
S.F.'s controversial fountain deemed ‘hazardous' and will be fenced off indefinitely
Construction of the fence, scheduled to begin at 7 a.m. Monday and continue throughout the week, cast new doubt on the massive artwork's future as a major renovation of the plaza gets underway.
The blocky, 710-ton sculpture has been a lightning rod for public opinion for more than a half-century, but it was a draw for parkgoers who darted through its gushing water and for skateboarders who plied its famed stairs and ledges.
But a pump failure has left the fountain dry for the past year, and the closure seeks to prevent anyone from climbing on the interactive structure or even getting close to it.
It comes as a result of an independent report commissioned by the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department, which manages Embarcadero Plaza, as officials consider how to treat the fountain as part of the planned $30 million plaza renovation.
The 122-page assessment issued last week by architecture firm Page & Turnbull found that the 55-year-old public art is corroding and deteriorating, contains toxic materials including asbestos and lead, and fails to meet seismic safety codes. Based on those findings, Recreation and Park staff judged the sculpture unsafe for the public to interact with and for structural maintenance workers to get inside and repair.
'The fountain isn't just falling apart — it's hazardous,' said Recreation and Park spokesperson Tamara Aparton. 'The structure is cracked, corroded and missing key supports. Add lead and asbestos to the mix, and it's a serious safety risk. That's why we're fencing it off now, to protect the public while longer term decisions are made.'
The new steel mesh security fencing will be 3½ feet tall on the Market Street side, so people can still lean over it and look at the sculpture. In the back, on the Embarcadero side, it will connect to an existing 6-foot-tall fence.
The reinforced concrete artwork by Canadian sculptor Armand Vaillancourt, completed in 1971, is part of San Francisco's Civic Art Collection, and any final decision about its fate will be determined by the Arts Commission after public hearings and possibly a vote by the Board of Supervisors.
The city is in the planning and design phase for an ambitious new park that will combine Embarcadero Plaza and the adjacent Sue Bierman Park in a space spanning 5 acres, twice the size of Union Square.
Since the release of a preliminary rendering of the park that omitted the fountain, Vaillancourt and architectural preservationists have been lobbying for it to stay put.
The report, which included structural analysis by DCI Engineers and hazardous materials testing by North Tower Environmental, did not specify the cost of bringing the fountain up to code and restoring the water element. Rec and Park estimates the cost to fully renovate the artwork, inside and out, at $12 million to $17 million, with ongoing maintenance costs of $100,000 per year.
Boosters of Brutalist architecture and other preservationists have been lobbying on the fountain's behalf, and in May, the 95-year-old Vaillancourt made a trip from his home in Montreal to meet with staff of both the Arts Commission and Rec and Park to plead for his sculpture's preservation.
'They made the new plan, and my monumental sculpture is not there,' Vaillancourt told the Chronicle during a visit to his namesake work. 'I'm here to save that piece of art.'
The fountain is 40 feet tall, and Vaillancourt told the Chronicle it is anchored 40 feet down. It survived the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, which severely damaged the adjacent Embarcadero Freeway, forcing that structure's demolition. The sculptor argued that cleaning and repairing the fountain would return it to its original glory and keep it sound for another century. He also said the fountain is immobile, and demolishing it would cost more than it would to fix it.
But the technical report tells a different story. It states that the fountain sits on bay mud and infill and does not meet seismic safety standards. In a major earthquake, 'The structure is likely to yield and deform beyond that deformation already apparent in some of the stress cracking in the concrete,' it says.
The report also states that parts of the interior support structure are corroded or missing, and asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint were found in parts of the sculpture, including the pump room.
Mechanical and electrical systems 'are beyond their serviceable life' and would need to be replaced, it says.
Disassembling and reassembling the fountain would be 'feasible,' the report says, but 'require substantial effort and time' to perform. The job would be complicated by the large machinery needed to stabilize and move the concrete tubes, and the dangers to workers who would have to climb in and around the pipes to cut them — as well as the precautions needed to prevent asbestos exposure.
'Overall, Vaillancourt exhibits a range of deterioration that must be addressed for the fountain to be enjoyed safely,' the report summary reads.
'That said,' it concludes, 'the fountain does not appear yet to have deteriorated beyond repair, though certain systems and components have, and there may be a variety of approaches to treatment to be explored in future phases that could stabilize and restore it.'
In the meantime, Aparton said, 'the bottom line is that the fountain is no longer safe to approach or interact with.'
Arts Commission spokesperson Coma Te concurred. 'Given the findings presented in the structural report, public safety comes first,' he said in an email. 'The Arts Commission supports Rec and Park's decision to secure the area as they work to complete planning and design work for the plaza.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
As Canada Post workers reject Crown corporation's final offer, next steps are unclear with both sides urged to return to bargaining
Canada Post workers have voted down the Crown corporation's 'final' contract offer, and labour experts say it's unclear exactly what will happen next in the already bitter dispute. Members of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers' urban unit voted the offer down 68.5 per cent to 31.5, while members of their suburban and rural unit turned it down 69.4 per cent to 30.6. Just under 81 per cent of the 53,000 eligible CUPW members cast their ballot. The voting, ordered by the federal government and monitored by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, opened on July 21 and wrapped up Friday at 5 p.m. In an emailed statement, CUPW urged Canada Post to come back to the bargaining table, and said the federal government should encourage bargaining to continue. 'The Government has stated its support for unions and fair bargaining. It needs to back its words with action by supporting a return to the bargaining table by both parties for meaningful negotiations. The best collective agreements are negotiated at the bargaining table,' CUPW said. 'CUPW is committed to staying at the bargaining table and expects Canada Post to do the same. CUPW's Negotiating Committees stand ready to negotiate good, ratifiable agreements.' The Crown corporation, which has said it lost $10 million per day during June, said it's considering its next steps. 'This result does not lessen the urgent need to modernize and protect this vital national service,' Canada Post said. 'However, it does mean the uncertainty that has been significantly impacting our business — and the many Canadians and Canadian businesses who depend on Canada Post — will continue. We are evaluating our next steps.' Those next steps, said labour relations experts, could include layoffs. But it all depends, said U of T professor Rafael Gomez, on whether the government gives a clear signal of whether it wants the Crown corporation to implement the restructuring recommended by veteran mediator William Kaplan in May. 'The government really needs to signal to both sides what it wants to do with the Kaplan report,' said Gomez, director of U of T's Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources. Kaplan's report, combined with rejection of the 'final' offer, means Canada Post management has a more free hand to cut costs than it did, said Gomez. 'What actions can Canada Post take on their own that don't require the government changing its official mandate? They probably now have a mandate to do it if they want to,' said Gomez. The 'final' offer vote, argued Brock University labour studies professor Larry Savage, prolonged the dispute without bringing it any closer to a resolution. 'The vote turned out to be major distraction. It didn't bring the parties any closer to concluding an agreement. And arguably, it only drew them further apart,' said Savage. 'The path to a negotiated settlement is as muddy as ever.' Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu urged the two sides to return to the bargaining table. 'It is now up to the parties to return to the table and come to an agreement that works for both of them,' Hajdu said in a post on X. 'The Government is monitoring this situation closely and expects the parties to reach a resolution as soon as possible.' On May 28, Canada Post made what it called its 'final' contract offer, which included a 13 per cent wage hike spread over four years, as well as a $1,000 signing bonus. Two days later, it asked Hajdu to order a vote on the offer. On June 12, Hajdu ordered the CIRB to organize a vote. The order came roughly a month after a key report from Kaplan, who said the Crown corporation was effectively insolvent. The union has repeatedly criticized the Crown corporation, saying it was trying to avoid a negotiated settlement . The report was done as part of an Industrial Inquiry Commission ordered in December by then-labour minister Steven MacKinnon, ending a month-long strike which began last November. Kaplan also said there's an impasse in bargaining, suggested arbitration wouldn't be a good choice to deal with Canada Post's need for restructuring, and said a 'final' offer would be the third option for an end to the dispute. Kaplan's May 15 report suggested the use of community mailboxes, the elimination of home delivery except for parcels, and getting rid of some post office locations and replacing them with franchises. Kaplan also suggested expanding parcel delivery to seven days a week, with the use of part-time and temporary employees. CUPW members have been in a legal strike position since May 23, but their strike action has so far been limited to a ban on overtime work. CUPW actively encouraged its members to vote against the offer. The Crown corporation has repeatedly insisted that it needs substantial restructuring, and has said it lost $10 million per day in June, calling those losses 'unsustainable.' The association representing Canada's small businesses pleaded with the federal government to extend CUPW's previous contract to avoid another work stoppage. According to the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, small businesses lost between $75 million and $100 million per day during last year's strike. 'This just brings more uncertainty at a time when small businesses are already struggling to plan ahead. We can't keep doing this,' said CFIB president Dan Kelly. A member survey by CFIB last month found that another strike could lead up to two thirds of businesses to ditch Canada Post for good.

Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Leaked Prelude Pricing: Too Pricey for Its Own Good?
The Honda Prelude is making a comeback. On paper, it has all the right ingredients for a frugal sports coupe: sleek styling, a hybrid powertrain, and a nameplate that still resonates with enthusiasts. But according to a leak from Japanese outlet Creative Trend, it might arrive with a price tag that could alienate the very buyers who made it iconic. According to the leak, Honda will officially debut the new Prelude on September 4, and orders in Japan will open the next day. The first production run will be limited to just 2,000 units. The leaked Japanese MSRP puts the 2026 Prelude at ¥6,179,800, or roughly $41,000. That's significantly more than the Civic Type R, which starts at ¥4,997,300 in Japan. It also puts it uncomfortably close to the price of more performance-focused cars. A limited-run ON Edition will also be offered at launch for ¥6,540,000 (about $43,400), with unique details like a black roof and bundled extras. However, buyers must pay in full, are limited to one unit, and cannot resell it after purchase. For a Honda coupe, that's unusually exclusive. The Prelude shares its platform with the Civic, but Honda is treating it as more than a badge-engineering job. Under the hood is a 2.0-liter hybrid system with two electric motors, paired with a CVT. Brakes and suspension are adapted from the Civic Type R, and the Prelude gets heated seats, a digital dash, and a BOSE sound system. Adaptive dampers and 19-inch wheels come standard, along with Google-based infotainment. It seems like less of a reskinned Civic coupe, and more like a grown-up Type R that you can cruise in without needing a chiropractor. Its ¥6,179,800 ($41,000) price tag feels especially steep when compared to what else the market offers. The Nissan Z starts at ¥5,497,800 ($36,500) in Japan, while the BMW Z4 - imported from Austria - starts at ¥4,995,000 ($33,200). Both are rear-wheel-drive and pack more power. The Prelude, by contrast, is front-wheel-drive only and CVT-exclusive. If built in Japan, export fees could bump the US price even higher. Initially, we thought it would go head-to-head with cheaper, enthusiast-approved options like the Toyota GR86 and Mazda MX-5 Miata. But if not, it's hard to see how this version of the Prelude will connect with the younger buyers it seems to target. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Donald Trump's next target could be deal that shields most Canadian imports from tariffs, experts warn
Canada's biggest shield against U.S. tariffs is still intact after Donald Trump's latest trade deadline, but that could change by next year, experts warn, as Prime Minister Mark Carney prepares for a new round of talks with the mercurial American president. While Trump raised the tariff on Canadian goods to 35 per cent in an executive order Thursday night, an exemption for goods which comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) was maintained. The order was signed after Ottawa and Washington failed to reach an economic and security deal. That means, most economists agree, that roughly 90 per cent of Canadian exports will still enter the U.S. tariff-free. But, warned BMO chief economist Douglas Porter, that agreement is up for renegotiation in 2026. 'Even though we're in a relatively good spot right now, I don't think that should give us much confidence in the longer term,' Porter said Friday. With CUSMA-compliant goods facing no tariffs, and sector-specific tariffs of 50 per cent on steel and aluminum, Canadian goods currently face an average tariff in the low single digits. But that could easily change when the agreement is renegotiated, Porter added. The fact that Canadian negotiators weren't able to get any agreement lowering the 35 per cent tariff — or cutting sector-specific tariffs — ahead of Trump's Aug. 1 deadline isn't exactly reassuring either, Porter said. 'It really does raise some questions over how smoothly the renegotiation of (CUSMA) is going to go,' said Porter. 'We're going to come into it with the U.S. holding this 35 per cent over our head.' Shortly after midnight on Thursday, just after the hike came into effect, Carney said he was 'disappointed' by Trump's decision, after Canadian officials spent several days this week hunkered down in Washington meeting with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and representatives of Senate Republicans. 'We remain committed to CUSMA, which is the world's second-largest free trade agreement by trading volume,' Carney's statement read. 'Other sectors of our economy — including lumber, steel, aluminum, and automobiles — are, however, heavily impacted by U.S. duties and tariffs. For such sectors, the Canadian government will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in our industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian and diversify our export markets.' Dominic LeBlanc, Carney's point-person on Canada-U.S. trade, told Radio-Canada's 'Midi info' that Canadian officials have always maintained that they 'wouldn't accept just any agreement.' 'We'd accept an agreement that was in the interests of workers, of the Canadian economy, and at the end of the day yesterday that agreement wasn't in sight,' LeBlanc said Friday, as he was set to leave Washington after meeting with Lutnick on Thursday. The head of the association representing small businesses said Canada avoided the worst-case scenario this week by keeping CUSMA-compliant goods tariff-free, but said the country is not out of the woods yet. In next year's renegotiation, the U.S. could give preferential status to goods which comply with CUSMA — but that doesn't mean they'd still be duty free, warned Dan Kelly, CEO of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business. 'That's absolutely one of the prospects I fear,' said Kelly of the idea that U.S. negotiators would try to put tariffs on CUSMA-compliant goods. 'There's also nothing stopping him from pulling out of CUSMA altogether. That would be the nuclear scenario.' A senior official with the Canadian Chamber of Commerce also said Canadian businesses need to be wary of the CUSMA revamp, and any lingering uncertainty until it's completed. 'The review could start Monday,' said Matthew Holmes, the chamber's head of public policy. 'But we're going to be talking about CUSMA until 2026, and that's the third act of this play.' At the moment, Holmes estimated, Canadian exports to the U.S. face an average tariff of anywhere from 2.9 to five per cent, which still gives this country the best treatment of any American trading partner. Still, Holmes isn't under any illusion that that low rate will continue — even if Canada's access remains better than most. 'I think it's reasonable to expect they come to the table with a baseline tariff,' Holmes said of U.S. negotiators. 'If they establish a floor of 15 per cent on the world and we come in at 10, we're in relatively good shape, but it's still not great for our businesses.' For sectors like steel and aluminum which still face targeted tariffs, the continuation of the CUSMA exemption didn't provide much comfort at all, said Catherine Cobden, CEO of the Canadian Steel Producers Association. 'What we see is some of our largest trading allies, both with us and the United States, accepting and normalizing 50 per cent tariffs,' said Cobden. 'That cannot happen in the case of Canada.' 'We don't have months to wait for a USMCA process. We are in the thick of it now,' she said. Dan Ujczo, an Ohio-based international trade lawyer, said in spite of sectoral pressures, Canada needs to get a clearer sense of the deals the White House has struck with the European Union, Japan and South Korea. 'Canada and Mexico started these negotiations with the best access to the United States in the world. They don't want to put themselves in a position now to accept a deal where that's going to get them less access to the United States than any other trading partner, so I think we still need to see what those other parties have agreed to,' said Ujczo, who has also worked for both Canadian and U.S. governments. Ujczo also said it's time for Carney and other Canadian political leaders to dial down the partisan rhetoric. On Friday, the Conservatives and the NDP accused Carney of failing to improve circumstances for Canadian workers. 'This is a negotiation,' Ujzco said. 'The political campaigns are over now.'