs and SSGNs with the multirole Project 885-M Yasen-class submarines. Russia launched its second Yasen-class submarine, the Kazan, in 2017. This vessel entered into service in the Northern Fleet in signed a contract with the shipbuilding company Sevmash to build two Project 885-M Yasen-class nuclear-powered attack submarines in June Borei-class (NATO: Dolgorukiy) SSBNs play a key role in Russia's post-Cold War strategic arsenal. Launched in 1996, the Borei-class is set to replace the aging Typhoon-class, Kalmar-class (NATO: Delta III), and Delfin-class (NATO: Delta IV) submarines, according to Russia launched its first Borei-A class submarine, Knyaz Vladimir, in 2017. It includes several upgrades over the original design. The Russian military declared Knyaz Vladimir fully operational in 2021, and it has since taken part in groundbreaking under-ice April 2019, the Russian Ministry of Defense revealed its plans to build two new Borei-K-class nuclear submarines. The first of these boats, the Knyaz Oleg, was laid down in July 2014-15, completed sea trials, and was commissioned to the Pacific Fleet in late second submarine, Generalissimo Suvorov, was commissioned in late 2022. As of early 2023, reports indicate it is serving with Russia's Northern Fleet. These vessels are nearly identical to earlier Borei-class models but can launch long-range cruise missiles.
