Thayer PD denies releasing body cam footage of officers killing dog
However, based on the police department's response, it's unclear if the attorney for Thayer Police actually reviewed the body camera footage prior to denying Ozarks First Investigates' Sunshine Law request.
The response reads, 'Pursuant to 610.100.2(4), the requested record would be closed. I am basing that on the assumption that the video was recorded on private property (non-public location) and would contain images of a juvenile.'
Small town demands body cam footage after Thayer police officers kill dog
Ozarks First Investigates is working to learn if the department can confirm the video was filmed on private property and/or contains video footage of a minor.
If so, the video would only be releasable to the person depicted in the video, or their guardian or attorney:
610.100.2.(4) Except as provided in subsections 3 and 5 of this section, a mobile video recording that is recorded in a nonpublic location is authorized to be closed, except that any person who is depicted in the recording or whose voice is in the recording, a legal guardian or parent of such person if he or she is a minor, a family member of such person within the first degree of consanguinity if he or she is deceased or incompetent, an attorney for such person, or insurer of such person, upon written request, may obtain a complete, unaltered, and unedited copy of a recording under and pursuant to this section.
The denial comes as a growing number of people demand answers following the fatal shooting, which occurred on April 18 in response to an alleged dog attack on a child.
According to a press release from the Thayer Police Department, officers responded to a report of a dog bite involving a 5-year-old child around 3:23 p.m. that Friday. The child sustained injuries to the neck, prompting officers to call for an Oregon County Ambulance.
Police say the dog remained at large when officers arrived and later 'aggressively charged' them during the investigation. One officer was reportedly bitten before police opened fire, killing the animal.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Yahoo
NAACP lawsuit accuses Missouri AG of illegally withholding info on police vehicle stops
Attorney General Andrew Bailey speaks during a 2024 news conference in the Missouri House Lounge, flanked by House Speaker Dean Plocher, left, and state Rep. Justin Sparks (Tim Bommel/Missouri House Communications). A new lawsuit filed by the Missouri NAACP accuses Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey of failing to follow state law last year when the annual vehicle stops report omitted data that shows whether minority motorists are being stopped more frequently than white drivers. Filed Tuesday in Cole County, the lawsuit also accuses Bailey and the University of Missouri of violating the state Sunshine Law by withholding documents showing why the information called a disparity index was left out of the report on stops during 2023 and whether it was calculated at all. The lawsuit was filed just days before the report for stops in 2024 is due on Sunday. The disparity index is a ratio of stops among an identifiable group compared to their share of the population of driving age. If the ratio is one, it means that traffic stops in that particular group align with their share of the whole. Bailey 'has an absolute, statutory and ministerial duty, pursuant to (state law), to include a 'disparity index,' that is a comparison of the percentage of stopped motor vehicles driven by each minority group and the percentage of the state's population that each minority group comprises, in his annual report,' the lawsuit states. In the executive summary of the report issued June 1, 2024, the omission was explained as a decision to stop using a data point of questionable value and sometimes incorrect interpretation. A disparity index of two for any minority group, the summary states, means very different things in a community where 10% of the population are members of that group compared to a community where 50% of the population are members of that group. 'The (vehicle stops report) already provides detailed information on traffic stops and rates relative to subgroup population, so no new objective information is provided by calculating the index,' the summary states. But Rod Chapel, president of the Missouri NAACP and a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said questions about the usefulness of a data point are not enough to excuse ignoring the law that requires it. 'The requirements of the statute are clear, there shall be a disparity index that is produced by the attorney general,' he said. 'Last year, Attorney General Bailey recognized that, I think, in his summary, and chose not to do it.' For the state as a whole, the report for 2023 shows, 538 police agencies made almost 1.4 million traffic stops, issued almost 570,000 citations and made 57,713 arrests. White motorists accounted for 77% of the stops, another 17.3% of the motorists were Black and 3.1% were Hispanic. The Independent calculated a disparity index that showed the index for white drivers was 0.97 while the index for black drivers was 1.59. For Hispanic drivers, the disparity index was 0.8, indicating stops in smaller numbers than their portion of the population. Those figures are similar to what past reports showed. In the lawsuit, the NAACP is asking for an order directing Bailey to publish the disparity index calculations for the state as a whole and for the 538 police agencies that submitted reports on their traffic stops. The lawsuit also asks for an order stating he has a statutory obligation to include it in future reports and to turn over records requested last year regarding the decision to omit the index. The Sunshine Law violations alleged in the lawsuit state that the last communication from the attorney general's office regarding a Nov. 13 request for records was Feb. 26. Bailey's office said records would be ready in a week but has not delivered them, the lawsuit states. The University of Missouri performed calculations presented in the report, and the NAACP sought records regarding those calculations and the decision not to include the index. On May 16, the university, after taking six months, delivered 443,000 documents. But it also said, according to the lawsuit, that 'many of the records identified in response to your search criteria have been withheld' under Sunshine Law provisions allowing records to be closed. One of the exemptions cited is that the withheld records were related to legal actions or litigation or confidential or privileged communications with attorneys. In the court filing, the NAACP says that claim is a ruse because, other than the lawsuit filed Tuesday, the University of Missouri is 'not involved in legal actions, causes of action or litigation involving the requested documents.' Bailey's office said it would not comment on the lawsuit. University of Missouri spokesman Christopher Ave, in an email, said 'we deny liability for the violation alleged in this case and plan to present our defenses in court.' The vehicle stops report has been published since 2000 under a law intended to detect and prevent racial profiling of motorists. The data reported has been refined over the years, including the disparity index. The most recent version of the disparity index, before it was discontinued, was calculated based on total stops within a jurisdiction and for stops of motorists who reside within that jurisdiction. That is an improvement in the data, Chapel said, because it shows whether minority visitors to tourist areas are being stopped in greater numbers than the resident population. The NAACP travel advisory for Missouri issued in 2017 used data from the vehicle stops reports to state that 'African Americans are 75 per cent more likely to be stopped and searched based on skin color than Caucasians.' The allegation is supported by data on stops that result in discovery of contraband, Chapel said. 'If you look at most of the data, it says that black and brown people get stopped more than anybody else, but the rate at which they're found with contraband is lower,' Chapel said. 'So that would say that we are misusing community resources in a way that is not effective.' In 2023, 25.5% of white drivers stopped had contraband, compared to 20.5% for Black drivers and 16.3% for Hispanic drivers. Black and Hispanic drivers were, however, much more likely to receive a citation after the stop, with 38.2% of white drivers stopped receiving a ticket, compared to 55.2% for Black drivers and 50.4% for Hispanic drivers. Don Love of Columbia, who has been analyzing the annual vehicle stops reports for more than a decade, said that he dislikes the disparity index because it is an imprecise measure of officer motives for a stop. He's argued for a new method to replace it. 'What they did wasn't replace it, but just to leave it out entirely,' Love said. 'It wasn't good, but it's illegal for them not to have it in there.' The use of ratios to analyze the data should be expanded, he said, to cover other data in the report, including the number of drivers searched, the contraband found and the arrests made, as well as whether drivers get a citation or just a warning. Breaking the stop data into resident and non-resident stops added a new dimension to the data, Love said. 'If you look at what happens for Black drivers when they leave their home jurisdictions and go someplace else, there's something more than two times the white rate,' he said. Omitting the disparity index was not done without thought, Chapel said. The lawsuit is intended to discover the motive and prove that the law requires it as part of the report, he added. 'There's any number of things that the attorney general is supposed to do,' Chapel said, 'and if he's just making the decision not to do it, we deserve to know.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
14-05-2025
- Yahoo
Commissioners settle case of former employee for over $50K
WARREN, Ohio (WKBN) — The Trumbull County Commissioners today voted unanimously to settle the case involving former commissioner Niki Frenchko, who claimed she was unlawfully arrested during a commissioners meeting almost three years ago. The commissioners agreed to a settlement of $51,000, $49,500 of which will go to Frenchko's lawyers, which included Dave Betras. $1,500 will go to Frenchko and a group called Open Government Advocacy. In a statement after the vote, the commissioners said the case is now over. Current Trumbull County Commissioner Denny Malloy issued this statement: Rather than continue to unnecessarily expend Trumbull County taxpayer dollars in litigation brought by a former commissioner, the Trumbull County Commissioners settled the lawsuit so that the County can, finally, move on from that fiasco and continue to serve and advocate for the people of Trumbull County. It's sad that the County's elected officials and taxpayers had to spend nearly two years fighting alleged Sunshine Law violations brought by a former commissioner against the very Board of Commissioners that she served on. All this so she and her accomplices can personally pocket $1,500 of taxpayer funds while getting her attorneys paid almost $50,000. But it's now over and the new Board of Commissioners can continue to work to move Trumbull County forward in a positive direction. Trumbull County Commissioner Denny Malloy Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
14-05-2025
- Yahoo
State to audit Humansville for the first time after residents petition amid turmoil
For more than a year, the city of Humansville has been embroiled in multiple controversies, including concerns about misused funds. Residents of the small Polk County town have now gathered signatures required to request the State Auditor's Office conduct an audit to ensure the city is operating properly. While the Board of Alderman had previously voted to initiate a state audit themselves, the action failed when Mayor Tracy Mason broke the tie by voting against it. Residents then gathered 170 certified signatures to request the audit, above the required 135 signature threshold, according to an Auditor's Office news release. "With the numerous issues that have occurred in the city over the last year, and with allegations of missing money, it's important that we shine the light of truth and transparency on the city's government," State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick said in the release. "We will do our best to give taxpayers a better understanding of the financial health and operational effectiveness of their city. If necessary, we will also provide recommendations to improve the performance of their government." This is the first time, according to the release, that the city will be audited by the Missouri State Auditor's Office. Fitzpatrick asked for patience during the process and encouraged those with any information to reach out through the Whistleblower Hotline at 800-347-8597, by email at moaudit@ or by visiting Two state investigations already have been conducted within the city government of Humansville. One, by the Missouri Secretary of State's Office, resulted in charges being filed against city employee Sophia Piper alleging election interference, although that case was dismissed right before a trial was set to begin in April due to witnesses failing to appear. The other investigation was conducted by the Missouri State Highway Patrol looking into misuse of public funds. While a representative from the MSHP confirmed in October the investigation was complete and forwarded to the Polk County Prosecutor's Office, no additional updates have emerged since. More: Stone County Developmental Disabilities Board didn't comply with state law, audit finds There is also plenty of other controversy involving former aldermen and city staff. In November, the city attorney sued former alderman Ashley Albright and two other women for defamation after Albright accused the attorney of sexual harassment. Prior to that, former alderman Robert Thomas filed a lawsuit against the city for alleged Sunshine Law violations. Both lawsuits are ongoing. Most recently, former Humansville police chief Ryan Snow filed a lawsuit against the city claiming his firing was illegal and the city still owed him wages. Snow played a role in initiating the state's investigations, which the lawsuit claims was a reason the city retaliated and dismissed him. Marta Mieze covers local government at the News-Leader. Have feedback, tips or story ideas? Contact her at mmieze@ This article originally appeared on Springfield News-Leader: Humansville to be audited amid turmoil after resident petition
