logo
‘Gringo go home.' Mexico City protests target Americans, gentrification

‘Gringo go home.' Mexico City protests target Americans, gentrification

MEXICO CITY — Since the early days of the pandemic, foreigners have flooded Mexico City, particularly Americans and Europeans drawn by the cost of living and possibilities of remote work.
During that time, several neighborhoods in the city center have transformed, with tortillerías, corner stores and barber shops replaced by wine bars, cafes and Pilates studios, many of which advertise in English. Rents have soared, and some locals have been priced out of their homes.
Some blame the city's housing crunch and rising costs on the new arrivals — and the more than 35,000 Airbnbs operating here.
In recent days, that anger spilled into the streets.
A march against gentrification drew hundreds of people, with protesters holding signs that said 'gringo go home,' and demanding that Mexican leaders curb short-term rentals and tax foreigners.
It was held on July 4 — U.S. Independence Day — and was advertised as a protest against 'American imperialism.'
The march, which passed the U.S. Embassy, was mostly peaceful. But later, some marchers turned to vandalism, smashing windows of more than a dozen storefronts, including a bank, a popular taco chain and a Starbucks.
Videos showed protesters harassing tourists seated at an upscale taquería until they got up and left. Some patrons sitting at street-side cafes targeted by the demonstrators protested that they were Mexicans, not foreigners, in some cases flashing their identification cards.
In parts of the city, walls remain scrawled with graffiti: 'My culture is not your trend' and 'Kill a gringo.'
The protests, which echoed demonstrations against mass tourism and high housing costs in other places, including Barcelona and Berlin, have challenged the long-held notion of Mexico City as a place that welcomes outsiders.
And they add fuel to rising binational tensions, as President Trump threatens tariffs on Mexican imports and seeks to deport immigrants living without authorization in the United States. Trump's attacks on Mexico have sparked a wave of nationalism, with some people pushing a boycott of American products and companies embracing the red, green and white of the Mexican flag in ad campaigns.
On social media, where commentators both applauded and assailed the protests, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security joined in the fray, publishing a post on X Sunday encouraging undocumented immigrants to self-deport via a Customs and Border Protection application: 'If you are in the United States illegally and wish to join the next protest in Mexico City, use the CBP Home app to facilitate your departure.'
Mexican leaders condemned the vandalism and the nativist tone adopted by many protesters.
'Xenophobic displays of this kind must be condemned,' President Claudia Sheinbaum said at her daily news conference on Monday. 'Mexico is a country open to the world.'
But she stressed that protesters had legitimate complaints, and that 'gentrification is a phenomenon that needs to be addressed.'
Mexico City Mayor Clara Brugada, who, like Sheinbaum, belongs to the leftist political party that controls much of the country, said the city must focus on building more affordable housing.
'We must continue implementing measures and public policies to combat these phenomena,' she said Monday. 'The demand for housing and rents are increasing overnight, and residents are being evicted because they no longer have the economic means to live there.'
Sheinbaum, who was mayor of Mexico City before being elected president, was criticized during her term for not taking stronger action against the dispossession of long-time residents as landlords rented out properties to digital nomads, tourists and other foreigners. Demonstrators say the government is still not doing enough.
'We're not against migration, which is a human right,' one of the collectives that organized the march wrote in a statement. 'But we have to recognize that the state, institutions and both local and foreign businesses offer different treatment to those with greater purchasing power.'
Analysts have pushed back on the claims that an influx in foreigners is largely blame for rising costs in Mexico City.
'The reality is that, with or without gringos, housing in Mexico has become enormously more expensive,' Viri Ríos, a political scientist, wrote in El País newspaper. From 2005 to 2021, home prices throughout Mexico increased by 247%, she said. That includes states with low tourist flows, such as Morelos, where prices increased 193%. She said increases in Mexico City have actually decelerated since the pandemic.
'The rise in Mexico City precedes the gringos, is happening throughout the country and has causes that go beyond the arrival of tourists or digital nomads,' she wrote. More to blame, she said: High construction costs and public policies that mean building is not keeping up with demand. She said Mexico City officials had embraced Airbnb in large part because it is much easier to collect taxes from the company compared to long-term rentals, many of which are paid for with cash.
Some of the neighborhoods currently at the center of debate were first gentrified by Mexicans.
Mexico has long been the top foreign travel destination for Americans, its beaches and pueblos luring tens of millions of U.S. visitors annually. But Americans began flooding Mexico City in earnest around 2016, when the New York Times named it the world's top travel destination, and magazine writers wondered whether it was the 'new Berlin.'
International artists, chefs and designers arrived, scooping up inexpensive studio spaces, opening restaurants and integrating themselves into the city's imaginative nightlife.
The pandemic pushed it into overdrive. As much of Europe and Asia shut their doors to Americans in 2020, Mexico, which adopted few COVID-19 restrictions, was one of the few places where gringos were welcome.
Making it easier: Americans have long been able to stay here up to six months without a visa.
For remote workers earning in dollars, the appeal is clear: For the cost of a $2,500 one-bedroom in Los Angeles or New York, a person can rent a penthouse here.
The phenomenon is transforming some of the city's most beloved neighborhoods into expat enclaves.English rings out everywhere in the leafy, walkable neighborhoods of Roma, Condesa, Centro and Juárez.
For years, most people in this metropolis were unwaveringly kind and patient with international visitors.
But some chilangos, as locals are known, have become fed up.
A few years ago, expletive-laced posters appeared around town. 'New to the city? Working remotely?' they read in English. 'You're a f—ing plague and the locals f—ing hate you. Leave.'
That sentiment echoed the hundreds of responses that poured in after a young American posted a seemingly innocuous tweet: 'Do yourself a favor and remote work in Mexico City — it is truly magical.'
'Please don't,' read one of the nicer replies. 'This city is becoming more and more expensive every day in part because of people like you, and you don't even realize or care about it.'
Genoveva Ramírez, 35, who works in marketing and advertising, commutes two hours each day to the Juárez neighborhood because rent in the city is 'impossible for me.' So, too, is picking up the tab at restaurants.
'When you see those places, they're full of foreigners, and you understand why prices have risen so much, because foreigners do pay.'
Still, she said she didn't blame them. 'Ultimately, it's not their fault.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale ‘Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court
Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale ‘Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale ‘Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court

Bill O'Reilly said what basically everyone has been thinking since CBS parent company Paramount agreed to a $16 million settlement over the Kamala Harris interview on '60 Minutes' last week: The company would have won in court – but needs Trump to approve its complex sale to Skydance. 'So the settlement, uh, from CBS is interesting,' the 'No Spin News' host said Monday. 'Trump [was] never going to approve that unless CBS capitulated — which they did. … But the bigger picture is what's important.' More from TheWrap Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale 'Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court | Video ABC Revamps 'GMA3' Lineup as Anchors DeMarco Morgan, Eva Pilgrim Exit CBS News Legend Lowell Bergman Explains Why Paramount's Trump Settlement Is 'A Lot Worse' Than His Big Tobacco Case Trump Media Launches TV Streaming Platform Truth+ in Partnership With Newsmax The July 1 settlement includes 'plaintiffs' fees and costs' as well as a donation to a future presidential library; Trump will not personally receive any money. Paramount also said that 'in the future, 60 Minutes will release transcripts of interviews with eligible U.S. presidential candidates after such interviews have aired.' 'This is all about '60 Minutes,'' the former CBS employee and Fox News host said. '[They] wanted Kamala Harris to win the election. There's no doubt about it. You just go back and look at the transcripts as I have, and it's all about promoting Kamala and diminishing Trump.' Trump claimed CBS interfered with the election and damaged his own companies when it aired a promo that was different from an answer Harris gave to correspondent Bill Whitaker. While O'Reilly believes Trump had a point, he didn't think the president would have won. 'I don't think that CBS would have lost that case in court,' O'Reilly said. 'There is a difference, but is it egregious? So Trump sued them for billions of dollars.' O'Reilly said he knows the corporate media has gone far left – 'I know … I don't think that, it's not an opinion' – and played a clip from the October 8, 2024 interview to prove his point. 'Whitaker should have gone bang — 'Give me one solution you've offered in the first year of the Biden administration.' Give me one' … Because she always falls back on, 'Oh, Trump killed the immigration bill that Charles Schumer ginned up early this year.' … [Whitaker] booted it because he didn't anticipate the boldness of the lie — that what she just said, 'From day one, literally, we have been offering solutions,' is about the biggest falsehood I have heard from any politician in the last decade.' O'Reilly said Trump proved as much when he shut down the border and 'stopped the illegal immigration asylum madness in two months.' 'Whitaker was soft on her,' O'Reilly added. 'This is not an interview. It's not the way it's done. You've been watching me for almost 30 years. You know how an interview on television should be done. This is gibberish.' Paramount Global has agreed to merge with Skydance Media in a complex $8 billion deal. If approved, the deal is expected to close by fall 2025. The post Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale 'Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court | Video appeared first on TheWrap.

Trump, Netanyahu look to relocate Palestinians voluntarily from Gaza to other countries
Trump, Netanyahu look to relocate Palestinians voluntarily from Gaza to other countries

USA Today

time31 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump, Netanyahu look to relocate Palestinians voluntarily from Gaza to other countries

The meeting was the third time Trump has hosted Netanyahu since returning to the White House in January and came as they seek a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said they would seek other countries to relocate Palestinians as part of ending Israel's war with Hamas. Asked about a two-state solution that includes recognition of an independent Palestinian state, Netanyahu said Palestinians had already shown through Hamas that they couldn't be trusted with a neighboring government. 'So people aren't likely to say, 'Let's just give them another state and the platform to destroy Israel,'" Netanyahu said. Netanyahu added that Israel will 'work out a peace with our Palestinian neighbors – those who don't want to destroy us.' But he said Israel must retain control over security, and that 'we don't care' if people say 'it's not a complete state.' 'We vowed never again,' he said. Netanyahu said Israel would have to retain control of security over Gaza rather than a complete state. "I think the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us," he said. "That means a certain power, like overall security, will always remain in our hands. Now, that is a fact, and no one in Israel will agree to anything else, because we don't commit suicide." Netanyahu told reporters at the White House that "Trump is bringing a vision" for the region by seeking other countries to locate Palestinians. Trump called in February for the U.S. to take over the Gaza Strip and relocate roughly 2 million Palestinians to neighboring Arab countries. His goal, he said, is to turn the war-ravaged enclave into the "Riviera of the Middle East." "It's called free choice," Netanyahu said. "You know, if people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave. It shouldn't be a prison. It should be an open place and give people a free choice." The meeting was the third time Trump has hosted Netanyahu since returning to the White House in January. Netanyahu met earlier with Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy in the Middle East, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio before meeting with the president. The officials aim for a cease-fire in the war between Israel and Hamas, which attacked southern Israel in October 2023. The attack killed about 1,200 people and took 251 hostages. About 50 hostages remain, with 20 believed to be alive. Hamas has demanded an end to the war before it would free remaining hostages. Israel has insisted it would not agree to halt fighting until all hostages are free and Hamas dismantled. 'We need to end this war,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters July 7. 'We need to get all the hostages home. Hamas has to accept this proposal in order to do that.' Asked if there was a holdup with a cease-fire agreement, Trump said: 'I don't think there is a holdup.' 'Something good will happen': Netanyahu Netanyahu said Israel was working with Trump to find other countries "to give the Palestinians a better future." 'We've had great cooperation from countries surrounding Israel,' Trump said. 'Something good will happen.' Israelis cherish life for themselves and their neighbors in "the entire Middle East,' Netanyahu said. But he said Israel can't allow its neighbors to threaten it.

Planned Parenthood sues Trump admin, saying it is targeted by provision in megabill

time37 minutes ago

Planned Parenthood sues Trump admin, saying it is targeted by provision in megabill

A federal judge in Massachusetts granted a temporary restraining order against a provision in President Donald Trump's recently passed tax and policy megabill that would deny Planned Parenthood and its member organizations Medicaid funding for one year for non-abortion health services. Planned Parenthood, the largest reproductive health provider in the United States, and two of its member organizations had filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration earlier Monday over the provision, which the groups said was meant to target Planned Parenthood and its member organizations over abortion access. While the Hyde Amendment already prohibits the use of federal funding for abortions, the provision would prevent providers that offer abortion services and that received over $800,000 or more in federal Medicaid funding in 2023 from receiving Medicaid funding for other kinds of care for one year. Judge Indira Talwani, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama, wrote in the temporary restraining order that "Defendants, their agents, employees, appointees, successors, and anyone acting in concert or participation with Defendants shall take all steps necessary to ensure that Medicaid funding continues to be disbursed in the customary manner and timeframes to Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its members; Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts; and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah." The order is set to remain in effect for 14 days, and a hearing has been set for July 21. Planned Parenthood, in a statement on social media on Monday night, wrote, "We're grateful that the court acted swiftly to block this unconstitutional law attacking Planned Parenthood providers and patients... The fight is just beginning, and we look forward to our day in court!" In its lawsuit, Planned Parenthood wrote that the bill's provision was meant "to categorically prohibit health centers associated with Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid reimbursements… in order to punish them for lawful activity, namely advocating for and providing legal abortion access wholly outside the Medicaid program and without using any federal funds." Mentioning that Planned Parenthood branches serve over a million patients using Medicaid each year, the group wrote, "losing the ability to choose a Planned Parenthood Member health center as their Medicaid provider will be devastating for Medicaid patients across the country." The group also said that Planned Parenthood clinics, services, and staff would likely be eliminated if the clinics can no longer get Medicaid reimbursement. The lawsuit names Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator Mehmet Oz, along with their respective agencies, as plaintiffs. ABC News has reached out to HHS and CMS for comment. Multiple groups that oppose abortion access condemned the lawsuit, calling the bill a win for their cause and framing Planned Parenthood as desperate. "Planned Parenthood's desperation is showing as they run to the courts again to fix a crisis of their own making. Time after time they rely on unelected judges to bail them out of trouble, rather than fix deep systemic problems internally... As Planned Parenthood doubles down on lawfare and abortion politics, they prove exactly why the One Big Beautiful Bill is a historic victory for the people, stopping half a billion dollars in forced taxpayer funding of the corrupt abortion industry for the first time," Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America director of legal affairs Katie Daniel said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store