
NZ Law Change Restores Balance – Fairer Rules For Partial Strikes
Hon Brooke van Velden
Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety
The Government has passed a change to the Employment Relations Act that reinstates the ability for employers to make pay deductions during partial strikes – making the system fairer for all, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden announced today.
'These changes will help both employers and unions to return to the bargaining table and restores the law to what it was before the previous government removed this option in 2018.
'I acknowledge the right of workers to strike in support of their collective bargaining claims, the right to strike remains,' says Ms van Velden.
'The changes were needed to ensure a fairer bargaining process and minimise the disruption partial strikes have caused to public and customer services.
'The key benefit for all workers and the public is less disruption to our communities – partial strikes had serious impacts on Kiwi families, students, patients, and other workers across our workplaces,' says Ms van Velden.
Some of the impacts included MRI and nuclear medicine technologists limiting scans, around 50 per cent fewer procedures were done. That meant delays in early cancer treatment, growing waitlists, increased outsourcing costs and pressure on front-line staff to pick up the work of others participating in the partial strikes.
In 2023, teachers took partial strike action, refusing to teach certain year levels on specific days. This disrupted student learning and made it hard for some parents to work.
'Rebalancing collective bargaining settings will support the Government's priority to deliver better public services, by reducing disruption and maintaining a high quality of service,' says Ms van Velden.
This new law allows for pay to be deducted during partial strikes, but it's up to each affected employer to decide how they respond to partial strikes when they occur.
Notes:
What is partial strike and what did it mean prior to this change
A partial strike is industrial action that would normally involve turning up to work but refusing to partake in parts of the job. Until now, if an employee was on a partial strike, their employer could not deduct their pay unless they suspended the employee or issued a lockout notice.
Other noted impacts on the communities:
Since mid-September 2024, NZDF PSA union members have been 'working-to-rule', and from November, they have been taking coordinated breaks and stopped working at heights or off-site. In response, the Minister of Defence has authorised uniformed personnel to cover civilian work in some selected areas.
In September 2024, train operators in Wellington began work-to-rule industrial action including refusing shift changes, leading to disruption for travellers.
What these changes mean
Employers can respond to a partial strike by either:
a) reducing an employee's pay by a proportionate amount, calculated in accordance with a specified method that is based on identifying the work that the employee will not be performing due to the strike, or
b) deducting 10 percent of their wages.
Employers will have to provide written notification to employees that they will be reducing their pay before the deduction is made (the amount of deduction is not required in the notice).
If the union believes the employer has incorrectly applied a pay deduction, the union must advise the employer of that as soon as practicable, after receiving the employer's information on how they calculated the specified pay deduction if relevant. The union can apply to the Employment Relations Authority, who can determine whether the employer has correctly applied the deduction.
Employers do not have to deduct pay in response to partial strikes – this simply provides an additional tool for how they can respond to a partial strike, if it works for them.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Pōmare Power Fuels Stinging Health Blast
A century after he was Minister of Health Sir Māui Pōmare remained politically potent at Waitara's Ōwae marae on the weekend, inspiring outright rejection of Government policy on Māori health. Standing for the Crown, New Plymouth MP David MacLeod bore the stinging criticism with obvious discomfort – like Pōmare he is a son of Ngāti Mutunga iwi. Te Rā o Tā Māui Pōmare (Sir Māui Pōmare Day) each year celebrates the first Māori medical doctor and health minister, with kōrero about uplifting Māori health. On Saturday Pōmare's great-granddaughter Miria gave the whānau address, condemning health policy changes for Māori. 'Hard-fought, hard-won gains for Māori health over the last 125 years have now been seriously undermined by the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora, the Māori Health Authority – a move that has been severely criticized for discouraging Māori initiatives and disregarding the principle of tino rangatiratanga: self-determination.' Her tupuna embraced scientific medical advances, but Miria Pōmare said he also pushed for a systematic Māori health focus. Reforms were underpinned by Maori leadership, culturally-appropriate interventions, and commitment to self-determination: principles derived from Te Tiriti o Waitangi, she said. 'He knew the issues were not medical alone – they were political and economic and spiritual.' As New Zealand's first statistics minister Tā Māui knew accurate data was crucial to win resources for Māori health equity. Two weeks ago the Government canned the regular census and will instead collate data already gathered by state agencies. 'It appears to be a sinister reversion back to an assimilationist approach of former times,' said Miria Pōmare. Her address drew vocal assent and applause. In Te Ikaroa a Māui – the wharenui built and named to honour Tā Māui – Te Ātiawa and Taranaki leader Wharehoka Wano acknowledged David MacLeod's whakapapa with Pōmare. But Wano told the National Party MP that tribal leaders on the paepae agreed with Miria Pōmare. 'Haere mai ki te Paremata o Tā Māui Pōmare (Welcome to Sir Maui Pōmare's Parliament).' 'And this is the opposition!' 'Forever!' someone called from the floor. MacLeod stood in place of Māori-Crown relations minister Tama Potaka, who was at MP Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp's tangihanga. 'I'm here for the Crown. It's not David McLeod, it's not myself, but it is the Crown that I'm representing today.' He delivered Potaka's message of hope: health spending rises, hospital upgrades including in New Plymouth, funding for Māori wardens, Kāinga Ora working with iwi housing providers, support for Kura Kaupapa Māori. MacLeod said Pōmare worked with fellow Māori MPs from different parties. 'Today, we have Maori MPs in all political parties,' said MacLeod. 'We are mainly focused on common goals, just like Māui and Apirana [Ngata] back in the day.' There was no applause. Kaumātua Peter Moeahu was glad for the MP's clarity about representing the Crown. 'I don't think a helluva lot of the Crown at the moment, David.' Moeahu said Māori were threatened 'every single day' by laws like the Treaty Principles Bill, the Regulatory Standards Bill and changes to resource management and local government. 'We know what you're doing, David,' said Moeahu 'But you are demonising us Māori as you do it, so that everybody's attention is focused on Māori … while you dismantle the environmental protections of this nation.' Moeahu's son, New Plymouth District councillor Dinnie Moeahu, took his turn at MacLeod and his Government. 'Since you've been in office… I have been more frustrated, angry, mamae - in pain - than ever before,' he told MacLeod. 'You speak with a forked tongue. I don't believe everything that you said today and I don't even think you believe it.' A dozen young Māori doctors at Ōwae to honour Tā Māui told the hui a wave of hundreds more was in the pipeline. Acclaimed Te Ātiawa brain scientist Professor Sir Richard Faull said his childhood heroes were Pōmare and fellow Ngāti Mutunga doctor and MP Te Rangi Hīroa (Sir Peter Buck). Faull said Te Tiriti set the gold standard for Māori health and wasn't about one partner being dominant. 'We have to have our Māori doctors to look after our Māori people and that is non-negotiable. 'Māui Pōmare knew that.'


NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Real Life: Forest and Bird CEO Nicola Toki slams ‘sneaky' conservation reforms
'Really concerning ' and 'sneaky' reforms by the coalition Government are stripping back protections for nature so fast that 'no New Zealander can keep up', Forest and Bird 's CEO says. Nicola Toki raised the alarm in an interview on Newstalk ZB's Real Life with John Cowan


Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Bill To Regulate Online Casino Gambling Introduced
Minister of Internal Affairs Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden has today introduced the Online Casino Gambling Bill to the House of Representatives. 'The Online Casino Gambling Bill will introduce a regulatory system for online gambling in New Zealand, which will prioritise harm minimisation, consumer protection, and tax collection,' says Ms van Velden. Cabinet has previously agreed to introduce new legislation to regulate the online casino gambling market, which is currently unregulated in New Zealand. Key features of the Bill include: Up to 15 licences for online casino gambling operators will be auctioned Companies applying for a licence will need to provide detailed information to the regulator, including on their business plans for New Zealand Licensed operators will be allowed to advertise, with restrictions Unlicensed operators will be prohibited and fines up to $5 million may be applicable for breaking the law Detailed regulations about advertising and harm minimisation standards are currently being developed and will set out the specific requirements that operators must abide by. 'The Bill will proceed to select committee later this year and New Zealanders will have the ability to have their say through the select committee process.'