At Norfolk State University, Veterans Affairs workers decry effects of budget cuts
The testimony at the event at Norfolk State University centered on the staffing levels at the recently opened North Battlefield VA Outpatient Clinic, cuts to Veterans Affairs, and uncertainty in veterans' health care and benefits.
The VA has plans to lay off as many as 80,000 staff by the end of the year. The federal government instituted a hiring freeze earlier this year and has also laid off thousands of probationary employees.
Dr. Sheila Elliott, a pharmacist who has worked at the Hampton VA Medical Center for 35 years and serves as the president of Local 2328 AFGE union that represents direct patient care staff, told the group that workers who are essential to veterans' health care have lived in fear for their jobs since the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) began making cuts to the federal government.
She said the list of VA employees that are exempt from layoffs, such as recreation therapists shows the 'unnuanced approach' to how the VA functions.
'Recreational therapists work with veterans to improve physical fitness, reduce stress, anxiety, ultimately leading to a higher quality of life,' Elliott said. 'I have seen first hand the impact of indiscriminate cuts on veterans access to services.'
Susan Hippen, a retired Navy Master Chief who represents the Veterans of Military Families Caucus, said in her recent visit to the North Battlefield Clinic, which opened in April at less than 30% of its full staffing level, that it is a 'ghost town' and is failing to meet the needs of veterans on the Southside.
Among the services not being provided at the new clinic are dentistry and radiology, on top of mental health appointments already taking months to schedule, according to Hippen.
'Expressing my concern about the careless dismissal of the people who provide our care, process our claims, or assist with benefits should not be referred to as political fearmongering — it is a fact,' she said.
Scott closed the event by quoting President George Washington who reportedly said, 'The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive our veterans in early wars were treated and appreciated by our nation.'
'We owe it to our veterans to provide the health care they need,' Scott said. 'Not only is it the right thing to do, it's a national imperative.'
VA Secretary Doug Collins has insisted that the job cuts will not be a detriment.
'The department's history shows that adding more employees to the system doesn't automatically equal better results,' Collins told Congress last month.
Collins has said that the personnel changes would not hurt VA health care, benefits or beneficiaries, and that 'mission-critical' positions were exempt from the reductions. The cuts, he said, would increase productivity and eliminate waste.
Gavin Stone, 757-412-4806, gavin.stone@virginiamedia.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Rubio on 2028 election: ‘I think JD Vance would be a great nominee'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio threw a wrench in speculation that he might be on a collision course with Vice President JD Vance in the 2028 presidential election, praising the veep. When asked about whether he has his 'sights set outside of the State Department,' Rubio said he hopes that Vance tosses his hat in the ring during the next presidential race. 'Well, I think JD Vance would be a great nominee. If he decides he wants to do that. I think he's doing a great job as Vice President. He's a close friend and I hope he intends to do it,' Rubio told Fox News' 'My View With Lara Trump.' The former 2016 presidential hopeful also downplayed the possibility of him jumping into the arena in 2028, noting that he is very attached to his current gig as America's top diplomat. Still, he didn't rule out a presidential run entirely. 4 Secretary of State Marco Rubio described Vice President JD Vance as a close friend. Fox News 4 Secretary of State Marco Rubio didn't rule out a presidential run. Fox News 'It's kind of early, you know, but being in the role that I'm in here at the Secretary of State, I really don't play in politics,' Rubio explained. 'There's actually rules against me being involved in domestic politics.' 'I want to do this job as long as the president allows me to do it and stay in that job, which would keep me here all the way through January of 2028,' he went on. 'You never know what the future holds. You never rule things out or anything.' The Secretary of State also described Vance as 'one of my closest friends in politics.' Rubio had been a top contender in last year's veepstakes, but Trump ultimately went with Vance. Since being tapped as Secretary of State, Trump has thrown tough assignments at Rubio, making him run United States Agency for International Development (USAID), effectively serve as a national security adviser, acting Archivist and more. 4 Vice President JD Vance is widely seen as the GOP frontrunner for the 2028 presidential race. REUTERS Vance has even joked about the multiple hats Rubio wears in the Trump administration. 'I think he could take on a bit more. If only there was a job opening for a devout Catholic…' Vance joked last month after Pope Francis died. The next presidential cycle will be the first time since 2016 that the path to the White House will be wide open race on both the Republican and Democratic sides. It will also likely be the first time since 2016 that Republicans will run without President Trump as the party's top standard bearer, posing a major test for the party 4 President Trump has loaded Marco Rubio up with a variety of jobs that usually aren't given to secretaries of state. AP Rubio also reflected with Trump's daughter-in-law about his experience running against the president in 2016. Trump had belittled him as 'Little Marco,' and the two had chafed bitterly during the campaign. 'I knew who he was, obviously, but I'd never met him,' Rubio recounted. 'We happened to be competing for the same thing. So in any competition, especially as you get down and it narrows down to three or four people, you know, punches are going to be thrown.' 'But then that ends and then we're on the same team because he's a Republican nominee and I'm a Republican.' Rubio hailed Trump's 'incredible instincts for human behavior' and took note of the contrast between the fast pace of his administration and the turtle speed of the Senate. 'It's incredibly rewarding. There is no point in being in this business and in this line of work if you can't get things done. So that makes it a lot of fun,' he said.
2 hours ago
'This Week' Transcript 7-27-25: Rep. Ro Khanna, Rep. Thomas Massie, Save the Children Gaza Humanitarian Director Rachael Cummings & Stephen A. Smith
A rush transcript of "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" airing on Sunday, July 27, 2025 on ABC News is below. This copy may not be in its final form, may be updated and may contain minor transcription errors. For previous show transcripts, visit the "This Week" transcript archive. KARL: And I'm joined now by the bipartisan duo pushing the Trump administration to release the Epstein files, Republican Congressman Tom Massie of Kentucky, and Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna of California. Congressman Massie, let me start with you. You are co-sponsoring this bill to force a release of these files. Why -- what does -- what does your bill do exactly, and why now? REP. THOMAS MASSIE, (R) KENTUCKY & JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEMBER: It would force a full release of the files. It has the force of law. It's not a subpoena. It's not a pretty please would you release the files. It's the force of law. And it's got protections to redact victims' names and to prevent, you know, release of child pornography. Why are we doing it now? Because it wasn't until now that I realized how insincere the people working on this were. I mean, they've told us all along that we were going to get these files, and then only recently did we find out they're not going to release the files. KARL: So, Congressman Khanna, let me ask you a really basic question on this. Why are Democrats suddenly interested in the Epstein case? I mean, did -- did you or -- I mean,n did you ask the Biden Justice Department to release these files? REP. RO KHANNA, (D) CALIFORNIA & OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEMBER: It's not a sudden interest. Actually, the former chair, Elijah Cummings, had an investigation starting in 2019. And I have tweeted out supporting that back in 2019. We have been pushing for transparency. During the Biden administration, both in 2021 and 2024, the court ordered release of documents. But Donald Trump raised the stakes. And he did it in a way in the campaign that was justified. He said, look, when I get there, I'm going to release the files. Pam Bondi says there's a client list. Then she says, no, it's just a file. She's going to release them. I didn't criticize them at all those first few months. But when they refused to release the files, when they said there's nothing more to see, that's when we said transparency demands the full release of the files. KARL: Yes, and -- and what is going on in the administration on this, Congressman Massie? I mean, they -- they devoted -- we talked earlier -- about 1,000 FBI, DOJ personnel, DOJ personnel working on this, all this talk of releasing it and then suddenly the president's out referring to it as a hoax and saying nobody cares. MASSIE: Well, I don't think it's a hoax at all. It's emblematic of the promise that President Trump brought with him to the White House, how he energized so many people who had checked out of the political system. He was going to be the guy who holds all the rich and powerful and politically connected people accountable, and that's why there's so much disappointment right now. I don't think the president himself is particularly implicated in these files. You know, there have been some theories that that's the case. But I do think he has friend who may be embarrassed by the release of these files. And the release of these files may not implicate them. It may just be embarrassment. But for some reason he's decided to do a 180 on this. KARL: Now, there was this story in "The Wall Street Journal" about a -- a birthday message that -- that "The Journal" reports that Trump wrote to Epstein for his 50th birthday. And it's part of a book of -- of messages. Obviously, the president denies that he did this. He's suing "The Wall Street Journal" over it. But would you support something that Congressman Khanna has been calling for, which is a -- pressing the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, subpoenaing the estate to turn that book over? MASSIE: Well, I think we should get a lot more than just the book. Let's get the financial records of the estate. We're -- follow the money, as they say up here. KARL: Yes. MASSIE: We should look at the plea-bargain, open that up, see what was the deal -- what was the deal that was cut. I think there's a lot more than just that letter. But that letter is also sort of representative of something that's embarrassing, but not illegal. That, you know, another reason why these files may be sealed and -- and stay sealed. But we're going to -- we're going to force a vote on this when we get back from the August recess. Ro Khanna and I are using a procedure in the House called a discharge petition, whereby if we get 218 votes, and we're well on our way to that, 218 signatures, then we can force the vote. KARL: Yes. So you're just going to need a couple more Republicans to sign that if Democrats go along. Are -- you can get that? MASSIE: If every -- if every Democrat signs this, I've already got 12 Republican co-sponsors, and I only need six to sign it. KARL: But will they sign? I mean, will they -- because that -- because that's taking control of the House schedule away from the speaker. MASSIE: Yes. I think the pressure is going to build over August recess. I don't think it's going to dissipate like the speaker hopes that it will. And if merely just half the people who've co-sponsored this legislation follow through and sign it, then it's going to come to the floor for a vote. KARL: So, Congressman Khanna, we had this rather extraordinary visit to Florida of Todd Blanche to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell. Do you agree with those who say that she should testify, wanting her to testify before Congress? KHANNA: I do. I have skepticism given she was indicted of perjury, given she has a motive for getting a pardon. Again, love that Todd Blanche was meeting with her, allegedly, one-on-one. But I'm for all the evidence coming out. It's important, though, that this is not something that is anti-President Trump. This is for transparency. I'm less concerned about his mentions. I'm much more concerned about the hundreds of people who were powerful and rich, who had impunity, and I'm concerned about restoring justice for the victims. He promised to expose this. I think the American people don't think he's a perfect person. They thought he was going to expose a system that wasn't working for them, and that's really what this is about. KARL: What would be the reaction if he actually went through and did some form of clemency, granted some form of clemency to Ghislaine Maxwell, Congressman Khanna? KHANNA: Well, I think people would say, why is he doing that? And is -- can we really believe Maxwell's testimony? I mean, I don't love the broad pardon power in the first place. I think it has been abused. I think at this point, though, what the American people desperately need is for all of the evidence in the files to come out so they can decide for themselves, so they're not relying on Maxwell, so they're not relying on even congressional committees. Let the American people decide. KARL: And how would you react to a pardon or a clemency? MASSIE: I don't think she deserves that or needs that. I mean, she's guilty of crimes. But it's hard to believe that she herself and Epstein did these crimes by themselves, right? KARL: Yes. MASSIE: So it's time to find out who else was involved. And I agree with Ro here. The bank records don't lie. The documents don't lie. They don't change. The plea bargains that have been sealed don't lie. Let's release those. KARL: Before you go, I want -- I want to look at how Speaker Johnson has reacted to what you are doing on this, trying to force a vote to release the records. Here's just some of what Johnson said this week about you. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) REP. MIKE JOHNSON (R-LA): I say Thomas Massie is the one trying to bite Republicans. OK. I'm not certain what his strategy is. I don't understand Thomas Massie's motivation. I really don't. I don't know how his mind works. I don't know what he's -- what he's thinking. Thomas Massie could have brought his discharge petition anytime over the last four and a half years, over the last four years of the Biden administration. (END VIDEO CLIP) KARL: And he also said bless your heart. MASSIE: Yes. KARL: So, how do you respond to that? And he's making -- yes, he's asking a variation of the question I asked Congressman Khanna. He's like, you know, why didn't you try to do this four years ago? MASSIE: Well, like Khanna said, you know, I've got evidence of tweets where I've been asking for these things before. The question is, why isn't Mike Johnson having this vote? Why did he send us home early? And he talks about political pain for Republicans, as if by invoking transparency and inflicting pain, that should be very telling. What is painful about having this vote? I'll tell you what's politically going to be a liability is if we don't vote on this and we go into the midterms and everybody becomes, you know, they just check out because Republicans didn't keep their promise, and Donald Trump. We'll lose the majority. By the way, they're also running $1.8 million of ads against me, Republicans are. KARL: Republicans. Yes. MASSIE: For bringing measures like this to the floor. KARL: All right. Congressman Massie, Congressman Khanna, bipartisanship here on THIS WEEK. Thank you both very much. KARL: I'm joined now by Rachael Cummings, the Gaza humanitarian director for Save the Children, who is right now coming to us on the ground in Gaza. So thank you, Rachael. Thank you for the work you are doing. Thank you for taking time to speak with us. Just give me a sense, how is it looking right now on the ground? RACHAEL CUMMINGS, SAVE THE CHILDREN GAZA HUMANITARIAN DIRECTOR: The situation in Gaza is catastrophic for children and increasingly now for adults. There is no food available in the market. Children are literally starving, and we run health connects in Deir al-Balah and Khan Younis through a nutrition center in Deir al-Balah and Khan Younis, and we are seeing an exponential lines in the number of children attending our clinic. In the first two weeks of July, we've seen exactly the same number of children we saw in the whole of June, and we're expecting that trajectory, sadly, to increase. The number of children who are malnourished, very concerningly, pregnant women, women who are breastfeeding are also malnourished. But this morning, I went to our clinic in Deir Al-Balah, about 10 minutes from where I am right now. And it was absolutely packed, and it was a scene I had never witnessed before. And I've been working in this sector for over 20 years in the whole (ph) of Africa, in various places around the world. And every child in the health center today was malnourished, but also every adult was extremely thin, gaunt-looking, exhausted. The situation is absolutely terrible here. KARL: And you've been there since early last year, so you've seen a desperate situation getting exponentially more desperate. CUMMINGS: Yeah. And for months I've said, how can it get worse for children? It cannot get any worse for children, but apparently, yes, it can get worse for children. And now, we are seeing all of the coping mechanisms that families have deployed within -- with mothers eating less than three meals a day to two meals a day, to one meal a day. Now, they're not having a meal a day. And this is very, very concerning. And this is at scale. KARL: So overnight, we saw the Israelis do these humanitarian air aid drops. I know that you and other aid workers say this is not the effective way to get support in. But you also have this pause in the military operations. Is it -- are you seeing any signs that this is going to make a difference? CUMMINGS: We welcome the humanitarian supplies entering Garza, of course. And we need to do that in a controlled manner. Airdrops are not in a controlled manner and one airdrop is equal to around one truck. So we need to bring in humanitarian supplies, supplies over land through the recognized routes. We need the U.N. system be enabled to manage the distributions. We know as Save the Children, as humanitarian agencies, how to do safe and dignified distributions. So yes, we welcome the fact that now the U.N. is allowed to bring in humanitarian supplies, including food, including medicines, including nutrition commodities, and including hygiene supplies. KARL: All right. Rachael Cummings with Save the Children, again, thank you for the work you're doing. I can hear your commitment. I can hear the emotion in your voice. Thank you for sharing your observations with us, and we hope this situation turns around and turns around soon. Thank you very much.
3 hours ago
GOP Rep. Massie says he wants more from Epstein estate than his reported ‘birthday book'
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie said Sunday he stands with Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna's calls to subpoena Jeffrey Epstein's estate for documents related to his case, including, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, a birthday letter to Epstein allegedly written by President Donald Trump in 2003. "Well, I think we should get a lot more than just the book. Let's get the financial records of the estate. Where is it -- follow the money, as they say up here," Massie told ABC News' "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl. "We should look at the plea bargain. Open that up. See what was the deal? What was the deal that was cut? I think there's a lot more than just that letter." The Wall Street Journal reported on a birthday message Trump allegedly wrote in a book of messages for Epstein's 50th birthday -- the president denies it exists and has sued the Journal for defamation over the report. ABC News has not been able to confirm the existence of the letter. Massie and Khanna's joint legislation would force a House vote on the release of the Epstein files. However, Speaker Mike Johnson sent the House on an August recess a day early, effectively skirting the vote. Massie and Khanna are now seeking a discharge petition, which with 218 votes from House members, would bypass Johnson. Massie said: "It would force a full release of the files. It has the force of law. It's not a subpoena. It's not a 'Pretty please, would you release the files?' It's the force of law and, it's got protections to redact victims' names and to prevent, you know, release of child pornography." Khanna added the Democratic interest in this case is not new, despite claims that the party has latched on to the case as it causes infighting among some of Trump's MAGA base. "We have been pushing for transparency during the Biden administration, both in 2021 and 2024 the court ordered release of documents, but Donald Trump raised the stakes and he did it in a way in the campaign that was justified. He said, 'Look, when I get there, I'm going to release the files,'" Khanna said.
