Temperatures rise in UK's assisted dying debate amid claims of ‘chaotic' process
UK's
landmark Bill to legalise
assisted dying
– known by its detractors as assisted suicide – gathered in different verdant corners of sunny Westminster on Friday as MPs debated inside the House of Commons.
Those supporting a change in the law to allow terminally ill patients in England and Wales to seek medical help ending their own lives gathered beneath an array of bright pink banners on the lawns of Parliament Square. 'My dying wish is dignity,' they said.
Around the corner, at the statue of King George V off Abingdon Street, opponents of the proposal struck a darker tone, holding mocked up headstones engraved with a warning about the apparent watering down of oversight of future assisted deaths: 'RIP – 'strictest safeguards in the world.''
Pink to support the right to die, and headstones for the sanctity of life. Therein was captured the incongruity of Britain's national conversation about the right, or otherwise, to an assisted death. Increasingly fraught and tetchy, the mood of the national debate was reflected inside the Commons chamber, as MPs grew frustrated as they ran out of time to speak.
READ MORE
It was originally thought MPs might get their final say on Friday on Labour MP Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which passed its crucial second reading in the Commons last November by 330 votes to 275.
But there have been so many amendments proposed since, the speaker of the House, Lindsay Hoyle, has kicked the crucial vote out until at least June 13th, and possibly later. Even then, many MPs on Friday complained the Bill was being rushed through parliament without proper scrutiny.
[
Assisted dying: Do we understand it properly?
Opens in new window
]
One Labour MP, Naz Shah, described the process as 'chaos . . . a disservice to parliament and our constituents. We shouldn't be playing games with people's lives like this.' She complained of only being told by Leadbeater that her amendment might be accepted when she arrived in the Commons that morning, leaving her no time to study the wording.
Prime minister
Keir Starmer's
government is ostensibly neutral on the Bill, although everybody knows that he favours it. He has granted a free vote, meaning MPs are not party whipped and can vote with their conscience.
As the government did not bring the Bill forward, it has been proposed as a private members' Bill by Labour backbencher, Leadbeater. This means, however, that it can only be scrutinised during the time set aside each week for private Bills, Friday mornings and afternoons until 2.30pm.
Opponents say such a landmark proposal should have been proposed by the government, allowing it to be scrutinised at greater length during government time in the parliamentary week. Supporters, meanwhile, believe they still have the numbers to push it through the House.
They must wait until next month to find out.
[
Assisted dying: 'If I cannot consent to my own death, who owns my life?'
Opens in new window
]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
Samaritans plans to close at least 100 branches across Ireland and Britain
Samaritans has announced plans to close at least half of its 200 branches across Ireland and the UK, move volunteers into larger regional hubs and pilot remote call handling, in a shake-up that has left some volunteers dismayed. The mental health charity told volunteers in a video last week it hoped 'within the next seven to 10 years, our branch network will have reduced by at least half' and that it would move to 'fewer but bigger regions'. The charity's 22,000 listening volunteers answer calls and messages from people in mental health crisis at 201 branches across Ireland and the UK. It says its helplines receive a call every 10 seconds, while some branches also offer face-to-face services. Julie Bentley, the charity's chief executive, told volunteers that much of its fundraising income was going into 'maintaining bricks and mortar, rather than being used to improve our services'. READ MORE The charity wants a 'smaller number of larger brick branches' meaning 'larger shifts open with more volunteers on duty together'. It also said it wanted to make sure its buildings and shifts were 'accessible to all' and hoped its 'volunteer numbers will have increased as we offer more flexibility', adding it had no plans to reduce the level of service it offered. Some volunteers have expressed fears the charity is moving to a 'call centre-style' model that would remove the 'camaraderie' found in smaller branches. There were also concerns that volunteers, many of whom are over 50, would be unable to travel large distances to branches in large towns and cities. They also raised concerns about the impact of a potential move towards remote volunteering, in which people would answer calls in their homes while in contact with another volunteer via video call. Some said they would feel uncomfortable taking distressing and sensitive calls at home. One volunteer said: 'It does change the absolute basis of how we have worked and the understanding of our need to be in a safe place where we have support as callers. Would the ambulance service suddenly decide to have people take calls in their home? 'The current system has operated very successfully for 70 years. Now they're thinking of dismantling it, and in a way that I think has upset a lot of volunteers. A lot of us are anxious and worried. 'Almost every single volunteer that I have spoken to have said if they introduce call centres, we're out. As well as helping others, people volunteer for their own mental health, to go to a safe space and meet like-minded people.' The charity said remote volunteering would allow people unable to travel to branches to give their time, particularly for night shifts that are more challenging to fill. Samaritans said it would consult volunteers about its plans before the trustees made a final decision in September, and any proposed changes that are confirmed will take place over a number of years. Volunteers said they wanted clarity on how much money the charity spends on branches, and how much it was projected to save by closing half down. The Samaritans' annual accounts for 2023-24 show it has a fund of £7 million (€8 million) for fixed assets including branches, a property maintenance fund of £28,000 and a branch support fund of £287,000, while it received £24.6m in charitable income. In its last set of financial accounts, the charity said its 'income was down for the third year running, while costs continue to rise', and it had been forced to stop or postpone projects owing to lack of funding. In a statement, Ms Bentley said: 'Samaritans provides a life-saving service, day and night, 365 days a year, but the changing needs of our callers and volunteers means thinking differently about the way our services need to work. 'We are engaging with our volunteers on proposed improvements that will mean we are able to answer more calls, have more volunteers on duty and be there for more people in their darkest moments. Over 200 branches, varying in size from 10 to 300 volunteers, is not sustainable and hinders us providing the best possible service to people who need us.' − Guardian
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Betting tax increase in budget could raise €53m while higher vehicle levies also examined in tax strategy papers
Boosting betting tax in the budget would raise up to an extra €53 million a year for the State, according to Department of Finance officials. The tax take from betting almost doubled to €95 million in 2019 from €52 million the previous year, after the Government increased the rate on all bets placed in the State to 2 per cent from 1 per cent. Increasing the rate by 1 per cent would add a further €53 million a year, while adding 0.5 per cent would yield another €26.5 million, the department's Tax Strategy Group (TSG) report states. Government would collect a further €800,000 if it increased the tax on the commission earned by betting exchanges, which allow customers to bet against each other, to 30 per cent from 25 per cent, the report added. READ MORE But it cautions that those estimates depend on 'the betting market continuing as normal in 2025 and 2026″ with neither bookies nor their customers changing their behaviour. [ Income tax dilemma for Government as VAT cuts could cost €1bn Opens in new window ] 'It is understood the burden of such additional tax increases would mainly impact large bookmaking firms,' it said. Along with the increase in 2019, the Government introduced relief of €50,000, meant to ease the burden on small independent operators, whose share of the market has shrunk rapidly in recent years. The report suggests increasing this relief to €65,000 should the Government decide to boost the tax rate. However, it adds that Revenue officials argue that this would benefit only a handful of businesses, while it would add to the challenge of getting EU state aid approval for such a move. The report notes that three big businesses dominate the market. Although it does not name them, they are Irish-based giant, Flutter Entertainment, mostly through its subsidiary Paddy Power , Boylesports and UK-based Ladbrokes. A Health Research Report found in 2022 that problem gambling had fallen over the previous eight years, but still hit more than 135,000 lives in the Republic. Revenue figures show that betting is growing, but moving increasingly online. In 2019, customers wagered €28.9 million in cash and €23.5 million digitally, including €1.8 million with betting exchanges. In 2023, digital's share was more than €55 million, of a €102.7 million total, while punters bet €46.6 million in cash. Separately, a 1 per cent increase in the higher rates of Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT) is one of the budget options outlined by the TSG papers. It says that if applied across the upper VRT bands – 11 to 20 – covering the price of new and imported used cars, it 'would affect only cars with above-average emissions' and could raise €28 million based on 2024 registrations. The group also suggests increasing the NOx surcharge on new and imported cars by €5 per mg/km, potentially generating another €15.5 million. On Benefit-in-Kind tax (BIK), the paper proposes creating a new zero-emissions category, with rates ranging between 6 and 15 per cent, depending on annual business mileage. A higher VRT rate of 15 per cent is also suggested for vans and light commercial vehicles emitting more than 260g/km of CO2. This would sit above the recently introduced two-band emissions-based VRT system, where the top rate currently stands at 13.3 per cent for vehicles over 120g/km. The TSG notes that future reforms could include emissions-based BIK rates for vans, potentially retaining the current 8 per cent rate for low-emission models, with higher rates for those over a certain CO2 threshold. The latest TSG paper revises a proposal made last year on an additional VRT surcharge based on a vehicle's weight. Modelled on a system currently operated in France and Norway, an additional charge would be imposed on vehicles above a certain weight threshold, with various potential reliefs for the likes of fully-electric or hybrid models. The TSG states: 'It is well documented that the scale of the proposed electrification of the national fleet will entail significant revenue risk, with the growth in EVs expected to erode Exchequer receipts from motor tax, VRT, VAT and fuel excise, particularly if the current tax structures remain unchanged.' It estimates that revenue from taxes on fossil fuel use and related transport will fall by €1 billion by 2030, down from €5.3 billion in 2022.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
How many steps a day do you really need for improve your health? It's not 10,000
Walking more could reduce your risk of dementia , depression and dying from cancer , as well as being good for your heart , according to research. And you may not need to walk as far as previously thought to reap those benefits. The UK's NHS recommends a brisk 10-minute walk every day. Many people aim to walk 10,000 steps, but struggle to achieve it. Now researchers have calculated that even 7,000 steps could be enough to protect health. Scientists examined data from more than 160,000 adults and found that walking 7,000 steps a day was associated with a reduced risk of a number of serious health conditions and death. Whereas previous studies have mainly examined the links between step count and heart health or overall death rates, this systematic review and meta analysis, published in the Lancet Public Health, sought to comprehensively examine how taking more steps per day could reduce the risk of a range of other health conditions as well. READ MORE Compared with those who walked 2,000 steps a day, the researchers found that achieving the 7,000 daily step target was linked to a 37 per cent reduction in risk of dying from cancer, while the risk was 14 per cent lower for type 2 diabetes, 38 per cent for dementia, 22 per cent depression and 28 per cent for falls respectively. It was also associated with a 25 per cent lower risk of cardiovascular disease and a 47 per cent reduction in overall risk of dying. Although step count does not measure the quality or intensity of exercise, the findings underscore the importance of being active. There is a 'return on investment' with every additional 1,000 steps taken and even 4,000 steps per day reduced the risk of disease, compared with very low activity levels, the researchers observed. Although the risk continues to decrease above 7,000 steps, the rate at which it reduces that risk starts to slow. Melody Ding, professor of public health at the University of Sydney and lead author of the research, said that those who already walked 10,000 steps should not go back to 7,000, but that 7,000 was a more practical target for those who were currently inactive. 'Those who are currently active and achieving the 10,000 steps a day, keep up the good work – there is no need to modify your step counts. However, for those of us who are far from achieving the 10,000 targets, getting to 7,000 steps/day offers almost comparable health benefits for the outcomes we examined,' Prof Ding said. [ I walk to work in Dublin every day... daydreaming can't be done on a bus Opens in new window ] Responding to the findings, Dr Daniel Bailey, reader in sedentary behaviour and health at Brunel University of London, said the research helped debunk the myth that 10,000 steps per day should be the target for optimal health. 'The real-world implications are that people can get health benefits just from small increases in physical activity, such as doing an extra 1,000 steps per day,' Dr Bailey said 'To achieve the best reductions in risk, aiming for 5,000-7,000 per day can be recommended, which will be more achievable for many people than the unofficial target of 10,000 steps that has been around for many years.' Dr Andrew Scott, senior lecturer in clinical exercise physiology at the University of Portsmouth, pointed out that not all activity was captured by step counts. 'The steps per day is useful when people's exercise is weight-bearing, however cycling, swimming and rowing are not well-represented by the steps-per-day model.' June Davison, senior cardiac nurse at the British Heart Foundation, said: 'We know that regular walking is one of the easiest ways to help maintain a healthy lifestyle and reduce your risk of heart disease. 'Adults should aim to build up to a total of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity every week, but getting active isn't always easy. Incorporating activity snacks, such as walking while taking phone calls, or taking a brisk 10-minute walk during your lunch break, can all count to reduce your chances of developing heart disease.' – Guardian
