Medicine that crosses the mind/body divide
Samuel Taylor Coleridge coined the term 'psychosomatic' in the late 18th century to describe bodymind conditions, while the term 'placebo' was first used in the same period, referencing a link between imagination and physical symptom. A few years later, in 1800, the physician John Haygarth published the widely read pamphlet Of the Imagination As a Cause and a Cure of Disorders of the Body.
Franz Anton Mesmer (a friend of Haydn and Mozart) had infamously 'treated' so-called hysteria (a term invented by Hippocrates in the 5th century BC to describe a psychological condition noted in women, spuriously thought to be caused by a 'restless womb') with a combination of music-induced relaxation augmented by hypnotic suggestion and a questionable use of magnets passed over the body. This concentrated on what would come to be known as 'erogenous zones'.
Mesmer's work with 'animal magnetism' was discredited, but nevertheless influenced the neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot, who – in the late 19th century – treated so-called hysterics at the Salpêtrière hospital in Paris through induction of hypnotic trance and suggestion.
During the winter of 1885-86, Sigmund Freud attended Charcot's theatrical demonstrations of psychosomatic treatment of women patients, where his idea of a deep relationship between body and mind – as a symptom linked to repression – was formed. Drawing on Suzannah Jones's work arguing that, in comparison with men, women are airbrushed from history, we might note that historically the 'psychosomatic' in medicine is largely gendered as 'women's issues'. Or the rest is 'hystery'.Alan BleakleyEmeritus professor of medical humanities, Plymouth Peninsula School of Medicine
Aida Edemariam's article is magnificent. I have been waiting for it for years. I can say that I have been talking about monism all my career. The damage Descartes dealt us reached very far, even into the phraseology we use, not only when we talk about illness. As a consultant psychiatrist, I regularly used to draw attention to dualism in ward rounds and meetings. 'It's physical,' colleagues would say to exclude a condition from our interest, to which I would retort: 'Everything is physical.' I also noticed that many patients with anxiety and obsessional disorder, as well as functional disorders, seemed to conceptualise their condition in the most dualistic way. They would say: 'It's not me, doctor – it's my mind.' I maintain that the word 'mind' should be treated as a verb, not as a noun. It's an activity carried out by the brain at its highest level of functioning.Name and address supplied
This article was a well-written summary of an understanding that I have used to hack my wiring as part of recovery from long Covid. Many others are doing this for conditions such as fibromyalgia (which the article mentions) and ME (or CFS – chronic fatigue syndrome).
The role of the mind in illness is difficult to explain in a way that resonates with most people and is not interpreted as dismissive or as saying: 'It's all in the head.' The article does a really good job of this, and so it is a shame that illnesses including ME and long Covid are not even mentioned. Far more people suffer from long Covid today, for example, than most of the conditions mentioned in the article.While this knowledge is helping many, it could help so many more people if it were more widely understood by both medical practitioners and society in general. Those searching online using 'ME' or 'long Covid' will miss this piece of otherwise excellent journalism and, potentially, the understanding that can help them recover. That is the real shame.Julie BlackLaurencekirk, Aberdeenshire
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
How one skeleton upended how historians view Ancient Egypt
A skeleton found in a 4,500-year-old ceramic pot has rewritten the history of Ancient Egypt. A DNA test on the man's bones has upended how historians could view the rise of Ancient Egyptian civilisation. The skeleton, found 165 miles south of Cairo at Nuwayrat, belongs to a 60-year-old potter who lived between 2855–2570 BC. However, researchers have revealed that a fifth of his DNA came from ancestors living 9,000 miles away in Mesopotamia, in modern-day Iraq. It is the first direct evidence that the two legendary cultures influenced each other through migration as far back as 10,000 years ago. Mesopotamia is the site of the earliest developments of the Neolithic Revolution from around 10,000 BC, when people began to farm and domesticate animals. This led to the formation of an agricultural society. Egyptologists had theorised that this revolution contributed to similar development in Egypt, with this DNA now proving their case. This is because it shows migration from West Asia towards Egypt, meaning information could have been passed on when migrants arrived at the Nile. This new information could explain how Egypt went from simple farming communities to becoming one of the most powerful civilisations on Earth. Adeline Morez Jacobs, who analysed the remains as part of her PhD at Liverpool John Moores University, told BBC News: 'You have two regions developing the first writing systems, so archaeologists believe that they were in contact and exchanging ideas. Now we have the evidence that they were. 'We hope that future DNA samples from Ancient Egypt can expand on when precisely this movement from West Asia started and its extent.' While researchers did caution that this study only considered the case of one man, who could have been an anomaly due to his high-status burial, they say their findings support other evidence that Mesopotamian culture had reached Egypt, likely through migration. Egypt specialists have unearthed a lot more information about this Egyptian potter than just his migrant heritage. Despite his job, his body was placed in a large pot inside a rock-cut tomb, usually reserved for the Egyptian upper class. This burial, which took place before mummification was the norm, likely helped preserve his DNA, which was taken from bone in his inner ear. He is predicted to have had brown eyes, brown hair and dark to black skin and was 5ft 2in (1.57m). The Nuwayrat man also lived to an advanced old age, with his worn teeth and osteoarthritis indicating he could have died as late as 64 years. Experts believe certain skeletal features point to his work as a potter, including an enlarged hook-shaped bone at the back of his skull, meaning he looked down a lot. Professor Joel Irish at Liverpool John Moores University said: 'He worked his tail off. He's worked his entire life. 'What I wanted to do was to find out who this guy was, learn as much about him as possible. What his age was, his stature was, what he did for a living and to try and personalise the whole thing rather than treat him as a cold specimen.' More Trending The Nuwayrat man's life also coincided with the beginning of the legendary Old Kingdom in Egypt's history, which witnessed the building of the 'Great Pyramid of Giza' by King Khufu. The ability of scientists to extract and read DNA from ancient bones could trigger a wave of discoveries about Ancient Egypt. Prof Pontus Skoglund at the Francis Crick Institute explained: 'If we get more DNA information and put it side by side with what we know from archaeological, cultural, and written information we have from the time, it will be very exciting.' It also allows experts to look at history from the perspective of ordinary people, through written records from rich and powerful people. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Man stabbed through armour during historic re-enactment gone wrong MORE: Cabin crew calls on passengers to subdue air rage woman demanding upgrade MORE: Moment cargo ship crashes into Suez Canal port as workers flee
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
A Spartan's guide to body shaming
Now that new drugs have allowed the government's Fat Controller to celebrate a nation of skinnies – let us hope the drugs are not too temptingly tasty – he will not have to adopt the Spartan custom of checking their naked young men every ten days for signs of excessive thinness or corpulence. In Greek eyes, obesity was particularly associated with luxury. On their tomb paintings, Etruscans tended to depict aristocrats at dinner as very fat and even more contented. Ptolemy Alexander, a Greek king of Egypt, needed two people to support him when he left the room to relieve himself. The vast Dionysius, tyrant of Heraclea (coast of north Turkey), was in danger of choking if he fell deeply asleep and had to be pricked awake with very fine needles long enough to locate the nerves under the rolls of flesh. Yet he lived to 55 and was tyrant for 33 years, 'excelling all in gentleness and decency'. The great 5th-century BC Greek doctor Hippocrates knew that sudden death was more common in the fat. Both he and Aristotle thought that obesity in women caused sterility (a disaster in ancient eyes, when half of all children born would be dead before their fifth birthday). But they were well aware that losing weight could cause problems. Slimming, however, was not associated with female desirability. Anorexia was unknown. One recommendation was to 'exercise on an empty stomach and eat when out of breath… and take only one meal a day, go without baths, sleep on hard beds and wear as little clothing as possible. The people who want to get fat should do exactly the opposite'. The Roman doctor Celsus, taking walking for granted, recommended thin men put on weight through rest, constipation and big meals, and the fat take it off through late nights, worry and violent exercise. Others recommended that men should walk quickly in winter, more slowly in summer, and that fleshy people should walk faster, thin people more slowly. All that now remains is for the BBC to celebrate the new drugs with a suitably humiliating Come Slimming gameshow, hosted by all those hysterical chef-comedians.
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
Could the giant panda be real?
Nathalia Holt's book begins irresistibly. The year is 1928. Two sons of Theodore Roosevelt called Ted and Kermit – yes I know we're thinking it's a Wes Anderson movie – have smoothed a map out on the table in front of them. Let's imagine the setting is a bit like the Explorers' Club in New York, with exotic anthropological curios on the walls – poisoned spears and wooden shields – and globes the size of beach balls lit up from within. The land they are examining is mainly coloured in greens, browns and greys. But running across the map, like the stripes of a tiger, are irregular white blotches. Each of these blank spaces represents terra incognita. This is China, or what was then known of it. And from somewhere deep within those blanks on the map have come persistent rumours of an animal so exotic and large it seems extraordinary nobody has reported on it properly before. The animal the Roosevelt brothers coveted looked like no other species in the world: a black-and-white bear so rare many people did not believe it was real. This legendary creature was called the giant panda. Rumours swirled about the mysterious animal. No one, not even naturalists who had worked in China all their lives, could say precisely where it lived, what it ate or how it behaved. For centuries the world had known about other strange bears. Ptolemy II of Egypt had a polar bear in his zoo in Alexandria as early as 285 BC. In 1252, a polar bear was part of the Tower of London's extensive menagerie. But the same could not be said of the panda. Even among those living in China, spanning some 7.7 per cent of Earth's landmass, few had ever caught sight of it. There was no rendition of this endearing beast in any of imperial China's illustrated natural histories stretching back millennia, despite its being such an obviously arresting subject. In 1916, a party of German explorers travelled to China and Tibet in search of it. But no matter how hard they looked, they could find no evidence. In the small village of Lianghoku, their leader, Walther Stozner, asked some local hunters to bring them pandas, dead or alive. The hunters returned with several dead ones, along with one very young living cub. The Germans tried to feed it milk, then a flour slurry, and finally sought out a human wet nurse, but all their efforts failed. A few days later it died. The Roosevelts set out to put this right. They had family form in such matters. Their father Teddy had mounted expeditions to the Amazon, in an age when American presidents could behave eccentrically – long past, of course. And it's hardly a spoiler to reveal that they succeeded, although with unintended consequences. The first pandas brought back to the United States all died in captivity, as their keepers did not know how to look after them. It is true that giant pandas are now the dazzling poster boys and girls of worldwide conservation; that they have been taken off the critically endangered list; and that, as earnest zoologists keep insisting, we should be 'remembering the protozoa' and less glamorous species. But pandas remain iconic for a reason, being waywardly perverse in their rare bamboo diet and equally herbivorous in their sexuality. In 1974, London Zoo attracted record crowds, so great was the excitement over the arrival of Chia Chia – 'Most Excellent and Very Good' – and Ching Ching. Holt's delightful, well-written book reminds us of a time when the world was full of explorers, all examining maps like the ones the Roosevelts possessed. There was a heady, optimistic feeling that persisted among them. No one could be certain which mountain was the tallest on Earth, nor which trench in the ocean the deepest. Every expedition held the possibility of making its members world-famous explorers. While those days are past, it would be dangerous to suppose we know the planet as well as we think. Every generation has assumed there was nothing left to find, and has been proved wrong. There may not be any unknown animals the size of giant pandas still out there; but there could be some interesting protozoa.
