logo
Science has proven why your skin wrinkles. Here is what you need to know

Science has proven why your skin wrinkles. Here is what you need to know

Independent3 days ago
Researchers finally know why our skin wrinkles over time - and Silly Putty can help explain it.
Scientists at New York's Binghamton University say experimental evidence shows that it's a similar process to stretching out a favorite hoodie or t-shirt from overuse. Essentially, aging skin stretches in one direction, contracts in another, and then collapses. As you age, the contraction gets bigger, resulting in the formation of the skin folds and creases.
'If you stretch Silly Putty, for instance, it stretches horizontally, but it also shrinks in the other direction — it gets thinner,' Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Guy German, explained in a statement. 'That's what skin does, as well.'
Wrinkles start to appear after around the age of 25 years old, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Scientists have long believed that skin wrinkles due to genetics, the effects of disease, and damage from the sun. As you get older, your skin cells are replaced at a slower rate, causing the skin's outer layer to thin and forming wrinkles. Lines in the face, including forehead and frown lines, are largely out of our control, as they're caused by repeated muscle movements.
Previous studies, using computational models, have also shown changes in the mechanical properties such as the elasticity and structure of the skin's middle layer during aging. The layer, which contains the proteins elastin and collagen, is the home to hair follicles, blood vessels, and sweat glands. Until now, those changes had never been proven experimentally.
'When I got into this field, that was one of my goals – can I figure out aging?' said German. 'Because if I look at the TV, the radio, online, at shops, I'm being told 1,000 different things about how to improve my skin health, and I want to know what's right and what isn't.'
To reach these conclusions, German and his team used a low-force tensometer to stretch out seven tiny strips of skin from people between the ages 16 through 91, simulating the forces the skin naturally experiences. The tensometer tests the maximum force a material can withstand while being pulled or stretched before breaking. The skin was collected through elective surgery or tissue from cadavers.
They found that the skin has one set of mechanical properties when you're young. As you age, things get a bit 'wonky,' German noted.
'Things degrade a bit, and it turns out the skin stretches laterally more, which causes the actual wrinkles that form,' said German. 'And the reason why that exists in the first place is that your skin is not in a stress-free state. It's actually stretched a little bit. So there are inherent forces within your skin itself, and those are the driving force towards wrinkles.'
The research, which didn't delve into how these forces could be halted, was published recently in the Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.
Of course, there are other things that we know affect the skin that can contribute to appearance over time. Spending too much time outside can result in a nasty sun burn, as well as age the skin prematurely with the same effect as aging naturally.
'If you spend your life working outside, you're more likely to have more aged and wrinkled skin than those who are office workers, for example,' German warned.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kennedy to oust care task force, WSJ reports; HHS says no decision yet
Kennedy to oust care task force, WSJ reports; HHS says no decision yet

Reuters

time13 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Kennedy to oust care task force, WSJ reports; HHS says no decision yet

WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is planning to remove all the members of an advisory panel that determines what cancer screenings and other preventive health measures insurers must cover, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. A Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson said on Friday that Kennedy had not yet made a decision regarding the 16-member U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. "No final decision has been made on how the USPSTF can better support HHS' mandate to Make America Healthy Again," the HHS spokesperson said. The Journal said Kennedy planned to dismiss all 16 panel members in what would be the latest in a series of far-reaching actions by Kennedy, a long-time vaccine skeptic, to reshape U.S. regulation of vaccines, food and medicine. In June he fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a panel of vaccine experts, replacing them with seven handpicked members, including known vaccine skeptics. The USPSTF includes medical experts serving staggered four-year terms on a volunteer basis. Its role in choosing what services will be covered by insurers was established under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The 40-year-old group, whose recommendations provide guidance to doctors, looks at everything from routine breast cancer screening to drugs to prevent HIV infection. The U.S. Supreme Court in June upheld the constitution of the task force and ruled in favor of its recommendation to cover preventive care. Though made up of an independent group of volunteer experts, members are selected by the health secretary without Senate confirmation and it relies on support from the department's Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. A group of 104 health organizations, opens new tab, including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, in early July sent a letter to Congressional health committees, urging them "to protect the integrity" of the task force. The task force has been criticized by some conservatives, opens new tab as too left-leaning.

NFL star Joshua Hines-Allen reveals his seven-year-old son has been battling cancer
NFL star Joshua Hines-Allen reveals his seven-year-old son has been battling cancer

Daily Mail​

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

NFL star Joshua Hines-Allen reveals his seven-year-old son has been battling cancer

Jacksonville Jaguars star Joshua Hines-Allen has revealed his seven-year-old son Wesley is nearly cancer free after battling leukemia for the past seven months. Hines-Allen, who did not travel to Indianapolis for the Jaguars' 2024 season finale in January due to personal reasons at the time, made the emotional announcement on social media along with his wife Kaitlyn. Kaitlyn recalled the initial concern they had when Wesley began bleeding from his tooth after a weekend at Disneyland. 'I was just hugging him 'cause he was crying and he started bleeding even more in the gums, then he started to catch a fever,' she explained. Joshua continued: 'It just didn't get better, and the bleeding was consistent every day.' The couple, who also have another son and daughter together, were then forced to take Wesley to hospital when his symptoms showed no signs of slowing down. The dreaded six-letter word that no parent ever wants to hear: Cancer. Seven months ago, our world stopped when our son, Wesley, was diagnosed with leukemia. As parents, we've held each other through tears we didn't know we had, watching our little boy fight the biggest battle… — Joshua Hines-Allen (@JoshHinesAllen) July 25, 2025 'I was just leaving practice,' Hines-Allen remembered. 'Kate called me [saying], "Hey, we're going to the hospital. I need you to go home and pack a bag for Wes." Not thinking anything of it, really. 'He wasn't feeling good at all still, so he's like cuddling up and we're waiting in the lobby to go back there. We finally get in the back, and then later that night [they] came back, pulled us out and they told us that he had leukemia. 'It just kind of like hit me, and nothing else mattered after that.' Doctors informed Joshua and Kaitlyn that Wesley's journey was going to be a long one, explaining how he will need to undergo regular testing for the next 21 years of his life aside from chemotherapy. Fortunately, Wesley has responded well to the treatment and is now nearing a full recovery, Kaitlyn revealed. He is set to undergo his final chemotherapy treatment in late August at Nemours Children's Health in Jacksonville. 'Wesley is doing great,' she said. 'He's swimming every day, he's running around, he's playing sports.' 'He's got back to being the big brother he is,' Joshua added. Along with the video and the encouraging update on Wesley's progress, Hines-Allen also announced that his foundation, Four One For All, is conducting a season-long campaign called Four One For Hope that aims to give back to four cancer-focused nonprofits throughout the 2025 campaign. 'We recently received the good news that Wesley is on his way to a full recovery,' he said in a separate statement, via ESPN. 'We are grateful to the dedicated team of doctors, nurses, and caretakers who contributed to our son's well-being and counseled us through this time. 'Our goal is to ensure that families going through something similar feel the same level of love and support as we did.' Hines-Allen is now gearing up for his seventh season with the Jaguars after being selected by the team with the seventh overall pick in the 2019 NFL Draft.

US court upholds California's implicit bias training mandate for doctors
US court upholds California's implicit bias training mandate for doctors

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US court upholds California's implicit bias training mandate for doctors

July 25 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday rejected claims that California violated the free speech rights of doctors who teach continuing medical education courses by mandating that they include information on implicit bias. A unanimous three-judge panel, opens new tab of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that because the content of the courses, known as CMEs, is dictated by the state, it amounts to government speech shielded from constitutional scrutiny regardless of who delivers the message. The Medical Board of California requires physicians and surgeons to complete CMEs to maintain their licenses, and approves and accredits courses offered by doctors including Azadeh Khatibi, an ophthalmologist and the plaintiff in Friday's case. A 2021 state law requires that CMEs include information about implicit, or unconscious, bias and the potential for doctors to treat patients differently based on their race, sex or other factors. Khatibi and the nonprofit Do No Harm, which advocates against what it calls "radical, divisive and discriminatory ideologies" in the medical profession, say the law unlawfully forces instructors to endorse speech with which they may not agree in violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. But the 9th Circuit said that speech belongs to the government, as it has more than a century of closely regulating the medical profession and adopting detailed requirements for CMEs. "If physicians are cognizant that their profession is heavily regulated [and] that they attend CMEs primarily to secure credits to maintain their licenses ... then 'common sense' commands that licensees could attribute approved CMEs' content to California," Circuit Judge Jacqueline Nguyen wrote. The panel included Circuit Judges A. Wallace Tashima and Salvador Mendoza. All three judges are appointees of Democratic presidents. Caleb Trotter of Pacific Legal Foundation, who represents Khatibi and Do No Harm, said the libertarian group was disappointed with the ruling and is considering its options. "If continuing medical education courses in California are 'government speech' as the panel decided today, then there is little to stop governments around the country from compelling continuing education instructors in any trade or profession to profess all manner of controversial state-endorsed topics," Trotter said in an emailed statement. Many states in recent years have conditioned professional licenses for doctors, lawyers, teachers and others on completing diversity or anti-racism training, prompting backlash from some professionals and conservative groups. A Michigan dentist represented by Pacific Legal filed a lawsuit, opens new tab in April over a state licensing requirement that healthcare providers complete implicit bias training. Last year, the St. Louis-based 8th Circuit rejected claims, opens new tab that a Missouri school district violated employees' free-speech rights by requiring them to attend anti-racism training. Friday's decision affirms a 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani in Santa Ana, California, that dismissed the lawsuit by Khatibi and Do No Harm. The case is Khatibi v. Hawkins, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-3108. For Khatibi and Do No Harm: Joshua Thompson and Caleb Trotter of Pacific Legal Foundation For the state: Kristin Liska of the California Attorney General's office Read more: US court leery of free-speech challenge to school's anti-racism training U.S. law students to receive anti-bias training after ABA passes new rule

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store