Company Boasts Spending Up To $20 Million On Trump Crypto Coin To Buy Influence
WASHINGTON — An international trucking logistics firm is buying as much as $20 million worth of President Donald Trump's crypto coins to influence the administration's trade policy — the precise sort of quid-pro-quo arrangement that corruption experts warned Trump was encouraging when he unveiled his venture.
Freight Technologies Inc. CEO Javier Selgas said in a Wednesday news release that buying Trump coin would be 'an effective way to advocate for fair, balanced and free trade between Mexico and the U.S.'
The release was attached to a filing that same day with the Securities and Exchange Commission explaining why Freight Technologies was issuing bonds. 'The company will use the net proceeds from the offering to purchase TRUMP coins,' the company told the SEC.
'It's just another day for Donald Trump that an international freight company is paying a $20 million tribute towards the Trump family fortune after openly wishing it will lead to administration tariff relief,' said Tony Carrk, executive director of Accountable.us. The watchdog group discovered Freight Technologies' plan through a social media post bragging about it by GetTrumpMemes.com, the company that sells the Trump coins.
Neither Freight Technologies, which is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands but has a U.S. headquarters in Houston, nor Selgas responded to HuffPost queries. Trump White House officials also did not respond to HuffPost for this story, nor did GetTrumpMemes.com.
On April 23, GetTrumpMemes.com announced that it was holding a contest to reward the top 220 holders of Trump coins with a dinner with the president at his golf course in Sterling, Virginia, on May 22. The top 25 coinholders would get an 'exclusive' reception with him as well.
'Any company can seek to curry favor with Trump and flavor that curry with cash,' said Norm Eisen, the top ethics lawyer in the Obama White House. 'He's opened up an additional channel of illicit influence by hosting this dinner.'
Going back to his first term, Trump used his office to enrich himself — a textbook definition of corruption — more than any previous president going back at least a century. He operated a hotel blocks from the White House where both domestic and foreign lobbyists met with administration officials while spending at the bar and restaurant. Foreign delegations frequently took rooms there, sometimes blocks of rooms, for days and weeks at a time.
Republican Party groups and candidates held events at his properties, particularly the Washington, D.C., hotel and Mar-a-Lago, Trump's private club in Palm Beach, Florida. Trump even tried to host a G7 summit of the world's largest democratic economies at his cash-strapped golf resort in Doral, Florida, until critical press coverage made him back down.
All of those efforts, though, pale in comparison to Trump's eager promotion of his crypto schemes in his second term. Three days before his inauguration, he announced his Trump coin, which immediately soared to nearly $75 per coin before crashing back down. It had fallen as low as $7.57 last month before GetTrumpMemes.com announced the dinner and reception contest. The price on Friday stood at $12.97.
Crypto coins have zero intrinsic value and do not physically exist anywhere. Even the GetTrumpMemes.com site states: 'Trump Memes are intended to function as an expression of support for, and engagement with, the ideals and beliefs embodied by the symbol '$TRUMP,'' and they are 'not intended to be, or to be the subject of, an investment opportunity, investment contract, or security of any type.'
Ethics experts warned that Trump's coins would enable foreign and domestic interests seeking the president's favor to funnel him cash without leaving a public trace. Indeed, thus far, Freight Technologies appears to be the only company or individual making a large dollar purchase of Trump coins to announce it publicly. Crypto transactions are difficult to trace, which has made them a favorite for money launderers and other criminals since their invention.
GetTrumpMemes.com posts a 'leader board' of the top Trump coin owners, but only provides their user names and crypto 'wallets.' If Freight Technologies goes through with its plan to buy $20 million of Trump coins at Friday's $12.97 price, it would have 1,542,020 Trump coins, putting the company in the top spot on the rankings and likely giving its representative face time with Trump at the 'VIP' reception prior to the May 22 dinner.
Freight Technologies facilitates movements of goods back and forth across the U.S.-Mexico border by long-haul trucking — a business facing considerable financial threat from Trump's trade war. 'At the heart of Fr8Tech's mission is the promotion of productive and active commerce between the United States and Mexico. Mexico is the United States' top goods trading partner, with Mexico being the leading destination for US exports and the top source for US imports,' Selgas wrote in the April 30 release.
'There's little doubt this company is expecting some administration policy relief in return for their generous investment in the growing Trump crypto empire,' Carrk said. 'It's an indictment in and of itself that the president has paved the way for so much potential corruption for his own personal gain and at the public expense that few can keep up.'
Ty Cobb, a former federal prosecutor who served in Trump's first-term White House, said that while federal law makes either offering or accepting a bribe a crime, Trump has made it plain that won't be enforced so long as he is in the White House.
'They've made it clear that there are no ethics and they're not beholden to any standards, and it doesn't matter if it's illegal or not because they're not going to prosecute Republicans, so get over it,' Cobb said. 'What passes for routine at this White House is purely corrupt.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Tariffs Threaten Fed With a Real Inflation Headache, BIS Says
Resurgent US inflation could unfold as the world economy reels from Donald Trump's disruptive trade policies, the Bank for International Settlements warned. That bleak scenario was described by General Manager Agustin Carstens, presenting an annual report that catalogued how existing global vulnerabilities have been further exposed by the American president's actions since taking office in January.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
t42 IoT Tracking Solutions Full Year 2024 Earnings: US$0.032 loss per share (vs US$0.008 loss in FY 2023)
Revenue: US$4.16m (up 3.8% from FY 2023). Net loss: US$1.75m (loss widened by 316% from FY 2023). US$0.032 loss per share (further deteriorated from US$0.008 loss in FY 2023). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period t42 IoT Tracking Solutions shares are up 20% from a week ago. Don't forget that there may still be risks. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for t42 IoT Tracking Solutions (2 are concerning) you should be aware of. — Investing narratives with Fair Values A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
The '12-Day War,' World War III, and how we describe what's happening in Iran
USA TODAY interviewed experts about what is happening in the world, and how it should be described. Here's what they said. President Donald Trump wants to call the most recent round of fighting between Iran and Israel the "12-Day War," but he may not get his wish. That's because journalists and historians are usually the ones who put names on wars, and they often don't choose the titles that government officials put on them. It's even less likely that the conflict could be named World War III, even though Trump has been warning about it for more than a decade, and even told the leader of Ukraine this year he was risking starting it. 'There's no official naming body, international or national,' said David Sibley, a military historian for Cornell University who is based in Washington, D.C. 'It's really just kind of agreed on by historians, by countries, and sometimes not even that.' USA TODAY interviewed experts on international relations and military history to talk about what is happening in the world, and how it should be described. Here's what they said. The '12-Day War' Howard Stoffer, a professor at the University of New Haven in Connecticut, said the most recent fighting between Iran and Israel marks a "historic turning point in the Middle East,' comparable to the Six-Day War in 1967 or the Yom Kippur War in 1973. Trump's suggested title might be a way to invoke 1967, "where Israelis used a preemptive airstrike to defeat the Arab countries around them," Sibley said. Israel emerged politically stronger and with more land. 'It certainly would invoke that in Israel and in the Middle East," Sibley said. "It certainly has that sort of pithiness that is appealing, and so it would be interesting to see. I don't know. It might stick." On June 26 and June 27, the news wire Reuters used the phrase '12-day war' to describe the sparring between the two countries earlier in the month, but not as the official name of the war, which would have a capitalized the "D" and "W." USA TODAY has used the term in quotation marks. Bryon Greenwald, a professor at National Defense University in Washington, D.C., questioned whether the attacks between Iran and Israel amounted to a war at all, or just a flare-up of a long-simmering conflict the countries have engaged in for decades. He pointed to airstrikes between Iran and Israel in March, predating the most recent conflict that led the United States to drop bombs on nuclear facilities. 'Does that shift the start date to the left, so it is now longer (than) 12 Days?' he asked. Peter Singer, a political scientist and author specializing in 21st-century warfare, said if Trump wants the name to catch on, he needs "better marketing." Graphic: How 70 years of history led to the U.S. bombing in Iran Who names wars? Even if the the name a president or military leader catches on, names catches on, journalists and historians may change them over time. 'WWI was commonly called the Great War until the media needed to name its successor,' said Don Ritchie, a former Senate historian. 'Historians are usually writing long after the fact and follow the common usage.' Wayne Lee, a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, points to the usage by President George H.W. Bush's administration of 'Operation Desert Shield" and 'Operation Desert Storm' to describe early 1990s conflicts in the Middle East. Most people refer to those conflicts as the Gulf War, the First Gulf War, or the Persian Gulf War. When President George W. Bush invaded Iraq in 2003, his administration named it 'Operation Iraqi Freedom,' but most people call it the Iraq War. 'Sometimes even the names of wars aren't agreed on,' said Sibley, from Cornell. 'What we call the American Civil War, it depends on where you are what you call it − 'The War Between the States,' 'The War of Northern Aggression,' things like that.' Is World War III happening? When the U.S. bombed Iran on June 21, Americans grew anxious that World War III had started. Experts caution against declaring armed conflicts worldwide "world war." 'I would be really surprised if this morphed into something that looks anything like the past world wars we've had,' said Will Todman from the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'But that does not mean peace is likely around the world. … I just don't think those will all be connected in the same way it was in World War I or World War II.' Russia has been at war with Ukraine for more than three years, at times threatening to use nuclear weapons but never following through. Experts said tensions between North Korea and South Korea could escalate. Or they said China, another nuclear country, could invade Taiwan. 'Forces were fighting just about everywhere around the globe,' during both world wars, Sibley said. 'So even a conflict in the Middle East between two sets of alliances, I don't know that that would rise to the level. I don't know. It retroactively could be labeled that if it gets bad enough.' Sibley said nuclear weapons act as a deterrent to attack, because countries fear having those weapons used against them. But he said, if two major powers exchanged nuclear weapons it could warrant the moniker "World War III." Sibley said countries tend to be more cautious about invading or attacking nuclear powers because they fear having those weapons used against them. But he said, if two major powers exchanged nuclear weapons it could warrant the moniker "World War III." 'Post-1945, the assumption has been that World War III is going to be a nuclear one,' Sibley said. 'And, so, short of that, it's hard to see something getting that label.' Singer pointed to the massive casualties from world wars, numbers that the world has not seen in several of the most recent conflicts combined. "As many as 22 million people died in World War I and 85 million people in World War II,' he said. 'Stop trying to make World War III happen.'
