U.S. to revoke immigration status of Haitian migrants in September
The Trump administration will revoke the legal status and work permits of hundreds of thousands of Haitian migrants in early September, arguing that conditions in Haiti have sufficiently improved for them to return home, the Department of Homeland Security announced Friday.
The department said it would terminate Haiti's longstanding Temporary Protected Status program, which has allowed immigrants from the crisis-stricken Caribbean nation to live and work in the U.S. legally since 2010, following the devastating earthquake that year.
If they don't qualify for another legal immigration status — like asylum or a green card — those who lose their TPS protections will become ineligible to work in the U.S. legally and eligible to be arrested and deported by federal immigration authorities.
The Trump administration on Friday urged Haitians with TPS to voluntarily leave the U.S. by using a smartphone app that officials have converted into a system to facilitate self-deportations. The administration has warned immigrants in the U.S. illegally that if they don't self-deport, they will be found, arrested and forcibly deported.
"This decision restores integrity in our immigration system and ensures that Temporary Protective Status is actually temporary," DHS said in a statement. "The environmental situation in Haiti has improved enough that it is safe for Haitian citizens to return home."
As of late last year, more than a quarter of a million Haitians — 260,790 — had been approved for TPS, according to government data compiled by Congress' research unit. DHS said their TPS protections would lapse on Sept. 2.
Created by Congress in 1990, TPS allows the federal government to offer migrants work permits and a reprieve from deportation if their home countries are engulfed in a crisis, such as a war or an environmental disaster.
Despite the Trump administration's assertions on Friday, the U.S. government has described Haiti as a country with deep political instability and plagued by gang violence and widespread poverty. In fact, the State Department instructs Americans not to visit Haiti in a Level 4 travel advisory, warning them about the threat of "robbery, carjackings, sexual assault, and kidnappings for ransom."
The Biden administration vastly expanded the TPS program for Haitians, allowing many of those who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border — illegally and legally — to qualify for the initiative. It also used TPS at an unprecedented scale to offer legal status to hundreds of thousands migrants from Afghanistan, Cameroon, Venezuela, Ukraine and other nations.
But President Trump's administration has sought to severely curtail TPS programs, as part of its efforts to oversee the largest deportation effort in American history.
Since Mr. Trump took office, officials have announced plans to terminate TPS protections for Afghans, Cameronians and Venezuelans. Last month, the Supreme Court allowed the administration to end the work permits and deportation protections of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans TPS recipients.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘A Human Rights Disaster Waiting To Happen': ‘Alligator Alcatraz' Is Ripe For Abuse, Experts Warn
President Donald Trump is set to visit a Florida immigrant detention facility on Tuesday that Republicans have dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' a site legal experts describe as ripe for abuse. The temporary facility is located in a remote part of the Florida Everglades and is expected to hold as many as 5,000 beds. It's helmed by the Florida state government, backed by the Department of Homeland Security, and has been rapidly constructed in recent weeks. State and federal officials have touted the location, citing the alligators and snakes that could serve as security for the detainees inside. Immigrant detention sites have long faced scrutiny for abysmal living conditions and civil rights violations, and multiple aspects of this facility suggest it's primed to have the same problems, immigration law and policy experts tell HuffPost. DHS and the Florida Governor's Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'This facility is a human rights disaster waiting to happen,' Caitlin Patler, a University of California, Berkeley, public policy professor, told HuffPost, citing factors like its remote location, which will make it tougher for immigrants to reach legal counsel. The size of the facility, which is set to be one of the largest in the country, raises serious questions about whether there will be sufficient resources available including food, water and medical care, experts note. 'Medical concerns at these large detention centers are serious. Negligent deaths within immigrant detention centers have been documented over the years and there is often limited access to medical personnel and treatment needed for even common illnesses, injuries, or conditions,' says Lindsay Harris, a law professor at the University of San Francisco. Another key issue is that this site is temporary and composed of tents and trailers, rather than standard buildings. That feature, alone, suggests it's less equipped to provide suitable shelter for the detainees given the intense heat and humidity that's common to the region. 'This is a tent facility, so it's a temporary one, and those even more so than the brick and mortar facilities raise questions about just the basic necessities of life,' says Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute. The location, which is dozens of miles away from the closest city, also means it will be tough for attorneys to reach their clients and limit external oversight of the facility. 'The location of the detention center makes it hard to believe that standard protocol and monitoring to safeguard rights and humane treatment of detained persons will be observed,' said Harris. Kristi Noem's DHS Torched Over Absolutely Wild AI Post Promoting 'Alligator Alcatraz' 'Alligator Alcatraz' Is The Latest Alarming Immigrant Detention Idea Backed By The Trump Admin Florida AG Doubles Down On Trump's Immigration Agenda With 'Alligator Alcatraz' Pitch
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mohamad Fakih fights for Canadians to use their voice: 'If you can silence me, you're taking away being Canadian from me — and that's the greatest honour ever'
Yahoo News Canada presents 'My Canada," a series spotlighting Canadians —born-and-raised to brand new — sharing their views on the Canadian dream, national identity, and the triumphs and tribulations that come with life inside and outside these borders. Mohamad Fakih embarked on his Canadian journey in 1999, when he first departed Lebanon and landed in Canada with hopes of making this country his forever sanctuary. He didn't have a whole lot with him, except a hunger to prove his mettle and a conviction to succeed. "Canada represented hope for me — a place where I could work hard, grow, and, most importantly, be accepted," he shares with Yahoo News Canada, standing over a stove in a warm kitchen tucked behind a hallway in the Regent Park neighbourhood of downtown Toronto, where he's helping prepare 500 hot meals for those in need. The room is relatively quiet, barring the clattering utensils, hum of conversation and a comforting rhythm of service among Muslim Welfare Canada volunteers who pack trays of biryani as the aromatic scent of cumin, roasted chicken and vegetables fills the atmosphere. Across the hall is the dining area, which awaits hundreds of hungry occupants. It's also where Fakih and I sit down to talk about what Canada is to him. Fakih recalls strolling down unfamiliar streets and being greeted with welcoming smiles, a gesture that "made me feel like I belonged even before I got my citizenship." He remembers buying his first car and playing Arabic music from behind the wheel — feeling a mix of pride in his roots and an acceptance of his way of life in a country oceans away from his native land. "Getting my permanent residency was huge," he says, with decades-old relief still felt in his voice. "I finally felt secure like no one could just take me away." However, belonging — as a Muslim man and an outspoken advocate — hasn't always felt certain, as he feels acceptance in Canada can, at times, be conditional. "There are times I wonder if I'm truly safe — or if I can be myself as a Canadian." The founder of Paramount Fine Foods built a legacy, as part of which he became a pillar of strength and support for his community. However, his journey isn't only about success, but the price of standing up for his beliefs, the pain of losing friends and rejecting the idea of remaining silent when Canada's values are challenged. As part of our My Canada series, Fakih's conspicuous life story is a testament to courage, resilience and fierce love for this country. Following the events of Oct. 7, 2023, Fakih emerged as one of the few known Canadian business leaders who publicly advocated for the cause of Palestinian civilians. The backlash to his formidable stance on the war in Gaza was swift and personal, resulting in him facing threats and financial repercussions. "Yeah speaking for Gaza, speaking for Palestinians made me lose — I wouldn't call them friends, but they acted like friends at the time," he says, ladling stew into a container. "Some landlords said they wouldn't renew my lease." But Fakih never backed down. "Businesses are not walls. They're people. And if you think I shouldn't speak because it impacts my business — then you think I am owned by money." The 2022 Order of Canada appointee believes in the philosophy of "kinder capitalism" — a unique model which emphasizes on putting people, their values and purpose ahead of profits. "Kinder capitalism means be kind to people even when it costs, and do it until it hurts," Fakih stressed. "It's only giving when you do it until it hurts. That's when it really counts." Trump's recent rhetoric around making Canada his country's "51st state" sparked a quick reaction from Fakih, who used the opportunity to respond not with political gamesmanship but a plea to Canadians to see distinction between performative patriotism and national pride. You can't talk about Canada's sovereignty and wonder if our silence about what's happening in Gaza wasn't a wink that allowed Trump to say that 'I want you to become the 51st state.' "Injustice anywhere is a risk to justice everywhere," he quotes Martin Luther King Jr., adding, "We need to protect Canada, protect its sovereignty. And it will never be the 51st state to anybody." Fakih equates defending Canada to defending Canadian values, including the nation's responsibility to speak up for issues relating to international human rights. "If you can silence me, you're taking away being Canadian from me — and that's the greatest honour ever," he says, leaning over the dining table in a calm but firm voice. Fakih's commitment to advocacy isn't recent and neither is he a stranger to standing alone. In the past years, he's helped repair synagogues, reconstructed church doors, housed homeless strangers in hotels during a crisis and stood with Quebec mosque shooting victims — all rooted in a single motivation: "Half of life is showing up." "I have felt the taste of helping others. I was someone that needed help. I've been hungry. There are nights where I slept hungry," he says, visibly emotional. "Canada empowered me to not bury who I am. I wanted to be that example for our next generation of Canadians." But the advocacy comes with a price tag. "It hurt my business. Some days it hurt personally. I've had to explain to my children why I get weekly threats," he says. "But I came to Canada because we celebrate kindness, not just profit." It is that ethos which, he says, is "stronger than greed." You drive a Rolls Royce and still stop to feed someone hungry — that's Fakih, Founder, Paramount Fine Foods Fakih admits that his idea of Canada has evolved — not drifted — over time. He doesn't see Canada through rose-coloured glasses, but as someone who loves this country like he loves his family. "My dad passed away last year," he says, turning his attention inwards, his eyes on his hands. "And I think of Canada like my dad — kind, but in pain sometimes. And if Canada's in pain and needs me to use my voice — even if it hurts me — I will," his voice softening. That love shows up every year when Fakih proudly takes part in the Hazel McCallion Parade on Canada Day. "The first year, I was too shy to join. Now I walk with my kids. And I celebrate — because after my parents and children, Canada is the thing I love most." As he steps out in the hallway to welcome his fellow Canadians queued up for a hot meal, Fakih shares one final message: "Being Canadian is the greatest honour, and part of it is the freedom to say what you believe in, without fear. That's why we came here," he says, urging Canadians to use their voice while they still can. Speak for the hungry. Speak for the oppressed. One day, you might need someone to speak for Fakih, entrepreneur, businessman and philanthropist
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
America's Founders Valued Higher Education
Political attacks on higher education are escalating as we approach next year's 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Members of the Trump Administration, state legislatures, and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation call universities 'the enemy' to justify severe funding cuts, censorship, and restrictions on academic freedom. Yet, higher education has shaped the American experiment from the beginning. Enlightenment ideas studied in 18th-century universities provided the rationale for independence from Great Britain in 1776. Founders of the republic viewed higher learning as essential to its success. Indeed, Thomas Jefferson used ideas learned during his own college education to write the Declaration of Independence and establish one of the most consequential political doctrines in modern history: all people are created equal and possess inherent rights to a government based on their consent. Jefferson studied at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia, from 1760 to 1762 under his primary mentor, Dr. William Small, professor of natural philosophy. Small introduced students from the privileged social classes who attended William and Mary to Enlightenment thought. He taught students like Jefferson intellectually revolutionary theories of empirical science, natural rights, and popular government. Small's influence over Jefferson was extensive. His teachings, Jefferson said, 'probably fixed the destinies of my life' and provided 'my first views of the expansion of science and of the system of things in which we are placed.' References to 'the system of things' as Jefferson understood it dominate early passages of the Declaration. Jefferson rooted the Declaration in natural philosophy, or the philosophical study of nature and the physical universe without consideration of supernatural causes. This was Small's specialty and the language of this academic orientation—such as 'course of human events,' 'powers of the earth,' and 'Laws of Nature'—suffuses the document. Read More: College Presidents Are Right to Defy Trump's War on Higher Education Members of the Continental Congress of 1776 substantially revised Jefferson's original draft. Some of these revisions indicate that members of congress, not only Jefferson, wanted the Declaration to reflect advanced education of the time. Benjamin Franklin made a momentous revision in this respect: he changed Jefferson's original statement 'We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable' to 'We hold these truths to be self-evident.' The word "sacred," Franklin observed, suggested that those truths were matters of religious faith. The term "self-evident" invoked Isaac Newton. In the language of Newtonian science, a 'self-evident' truth needs no supernatural explanation. It is purely rational, empirically observable. Like Newton's laws of the physical world, the final version of the Declaration posits a natural law of the political world: people will always seek new forms of government to protect their rights. This decision to ground authority in reason, science, and secular humanism was profound at a time when European monarchs claimed that God had appointed them to the throne. In 1610, James I of England had declared that kings were 'God's lieutenants upon earth' and 'even by God himself, they are called gods.' By the 18th century, French monarchs professed to be deities on earth with 'absolute' power. Although the Declaration mentioned that people 'are endowed by their Creator' with 'unalienable Rights,' such statements vastly diminished the role of God as a source of rights and government compared to standard proclamations from European monarchs of the day. Jefferson's words implied that people are free to believe that a 'Creator' of their chosen faith is the source of their rights. The Declaration thus subtly rejected any official state religion as an element of American independence. The phrase 'Nature's God' was even more pointed in the Declaration. It classified 'God' as a passive possession of 'Nature.' The true agent of political events, in this formulation, is nature. The sole reference to God in the Declaration emphasizes empiricism over religiosity. Notably, Small was the only non-clergy member of the William and Mary faculty when he mentored Jefferson. The Declaration's references to John Locke's political treatises, which Small also taught to Jefferson and other students at William and Mary, further underscored its rejection of supernatural authority. Jefferson declared rights of 'Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness' by imitating Locke's argument that all men possess a right to 'life, liberty, and estate [or property].' In 1689, Locke examined natural rights in the second treatise of Two Treatises on Government, but his first treatise established the full meaning of those rights. Throughout that first treatise, Locke excoriated the divine right of kings. For him, rights of 'life, liberty, and property' were incompatible with a divine right to rule. When Jefferson extended those rights beyond property-holders, replacing 'estate' with the 'pursuit of Happiness,' he invited a much larger portion of humanity to reject supernatural justifications for government. That invitation reflected the philosophy that inspired him in college. In other words, the meaning of the Declaration of Independence depends on Enlightenment ideas that university-educated classes in general, and Jefferson in particular, enthusiastically studied. After the country's founding, many framers of the new republic advocated for institutions of higher learning to educate citizens in their rights and responsibilities. Doing so, they argued, would promote equality over aristocracy, knowledge over religious superstition, and self-determination over servitude. Read More: The Complicated History of Government Influence Over Universities Jefferson was immensely proud of his role in founding the University of Virginia—a publicly funded institution established to educate 'the mass of citizens' in everything they needed for their individual wellbeing and responsible civic participation. Franklin did not attend college formally but he was instrumental in founding the College of Philadelphia, which later became the University of Pennsylvania. Throughout his life, Franklin advocated educational opportunities for working classes as well as the upper class. As president, Washington proposed a publicly funded 'national university' for the general diffusion of knowledge to promote unity in the new republic. These are only a few examples of the deep ties between higher education and the founding generation; approximately half of them attained some form of it—an impressively high level of advanced learning for the time. Like the political ideals of Jefferson and other founders, however, the ideal of higher education remained out of reach for many Americans. He and many signers of the Declaration deemed Black people especially incapable of advanced study. For much of its existence, U.S. higher education has been badly segregated by race, class, sex and gender, religion, and more. The personal prejudices of founders like Jefferson, however, do not diminish the power of the ideals that they forged from university study. Free Black people and enslaved Africans in the late 18th century recognized that the revolution was unfinished without equal access to civic institutions, particularly those of higher education. From the Jim Crow era to modern struggles for civil rights, historically disenfranchised communities (people of color, women, LGBTQ Americans, and more) have cited the Declaration in their petitions for desegregated higher education. Universities have always been integral to American independence, from Jefferson's words to later generations of Americans who pursued the full implications of those words. Defending institutions of higher education from increasingly authoritarian measures is an important way to safeguard not only academic freedom, but the legacy of 1776 as well. Bradford Vivian is Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences at Penn State and author of Campus Misinformation: The Real Threat to Free Speech in American Higher Education (Oxford University Press). Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Learn more about Made by History at TIME here. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.
