Trump says he'll send new weapons to Ukraine
'We're going to send some more weapons. We have to – they have to be able to defend themselves,' Trump said ahead of a dinner with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu.
'They're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons,' Trump added. 'Defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard.'
The president's latest remarks come after a senior White House official told CNN last week the Trump administration was pausing some weapons shipments to Ukraine, including air defense missiles. The decision came after a review of military spending and American support to foreign countries that was signed off by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said at the time that the decision was made 'to put America's interests first.'
Some US officials insinuated the review of aid to Ukraine was related in part to the Pentagon's push to focus on China and be prepared for potential future conflict in the Pacific – an issue prioritized by the Pentagon's policy chief, Elbridge Colby.
'The Department of Defense continues to provide the President with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end. At the same time, the Department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving US forces' readiness for Administration defense priorities,' Colby said in a statement at the time of the pause.
Russia welcomed the halt in certain shipments to Ukraine, claiming – without providing any evidence – it was made because the US did not have enough weapons.
The US has been the biggest single donor of military aid to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, supplying Ukraine with air defense systems, drones, rocket launchers, radars, tanks and anti-armor weapons, leading to concerns over dwindling US stockpiles.
Trump previously halted all shipments of military aid to Ukraine in March following a heated Oval Office argument with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump resumed aid flows to Ukraine about a week later.
The decision to send additional weapons also comes after Trump spoke separately last week with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky. He said afterward his talk with Putin was disappointing and there was 'no progress' towards a ceasefire.
Meanwhile, Zelensky in recent weeks has been pleading with Western allies to bolster his nation's aerial defenses after intensifying Russian airborne attacks. Russia launched a record number of drones at Ukraine overnight on Friday, just hours after the Trump-Putin phone call.
Trump later Friday said the US was considering Ukraine's request for more Patriot defense systems after a 'very good' phone call with Zelensky. The Ukrainian president said on Saturday that latest conversation with Trump was the best and 'most productive' he has had.
Trump on Monday reaffirmed his displeasure with the Russian leader, saying: 'I'm not happy with President Putin at all.'
CNN's Kaanita Iyer contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump's Big Bill Is Now Law. What Was Learned?
To the Editor: Re 'Three Lessons From the Big, Awful Bill,' by Jason Furman (Opinion guest essay, July 7): I'm afraid that Professor Furman drew the wrong lessons from this bill. Its passage had nothing to do with the quality of ideas, experts or even economics. It was all about greed (for power and money) and fear (of President Trump). The legislators' constituents or the fate of the country meant nothing in the face of the Big, Awful Tyrant in the White House. Susan BodikerWashington To the Editor: Jason Furman is wrong to think that the way the Republicans brought us the worst piece of legislation in modern times holds a lesson for Democrats. It's easy to put together legislation that enriches the rich, brings cruelty to the vulnerable and is fiscally irresponsible. It's what Trump supporters do. It's much harder to craft legislation that helps bring about economic growth that can be widely shared among all Americans and do good for the world. The lesson here is more simple: Whatever debates Democrats are having between more centrist and progressive elements pales in comparison to the damage we do when we don't get out the vote to prevent Republicans from taking power. Richard DineSilver Spring, Md. To the Editor: Maybe there's only one lesson from President Trump's hugely horrific bill: Legislating works very differently when there is a large dose of authoritarianism in the body politic. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
14 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump is daring MAGA to oppose him right now
'I will give you everything,' Donald Trump famously intoned during the 2016 presidential campaign. And for his most ardent MAGA supporters, a more unshackled and unchecked second Trump term has carried the promise that he might actually deliver on many of his more controversial proposals – often things he failed to do in his first term. The reality is proving much more complicated. In recent days and weeks, the Trump administration has repeatedly bowed to the realities of governing. It's done things – on Jeffrey Epstein, on Russia's war in Ukraine, on deportations, on government spending and on Iran – that risk alienating the MAGA base that brought Trump to the dance. None of that is to say the president is about to lose his base; such predictions have long proven overzealous. And MAGA supporters often take their cues from Trump, readjusting their principles on the fly. But everyone has their limits. Trump's giving them reasons to be suspect about his and top administration officials' intentions. And there's been at least some evidence of a brewing backlash. The most significant example this week is Epstein. The administration has repeatedly failed to deliver on its promises of significant revelations about the Epstein case, dating back months. The case has for years been the object of MAGA fascination and conspiracy theories, which hold that Epstein's trafficking of underage girls implicated powerful figures who could soon be held to account. But this week, there were further disappointments for the base. Not only did those promises fall flat as the administration effectively concluded the matter, but the Justice Department's final conclusions in two key cases contradicted what Attorney General Pam Bondi had said in hyping the documents. Bondi responded to a reporter's question about a client list by saying she had one on her desk; the DOJ now says there was no client list. (The White House claimed Monday that Bondi was somehow referring to other documents.) And Bondi said there were tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child pornography; the DOJ's conclusions say nothing of the sort. The problem for the administration isn't just that it failed to deliver anything significant; it's that it did so in a way that could lead MAGA supporters to believe it's now in on the fix. Bondi suggested there was much more to these revelations than the administration has now produced, and prominent figures including now-Vice President JD Vance and now-Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino have for years linked the lack of publicly disclosed 'client list' to a cover-up. That has and will seed suspicion. Much of that suspicion for now is being geared toward figures who aren't Trump. That includes Bondi (who some MAGA figures like Laura Loomer say should be fired) and unnamed law enforcement officials who people like Fox News host Jesse Watters baselessly speculate might have covered things up. But the situation is a powder keg in a MAGA universe that has for years believed Trump was about to rip the lid off a conspiracy of child sex traffickers that included powerful figures. That's not just the case with Epstein, but also with the QAnon conspiracy theory – a theory that animated a large portion of Trump's base. Trump and his allies have cultivated a conspiratorial base, and they're now reaping what they sowed. But that's hardly the only example of a development that could cause the MAGA base to question whether Trump is really set to deliver for them. On Monday, Trump announced that he was reversing a brief pause on weapons shipments to Ukraine. The pause had initially caused many key MAGA figures to celebrate, believing Trump had finally cut off Ukraine. (A March poll found Republicans opposed continuing to send Ukraine weapons and financial aid by a nearly 2-to-1 margin.) Trump has also again signaled that he wants to exempt many undocumented longtime farm workers from deportations, despite his promises of mass deportations. The issue has divided his administration between those who believe in true mass deportation and those who worry about the economic effects of draining a key source of labor. The administration has provided a series of mixed messages in recent weeks. 'I did not vote for this,' Newsmax host Todd Starnes posted Monday on X, citing all three of the above examples. Many echoed that phrase. Other recent examples appear less likely to truly alienate supporters, but have certainly complicated matters. Last week brought a significant setback in Trump's professed campaign to cut government spending. The Trump agenda bill that ultimately passed Congress would balloon the national debt by trillions, according to multiple estimates. It's not clear that either Trump or MAGA truly care that much about the national debt. But it was a remarkable reversal from an administration that made Elon Musk's efforts to rein in government spending its early calling card. Musk pledged to cut as much as $1 trillion. He has now made this about-face from the administration the linchpin of his new third party effort, the America Party. The story is somewhat similar with Trump's recent strikes on Iran, which flew in the face of much of the MAGA movement's emphasis on 'America First' and non-interventionist foreign policy. Many key movement figures initially balked at the idea, and some like Tucker Carlson have continued to do so. Of course, that example shows how these episodes often pan out. Many MAGA influencers who criticized the idea of striking Iran beforehand ultimately came on board. Polls showed a sharp rise in Republican support for the US strikes after they happened. The episode reinforced something we have seen throughout the Trump era. His supporters care a lot less about the details of policies and actions than the fact that Trump spearheaded them. If he does something, it becomes a good idea, because they have largely unflinching faith in him. But that's always subject to change, especially when it concerns the policies and issues they hold near and dear. And Trump has recently set about testing just how much the base is willing to tolerate him departing from the MAGA line.
Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Asian Economies in Rush to Cut Tariff Deals as US Deadline Moves
Asian countries including Japan and South Korea said they'll keep pushing for a better deal for their exports to the US after President Donald Trump shifted his tariff deadline to Aug. 1 and tweaked the rates he's set for many economies. In his first wave of letters to key trading partners, Trump announced levies of 25% on goods from Japan and South Korea, with rates for Indonesia and Thailand set at over 30%. The US president also signed an executive order holding off the new duties until Aug. 1.
