Ireland will be rememberd as a beacon in dark times if we pass the Occupied Territories Bill
has taken a position of empathy and solidarity towards the suffering of
Palestinian
people. But the
Government
needs to continue to back up words with action. This is why passing the
Occupied Territories Bill
, which the foreign and trade committee recommends
should include trade in services
, is so important.
Right now around the world, the same people, politicians and media outlets who obfuscated, approved – and effectively gave licence to Israel to carry out unfettered war crimes by constantly stating that it 'has a right to defend itself', as though that's what it was doing – are currently embarking upon a collective reversal.
The spines achingly visible under the thin skin of starving children have finally prompted a vague expression of another kind of backbone.
[
Israel increasingly isolated as more countries sign up to recognise Palestine
Opens in new window
]
In so many ways, it's too late. In others, whatever on earth can be done to stop the horror being perpetrated on Gaza and the West Bank, whatever action to end Israel's daily massacres and strategic starvation of Palestinians, has to happen. It had to happen yesterday, and since it didn't, it has to happen today. This heel-dragging is incredibly frustrating. But what it also demonstrates is that everyone who called out war crimes and genocide for what they are from the get-go was right.
READ MORE
Famine unfolding in Gaza: 'Children are eating grass and weeds at the side of the road'
Listen |
23:23
A recent, very good
letter to The Irish Times
advocated for the Government to call a national day of protest. Tánaiste Simon Harris posted this letter to Instagram, and wrote: 'The people of Ireland stand with the people of Palestine. We stand for human rights, for international law, for a two-state solution, for aid to flow, for hostages to be released. We stand for peace. We stand for an end to genocide. The suggestion for a national day or moment of solidarity made by Michael Cush in the letter above is sensible and a good idea. It could be powerful if many countries did it together. I will now talk to colleagues on how to make this happen.'
[
Occupied Territories Bill: Irish voters grow more cautious, poll shows
Opens in new window
]
There have been many national days of protest and solidarity over the past two years, with hundreds of thousands of people participating – marching, protesting, rallying, fundraising, cycling, hiking, running, swimming, cooking, holding concerts, markets and matches, producing T-shirts and art – and doing everything they could to raise awareness and funds, all of which makes up an undeniable network of unbreakable grassroots solidarity.
This is already meaningful. While I am all for more protest – and the public does not need Government to give it a seal of approval, although it would be powerful to see all politicians in the Dáil and Seanad hold their own protest or march with those already on the streets – the public cannot draft legislation. The Government needs to do what is within its power.
That means passing the Occupied Territories Bill, including trade in services. It also means ending the transport of weapons of war and their components in Irish airspace – a question which Harris flubbed during an interview on The Late Late Show – and ending the export of components of machinery such as drones from companies in Ireland to Israel. The people are doing their work on the ground and in communities. The Government needs to do its work in Leinster House.
The 41st anniversary of the beginning of the Dunnes Stores strike protesting against apartheid South Africa passed recently. The people who participated in that strike – and Mary Manning was just 21 years old when she took the stand that catalysed it – did so at personal and financial cost. But the real cost of a stand such as this is never money, inconvenience, disapproval, the loss of acceptability or access to cliques of power. It's about what happens when you don't take it. And that's about our soul and integrity. It's about our morality and our ethical steadfastness. It's no surprise then, to see Manning at Palestine solidarity protests 41 years later.
In Omar El Akkad's book One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, he writes, 'The moral component of history, the most necessary component, is simply a single question, asked over and over again: When it mattered, who sided with justice and who sided with power? What makes moments such as this one so dangerous, so clarifying, is that one way or another everyone is forced to answer.'
[
Occupied Territories Bill: former Ceann Comhairle 'confident' Government will include ban on services
Opens in new window
]
We cannot wait to reflect with hindsight. We need to answer that question now. Time and time again, when Ireland has led, others have followed. Recognising Palestinian statehood, for example, was not merely symbolic, it was also a catalyst, one which other countries are following. The Occupied Territories Bill, including trade in services, can act as another catalyst, where Ireland can lead on a global movement of the boycott, divestment and sanctioning of Israel.
The reflection that will then occur in time can be one where Ireland can be seen as a beacon in dark times, a small nation that did everything it could to illuminate a path out of this horrific mire. The people of Ireland protesting have secured their legacy in this moment. Now it's time for our legislators to live up to such aspirations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Nature is worryingly absent from the National Development Plan review
Albert Einstein once said, look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. But even somebody with the cerebral capacity of Einstein would struggle to understand and get their head around the latest National Development Plan. This is a plan which purports to chart the progress of the country over the coming years, but which bizarrely fails to allocate any finance to nature in the middle of, what our current Taoiseach had referred to as, a biodiversity crisis. Low on detail, high on promises was how the Irish Examiner's Mick Clifford Podcast accurately described the NDP. Unfortunately when it comes to nature, it was worse – no detail and not even a promise. The gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund (ICNF) to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming, deeply disappointing and flies in the face of the Government's previous guarantees on nature restoration. The decision is even more concerning given that the Programme for Government committed that the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund will 'ensure ongoing protection for our environment for future generations', while also committing to the development of Ireland's Nature Restoration Plan which requires ambitious nature restoration at land and at sea under the EU's flagship Nature Restoration Law. However, the National Development Plan announced by the Government this week has allocated nothing to nature, instead taking €3.15 billion from the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund for transport, energy and water infrastructure. It appears that the Government is saying one thing but doing the opposite on nature restoration. It has decided to gut Nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund, instead using the budget to fund investment in transport, energy and water infrastructure. The Environmental Pillar has repeatedly criticised the absence of ringfencing for nature within the ICN fund, criticism that has been fully vindicated this week by the Government's shortsightedness. There is now a genuine concern that nature restoration funding is losing out to infrastructure projects that prioritise economic growth over measures to address the biodiversity emergency. It seems like a cynical sleight of hand to use ICN funding for a project that has been talked about for decades in various different forms and which pre-dates the fund. The Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund's purpose is to support State expenditure: where there is a significant deterioration in the economic or fiscal position of the State, and in the years 2026 to 2030, on designated environmental projects. But, while everyone acknowledges that we are living in uncertain times economically, the Government is not proposing to invoke the 'economic deterioration' provision, designed 'to provide for countercyclical capital expenditure in the event of an economic or fiscal downturn' (NTMA), so all the allocated spending for 2026 to 2030 must therefore be for 'designated environmental projects'. Under Section 20 of the Future Ireland Fund and Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund Act 2024, such projects must contribute to the achievement of various national and EU environmental regulations such as on water quality, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, the Birds and Habitats Directives, the National Biodiversity Action Plan and the Wildlife Act. However, the proposed allocation of the €3.15 billion that can be spent before 2030, laid out by Government in the NDP, contains no allocation for nature and looks much more like what the fund would be spent on if the 'economic deterioration' condition was being invoked to ensure 'countercyclical capital expenditure' in infrastructure. This is not an argument against funding for Metrolink. Ireland needs greater investment in public transport – whether it is Metrolink in Dublin, light rail in other major cities, expanded bus routes and active transport infrastructure. But in this case, there is over €100 billion of other money allocated to infrastructure by 2030 under the NDP so that provision clearly does not apply. This is not to mention the billions of euros in Apple back-taxes which Jack Chambers in a budget statement last October said provided the country with one-off revenue that has the capacity to be transformational and address the known challenges that we face in housing, energy, water and transport infrastructure. An artist's impression of the MetroLink rail project's Tara Street entrance. The Government has decided to gut Nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund, instead using the budget to fund investment in transport, energy and water infrastructure. File picture And then, there's the €305 million from the sale of the final AIB shares. It is all the more disappointing therefore that the dedicated Climate and Nature Fund is being diverted from its nature focus to further boost infrastructure spending which is not short of other funding. The lack of any funding for nature in the financial allocations for the NDP is even more shocking and worrying given that the State is currently engaging in an extensive consultation process involving farmers, fishers and environmentalists to inform the development of a national Nature Restoration Plan. The financing of that plan remains a key concern for all stakeholders. Ireland's Nature Restoration Plan has to be underpinned by significant investment. The Government has repeatedly told farmers that any nature restoration under the Nature Restoration Law would be funded and voluntary and that the main burden of restoration would take place on public lands. They have clearly been misleading farmers and Irish society as there is no indication that the Government intends to allocate new and additional funding towards nature restoration. And there is no sign that the Government is willing to take the kind of action that is needed to utilise Coillte and Bord Na Mona lands to the extent that is needed to achieve Ireland's legally binding targets. The Environmental Pillar is calling for the ringfencing of a substantial proportion of the Climate and Nature Fund for spending on nature. And we are in the fortunate position of knowing how much and where to invest that money. Unlike the vague and abstract NDP, a detailed financial needs assessment for biodiversity is available. Ireland needs greater investment in public transport – whether it is Metrolink in Dublin, light rail in other major cities, expanded bus routes and active transport infrastructure. File photo: Sasko Lazarov / The National Parks and Wildlife Service tasked UCD with carrying out a Biodiversity Financial Needs Assessment on how much would be required to reach the targets of the 4th National Biodiversity Action Plan 2023-2030 and international obligations including the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030. This was delivered in 2021 and updated in 2023 to take account of the draft Nature Restoration Law. The study estimated the expenditure required for nature restoration in Ireland at €463.5m per annum, according to the report Funding Ireland's Biodiversity: A Financial Needs Assessment for Biodiversity in Ireland. And last year, Natural Capital Ireland was commissioned by the Irish Environmental Network to deliver a report on high-level recommendations for funding nature restoration in Ireland. This project brought together a diverse group of subject matter experts from academia, business, environmental NGOs, farming, government departments, and semi-state bodies to workshop high-level recommendations for funding nature restoration. These would be good places for the Government to start if it's serious about nature restoration. Nature is conspicuous by its absence in the National Development Plan. Given that we are at a crucial time in relation to the biodiversity crisis in Ireland, it is inexcusable that no funding was earmarked for nature restoration. Biodiversity supports and underpins our society, whether it is food production or clean air or a stable climate. It is imperative that nature is adequately funded. Ciarán Brennan is communications officer at the Irish Environmental Network
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Two-state option is the viable solution for Israel and Palestine
A two-state solution in the Holy Land, whereby a Palestinian nation will be established and allowed co-exist alongside Israel, is once more becoming obvious as the only genuine answer to solving the seemingly endless warfare in the region. The merciless horror that has been visited upon the Palestinian people over the last two years by Israel requires a solution and there is an increasing realisation that the battle lines between moderate and extremist visions for the future of Gaza and the West Bank are becoming clearer. On one hand, you have the views of such as Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his voluble far-right minister for finance, Bezalel Smotrich, backed by the benign inaction of the White House in Washington, trying to bury — literally — the two-state vision. On the other, there are those increasingly nauseated by what the Israeli government is doing, who have finally realised that that goal — of two countries living alongside each other harmoniously — will be dug into Palestinian soil unless they act now. The French and British have indicated their willingness to finally recognise Palestinian statehood, but only because the increasingly genocidal administration in Tel Aviv is demonstrating little enthusiasm for any potential settlement. Certainly, we are going to have to see, amongst other things, a reformed Palestinian Authority come into being if the Israeli government is to stop waging war in Gaza and make the two-state solution workable, but such an outcome is far from being beyond the realms of possibility. Hamas is not helping its cause, or that of the people it claims to represent, by screening images of skeletal hostages. Indeed, it is only buttressing hardline Israeli views. All concerned have to come to the realisation that the two-state option is the only realistic and workable solution and the sooner the increasingly entrenched radical views on either side come to this conclusion, the sooner the bloodshed will stop. Trump silencing critics Not alone has Donald Trump changed the face of global trade with his scattergun tariffs, but he and his administration are engaged in a witchhunt — a favourite word of the US president — against a wide array of American media outlets and outspoken academics, which is threatening the very fabric of democracy there. Trump has effectively silenced much of the media criticism against him personally, and his wider regime, because corporate owners fear his wrath. CBS — along with parent company Paramount — effectively fired the hugely popular late-night show host Stephen Colbert in order to secure administration approval of the sale of Paramount to Skydance. Similarly, Amazon billionaire and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos silenced any criticism of the Trump regime on the editorial pages of his newspaper, because he fears the wrath of Trump will impact on his businesses' profitability. So too American universities — for eons bastions of democracy and free speech — have had to crawl cap in hand to the White House to get funding restored after incurring that wrath because high-profile staffers have criticised his illegal, unconstitutional actions. This silencing of media and universities willing to criticise the notoriously thin-skinned Trump is happening across America. However, the shame is on those media outlets and educationalists that have allowed it. Bezos proudly amplified the Washington Post's 'Democracy Dies In Darkness' tagline when he bought the newspaper. Yet he has himself allowed a darkness to descend on one of America's most valued independent media resources. The silencing of those who have helped America to understand just how alarming this regime has become is a terrible indictment for a country that prides itself on being the leading player in a 'Free World'. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Sprat ban overdue The Government's proposed ban on the inshore fishing of sprat by large trawlers is not before time. In fact, the move might have come a little too late, as overfishing of the species has already had a dramatic effect on the wellbeing of our native maritime wildlife, from sharks, dolphins, and whales, to sea birds such as puffins and kittiwakes. As a result of large-scale fishing, sprat numbers have seen a huge decline, and thus reduced the food supply to a wide variety of native species. The plan to stop trawlers over 18m in size from fishing within six nautical miles of our coastline can only boost sprat numbers, thus improving prospects for other maritime creatures. Sadly, however, the new restrictions will run only from October 1 until September 30, 2026. And while it may be that the authorities here are only trialling this inshore fishing ban and planning for more focused action in the future, it seems Government action may have come too late. For too many years now, the native Irish fishing industry has been treated as the poor relation to the agriculture sector when it comes to doling out necessary financial supports. This has meant that we have allowed our rich maritime resources to be plundered by other nations who care less about the wellbeing of Irish aquatic wildlife. Their fishing fleets, invariably better resourced and equipped than ours, do not discriminate in what they catch and therefore species which they have little use for, are arbitrarily and routinely over-fished. Hopefully, this limited ban will have an immediate effect in conserving a fish vital to our rich and abundant animal kingdom. It seems almost certain, however, this is a subject that will have to be revisited. Read More Irish Examiner view: Cork Crime series prompts us to seek out the roots of criminality
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on policing: domestic violence must be a key focus
Two days after Deputy Commissioner Justin Kelly was confirmed as successor to Garda Commissioner Drew Harris a fresh policing controversy erupted. A review of roads policing found a significant minority of frontline gardaí were uninterested in performing their duties. Indeed, they had a 'blatant disregard' for their jobs, often to the point of hostility. The report is yet to be published, but when the detail of the poor performance and belligerence of the problematic gardaí is laid bare, the controversy will only intensify. The episode is a timely lesson for Kelly as he prepares to take over as Garda commissioner on September 1st, when Harris resigns after seven years. Policing is complex, often problematic, and the next controversy is never too far away. Even if the vast majority of Garda members are committed and hardworking, things will go wrong. Docile, even corrupt, gardaí will create significant problems with the capacity to undermine the force in the eyes of the public. Shocking as the new roads policing revelations are, they have emerged because Garda Headquarters commissioned consultants to carry out a review after receiving claims in an anonymous letter from a Garda whistleblower. It is reassuring that Garda Headquarters was willing to unearth that incompetence and poor service, even if the details are stark. The continuation of that approach, being willing to proactively address problem areas in the force, must be one of Kelly's top priorities. This is a cultural approach he must lead and be seen to lead. READ MORE The Dubliner seems like a formidable policeman, with an impressive record from frontline uniform duties in some very challenging parts of Dublin to leading teams of specialist sex crime investigators. He also has experience leading some of the Garda's special units and was head of the organised and serious crime branch of the force. Though the fight against the gangs must continue, there is evidence from several sources – academia, NGOs and the Garda itself – that domestic and sexual violence is being perpetrated in the Republic at a scale we are only beginning to face up to. Victims, mostly women, are being beaten and terrorised in their homes by controlling men. Harris said this week that violent pornography had become so 'normalised' that sexual offenders were mimicking extreme behaviour in their attacks. As he comes to the job, Kelly is best known for his high profile senior management role in tackling the crime gangs and cartels that run Irish organised crime. This work must go on. However, with the gun feuds having dissipated over the last decade, the Garda must also refocus. Tackling the physical, sexual and psychological violence being inflicted on vulnerable victims across Irish society – most of it waged by men on women – must be a key part of this.
