logo
Rep. Julie von Haefen on why both competing state budget proposals at the legislature come up short

Rep. Julie von Haefen on why both competing state budget proposals at the legislature come up short

Yahoo09-06-2025
State Rep. Julie von Haefen (Photo: NCGA)
Well summer is here and with its arrival, the end of the state fiscal year will soon follow, and that means North Carolina legislators are under some pressure to pass a new state budget. Right now, however, despite complete Republican control of both the Senate and House, the two chambers remain far apart and that could portend a long hot summer at the Legislative Building.
So, what's at the heart of the dispute and where do both budget proposals come up short? Recently to get a handle on these issues, how lawmakers got in this fix, and why the state might be better off if they listened for a change to some different voices, Newsline's Rob Schofield caught up with a Wake County lawmaker who's spent the better part of seven years trying to get her colleagues to open their minds to some new ideas, State Rep. Julie von Haefen.
Click here to listen to the full interview with Rep. Julie von Haefen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Heckler hijacks Florida governor's Hulk Hogan tribute with profane tirade against 'Alligator Alcatraz'
Heckler hijacks Florida governor's Hulk Hogan tribute with profane tirade against 'Alligator Alcatraz'

Fox News

time18 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Heckler hijacks Florida governor's Hulk Hogan tribute with profane tirade against 'Alligator Alcatraz'

A heckler launched into a profanity-laced tirade Thursday, slamming Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' immigration policies during a news conference in Bradenton, interrupting the governor while he was paying tribute to pro wrestling legend and state resident Hulk Hogan, who died earlier in the man, positioned near the back of the room, was caught on camera jumping up from his seat and pointing aggressively at DeSantis while shouting, "Alligator Alcatraz — is that your f---ing legacy?"Authorities moved in as DeSantis abruptly stopped speaking and raised his voice at the WRESTLING ICON HULK HOGAN DEAD AT 71"Hey, stop, stop! Stop! Get out of here! Get outta here!" the Republican governor said, gesturing toward the unidentified heckler continued yelling as he was removed by authorities. The outburst came just three minutes into DeSantis' the time, DeSantis had been sharing a personal memory of watching Hogan's iconic showdown against André the Giant at WrestleMania III. "I remember WrestleMania III. He was up …," DeSantis started, before the heckler interjected with the jab about Alligator recently made headlines for pledging $245 million to Alligator Alcatraz, an immigration detention center in the Florida TAUNTS NEWSOM TO VISIT 'ALLIGATOR ALCATRAZ' AND 'LEARN SOMETHING' ABOUT IMMIGRATIONBefore the incident, DeSantis opened the press event with unscripted remarks about the 71-year-old Hogan's shocking death earlier in the day in Clearwater. "I was sad to see the news that Hulk Hogan passed away today. He was a major icon for anybody in Gen X," DeSantis who was born in Georgia and whose real name was Terry Bollea, grew up in the Tampa Bay area and called Florida home for most of his life."You know, back then, when they would do these big events like WrestleMania, you could go to it … they didn't even have pay-per-view. ... It was closed-circuit," DeSantis HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPFox News Digital has reached out to the governor's office for further comment.

House Speaker Johnson expects "rocky road" for Fed Chair Powell
House Speaker Johnson expects "rocky road" for Fed Chair Powell

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House Speaker Johnson expects "rocky road" for Fed Chair Powell

Washington — House Speaker Mike Johnson said he understands President Trump's frustration with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, but reiterated that he's uncertain about "what the legal parameters are" if the president fires him. Mr. Trump has lashed out at Powell, accusing him of not acting quickly enough to slash interest rates — the Fed has currently set a benchmark rate of 4.25% to 4.5%, where it has remained all year. The president has argued that cutting borrowing costs would boost economic growth, but the central bank has worried that slashing rates could make inflation worse. Powell has also cited the uncertainty of economic impacts of Mr. Trump's tariffs as another factor. Mr. Trump has brought up the idea of firing Powell but later said it's "highly unlikely" he would. "I do believe that he should reduce interest rates, and it's really too much power to be held in the hands of one person or a board," Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, told CBS News' chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett in an interview Wednesday. The decision to raise or lower interest rates is not Powell's alone. Eight times a year, the Federal Open Market Committee, which has 12 members, votes on monetary policy. Mr. Trump nominated Powell as Fed chair during his first term, and then-President Joe Biden subsequently nominated him for a second four-year term that expires in May 2026. "It's a rocky road for him between now and then," Johnson said. "I do believe a lot of economists will say, when the economy is hot, when it's running — and ours is, and we're ramping up lots of great development — that that is not a time for you to reduce interest rates. But I think desperate times call for desperate measures." Johnson said lowering interest rates would help solve the housing affordability crisis. "If you reduce the rates just a small percentage, you can solve that problem," he said. "I think that would be a big thing for the economy and I think he ought to duly consider that. It would save the nation a lot of money and would give a lot more people more opportunity." Johnson made the comments a day ahead of Mr. Trump's visit to the Federal Reserve in Washington. Bryan Kohberger sentenced to life in prison for murders of Idaho students Idaho murders victims' families speak out at Bryan Kohberger's sentencing hearing Johnson says Jeffrey Epstein files controversy is not a hoax Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump can't save Olympic sports through executive order, but he can by funding them
Trump can't save Olympic sports through executive order, but he can by funding them

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump can't save Olympic sports through executive order, but he can by funding them

There is probably little good that can come from President Trump's executive order on college sports given that it's legally questionable, vaguely written in terms of enforcement and an unpredictable stick of dynamite thrown into the middle of legislative movement on the current SCORE Act making its way through the House of Representatives. But rather than trying to limit by presidential edict how and what college athletes get paid, there is something Trump could do that would address one of the major concerns for his administration. Much of the executive order focuses on protecting opportunities for Olympic sport athletes. With athletic budgets getting squeezed by up to $20.5 million going directly to athletes thanks to the House vs. NCAA settlement, there's widespread fear that non-revenue programs across the country will be on the chopping block. And given the NCAA's role as the de facto development system for much of America's success at the Olympics every four years, a significantly smaller allotment of scholarships could mean both fewer educational opportunities for young people and an erosion of America's standing on the medal table. So here's a suggestion for the Trump Administration: Want to leave a legacy for Olympic sports? Use government money to fund them. Dan Wolken: Attempts to curb payments to college athletes keep failing. There's only one way forward. In nearly every country around the world except the United States of America, federal dollars are funding Olympic sports programs. But here, it's the responsibility of the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee and college athletic departments. The former is funded by corporate sponsorships and private donations. The latter is funded by college football. That system, imperfect as it may be, has worked for a long time. If it doesn't work anymore because the economics of college sports have changed, then we need to tweak the system. And if international domination of swimming, track and field and gymnastics is a priority for America, then what's the problem with taxpayers having a little skin in the game? It's not as if public dollars paying for sports is a new concept in this country. You can find the evidence by driving past nearly any pro stadium or arena if you live in a major city. Surely there are some smart people who can figure out how to build a federally funded joint partnership between the USOPC, various National Governing Bodies and the NCAA that coordinates and supports elite athlete development in a handful of Olympic sports that matter most, allowing schools to focus on providing opportunities and educating those who need athletic scholarships to attend college. Admittedly, this idea is a little radical, potentially impractical and rife with unintended consequences. But one way it could work, at least in theory, is that a certain percentage of the top American recruits in the key Olympic pipeline sports would go into a recruiting pool. When they choose a school, this government-funded organization would pay for the four-year scholarship, attach an NIL payment for the athlete to represent the organization and provide a grant to the school as reimbursement for the development cost. To make it more equitable, schools would be limited to a certain number of recruits every year from that elite pool of athletes. The rest of the roster would be filled with either foreign athletes or non-elite American recruits that they must pay for themselves. One obvious criticism of this plan is that smaller schools would get squeezed out even further, given that they're more likely to have a budget crisis than a Texas or an Ohio State and less likely to recruit elite athletes. This might require the NCAA to rethink how it stratifies schools into three divisions and instead move toward a two-tiered model where you either meet certain scholarship and funding standards to be in the Olympic development division or compete in the non-Olympic division, which would functionally be more like intramural or club sports. And maybe none of this is workable. But the point is, it's time to come up with some creative, bold solutions rather than just whining about how schools can't afford to pay for their non-revenue sports anymore. For many, many years, the USOPC has gotten a free ride on the back of the NCAA system, which has only been possible because universities illegally colluded not to share revenues with the athletes that played a significant role in generating them. But the good news is, all the systems are in place to keep Team USA's supremacy intact. There has to be a way for more formal collaboration between the USOPC and the NCAA that can save scholarships, development opportunities and teams from being cut. It just needs the funding. And the federal government can make that happen. Trump can make that happen. If he wants a real and lasting legacy as a president who kept the Olympic movement stable at a time of necessary change in college sports, that's how he can do it. Not an executive order destined to be picked apart and ultimately made irrelevant. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump can't save Olympic sports through EO, but could do this

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store