logo
Colman Noctor: Watching TV with your child can be educational for you both

Colman Noctor: Watching TV with your child can be educational for you both

Irish Examiner08-07-2025
WHEN I raise concerns about how technology affects children's development, I often hear the retort, 'They said the same about television and that turned out OK'. In response, I point out that web-based screen use is entirely different, because the online space is unregulated, interactive, and immersive.
The common perception of screen time has long been negative, and there's justification for it. Excessive screen use has been connected to sleep disturbance, obesity, and even attention difficulties. However, like any tools, screen devices aren't inherently good or bad. It all depends on how they're utilised.
As a psychotherapist who has worked with many families about screen-time concerns, television programmes and movies can be a learning tool, not only for children, but also for parents. This is why I have been consulting with companies that produce television content for children. It is an opportunity to create high-quality material that children can learn from and enjoy.
The most recent project I worked on was a short, animated show, called No Worries (currently available on the RTÉ Player). The show features the voices of comedians PJ Gallagher and Emma Doran, who play a son and mother navigating the worries of returning to school after the summer holidays.
The premise is that worries are normal and, with support and some reframing, we can cope with everyday concerns and overcome them. The series demonstrates that worry is not a disorder, but an expected part of life.
I am also working with the charity A Lust for Life, helping to create a mental-fitness curriculum for secondary schools. Video clips as catalysts for conversation are a key element of the programme's design. Screen-based stories are an excellent way to illustrate personal scenarios and to discuss issues we can relate to without requiring self-disclosure, which can be intimidating.
One of the most vital contributions we can make as parents is helping our children shift from passive to active engagement with screens. When children watch content passively, opportunities for reflection, discussion, and learning are limited. However, when adults co-view, ask questions, and discuss what's happening, a valuable educational opportunity can arise.
Research from the American Academy of Paediatrics (2020) supports joint media engagement with television shows. The researchers found that when parents watch and discuss content with their children, it improves comprehension, critical thinking, and emotional understanding — essential skills as they grow up in an increasingly technological and AI-driven world. Instead of screens being a babysitter, this approach positions them as a starting point for connection and conversation.
This is especially important for younger children, for whom opportunities to develop emotional literacy can be limited. Consider Bluey, for example, a programme often praised for its emotional intelligence and portrayal of gentle, responsive parenting.
If parents and children watch an episode together, and then discuss the characters' feelings or choices, it can open pathways to conversations about empathy, frustration, or resilience. In this way, television becomes a mirror and a guide, reflecting experiences children can relate to and helping them learn how to navigate these emotions.
Stories, whether told through books, films, or whispered at bedtime, are central to how children grasp the world. Film and television typically deliver content in a highly engaging format, using visual and emotional cues that can improve understanding, especially for children who find traditional literacy challenging or who struggle to focus.
Television as a teacher
Dr Jennifer Kotler Clarke, a Texas social scientist, says that well-designed children's programmes can teach social-emotional skills. She notes that the educational children's television series Sesame Street, for instance, has been shown in longitudinal studies to improve early literacy and numeracy, particularly among disadvantaged children. However, its influence goes beyond that, as it also models conflict resolution, inclusion, and kindness.
One storyline that springs to mind is Elmo and Zoe's rock argument. In this episode, Elmo gets frustrated when Zoe insists her pet rock, Rocco, is real and wants him to include it in their play. With guidance from adults, Elmo learns to respect Zoe's feelings, even if he doesn't understand them. It teaches young viewers that you can disagree with friends, but still show empathy and patience. And let's not forget the classic Sesame Street song and book, We're Different, We're the Same, which shows how people may look or live differently, but share the same feelings, needs, and worth. Modelling that diversity is something to celebrate, not fear.
In a 2013 study published in the journal Paediatrics, researchers found that children who watched pro-social television content showed more co-operative behaviour and less aggression when the media they viewed emphasised empathy and positive social interactions.
While it's easy to blame the media for increasing the portrayal of aggression on our screens, the reverse can also be true. The type of media to which children are exposed matters.
Television and film can also act as windows in to worlds that are otherwise inaccessible to children. A documentary about the rainforest can ignite an interest in environmental conservation; a show featuring a character with a disability can promote inclusion and understanding.
In Ireland, a television show created by Belfast's Paper Owl Films featured an autistic character, Pablo, and provided not only representation, but also a way for neurotypical children to understand their neurodiverse peers better.
Many children also watch content on their tablets, so it is advisable that parents sit and watch programmes on these devices as they would on television.
Media representation influences how children perceive race, gender, ability, and identity, and developmentally appropriate shows and movies can be essential tools for learning about these issues. When children watch content that portrays age-old stereotypes, such as Daddy Pig from Peppa Pig or Homer Simpson from The Simpsons, we need to encourage them to challenge, understand the context, and sometimes reject those messages.
The goal isn't to shield children from every uncomfortable idea, but to empower them to think critically about what they see.
Media literacy
Media literacy is quickly becoming one of the most essential skills in the digital age.
Essentially, we want our children to become discerning consumers of content, asking questions like, 'Who made this? What is it trying to tell me? Whose perspective is missing?' Discernment is one of the most important skills we can teach our children in today's world.
Any activity that helps them develop this skill should be encouraged.
This doesn't mean turning every movie night into a TED talk. However, subtle prompts, like 'Why do you think that character acted that way?' or 'What would you have done differently?' can encourage children to pause and think, and, hopefully, over time, this thinking becomes a habit.
It's tempting to want control over our children's media diets, to curate every moment and monitor every screen. However, with the rise of handheld devices that offer unrestricted access to the online world, this has become nearly impossible, just as with treat foods a strict or overly restrictive approach can have negative effects. Instead, parents must act as co-pilots. We need to understand the media our children consume and be willing to enter their world, walking alongside them as they make sense of it.
I strongly believe in the difference between presence and engagement. It's not enough to be in the same room as our children while they're glued to a screen. True engagement means stepping into the story with them.
It involves being curious about why they enjoy a particular programme, which characters they relate to, and how they feel when the plot changes.
When we do this, the screen becomes less of a wedge and more of a bridge, connecting us to our children's inner worlds in a way few other tools can.
You might presume that joint-engagement media watching only applies to small children, but my teenage son loves Brooklyn Nine-Nine, and we often watch it together. When I asked him what he liked about the show, he said he enjoys the sarcastic humour, which aligns with his current view of the world as a 15-year-old, where quick-witted one-line retorts are valuable if you want to survive social banter.
Of course, not all content is created equally. Some shows, often found on platforms like YouTube, are designed purely to exploit attention spans, and are characterised by frantic pacing and consumerist messages. And perhaps a moderate amount of exposure to such content is acceptable or could be part of the give-and-take approach to screen time. The key is balance.
The occasional mindless cartoon, or unboxing of videos (where YouTubers open the boxes of new toys, etc., and review them), or gamer influencer shouting annoyingly as they play a video game on their YouTube channel, isn't going to harm your child. However, if we want to raise thoughtful, empathetic, and curious young people, we need to ensure they also consume media that nurtures those qualities.
As parents, we often feel like we're battling against a digital tide. But perhaps stopping the flow altogether is impossible, so, instead, let's concentrate on learning how to steer through it. Not all television shows and films are hostile; some can be influential cultural texts, rich in meaning, potential, and impact.
When we use television shows intentionally as starting points for conversation or as tools for empathy, they can serve as springboards for curiosity.
So, undoubtedly, over the summer, when your child turns on the television, see it as an opportunity. Sit down beside your child and don't just watch the programme with them: Ask a few questions about it. The learning might surprise you both.
Dr Colman Noctor is a child psychotherapist
Read More
How to plan the perfect teen holiday: Real stories and expert tips for family travel
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shopoff Realty Investments Named One of the 2025 Best Places to Work in Orange County
Shopoff Realty Investments Named One of the 2025 Best Places to Work in Orange County

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Shopoff Realty Investments Named One of the 2025 Best Places to Work in Orange County

IRVINE, Calif., July 29, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Shopoff Realty Investments ("Shopoff"), a national manager of opportunistic and value-add real estate investments, was recently named one of the 2025 Best Places to Work in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal (OCBJ). This marks the firm's third recognition, with previous honors in 2022 and 2023. The OCBJ, in partnership with the Workforce Research Group, created the awards program and county-wide survey in 2009 to honor and recognize the best places of employment in Orange County, California. "We are honored to once again receive this recognition from the Orange County Business Journal and be featured alongside so many impressive organizations," said Shopoff Realty Investments President and CEO William A. Shopoff. "Shopoff Realty Investments genuinely values talent, diversity, and strong company culture. Being named one of the best places to work is a true reflection of the dedication and hard work our team puts into making this company not only a place of business, but a true community and somewhere folks enjoy coming to work every day. It's not by chance we have employees with us for nearly 20 years. Congratulations to the incredible team at Shopoff on this well-deserved achievement." Shopoff is committed to supporting employees' professional growth and well-being, offering a range of career development resources, including paid professional memberships, access to conferences and workshops, and a tuition and certification reimbursement program. The firm also prioritizes work-life balance with generous paid time off, paid holidays, flexible work hours, and summer hours that allow for early Friday closures with full pay from June through August. Shopoff's collaborative culture fosters a high-performing, inclusive environment where long-term growth and teamwork are at the forefront, recognizing and celebrating employee milestones and achievements, ensuring that contributions never go unnoticed. Giving back is also a core part of who Shopoff is, with volunteer opportunities and support for community initiatives like food, clothing, and toy drives throughout Orange County and the surrounding areas. The full list of winners was featured in the OCBJ's issue released on July 7, 2025. More about the 2025 Best Places to Work in Orange County List: To participate, employers must meet eligibility requirements. They must have at least 15 permanent full- or part-time employees working in Orange County and maintain a physical operation within the county. Organizations must be publicly or privately held and must operate as for-profit businesses, nonprofit organizations, or government entities. Additionally, they must have been in business for at least one year as of the program registration deadline. Each employer completed a thorough process which included an evaluation of workplace policies, practices, and demographics, along with an employee experience survey. The combined scores determined the top organizations and the final ranking. To learn more about this process, visit About Shopoff Realty Investments Shopoff Realty Investments is an Irvine, California-based real estate firm with a 33-year history of value-add and opportunistic investing across the United States. The company primarily focuses on proactively generating appreciation through the repositioning of commercial income-producing properties, the entitlement of land assets, and development projects. The 33-year history includes operating as Asset Recovery Fund, Eastbridge Partners, and Shopoff Realty Investments (formerly known as The Shopoff Group). Performance has varied in this time frame, with certain offerings generating losses. For additional information, please visit or call (844) 4-SHOPOFF. Disclosures This is not an offering to buy or sell any securities. Such an offer may only be made through the offering memorandum to qualified purchasers. Any investment in Shopoff Realty Investments programs involves substantial risks and is suitable only for investors who have no need for liquidity and who can bear the loss of their entire investment. There is no assurance that any strategy will succeed to meet its investment objectives. The performance of this asset is not indicative of future results of other assets. Securities are offered through Shopoff Securities, Inc. member FINRA/SIPC, 18565 Jamboree Road, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92612. Contact: Jill Swartz Spotlight Marketing Communications 949.427.1389 jill@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Shopoff Realty Investments Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Apple Slips to Fifth in China Market
Apple Slips to Fifth in China Market

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Apple Slips to Fifth in China Market

Huawei reclaimed the top spot in China's smartphone market in Q2 2025 by shipping 12.2 million units up 15% Y/Y for an 18% share while Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) slid to fifth with 10.1 million units, up just 4%. Canalys analyst Lucas Zhong says Huawei's Nova 14 series, now running HarmonyOS 5.0, helped expand its ecosystem and keep compatibility tight. Vivo followed closely with 11.8 million units (17% share) despite a 10% Y/Y dip from 13.1 million last year, thanks to staggered rollouts across its X200, S30 and Y300 lines. Oppo (including OnePlus) snagged third with 10.7 million units (16%), and Xiaomi notched its eighth straight quarter of growth at 10.4 million units, buoyed by its new in?house XRing O1 chipset in the Xiaomi 15s Pro and Pad 7 Ultra. Overall China's market fell 4% Y/Y as early subsidy-driven demand pulled forward and tapering support weighed on volume. Amber Liu at Canalys says a modest recovery is likely in H2 as consumer sentiment improves and healthy inventory levels meet cautious channel strategies. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Fantasy Football: Preparing for your salary cap draft? Here's how to approach player nominations
Fantasy Football: Preparing for your salary cap draft? Here's how to approach player nominations

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fantasy Football: Preparing for your salary cap draft? Here's how to approach player nominations

By Matt Okada, 4for4 If you've been following along on our 2025 salary cap draft journey, I appreciate you, and welcome back! If you're new here, check out my fantasy football mock draft breakdown and the massive tips and tricks guide published earlier this month. Now, we're going to hone in on a unique aspect of salary cap draft strategy to give you a deeper edge once that clock starts. Though it may seem superfluous on the surface, the player nomination process — particularly the who and when — is a key cog in the complex machine of salary cap drafts. Your approach to player nominations can dictate when and where your budget and the budgets of your opponents are spent ... and can create constructive chaos if wielded correctly. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Let's dive into the various strategies worth considering on the nomination hot seat and when they'll have the biggest impact on your draft. Early Rounds Information Acquisition In the Tips & Tricks article, I emphasized the importance of both knowing player values and knowing when to ditch those values for new ones. The only way to make those active adjustments accurately is to critically observe and evaluate your league on the fly. And the best way to do that is by nominating the players and positions most likely to reveal tendencies early in the draft. This approach can take a variety of forms. Nominate a top-tier running back and wide receiver in the first two rounds and compare the resulting bidding wars to get a sense of positional priority. Nominate a QB1 (or a couple) early on to see whether your league intends to battle for the best or save salary space. Do this with a high-end quarterback that you'd be happy drafting at a discount, just in case. Nominate a couple of rookies to gauge how sharp your opponents are on the 2024 draft class. Ashton Jeanty is an easy name for this strategy, but guys like RJ Harvey and Matthew Golden might reveal even more information. On the flip side, nominate a couple of less flashy "oldies" to judge your league's penchant for the "shiny, new toy." James Conner and Davante Adams are good examples of veterans who could become values in certain leagues. There are many more, but the concept is simple: each nomination you make early on should teach you something about your opponents, whether you end up drafting the player or not. The Best of the Busts For the first several nominations, lean heavily towards players with high average values and significant hype ... that you don't like. Bid a few times to maintain appearances, but eventually abandon the helm and watch your league mates blast away their bankrolls fighting over players you have no interest in drafting. Not only do you deplete your opponents' salary space (setting yourself up for easier buys in the future), but you also delay the players you want into the middle rounds, when discounts are easier to find. As I mentioned in the Tips & Tricks article, you can find "good" players to insert into this strategy by looking for the guys higher in ADP than in the rankings. Tyreek Hill and T.J. Hockenson are a couple of examples based on that approach (although I personally like Hock). But feel free to use your own rankings for this as well. I, for one, don't love Baker Mayfield, James Cook, Garrett Wilson, or Sam LaPorta as much as average value would indicate and will happily encourage my league mates to blow their budgets acquiring them. Don't Dry Your Tiers As awful as my "tiers" pun may be, this approach is crucial to avoid the mistake of "over-patience" in salary cap drafts. If you're targeting a specific player (or group of players), you must nominate them before they're the last one(s) left in their tier. Why? Simple economics. As with many of the nuances of salary cap drafts, this is about supply and demand. As a particular tier begins to dry up, the players in that tier become more attractive and more "necessary" in the eyes of many drafters. If Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen, Jalen Hurts, and Jayden Daniels are all gone, most everyone in the league knows Joe Burrow is the last chance at one of those "elite five" at the QB position. If you were intent on grabbing one, you're now likely to pay more for Burrow than you would have if you took him earlier in the tier. Other notable tiers include the "overall RB1 candidates" that end around Breece Hall at RB14, the "clear WR1s" that end between A.J. Brown and Ladd McConkey in the second round, and the "elite tight ends" that quickly disappear after Brock Bowers, Trey McBride, and George Kittle. That said, tiers extend throughout the entirety of drafts, murky though they may be in later rounds. Try to organize your own personal tiers before your draft, and make sure to manage your nominations accordingly. Middle Rounds Defenses and Kickers You read that right. Defenses and kickers are here in the "middle rounds" section ... though in fairness, this approach works throughout the entire draft. This should only be a strong consideration if your league requires you to draft these positions; otherwise, the better play is often to draft a potential training camp breakout and drop them for your kicker/defense before Week 1. Unlike in snake drafts, where being the first manager to take a defense or a kicker opens you up to ridicule, salary cap drafts can be an excellent opportunity to go for the elite defenses and kickers early on. The reason this strategy works here is that by nominating the best of the best for $1, you get a win-win proposition: either someone outbids you (spending extra budget on a less important position) or you sneak a Brandon Aubrey or Broncos D/ST for the absolute minimum. I don't mind doing this on repeat until, inevitably, the league lets me have a solid kicker and defense for pennies. As I mentioned, this strategy can work anywhere in the draft process, but it's likely to work earlier on when managers are hoarding their budget for "critical" target Leverage This is one of the easiest nomination strategies to execute and can be one of the most valuable through the meat of your draft. Quite simply, as soon as you're confident in your team's build at a position, start hammering that position with your nominations. Did you pick up an elite quarterback early on? Nominate QB1s until the rest of your league has paid their QB tax. Did you manage to pick up CeeDee Lamb, Drake London, and Marvin Harrison Jr. through the first few rounds? Throw up the top available wide receivers for the next several. Similar to the "Best of the Busts" approach, using this positional leverage has a twofold benefit. For starters, you're continuing to deplete opponent bankrolls with safe nominations that you'd have no regrets "losing." Simultaneously, you're continuing to push the players you do need down the draft board, into discount territory. This parlays perfectly into the next approach ... Don't Be Obvious We touched on this nomination strategy in the Tips & Tricks article, and once again, it's pretty simple: don't be obvious about your favorite value picks. In other words ... don't nominate them. Here in the middle rounds, nominations typically trend from the objective "best on the board" to the names that stand out subjectively to each individual manager. If you follow this tendency and nominate the players that catch your eye, your opponents will likely recognize your interest and run up the salary. Instead, let someone else nominate the players you're targeting and then fight for value once they're on the clock. This approach is best applied to players ranging from roughly $5-$25 in expected value (with a $200 budget), not to your deepest sleepers. Of course, you'll need to be prepared for the nominating manager to bid for your player (by the same logic that governs this strategy in the first place), so remember to track their budget and leverage yours accordingly. Friendly Fire If you followed the "Know Your League" tip from the Tips & Tricks piece, this nomination strategy becomes particularly valuable in the middle rounds. Start playing offense by making nominations targeted at specific managers — particularly the ones with hefty remaining budgets. If they have one half of a valuable QB-receiver stack, nominate the other half. If they've punted on running back and a great zero-RB target is still on the board, nominate that back. If they're a diehard Browns fan and don't have a tight end, send your condolences, and then nominate David Njoku. If you know their favorite sleeper, throw them out early to force a bidding war. You get the idea. Some portion of salary cap nomination strategy is assembling your own roster for the best possible value. But perhaps the majority of your approach should focus on filling your opponents' rosters and depleting their budgets, to leave you with the clearest (and cheapest) path to the players you want. Don't be afraid to get your hands dirty and stir up some conflict. Salary cap drafts are the battlefields of fantasy acumen, and it takes some aggression to come out on top. Late Rounds Get Your Guys The later rounds — when pricing drops into the low single digits — are for one thing and one thing only: stocking up your sleepers. You should be using the back quarter of your draft to nominate the players you want on your bench, and ideally, navigating the max bids and remaining budgets of your league mates to land those players successfully. Notably, this is also the one area of the draft where it can be viable and even profitable to nominate players for more than a single dollar. Keep a close eye on your opponents' salary space. If they're down to a maximum bid of $2 and you suspect they might have interest in your sleeper, nominating that player for $2 instead of $1 guarantees you get him. This article originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store