Brazil confronts military officers accused of plotting a coup in historic trial
It was a departure from military protocol that underscored how the country's once hugely popular military has been divided and roiled by scandal as Brazil tries an explosive case in which top military officers are accused of helping former President Jair Bolsonaro attempt a coup to remain in power after losing an election.
Analysts said that the two men's appearance in a civilian court marked a historic departure from the impunity senior military officers have enjoyed since the country underwent two decades of military rule.
'Putting a colonel up against a general levels the playing the field and signals that for the justice system, all defendants are equal,' said Lucas Figueiredo, the author of several books about Brazil's dictatorship. "The truth will prevail.'
Accusations of a coup
Cid, a former aide-de-camp to Bolsonaro who signed a plea bargain to cooperate with authorities, has already testified that Braga Netto took part in a meeting in November 2022 during which military officials discussed plans to stop current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from taking office.
Braga Netto is a close ally of Bolsonaro who also served as the former president's chief-of-staff and his 2022 running mate.
The officers are standing trial alongside Bolsonaro, several other officers, and a few civilians. They face five charges including attempting to stage a coup, involvement in an armed criminal organization, attempted violent abolition of the democratic rule of law, aggravated damage and degredation of listed heritage.
A verdict is expected by the end of 2025.
Cid says that in the days after Bolsonaro lost to Lula, he was called to Braga Netto's office and handed a bag of cash to distribute to Bolsonaro supporters camped outside the military headquarters. Braga Netto denies the account and calls Cid a traitor.
The two men were summoned to the Supreme Court on Tuesday for a confrontation, a step in Brazilian legal procedure in which the judge and both parties can interrogate witnesses about discrepancies in their testimony.
The examination was conducted behind closed doors by order of Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is chair the coup probe and did not provide more details about the decision. Brazilian law allows closed court hearings when matters of national security or deeply personal matters are involved.
Braga Netto arrived at the court in the country's capital of Brasilia from his jail cell in Rio de Janeiro, where he has been detained for obstructing investigations since December.
A staffer of the Supreme Court who observed the testimony told The Associated Press that both Braga Netto and Cid mostly stuck to their contradictory versions of events and avoided even looking at each other despite sitting opposite one another.
The staffer spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to brief the media.
In a heated exchange, the former defense minister shot back that Cid was a 'liar,' said Braga Netto's lawyer, José Luis Oliveira.
Moraes' decision to call both men for questioning at the same time signaled the judge's lack of confidence in their testimonies, legal experts and officials said.
Brazil's military has long enjoyed impunity
The fact that the two men appeared in a civilian court at all was a break from decades of impunity enjoyed by Brazilian senior officers.
No one in Brazil has been sent to jail on charges related to the 1964-1985 military dictatorship, unlike in neighboring countries Argentina and Chile. And Bolsonaro, despite facing a tangle of serious legal charges, remains the face of the country's opposition to President Lula.
The last Brazilian general to be jailed was Argemiro de Assis Brasil, who was arrested in 1964 for opposing the coup d'etat in which the military seized power.
Since the beginning of the proceedings, members of the military establishment have claimed the Supreme Court trial is an embarrassment to the armed forces.
'Such questioning doesn't help the armed forces,' said Gen. Roberto Peternelli, a former congressman affiliated with Bolsonaro's Liberal Party. 'In my perspective, it ends up harming the country.'
The accused sought to avoid civilian court by seeking a trial at the country's Superior Military Tribunal, where legal experts say they were more likely to find sympathy.
The military court, which handles only a few dozen cases a year, refused the cases.
'Members of the military court understood that, though perpetrated by military personnel, these are not military crimes,' said Alexandre Knopfholz, a law professor at UniCuritiba.
Millions of Brazilians have seen the case play out on TV over the past two years, from raids in which federal police arrest suspects and seize documents to court testimony.
Still, some experts doubt that Cid and Braga Netto would end up serving out full sentences behind bars, even if they are found guilty.
'This is the middle of the probe. We should not forget that every coup-mongering military man in Brazilian history was pardoned,' said Fabio Victor, author of a book about the links between the military and politics after Brazil's transition to democracy in 1985.
But he acknowledged: 'The fact that generals have become defendants for an attempted coup does show some evolution.'
____
Hughes reported from Rio de Janeiro.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Netanyahu's government on edge as ultra-Orthodox party quits coalition over military draft law
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition faces significant instability after a key ultra-Orthodox party announced its withdrawal early on Tuesday. The move directly threatens to undermine the Israeli leader's authority at a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict in Gaza. United Torah Judaism's two factions confirmed their exit from the government, citing deep disagreements over a proposed bill. This legislation aims to enshrine widespread military draft exemptions into law for their constituents, whose members primarily dedicate themselves to religious study rather than military service. The issue of conscription has long been a contentious point among Jewish Israelis, the majority of whom are subject to mandatory military service. This long-standing division has been exacerbated significantly since the war in Gaza began, as the military's demand for personnel has grown increasingly acute. The departure of a party that has long served as a kingmaker in Israeli politics doesn't immediately threaten Netanyahu's rule. But, once it comes into effect within 48 hours, it will leave the Israeli leader with a slim majority in a government that could now more heavily rely on the whims of two far-right parties. Those parties oppose concessions in ceasefire negotiations with Hamas and have themselves quit or threatened to quit the government over moves to end or even pause the war in Gaza. The political shake-up comes as Israel and Hamas are discussing the terms of a truce for the 21-month war in Gaza. Despite heavy pressure by the U.S., Israel's top ally, and mediators Egypt and Qatar, there is no breakthrough yet in the talks. A recurring sticking point has been whether the war ends as part of any truce and Netanyahu's far-right parties oppose ending the war while Hamas remains intact. United Torah Judaism's departure has a window of 48 hours before becoming official, meaning Netanyahu can still find ways to satisfy the party and bring it back into the coalition. But Shuki Friedman, vice president of the Jewish People Policy Institute, said the gaps between the draft law currently on the table and the demands of the party are still wide, making a compromise unlikely during that time. Friedman said the party's departure doesn't immediately put Netanyahu's rule at risk. A vote to dissolve parliament, that would bring down the government and trigger new elections, can't be brought by the opposition until the end of the year because of procedural reasons. And a summer recess for Parliament, beginning later this month and stretching until October, gives Netanyahu another attempt to bridge the gaps and bring the party back into the coalition. Cabinet Minister Miki Zohar, from Netanyahu's Likud party, said he was hopeful the party could be coaxed back to the coalition. 'God willing, everything will be fine,' he said. A Likud spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
I was beaten and sexually abused by a family friend when I was four - the sick face he pulled at me afterwards will haunt me forever
A man who sexually abused a four-year-old girl when he was 16, then stuck his tongue out at her before fleeing the scene, has finally been jailed more than 30 years later. Thomas Brown, now 47, was this year found guilty of indecently assaulting Kaylee Thompson when she was a defenceless little girl. He was jailed for just two years - the maximum he could receive under the lenient laws of the 1990s when the offence took place. Mother-of-three Kaylee, now 35, from Bradford, said: 'After the assault, I saw him downstairs and he stuck his tongue out at me. 'It was an image that haunted me for years. I can finally put that behind me and look to the future. 'As a four-year-old, I fought back against the attack, and I am still fighting back now. He is a coward, and I am glad people can see him for what he is.' Kaylee and her brother Sam, then aged six, were being babysat by their cousin while their mother was out one evening in 1994. Kaylee said: 'We were staying at my aunt's house while Mum was out. I remember very little, except that I was wearing pajamas with horses on them. 'When I woke up I was standing at the side of the bed and someone was sexually assaulting me. I recognised him as Thomas Brown, a friend of my cousin. 'I was scared and confused but he was hurting me, so I shouted out and pushed him away. He punched me and I fell onto the bed. When I came round, he'd gone and my face was stinging.' Kaylee made her way downstairs to find her cousin asleep on the sofa. 'I couldn't wake my cousin, but then I heard a noise in the kitchen and Thomas Brown appeared,' Kaylee continued. 'He stuck his tongue out at me before walking out of the house. I was terrified of him. I ran back upstairs and my brother woke up and settled me back in bed.' The next morning, Kaylee had a black eye. 'I told everyone Thomas Brown had hit me, but I couldn't tell them about the abuse,' she said. 'I didn't have the vocabulary at that age. I didn't know what had happened to me.' Kaylee's family reported the physical assault to police but, shockingly, no further action was taken. Kaylee became terrified of leaving her bedroom at night and she began wetting the bed. 'I had flashbacks all through my childhood,' she said. 'When I was 16, I got a job in a bar and Thomas Brown came in one night. 'I knew instantly it was him. I'd had so many flashbacks throughout my childhood and I hadn't forgotten him. 'I felt the blood drain from my face. I turned away, refusing even to look at him, and ran out of the bar. 'We had mutual friends on Facebook and I realised he was friendly with people who had kids of their own. I had to speak out but the longer it went on, the harder it became. 'I drank heavily to cope and confided in my friends who were always urging me to go to the police. I tried not to let it overshadow my life but the memories of the attack were always in my mind.' Kaylee later met her husband, James, and the couple now have three young sons together. Kaylee said her family and her husband James were always supportive, but it took time for her to speak the truth about her attacker (Kaylee with her husband James) 'James and my family knew about the abuse and they were always very supportive, but I wasn't ready to talk to the police,' said Kaylee. In 2021, as part of her role as a community development worker, Kaylee was invited to join an advisory group with Bradford Rape Crisis and Sexual Abuse Survivors Service. She said: 'Working there and talking with other survivors made me think I owed it to myself, and to all other women, to speak out.' Kaylee went to the police in November, 2021, and 47-year-old Brown appeared before Leeds Crown Court in April this year. 'The cross-examination was tough, the defence barrister repeatedly challenged my memory of events,' Kaylee said. 'But I knew I was telling the truth and I held onto that.' Brown was finally imprisoned for two years and put on the sex offender register for ten years. 'The process was very stressful,' Kaylee remembered. 'I had no support prior to the court case. When I was interviewed, I was taken to the "Vulnerable Victim Suite", which I objected to. 'I asked the police officer if they had a "Paedophile Suite" as well. I'm not a victim and I don't like to be categorised like that. 'Just as I was when I was aged four, I am still fighting, still standing up for myself and I want to stand up for other survivors too. 'I am pleased I have justice and that he's been exposed for the animal he really is. I carried so much shame all those years but now the shame is all on him. 'I would encourage any survivors to come forward, no matter how long it's been. The process is not easy. However, it does help you heal and get closure.' Kaylee continues to work with a survivor leaders group at Bradford Rape crisis centre.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Kyiv hails US weapons deal as Moscow dismisses Trump's sanctions threat
Politicians in Kyiv have welcomed Donald Trump's announcement that billions of dollars worth of US military equipment will be sent to Ukraine, while officials in Moscow dismissed his threat of sanctions against Russia as hot air. In a meeting with the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, at the White House, Trump said the US would send Patriot anti-aircraft batteries and interceptor missiles, paid for by European allies. He promised that additional Patriot systems would arrive within days, funded by Germany and other Nato partners, which would be a significant step in helping Ukraine to defend itself. Kyiv is believed to have only six functioning Patriot batteries. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, expressed gratitude to Trump on Monday evening. 'I am grateful to President Trump for his readiness to support the protection of our people's lives,' Zelenskyy said in his nightly video address. Zelenskyy also said he had had a 'productive' discussion in Kyiv with Keith Kellogg, Trump's special representative to Ukraine. He later said he had spoken to Trump and Rutte since the announcement. Andrii Kovalenko, a member of Ukraine's national security and defence council, earlier summed up the positive response from Zelenskyy's government in a one-word reaction: 'Cool.' Others acknowledged that Ukraine's relations with Washington had signally improved since Zelenskyy's disastrous meeting with Trump in the Oval Office in February. But there was also scepticism that the new package – coupled with the threat of sanctions on the Russian economy in 50 days' time – would be enough to persuade Moscow to stop fighting. One former Ukrainian military officer said it was unlikely to make a meaningful impression on the Kremlin, or act as a strong deterrent. The independent MP Mariana Bezuhla – a prominent critic of Zelenskyy and his top military team – dismissed the announcement as an empty 'game'. 'Trump gave Putin another 50 days to seize Ukraine,' she posted on social media. Referring to cities in the east of the country, where Russian troops are advancing, she said: 'Well, then, let's see, carte blanche, so to speak. To the Dnipro or Kramatorsk – everything is so appetising.' Russian officials and pro-war bloggers largely dismissed Trump's threats, portraying them as far less serious than anticipated. Konstantin Kosachev, a senior Russian lawmaker, wrote on Telegram that the US president's ultimatum amounted to 'hot air', suggesting he could easily walk it back. 'A lot can change in 50 days – on the battlefield and in the mindset of those in power, both in the US and in Nato,' he wrote. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Yuri Podolyaka, a popular pro-Kremlin military blogger, similarly wrote on Telegram that Trump 'could change his 'opinion' several times in the next 50 days'. Podolyaka and other commentators pointed to the main Moscow stock index, which gained more than 2.5% after Trump's announcement. The shift in tone stood in stark contrast to the earlier anxiety in Moscow, where state media had speculated that Trump might announce the delivery of long-range missiles capable of reaching the Russian capital. Some voices in Moscow, however, lamented that Trump's once-positive relationship with Putin may have fundamentally shifted. 'A new reality on Ukraine began today with Trump's statement,' said Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin commentator. 'As of today, he's pressuring only Russia and supporting Ukraine,' he wrote on Telegram. In Ukraine, there was frustration that it had taken the Trump administration nearly six months to agree to send substantial military support, at a time when Ukrainian cities were under heavy fire. Russia pounded Kyiv in a seven-hour attack last week, killing two people, and dispatched a record 741 drones and ballistic missiles across the country. The journalist and blogger Illia Ponomarenko suggested Trump had allowed himself to be deceived in his dealings with Putin. 'How many Ukrainian lives could have been saved if, from the very beginning, Trump had listened to wise and honest people about helping Ukraine, instead of the artful lies of that cannibal Putin on the phone?' he wrote. Rather, Trump had believed he could ''achieve peace' by indulging and encouraging the aggressor's appetite', he said.
