Drone controversy highlights duck impact on crops and water quality
Society needs, wants and desires … food, health and environmental quality.
Mallard ducks, the most common duck in New Zealand, are connected to all three.
Southland farmers have shown examples of ducks destroying significant areas of crops.
Southland's Federated Farmers president Jason Herrick's description, ' the skies are black and the paddocks are black with ducks,' is reminiscent of locusts and farm devastation.
Crops destroyed by pests are a sunk cost to the farmer (soil preparation and seed, for instance) and a cost in terms of replacement feed for animals (sourcing and buying the feed itself and the transport and feeding-out time and costs).
This increases the cost of anything produced by the animal – the meat, milk or wool.
Will the consumer pay the extra?
Or might the people saving ducks be prepared to cover the costs of duck depredation at the farm level?
Health is sometimes overlooked in the impact of ducks on water quality.
Ducks contain a remarkable number of bacteria.
Researchers in Germany reported in 2009 that mallard ducks are an important reservoir for zoonotic E. coli strains.
They were found to be 'a substantial non-point source, especially of strains capable of causing extraintestinal diseases'.
In 2011, researchers at ESR (NZ Crown Research Institute) reported that ducks produce the highest loadings of E. coli and enterococci per bird; Canada geese produce the highest loadings of Campylobacter spp. per bird.
Further work by ESR (a report to ECan in 2015) compared duck production of E. coli with that from dairy cows.
Each duck was calculated to produce 1.17x 10 to the 10 E. coli a day, in comparison with each cow producing 2.01 times 10 to the 9 – an order of magnitude lower.
In contrast, lambs produced 4.53 times 10 to the 11.
Many zeros are involved in these numbers, but the basic order of production per live bird or animal a day was lambs, sheep, ducks, dairy cows, black swans, gulls, and Canada geese.
This explains the findings from the Southland Client Report Template,, again provided by experts from ESR, that waterfowl are the main contributors to faecal contamination of waterways during base flow, but that in periods of heavy rain, ruminant sources increase.
In some areas, human effluent from overflowing septic tanks and sewerage systems has also been recorded.
People are always advised not to swim during and immediately after heavy rain because of debris and high-speed currents, as well as the likelihood of microbial contamination.
Fencing to keep animals from direct access to riparian areas of rivers has reduced the impact of dairy cows and cattle, but in flooding, overland flow can create contamination.
Contamination from birds is always present.
The third consideration is environmental quality.
The origin of the New Zealand mallard population was the importation of game farm mallards from England between 1870 and 1930, and two later imports of birds and eggs from a game farm in Connecticut, USA.
Mallards are not native.
The Acclimatisation Societies (now Fish & Game) released over 30,000 mallards throughout New Zealand before 1974.
The mallards were then (and are now) the most common waterfowl in the country and had hybridised with the native grey duck.
Grey ducks are now 'nationally vulnerable': they have been competitively excluded by mallards.
The drone flyers might well have as their defence that their aim was to prevent animal cruelty.
That is also the aim of the hunter and their dogs – a clean shot and retrieval. There is pride taken in both.
Like many introduced species, mallard ducks have no natural predators in New Zealand; no foxes, bears, or large cats, for instance, and though ferrets are active in some countries, New Zealand is trying to control them because of other issues, such as native birds.
Alternatives are poison or increased food prices.
They are out of control, and the duck equivalent of kryptonite has not been identified.
The spy-drone was not faster than a speeding bullet, as in the 1940s Superman radio show (Superman was also deemed to be more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound.…).
The question remains about its purpose.
Ducks are fun to feed (though councils request that one doesn't) and ducklings are delightful, but they are associated with negative factors in food, health and environment – and the cost of the negatives is not being factored into any equation.
The animal welfare issues of too many ducks vying for a limited feed source (starvation and disease) have also not been considered.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 days ago
- Scoop
Gore 'Not Out Of The Woods Yet'- Nitrate Level Linked To Increased Risk Of Preterm Birth
Greenpeace Aotearoa has tested a sample collected from the Gore town supply, which returned a result above 5 mg/L nitrate (NO3-N), a level associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. Above this level of nitrate, the New Zealand College of Midwives recommends that pregnant people consider finding another source of water because of the increased risk of preterm birth. The sample was collected on the morning of Wednesday 23 July and tested with an optical spectrometer, which is standard equipment for testing nitrate in the field, and followed the organisation's standard testing procedures which have been externally reviewed by GNS science. While the township's do-not-drink notice has been lifted, Greenpeace freshwater campaigner Will Appelbe says there is still a risk to public health. "Gore is not out of the woods yet and we're concerned about the risk to pregnant people and babies in other rural communities. Many rural communities are experiencing nitrate contamination caused by intensive dairying. Gore was issued a do-not-drink notice last Friday after the town supply exceeded the maximum allowable value (MAV) of 11.3 mg/L for nitrate. This was set in the 1950s to avoid blue baby syndrome, but it doesn't take into account the more recent health science that has linked several health risks with long-term exposure to nitrate at levels below the current legal limits, including bowel cancer and preterm birth. "We know the source of this pollution. It's the overuse of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser in intensive dairy farming, led by Fonterra and their lobbyists at Federated Farmers. This is an industry that isn't working for anyone except for the industry itself. Dairy pollution is contaminating people's drinking water. Meanwhile, New Zealanders are paying through the nose for a block of butter at the supermarket." "But instead of taking action, Luxon's government has proposed weakening freshwater protections at the behest of Federated Farmers - which will worsen the drinking water crisis." "It's about time that Federated Farmers were accountable to the people of New Zealand. Fed Farmers are opposing every measure to protect freshwater, and they should do right by the rural communities whose drinking water that they and Fonterra have polluted."
NZ Herald
22-07-2025
- NZ Herald
Whanganui West Catchment Group to reveal results from three years of water testing
'On the other hand, E. coli bacteria continue to cause concern, and the group is refining its surveying to try to find better ways to reduce that persistent problem,' it said. 'The work is separate from Horizons' [Regional Council] monitoring, which gives rise to warnings in summer to bathers at Kai Iwi and Ototoka.' Earlier this year, swimming at Kai Iwi was off-limits for several days, after detection of high levels of enterococci bacteria. Whanganui Region Catchment Collective (WRCC) co-ordinator Natasha de Rose said volunteers undertook the sampling at 82 sites. The WRCC is the umbrella organisation for the West Whanganui group. 'We always need more buy-in, but there are certainly some farmers who are pulling their weight and doing a lot of stuff on their properties,' de Rose said. 'I think farmers got sick of the narrative that they were causing E. coli in swim spots, and that's been a big driver for them behind the scenes.' The Mowhanau Stream is one of five in the Whanganui West catchment. Photo / NZME Russell said the group was 'a very small cog in the big picture'. 'It all feeds into what New Zealand Inc is getting for produce overseas,' he said. 'More and more of our red meat customers, the likes of [United Kingdom supermarket] Sainsbury's, are starting to ask about the environment from which their meat is being supplied and whether it's being looked after.' He said, historically, there had been minimal water testing in the area. 'This report is forming the basis of what our next actions will be. 'It is a long-term thing we're looking at. We have to hold our position in terms of water quality, and try and improve it.' De Rose said funding for the group's work came from the Ministries for Primary Industries and Environment via the WRCC, with additional funding for sampling and reporting from Wai Connection. 'There are a few catchment groups up and running now, like Okoia and a little one in the back of Brunswick down to Papaiti. 'They are up country as well, through to Taumarunui and beyond. 'We are all trying to do the same things, but working together makes it a bit easier.' Russell said in the 1970s and 1980s, the focus in the Whanganui West area was to clear land and grow grass. 'The focus for this generation is actually looking after the environment, waterways and biodiversity. 'We'd like to see more farmers getting involved, and we'd like more members. The more the merrier.' The report will be presented at the Mowhanau Beach Community Hall on July 24 at 7pm. Mike Tweed is a multimedia journalist at the Whanganui Chronicle. Since starting in March 2020, he has dabbled in everything from sport to music. At present his focus is local government, primarily the Whanganui District Council.
NZ Herald
20-07-2025
- NZ Herald
Kāeo's decade-long boil-water notice raises health concerns
Valentine said the colour of the water had improved in recent years, but it was still no good for drinking. In July 2015, Northland's Medical Officer of Health issued a boil-water notice because of levels of E. coli bacteria found in the water. That notice had never been lifted. Kāeo Water supplies just under 30 customers – a mix of homes, businesses and public facilities such as the toilets and community hall – on State Highway 10, the town's main street. Rather than face the cost of constantly boiling water, the Valentines have rigged up a tank for catching rainwater and every day they use it to fill up bottles for drinking water. Valentine said she had organised public meetings and lobbied the council in the past, but little had changed. 'The water needs to be drinkable out of the tap, for the kids that go to the community hall, and the people coming through town. They don't know that it's not drinkable. The businesses in town, a lot of them have installed their own rainwater tanks because they just can't rely on the water.' Kāeo chef Anna Valentine says her children have never known what it's like to drink out of a tap. Photo / RNZ Until the year 2000 Kāeo's water supply was owned by the Far North District Council. The council sold it to Doubtless Bay Water, which quit in 2008, saying it was not economically viable. It was then taken on by Wai Care Environmental Consultants. Kāeo Water operator Bryce Aldridge said it was difficult keeping up with ever-changing drinking water standards, especially for a small scheme like Kāeo's. 'And the Government's not assisting with the upgrading that's needed to meet those standards, because of the size of plant that we are.' Aldridge said he had never put up the price of water, and only a small minority complained about the quality. 'It's actually only one client … I have spoken to the other clients, and this is their fear [if the system is upgraded]: the water price going up, and the battle of having to put fluoride in our water, so a boil water notice actually protects us there.' The Ministry of Health has recently ordered the Far North District Council to add fluoride to its Kerikeri and Kaitāia town water supplies, but a spokesperson told RNZ the ministry did not order fluoridation of privately-owned water supplies. Aldridge said the discolouration was caused by iron and manganese naturally present in the source water from the Waikara Stream. Removing iron and manganese completely was difficult and required multiple treatment stages. He said the next step for the water scheme would be to move the plant to a new location, and introduce UV treatment. He told RNZ he had secured a new location just last week, but that had yet to be confirmed. Kāeo's private water treatment plant, on School Gully Road, draws from the Waikara Stream. Photo / RNZ Aldridge said he welcomed media scrutiny because it had caught the attention of Taumata Arowai, the national water authority, and had bumped Kāeo's water supply up its priority list. Taumata Arowai head of operations Steve Taylor said even a small private drinking water supply such as Kāeo's had to meet the requirements of the Water Services Act 2021 and other rules. The authority had sent a letter outlining its expectations in March, but a meeting scheduled that month had been cancelled by the supplier. Expectations included boil-water notice communication with consumers, and providing a confirmed, funded plan for achieving compliance with legal requirements. Taylor said those expectations had not yet been met. The authority had set a new date of July 23 for meeting the supplier and inspecting the plant. Taylor said boil water notices were only meant to be a temporary solution, because over time people could forget and risked drinking contaminated water. The authority could take action if it believed a supplier was not responding adequately to concerns about unsafe drinking water or failed persistently to comply with legal requirements. That could include requiring the local authority, in this case the Far North District Council, to take over the supply. All Kāeo Water's customers are based on the Far North town's main street. Photo / RNZ Te Rūnanga o Whaingaroa pou arahi, or cultural manager, Raniera Kaio said the scheme had suffered from buck-passing between the council and the operator as to who was responsible. He believed the only way to fix it was by the council, the operator and iwi working together. 'My personal opinion, indeed my professional opinion, is that the operator lacks the resources to fix it. Lacks the resources to fix it alone. It has to be a collaborative solution.' Kaio said the water plant had been inundated in the 2007 floods and never fully recovered. The boil-water notice also had a financial effect on the rūnanga, which spent $300-$400 a month on bottled water for staff and manuhiri [visitors]. He said Kāeo's water woes were emblematic of the neglect suffered by many rural, Māori-majority towns. The effects went well beyond the cost and inconvenience of having to boil water or buy it by the bottle. 'It's about the dignity of Kāeo, the mana of Kāeo. And whānau in Kāeo have lived with daily anxiety around whether their water is safe to drink, that really affects not only your health, your hauora [wellbeing], but it sort of affects your own self-worth and your identity as being from Kāeo.' However, Kaio said he was buoyed by news that Taumata Arowai was about to meet the operator, and hopeful a solution could be found. Meanwhile, Anna Valentine just hoped one day soon her children would be able to drink water out of the tap. 'I mean, we live in New Zealand, but it feels like we're in a bit of a third world country up here in Kāeo, having to go out every day and fill our plastic bottles from a water container that we collect off the roof. It's just crazy, actually.' Kāeo's boil-water notice is not the longest-running one in the country. A 2024 Drinking Water Regulation Report stated 74 long-term 'consumer advisories' – which include boil-water notices – were in place at the end of last year, and 20 council supplies serving a total of 7000 people had advisories in place for three or more years. 'The persistence of long-term consumer advisories represents a significant regulatory and public health challenge,' the report stated.
