Louisiana execution recharges debate on death by nitrogen gas
Jessie Hoffman is set to be executed March 18, but his attorneys are asking a judge for a preliminary injunction to prevent it due to the secrecy of how the execution will be carried out.
The inmate will present his arguments during a hearing on Friday, during which he is expected to testify.
Hoffman was convicted of first-degree murder in the 1996 rape and murder of 28-year-old Mary 'Molly' Elliot.
Hoffman's lawyers say that he was informed Feb. 20 that he will be killed using nitrogen gas, but state officials have not yet provided a detailed execution protocol, which the lawyers say is necessary to meet his constitutional rights.
'The State wants to roll out this new gas protocol but keep it hidden from the public and even from the man they seek to kill,' Samantha Kennedy, executive director of the Promise of Justice Initiative, who is representing Hoffman, told NewsNation.
'Jessie Hoffman has a right to know how he's going to be killed, and we have a right as his attorneys to be able to determine if it's going to be a constitutional.'
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has defended the state's decision to utilize nitrogen hypoxia, a method used to suffocate a person by denying them oxygen and allowing them to only inhale nitrogen gas.
'On March 18, 2025, the State of Louisiana will execute Hoffman by nitrogen hypoxia for Molly's murder. We have and will continue to vigorously defend the State's obligation to carry out this sentence and bring justice to the family and friends of Molly Elliot,' Murrill said in a statement.
Murrill told Nexstar affiliate WVLA that she hasn't personally spoken to the victim's family.
History of nitrogen gas executions in the US
The country's first execution using nitrogen gas was carried out last year in Alabama, which has now been used to execute four people in the state. If Hoffman's execution doesn't get halted, Louisiana will become the second state to utilize the method on death row inmates.
All of the men executed in Alabama using nitrogen shook or gasped to varying degrees on the gurney as they were being put to death, according to media witnesses, including The Associated Press.
Rev. Jeff Hood, the spiritual advisor for Kenneth Smith, who was the first person to be killed using nitrogen, witnessed his execution and called it 'a slow, painful means of torture.'
Smith's execution was 'the most violent thing that I have ever witnessed or engaged with,' Hood told Catholic news outlet OSV. 'It was absolutely … incredibly disturbing to see a human being suffocated to death.'
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall has maintained the method as 'painless and humane.'
After convicted murderer Alan Miller settled a lawsuit against Alabama over the use of nitrogen gas in 2024, Marshall stated, 'The resolution of this case confirms that Alabama's nitrogen hypoxia system is reliable and humane.'
Alabama's nitrogen executions prove even more how untested this method is, Kennedy said.
'It's impossible to know if somehow Louisiana Department of Corrections has fixed all the problems that happened in Alabama, where every single time they killed people with gas, it was absolutely a torturous, gruesome, horrific experience,' she said.
'Jessie Hoffman and the public have a right to know what is the process that Louisiana is engaging in, and … if they're upholding everyone's constitutional rights,' Kennedy added.
Which states allow for the use of nitrogen gas in executions?
Currently, four states allow nitrogen gas executions: Louisiana, Alabama, Oklahoma and Mississippi.
An Arkansas bill that would allow nitrogen on death row inmates passed the state House on Tuesday and will now advance for a full vote.
Louisiana had paused executions for 15 years due to an inability to secure lethal injection drugs, but with a nitrogen gas execution protocol finalized last month, the state has been eager to proceed.
'For too long, Louisiana has failed to uphold the promises made to victims of our State's most violent crimes, but that failure of leadership by previous administrations is over,' Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry said in a statement.
Louisiana scheduled two executions on consecutive days in March, but inmate Christopher Sepulvado, who was scheduled to be executed one day before Hoffman, died on Feb. 23 of an illness.
Hoffman had initially challenged Louisiana's lethal injection protocol in 2012 on the grounds that the method was cruel and unusual punishment.
U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick dismissed the lawsuit in 2022 because the state had no executions planned but reopened the case last month, saying that the scheduled executions were 'extraordinary circumstances' that warranted more scrutiny.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay in Dick's ruling while it considers an opposition from Murrill.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP rep says he believes Epstein files were destroyed
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) said Wednesday he believes a so-called 'client list' associated with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein once existed but was 'destroyed' by the Biden administration. 'I think the files existed at one time,' Burchett said in an interview on NewsNation's 'On Balance' with host Leland Vittert. 'I think they were destroyed in the previous administration.' The Justice Department (DOJ) released a memo earlier this week concluding that Epstein did not keep such a list that was allegedly used to blackmail high-profile individuals — contradicting conspiracy theories circulating for years that suggested otherwise. The memo also concluded that the convicted sex offender died in his New York City jail cell in 2019 by suicide, refuting other claims that he died under suspicious circumstances. Burchett pushed back on suggestions by former Trump adviser Elon Musk and other media influencers that the president was among the individuals whose names were included in the files associated with Epstein. 'I think if they'd ever had anything on Trump, it would have been out day one under the Biden administration,' the Tennessee Republican said. 'I think there's some very prominent people. There's Hollywood people,' he added. 'I mean, I think there's world leaders too. And would it have caused economic disruption around the globe? maybe. But I don't really care. I want to bury those dirtbags.' Asked why Attorney General Pam Bondi would not simply say that the evidence has been destroyed, Burchett said, 'She doesn't have any proof of it.' 'I'm just telling you what I think. I've been around this town enough,' the lawmaker continued. 'I think she got over her skis pretty much saying all this stuff, the files are on my desk, I'm going to release it, and then she releases stuff that I knew.' 'I think they all got out there, got a little excited, and I don't think they exist,' he added, referring to the files. The interview comes amid backlash from segments of the right-wing media ecosphere following the release of the DOJ memo. Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, in particular, have come under scrutiny from prominent voices in the MAGA movement who have questioned whether the government is covering up salacious information surrounding Epstein. Patel and Bongino are among those who had pushed such ideas before joining the government. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier this week that DOJ's conclusion is the result of an 'exhaustive review of all of the files related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his death.' She noted there was some material the Trump administration did not release due to its graphic nature. Epstein was federally charged in 2019 on allegations that he led a sex trafficking operation involving underage girls from 2002 to 2005. He died in prison a month later, before the case could go to trial. He had earlier pleaded guilty to separate sexual misconduct charges.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
O'Reilly: Trump said ‘a lot of names associated with Epstein' had nothing to do with his conduct
Former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly said he discussed the Jeffrey Epstein case in March with President Trump, who told him that there are 'a lot of names associated' with the disgraced financier for innocuous reasons. 'I talked to President Trump, man to man, eye to eye, on St Patrick's Day about this… And he said — and I agree — 'there are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein's conduct,'' O'Reilly said Wednesday during an appearance on NewsNation's 'CUOMO.' 'They maybe had lunch with them or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another,' he told host Chris Cuomo. 'If that name gets out,' O'Reilly continued, 'those people are destroyed — because there's not going to be any context. Media doesn't care about context, so you can't do that. You can't destroy a human being by putting out the files, whatever they may be.' The news veteran argued that, instead, Attorney General Pam Bondi should host a press conference where she addresses the Epstein case head-on and shares with the public everything she can about the case. 'You certainly can have Attorney General Bondi say, this is what we know, and, you know, we're going to protect the innocent, and he's a heinous individual,' he said, adding that former Attorney General Merrick Garland — who served in the Biden administration — should sit next to her during the presser. The interview comes amid fierce backlash from segments of the right-wing media sphere and others after the Justice Department on Monday released a memo concluding the convicted sex offender did not keep any client list used to blackmail high-profile individuals, contradicting conspiracy theories circulating for years that suggested otherwise. The memo also concluded that Epstein died in 2019 by suicide, refuting other claims that he died under suspicious circumstances. The Trump administration has pushed back on those claims and has stressed its commitment to truth and transparency. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday that the memo is the result of an 'exhaustive review of all of the files related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his death.' She noted there was some material that DOJ 'did not release because, frankly, it was incredibly graphic and it contained child pornography, which is not something that's appropriate for public consumption.' Trump grew exasperated on Tuesday during a Cabinet meeting when a reporter tried to ask Bondi questions about the memo. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' the president said. 'This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking — we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things. And are people still talking about this guy? This creep? That is unbelievable.' 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this where we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy, with what happened in Texas,' he added. 'It just seems like a desecration.'
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Southern California bishop suspends weekly Mass obligation over immigration raid fears
A Catholic bishop who oversees a major diocese in Southern California has issued a rare decree, formally allowing parishioners to miss weekly Mass amid fears of immigration raids across the region. San Bernardino Bishop Alberto Rojas announced on July 8 that parishioners who have a "genuine fear" over raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were dispensed from their obligation to attend Mass on Sundays and other holy days of obligation, such as Christmas. Rojas noted that "such fear constitutes a grave inconvenience that may impede the spiritual good of the faithful." "In issuing this decree, I am guided by the Church's mission to care for the spiritual welfare of all entrusted to my care, particularly those who face fear or hardship," Rojas wrote. Such diocesan-wide dispensations are usually issued in response to serious circumstances or during times of crisis, like the COVID-19 pandemic, natural disasters, and social or political unrest. Observant Catholics are required to attend Mass every Sunday and on holy days of obligation, and those who "deliberately fail in this obligation commit grave sin," according to the Roman Catholic Catechism. Rojas' announcement comes after immigration agents detained migrants at two of the diocese's parish properties last month, according to the National Catholic Reporter. A spokesperson for the Diocese of San Bernardino told the newspaper that the ICE detentions occurred on June 20 at the St. Adelaide Parish in Highland, California, where several men were detained, and at Our Lady of Lourdes in Montclair, California, where a "longtime parishioner" was detained. Following the detentions, Rojas said in a letter to his diocese that the immigration enforcement actions were "creating a tremendous amount of fear, confusion and anxiety for many." The bishop called on public officials to "please reconsider and cease these tactics immediately." "We have seen a change and an increase in immigration enforcement in our region and specifically in our diocese," Rojas wrote in the letter. "Authorities are now seizing brothers and sisters indiscriminately, without respect for their right to due process and their dignity as children of God." The Diocese of San Bernardino, east of Los Angeles, was established in 1978 and is the sixth-largest diocese in the United States, according to its website. The diocese says that it serves about 1 million Catholics in San Bernardino County, which is 56.4% Latino, and Riverside County, which is 52.5% Latino, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. In Paramount, ICE raids hit hard. Here's why. Special decree comes amid objections over Trump's immigration agenda The Diocese of San Bernardino's decree comes amid growing opposition from Roman Catholic bishops across the United States over President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. Many bishops have echoed the sentiments of Pope Leo XIV and the late Pope Francis, who both criticized Trump's stances on immigration. After taking office in January, Trump dropped a longstanding federal policy against immigration enforcement in sensitive locations, such as schools and places of worship. Multiple religious groups sued the Trump administration over the policy change in February. But in April, a federal judge ruled against the religious groups, refusing to limit the administration's enforcement activity, according to Reuters. Following the 2024 presidential election, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said that it stood in "firm solidarity with our immigrant brothers and sisters." Multiple other Catholic leaders have also expressed solidarity with immigrants, the Nashville Tennessean, part of the USA TODAY Network, reported. The Diocese of San Bernardino appears to be the first to issue a formal dispensation over immigration enforcement. In May, the Diocese of Nashville in Tennessee advised caution for attending Mass, according to the Tennessean. "We are very concerned that the immigration enforcement activities in the Nashville area are going well beyond efforts to target individuals accused of serious and dangerous crimes,' the Diocese of Nashville said in a statement to The Tennessean. "Concerns about the lack of due process under law for those picked up in the current environment are creating even greater fear within our communities, including the fear of being confronted or detained while attending Mass or other events at our parishes." Protests against ICE raids: Local protests build in response to Trump's stepped up immigration raids Trump's immigration crackdown in California In recent months, the Trump administration has intensified its deportation efforts in California with immigration raids at workplaces, traffic stops, and routine legal check-ins. A series of raids across Los Angeles County sparked intense protests in June. After the protests — which mainly occurred in a small area of downtown Los Angeles — began on June 6, Trump took several swift actions, including calling in the 4,000 California National Guard troops and 700 Marines. The decision drew ire from California officials who accused the president of stoking tension and escalating unrest. State and local officials have also repeatedly denounced the federal immigration raids. Earlier this week, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass condemned federal agents and National Guard troops for descending on a city park. Armored vehicles, mounted officers, and armed troops briefly swarmed MacArthur Park in the Westlake neighborhood of Los Angeles before leaving. Bass said 20 children were playing at the park before the troops surged through and shared footage of federal officers running through the park. "Franky, it is outrageous and un-American that we have federal armed vehicles in our parks when nothing is going on in our parks," Bass said at a July 7 news conference. "It is outrageous and un-American that the federal government seized our state's National Guard. It's outrageous and un-American that we have U.S. Marines who are trained to kill foreign soldiers overseas, deployed in our American city." 'Standing up for those who cannot': Immigrant justice advocates say FBI is targeting LA protest organizers Contributing: Christopher Cann and Anthony Robledo, USA TODAY; Liam Adams, Nashville Tennessean; Reuters
