Life of the party David Colturi has no regrets despite close shaves in high diving career
SINGAPORE – With his Maggi-noodles locks and infectious smile, David Colturi is one of the most recognisable faces in high diving.
The American's affable nature belies his eventful life, having started diving at just five years old before joining the circus in his 20s, when he set himself on fire for fire-diving performances.
Now 36, he admits that some might look at him and think that he is 'crazy', but he would not change a thing.
'It's been a wild ride,' he told The Straits Times at Sentosa's Palawan Green, where he is taking part in the World Aquatics Championships' (WCH) high diving competition from July 24 to 27.
'I think to the everyday person who looks at us jumping from 27 metres or higher and the stunts that I've done, most people are going to say, 'Crazy, would never do it'.
'But most of us in the sport are calculated risk takers. We don't go up there unless we know that we're going to be able to do what we do, and do it safely and do it again, again and again.
'It's a lifetime of dedication to training, physically, mentally, emotionally, being able to handle the pressure, the fear, all of it.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore SMRT to pay lower fine of $2.4m for EWL disruption; must invest at least $600k to boost reliability
Singapore MRT service changes needed to modify 3 East-West Line stations on Changi Airport stretch: LTA
Singapore S'pore could have nuclear energy 'within a few years', if it decides on it: UN nuclear watchdog chief
Asia Live: Thailand-Cambodia border clashes continue for second day
Life 'Do you kill children?': Even before independence, S'pore has always loved its over-the-top campaigns
Singapore Lung damage, poor brain development, addiction: What vaping does to the body
Singapore Fine for couple whose catering companies owed $432,000 in salaries to 103 employees
Singapore Kopi, care and conversation: How this 20-year-old helps improve the well-being of the elderly
'It's a lot of sacrifice and a lot of work. So, when I look back on my career, some crazy stuff absolutely, and I'm thankful for those moments.'
His devil-may-care attitude is what he brings to the sport but, with it also comes miscalculations. While paragliding over Lake Lucerne in Switzerland for a promotional stunt in 2018, he hit the water with such force that it caused him to rupture his spleen.
That led to internal bleeding, which could have had fatal consequences, had he not been taken to the hospital in time.
'Anybody that gets a near-death experience and a second chance at life is gonna have a perspective change,' Colturi added.
'Of course, I'm still going to make mistakes, and I get caught up in the pressures and the distractions of everyday noise... that stunt was crazy, and if I had the chance to do it again, I would...
'I'd maybe change a few things in the approach, but Red Bull Cliff Diving has done so much for us, and being able to be one of their star athletes and promote the sport in the ways that I did was an honour... I look back at all of it in appreciation.
'They're not failures, they're just lessons learnt... I have more than my fair share of wisdom, maybe a couple lessons learnt the hard way, but I'm happy to share those with my fellow divers .'
Colturi looks forward to helping the young get into the sport as he hopes they can 'build towards the Olympic Games'.
After completing the four preliminary rounds of the WCH men's 27m event at Sentosa on July 24 and 25, he scored 355.30 points to be 10th out of 23 competitors to qualify for round 5 on July 27. Only the top 14 advance.
Romania's Constantin Popovici topped the men's category with 452.30 points, ahead of Spain's Carlos Gimeno (450.65) and American James Lichtenstein (411.55).
While qualifying takes into account all four rounds, only points for the first and third rounds will be carried forward into round 5. This means Gimeno leads the pack, followed by Lichtenstein and Colturi.
Romania's Constantin Popovici qualified in first after four rounds of high diving.
ST PHOTO: CHONG JUN LIANG
Meanwhile, in the women's 20m, four-time world champion Rhiannan Iffland is the top qualifier with 351.40 points after four rounds. Canadian Molly Carlson finished second (322.80) ahead of American Kaylea Arnett (322.25).
Based on their first- and third-round scores, Australian Iffland will head into the final day on July 26 with the highest points, ahead of Canada's Simone Leathead and Mexico's Alejandra Aguilar Tovar.
Australia's Rhiannan Iffland in action during the Women's 20m platform Rounds 1-4 at the World Aquatics Championships on July 25.
ST PHOTO: CHONG JUN LIANG
Said Iffland: 'I would love to be holding that gold medal at the end of the event, but coming (here) and just being a part of my fifth world championships is an achievement in itself.
'So, regardless of tomorrow, I'm proud of what I've done. I try not to think about the end result too much while I'm diving.
'It's kind of a step-by-step thing, and with diving being such a fickle sport, you could miss one dive by a fraction and then there it's gone.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 minutes ago
- Business Times
South Korea pitches Trump on shipyards for last-minute trade deal
[SEOUL] South Korea is pitching the US on a shipbuilding partnership as a key proposal to seal a last-minute agreement to avoid a 25 per cent tariff rate. While details remain unclear, Yonhap News reported that South Korea has proposed a multi-billion dollar project dubbed 'Make American Shipbuilding Great Again'. South Korea's Industry Ministry declined to comment. 'We confirmed the US side's strong interest in the shipbuilding sector and the two countries agreed to work together to develop mutually acceptable terms that include shipbuilding cooperation,' South Korea's presidential office said on Saturday (Jul 26). As countries across Asia clinched deals last week, Seoul's negotiators have been racing to stay engaged with their US counterparts as Washington shifted its focus to the European Union and China. The US and EU announced a pact on Sunday that will see the bloc face 15 per cent tariffs on most of its exports to the US, including automobiles. The latest agreement, which follows a Japan deal last week, adds to the pressure on Asia's fourth-largest economy to clinch a deal. South Korea, where negotiations have been slowed by internal political turmoil, is one of the biggest Asian economies to still be without a deal. Aside from China, other major exporters in the region that are in the thick of negotiations include India and Taiwan. South Korea's finance and foreign ministers are set to meet with their US counterparts this week in a last-minute bid to close the negotiations and the government in Seoul has said the two countries are committed to making a deal before US President Donald Trump's Aug 1 deadline. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Also on the table is increased access to South Korea's agricultural market, as well as a fund to invest in American projects similar to an agreement Japan struck. Under the deal, the two sides touted a US$550 billion fund as part of the agreement on the tariff rate dropping to 15 per cent. The South Korean talks are similarly focused on reaching a 15 per cent tariff rate, including for autos, and the recent proposals suggest a comparable structure. Putting agricultural imports on the table raises the stakes for South Korea's new government. Past efforts to open the country's beef market sparked nationwide protests and any shift on rice imports could face even stiffer resistance. Barring a deal, Bloomberg Economics estimates a 1.7 per cent hit to South Korea's gross domestic product, with market volatility and uncertainty threatening to push the GDP losses beyond that. Overseas shipments were equivalent to more than 40 per cent of South Korea's GDP last year. 'Japan's trade deal paints a positive backdrop but also sets a high bar for others,' Morgan Stanley economist Kathleen Oh said in a note last week. 'Korea and Taiwan may need to ramp up new investment schemes to increase agricultural and energy imports and expand market access, as seen in Japan's case.' BLOOMBERG

Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Boeing emerges as a winner in Trump's trade wars
US President Donald Trump and President and CEO of Boeing Kelly Ortberg attending a roundtable discussion in Doha, Qatar, in May. WASHINGTON - There are typically not many winners in a trade war, but Boeing appears to be reaping some rewards from the one started by US President Donald Trump. The aerospace company has received a steady stream of new orders as part of trade deals between the United States and other countries. These sales could be a boon for Boeing as it emerges from years of bruising crises. They also allow Mr Trump to claim that his unconventional trade policies are helping American manufacturing. Orders for hundreds of Boeing jets have been announced in deals with Indonesia and Japan in Jult, as well as Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Qatar earlier in 2025. 'Ever since his first term, his trade deals have generally involved these kinds of purchase agreements,' said Mr Bruce Hirsh, a trade policy expert at Capitol Counsel, a lobbying firm in Washington that has clients in the aerospace industry. 'Our trading partners know this, so they're looking for these kinds of big-ticket items that they can offer to purchase.' Some aviation analysts are sceptical that US trade negotiators had to twist arms to persuade countries to buy Boeing planes. Airlines, including those controlled by foreign governments, plan such expensive purchases carefully and over months, if not years. Moreover, airlines have few choices, since Boeing and Airbus of France are the only two suppliers of large commercial jets. Still, those experts said, it was not surprising that Mr Trump and his aides have made a point of highlighting new Boeing orders as part of their trade deals. The company employs tens of thousands of Americans and is one of the country's top exporters. Wall Street has also taken note of the announcement of new orders, and Boeing's share price has climbed steadily since early April, when Mr Trump announced steep new tariffs on many countries. Analysts note that the trade deal announcements could generate even more orders. That is because customers who have not placed orders may feel pressure to buy planes now or risk having to wait when they need them. Planes ordered today will typically be delivered years from now. Boeing, which declined to comment for this article, has seemed to welcome Mr Trump's interest in its business. Boeing chief executive Kelly Ortberg joined Mr Trump on a May visit to the Middle East, during which the Qatar deal was announced. 'If the president of the country says, 'Come with me and be certain that we sign something big that says there will be many jobs in the US', what will you do?' said Mr Adam Pilarski, president of Avitas, an aviation consulting firm. But Mr Pilarski and other experts cautioned that the orders might not be nearly as substantial as they seemed. The administration, other countries and Boeing have offered few details about the deals, suggesting that at least some are still subject to complex negotiations between the manufacturer and airlines. In July, for example, Mr Trump said Indonesia had agreed to buy 50 Boeing jets. Later, however, an Indonesian official said the deal was still being hashed out between Garuda, a state-owned airline, and Boeing. 'I suspect these orders are, as we used to joke at air shows, Mouthls – memoranda of understanding to have lunch,' said Mr Richard Aboulafia, a managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory, a consulting firm. 'The real hard work of contract negotiation and finance package negotiation takes place after the President's plane has left the country.' Even if the orders are confirmed with formal contracts, many probably would have been placed even without Mr Trump's intervention, experts said. In May, Qatar Airways, a large airline that operates many long-distance flights, placed an order for 150 of Boeing's wide-body planes. The announcement was notably thorough. 'They involved press conferences, shaking hands, everything but the proverbial kissing of the babies,' said Mr Courtney Miller, managing director of Visual Approach Analytics, an aviation consulting firm. That deal, he said, probably would have been placed anyway, even if the timing had been accelerated to align with Mr Trump's visit. While some orders may be the result of real political pressure, even then a lot can change by the time the planes are ready to be delivered. Boeing and Airbus each have thousands of planes on order, accounting for many years of production. In that time, airlines can back out of agreements, though they may have to forfeit deposits. Customers can also ask Boeing or Airbus to delay deliveries or reduce their orders. A manufacturer may be willing to make such changes, especially if doing so will allow it to sell those planes to another airline that is desperate for new jets. The tariffs Mr Trump has imposed may threaten the financial health of Boeing's suppliers, and the prospects of retaliation by US trading partners like the European Union could hurt the plane maker's sales. Last week, budget airline Ryanair said it would consider deferring deliveries of Boeing planes if European officials imposed tariffs on American planes. European leaders may take other steps that could hurt Boeing. If the trade deals that the US strikes with other countries give Boeing too big an advantage, Europe could try to entice other countries to order more planes from Airbus, experts said. 'If this game is going to be played, the question is, in the long term, who plays it better?' Mr Miller said. 'It has reopened a very old dynamic of aligning aircraft and airline economics with geopolitical favour.' NYTIMES


CNA
33 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Trump's call didn't stop the fighting in Thailand and Cambodia. Can Malaysia do better?
SINGAPORE: In a few hours, Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet will sit down for peace talks in Malaysia, amid an escalating border conflict that has killed at least 30 people and displaced thousands more. The visit to Kuala Lumpur on Monday (Jul 28) by the leaders will offer the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) a chance to preserve its treasured centrality and demonstrate a capacity to solve its problems on its own rather than under external intervention or pressure. It also offers current ASEAN chair, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, an opportunity to create a legacy. This is something that has thus far eluded him, and ASEAN in the other major crisis it faces – Myanmar's seemingly intractable and ongoing civil war. The scheduled talks follow a characteristically unilateral announcement on Saturday by United States President Donald Trump claiming both countries had agreed to work out a ceasefire after he threatened to cease trade talks if the fighting did not stop soon. Cambodia had already proposed a ceasefire, but Thailand – after the call from Mr Trump – said while it agreed in principle with a ceasefire, the onus was on Cambodia to stand down. Mr Trump's announcement did not seem to have any effect. There was no sign of de-escalation. Within hours of a brief pause, Thailand and Cambodia were exchanging rocket and gun fire again, possibly with each intent on gaining advantage on the ground ahead of a truce so that a clear win could be presented domestically. A WINDOW FOR ASEAN Speculation on the origins of the conflict ranges from bad blood over business and economic interests – from casinos to scam centres – to personal falling out between the Hun and Shinawatra families; to domestic agendas to prop up wobbly political parties and mandates; and even superpower rivalry between the US, an ally of Thailand, and China which has significant economic interests in Cambodia. Premier Hun Manet's father Hun Sen – now President of the country's Senate and viewed as the de facto leader of Cambodia – may indeed feel he has greater strategic space with China's backing, given China's interests in Cambodia. But while there may be some element of truth in that, it risks falling into the trap of seeing the conflict through an American, China-centric prism. China took pains last week to say the weaponry Cambodia was using was old stock supplied not recently but previously by Beijing. In fact, any definitive explanation without real evidence is suspect; the origins of the conflict remain opaque and likely only really known to a relatively small circle of power elites in both capitals. Regardless, neither country wants to be seen domestically to bending to external pressure. This offers a thus far ineffective ASEAN response new traction. Conversely, the opportunity puts pressure on Mr Anwar, who may be seen as somewhat compromised by his decision earlier this year to appoint former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra as an adviser – even if one of several – to the ASEAN chair he holds. Thus while the meeting offers hope, underlying complexities should not be underestimated. The proximate and historical causes of the conflict may be many, and significantly intertwined, but what is evident and indisputable is that what tipped a volatile situation over the edge was a falling out between old friends Mr Hun Sen and Mr Thaksin. The latter's daughter, Paetongtarn Shinawatra – who became prime minister only last August – has been suspended pending an ethics investigation over her leaked phone call with Mr Hun Sen, throwing Thailand's civilian coalition government into some disarray and giving its military an opportunity to wave its nationalist credentials. 'Failure to secure a meaningful and lasting ceasefire could severely damage ASEAN's credibility as a regional problem-solver, especially given past criticisms of its effectiveness in other regional crises,' Professor Pavin Chachavalpongpun of Kyoto University's Centre for Southeast Asian Studies told me. THE LIMITS OF MEDIATION The meeting signals a step towards de-escalation, but it doesn't magically resolve the deep-seated territorial disputes, nationalistic sentiments and historical grievances that fuelled this conflict, Professor Pavin added. 'The true test will be whether it leads to genuine, sustained efforts to address the root causes, or merely provides a temporary pause in hostilities.' That the conflict so easily ignited historical grievances underscores its unfinished nature. A particularly disturbing aspect – mirroring the India-Pakistan crisis in May – is the jingoism that has reached such levels, even in the local media, that it has prompted some civil society organisations to speak out. Thailand's Assembly of the Poor for instance, last week said: 'We resist the ultra-patriotism and militarism that makes states turn their back on people, while manipulating fear, hatred and loss as their political instruments.' Securing a ceasefire may be the easiest part of Monday's meeting. The more difficult aspects will however have to be addressed by political-military elites in Cambodia and Thailand, to avoid a repetition of a cycle that, with tourism and investor confidence plunging, both countries can ill afford.