Reform pledges to scrap Online Safety Act over free speech concerns
Addressing a press conference at Reform's headquarters in Westminster, Mr Yusuf said: 'We will repeal this Act as one of the first things a Reform government does.'
Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide.
This includes introducing age verification for websites and ensuring algorithms do not work to harm children by, for example, pushing such content towards them when online.
Failing to comply with the new rules could incur fines of up to £18 million or 10% of a firm's global turnover, whichever is greater.
But Mr Yusuf said greater take-up of VPN services, which can enable internet users to circumvent the new rules, showed the legislation did not protect children and in fact made them less safe.
He said: 'Sending all of these kids onto VPNs is a far worse situation, and sends them much closer to the dark web, where the real dangers lie.'
He also criticised sections of the legislation that allow ministers to direct regulator Ofcom to modify its rules setting out how companies can comply with requirements to crack down on illegal or harmful content, saying it was 'the sort of thing that I think (Chinese president) Xi Jinping himself would blush at the concept of'.
During the press conference, Reform leader Nigel Farage acknowledged that his party did not have 'a perfect answer' for what could replace the Online Safety Act, but said his party had 'more access to some of the best tech brains, not just in the country but in the world' and would 'make a much better job of it'.
A Labour Party spokesperson said repealing the Online Safety Act would 'scrap vital protections for young people online and recklessly open the floodgates to kids being exposed to extreme digital content'.
They added: 'Reform offers anger but no answers. They won't say what they would do instead to keep people safe. Farage would give children access to material on suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and pornography. He is simply not serious.'
Reform's announcement came during a press conference on crime, at which Mr Farage unveiled retired Metropolitan Police detective Colin Sutton as an adviser on police and crime.
Mr Sutton, who retired from the police in 2011, led the investigations into serial killer Levi Bellfield and serial rapist Delroy Grant during a 30-year career.
He is expected to stand for Reform at the next general election, and said he would push for Reform to commit to opening at least 300 public-facing police buildings along with recruiting 30,000 new officers.
Mr Sutton said he would also back getting rid of diversity initiatives in the police, saying: 'If you need some help, if you need police officers, if you need help quickly, do you actually care who comes through the door?'
The event was also attended by American conservative media pundit Ann Coulter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Scottish Tories eye Reform electoral pact
Senior Scottish Conservatives have discussed striking an electoral pact with Reform UK for the Holyrood elections next spring. One figure backing a deal told The Telegraph it could help avoid splitting the vote on the Right and kick the SNP out of power in Scotland. The deal, which would not need to be made public, would see the Tories either not stand candidates or go easy in areas where Reform is better placed to win and vice versa. It comes as Nigel Farage 's party sits above the Conservatives in third place in opinion polls for the Scottish Parliament elections next May. A pact does not have the backing of Russell Findlay, the Scottish Tory leader, whose team released a statement ruling out the possibility when approached by The Telegraph. But the fact a deal is being considered at senior levels in the party underscores the scale of Reform's popularity surge north of the border and the concerns it has triggered among Tories. In Scotland, Reform now has 15 councillors, 14 of whom used to be Conservatives. It is in marked contrast to other political parties previously run by Mr Farage, such as the UK Independence Party (Ukip), which struggled to get a foothold north of border. One Tory MSP has privately spoken of a defection 'watch list' in Holyrood of those suspected of switching to Reform. Mr Farage also waved away the idea he would agree to any such pact, telling The Telegraph: 'No chance. The Tories are dying in Scotland and I've got no desire to do a deal with them whatsoever.' The idea of some form of agreement, public or private, between the Conservatives and Reform has become a common discussion point in Westminster. Average UK-wide voting polls have Reform in first place on 30 per cent of the vote, with the Tories in a distant third on 17 per cent. Labour is in second place on 22 per cent. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has ruled out a pre-vote deal with Mr Farage, but speculation continues with the next general election not due until 2029. The recent by-election result for the Scottish Parliament seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse underscored the challenges of Right-wing parties splitting the vote. Labour won the seat with 32 per cent of the vote, followed by the SNP on 29 per cent. Reform came third on 26 per cent. Had the Tories, who got 6 per cent, not stood a candidate, it is possible Reform would have beaten Labour and taken the seat, though pollsters often caution against hard conclusions when predicting voter behaviour. Mr Farage has agreed to election pacts before. The Brexit Party, the precursor to Reform which Mr Farage led, had criticism of the Tory handling of the issue of Europe as its heart. Yet he still agreed not to stand candidates against sitting Conservatives at the 2019 general election to help Boris Johnson win and get a Brexit deal through the Commons, securing the UK's departure from the European Union. Despite interest in some quarters of the Scottish Conservative Party, other figures strongly played down the possibility of a pact. One Scottish Tory politician who has spent years in influential positions said: 'Churchill's phrase comes to mind, 'You don't negotiate with a tiger when your head's in its mouth'. We're in competition with Reform – we're not in partnership with them.' The source said Scottish Tory supporters had brought up the prospect of a deal with Reform but that there was little chance it would be adopted by the leadership. Another senior Scottish Tory said: 'Why would Reform do a deal? I can see why we might be interested in it, but why would they?' There have long been suspicions on the Right of coordination between Labour and the Liberal Democrats at general elections to maximise the chances of Tory defeats. The Lib Dems surged from winning 11 MPs at the 2019 general election to 72 MPs at the 2024 general election with almost no increase in overall vote share. The party's strategists have talked about how they ruthlessly focused on a small number of winnable seats rather than competing hard everywhere. Labour was likely to have benefited from the decreased campaigning in non-target seats. But there are reasons why striking some form of deal would be less likely in elections for the Scottish Parliament than the UK-wide Parliament in Westminster. The electoral system for the Scottish Parliament has a proportional element, meaning as well as individual constituency races a party wins some MPs for their overall vote totals. Reform, whose strategists hope to get between 10 and 20 MSPs next spring, is expected to get their victories almost entirely via this way, known as 'the list', rather than winning constituencies. That could provide a disincentive to strike a deal with the Tories, given a lower overall vote total would likely mean fewer MSPs thanks to this proportion element of the election. In polling for next spring's Scottish Parliament elections, Reform is on around 17 per cent, above the Tories on around 12 per cent. The SNP is top, followed by Labour. A year ago, it looked likely that Labour could win power in Scotland but a support slump since Sir Keir Starmer took office last summer means the SNP is now well-placed to remain in office. A Scottish Conservative spokesman said: 'Nigel Farage has said he is content with the SNP winning another five years in power and Reform stood multiple pro-independence candidates in the general election, so no, this won't be happening. 'The Scottish Conservatives want to get the SNP out of power, while Reform will gladly help the nationalists.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Online Safety Act threatens free speech, says Elon Musk's X
Elon Musk's X platform has claimed the Online Safety Act, the 'heavy-handed' regulator Ofcom, and a planned police monitoring unit are harming free speech in the UK. The company published a post on X titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach' criticising what it saw was a triple-pronged attack on free expression. The post said the 'act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer.' Ofcom was taking an 'aggressive approach' to enforcement, X said, at the same time as publishing plans to force companies to take down hate speech proactively, which it called a 'double compliance' burden. A national police unit proposed by the Home Office to monitor social media for signs of unrest 'has set off alarm bells for free speech advocates who characterise it as excessive and potentially restrictive', the company claimed. A political row has broken out over the act, which introduced measures to protect children last week. A video of a speech in parliament by the shadow Home Office minister, Katie Lam, about sexual crimes committed by grooming gangs was restricted on X after being flagged as 'harmful content'. Nigel Farage and his Reform UK party have painted it as 'dystopian' legislation and vowed to repeal the laws. Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, said that Farage was siding with predators like Jimmy Savile. Kyle and Ofcom have also come under pressure from US Republicans this week, who have been in the UK to express their concerns about the act's impact on free speech. Jim Jordan, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has called the act 'the UK online censorship law'. He also published communications from the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology to social media platforms during the Southport riots last year that expressed concerns about the use of the expression 'two-tier policing'. X said that the act 'is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression' and parliament 'made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of online safety'. It claimed the act's measures 'prevent adults from encountering illegal content and steps to ensure age verification that limit adults' anonymity online'. Ofcom denies this. In the wake of the Southport riots, Ofcom proposed measures that would require social media platforms to remove hate speech from feeds. Platforms that are at high or medium risk of carrying hate speech would take it out of algorithmic feeds if it is potentially illegal. X called this a 'double compliance' burden on top of the act. Ofcom admitted the proposal 'has the potential to interfere with users' rights to freedom of expression and association.' Diana Johnson, the Home Office minister, last week proposed a national police unit that would monitor social media for signs of anti-migrant disorder. PATRICK PLEUL/REUTERS X said: 'While positioned as a safety measure, it clearly goes far beyond that intent.' The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. While the X post was not attributed to Musk, he retweeted an answer from his Grok chatbot that said: 'Evidence shows Labour has suppressed aspects of free speech via the Online Safety Act's content monitoring.' Ofcom said: 'The new rules require tech firms to tackle criminal content and prevent children from seeing defined types of material that's harmful to them. There is no requirement on them to restrict legal content for adult users. In fact, they must carefully consider how they protect users' rights to freedom of expression while keeping people safe.' Imran Ahmed, the CEO and founder of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, said: 'The Online Safety Act is a necessary step toward protecting our children in the digital world. Years of work have gone into crafting a law that addresses the real dangers kids face in online spaces, including exploitation, suicide promotion and self-harm. Those who propose to scrap this vital law must explain why they think these heinous online activities are tolerable.' A government spokesman said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Trans rage' protesters vandalise Wes Streeting's office
Wes Streeting 's constituency office has been vandalised by 'trans rage' protesters. Windows at the Health Secretary's Ilford North Office were smashed, and the words 'child killer' daubed on the front in paint. Trans Bash Back, a 'trans-led direct action project', claimed they were responsible for the vandalism in a post on the social media platform BlueSky. Sharing an image of the front of the office shortly after it had been vandalised, they wrote: ' Don't want action? Don't kill kids.' A local business owner, who did not wish to be named, told The Telegraph that 'glass was broken and there's paint everywhere' adding 'It's happened a few times – he's only just had the window replaced'. After the vandalism, Mr Streeting posted on social media platform X that 'repeated criminal damage is unfair to my staff'. He added: 'From day one as Ilford North's MP I've had an accessible and visible constituency office to serve my local community. 'Repeated criminal damage is unfair to my staff and an attack on democracy. I will not be commenting further while there is a live police investigation.' The Health Secretary did not address the accusations made by the activist group. A Labour Party spokesman confirmed that there was an ongoing police investigation into the incident. Trans Bash Back, which appears to have only recently been launched, posted a manifesto online in which it said that organisations seeking to ban puberty blockers, or define what a man or woman is, should 'expect' it. In an online FAQ, the organisation described itself as a 'Nonviolent Direct Action Group', and defines the actions it takes as 'risky, and rarely legal'. In a statement on social media, the group said it refuses 'to sit and watch as trans young people have their healthcare stripped from them. We refuse to allow Streeting to cover up their suicides. We refuse to endure the violence and humiliation. They will have to go through us'. Mr Streeting retained his London seat at last year's general election with a reduced majority of only 528 votes. In an interview with Talk Radio that year, he was asked if he believes transgender women are women, and said: 'Men have penises, women have vaginas; here ends my biology lesson.' A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: 'Police were called at 10.16 on Friday, Aug 1 to reports of criminal damage at an office in Woodford Avenue, IG4. 'Officers attended the scene, where they discovered that the address had been attacked with paint and the windows had been damaged. No one was injured. No arrests have been made at this early stage in the investigation.'
