U.S. to implement Trump's executive order restricting Birthright Citizenship
The SSA intends to enforce an executive order signed by President Trump limiting automatic birthright citizenship.
The order applies to children born after February 19, 2025, and restricts citizenship to children of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.
This policy shift could significantly affect immigrant populations, particularly their access to citizenship and social benefits.
The executive order, titled ' Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,' was signed on January 20, 2025. It is expected to apply to children born after February 19, 2025, with enforcement scheduled to begin on July 27, 2025.
This move will alter decades of established practice that grants citizenship to nearly all individuals born in the U.S. and will affect a wide range of foreign nationals, including African migrants, students, and professionals residing legally or temporarily in the United States.
According to Reuters, the SSA's plans signal the administration's readiness to proceed with enforcement as soon as legal challenges are cleared.
Under the current constitutional framework, children born in the U.S. are automatically granted citizenship regardless of their parents' immigration status. However, the new policy would limit that right to children born to U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.
' With respect to citizenship, an SSN applicant may currently demonstrate U.S. citizenship by providing a birth certificate showing a U.S. place of birth, ' the SSA stated.
CNN reports that, 'Several rulings issued by federal courts this month have ensured that that policy will not take effect for now, and the guidance documents acknowledge that reality.'
However, preparations for implementation are underway. 'The government is preparing to implement the EO in the event that it is permitted to go into effect,' a USCIS memo read.
Key Changes to Citizenship Verification
Previously, Social Security Numbers (SSNs) were issued to U.S.-born applicants based solely on a birth certificate indicating a place of birth within the country. Under the new order, that will no longer be sufficient.
Applicants born after the EO's implementation date will be required to provide proof that at least one parent was a U.S. citizen or a lawful permanent resident at the time of their birth.
'To comply with the EO, SSA will require evidence that such a person's mother and/or father is a U.S. citizen or in an eligible immigration status at the time of the person's birth, ' the SSA stated.
The Social Security Administration will revise its internal manuals and application procedures to reflect these changes.
Updated procedures will require applicants to submit one or more of the following:
1. Certificate of Naturalization
2. Certificate of Citizenship
3. U.S. Passport issued under the EO
4. U.S. Citizen Identification Card issued by the Department of Homeland Security
5. Consular Report of Birth Abroad
6. Other verification from the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, or federal/state court records
7. A U.S. birth certificate plus evidence of a parent's U.S. citizenship or eligible immigration status
The Security administration added that children of green card holders may also qualify, but only with verified documentation such as a Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551), a Machine Readable Immigrant Visa (MRIV) with a Temporary I-551 stamp, or relevant DHS records.
' Once the EO takes effect, a birth certificate showing a U.S. place of birth will not be sufficient documentary evidence of U.S. citizenship for persons born after the EO takes effect, ' the SSA said.
Implications for African Families
The policy shift is expected to impact thousands of African nationals living in the U.S. on temporary work or student visas, including those under H-1B and F-1 classifications.
It may also affect African families who travel to the U.S. for childbirth or educational purposes, expecting their children to gain automatic citizenship.
For African countries with large diaspora populations in the U.S. including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa; the loss of automatic citizenship rights could have long-term impacts, including reduced access to public benefits, limited legal protections for children, and potential disruptions to remittance flows and transnational family stability.
On the brighter side, CNN reports that immigration rights advocates have filed legal challenges against the policy and have emphasized that the newly released SSA and USCIS guidance is 'meaningless' so long as the courts continue to block enforcement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former UK PM Johnson rejects China's bullying of Taiwan, calls for deeper ties with West
TAIPEI (Reuters) -Former British prime minister Boris Johnson said on Tuesday that Taiwan did not deserve to be bullied by China and urged the West to build economic and political relations with Taipei in the face of Beijing's campaign against the democratic island. Johnson is the third former British prime minister to visit Taiwan, after Liz Truss in 2023 and Margaret Thatcher in the 1990s, and his trip comes at a time when Britain and China are seeking to further stabilise ties as Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to visit Beijing later this year. Britain, like most countries, has no formal diplomatic ties with Taiwan but the two governments have close economic and culture exchanges. Beijing has in recent years ramped up military and diplomatic pressure campaigns against Taiwan, including daily military activities near the island, to assert territorial claims the government in Taipei strongly rejects. "In very difficult and intense times, this is the moment for all western countries to build economic and political relations with Taiwan, not to tiptoe away from Taiwan at the pressure from any other country," Johnson told Taiwan President Lai Ching-te in the presidential office in Taipei. "There's absolutely no case for the current Chinese bullying of Taiwan. This is a free, peaceful society. It does not deserve to be intimidated in this way. There's no point in it and I hope it stops as soon as possible," Johnson said in video footage by Lai's office. China's Taiwan Affairs Office did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Beijing has previously condemned visits by British lawmakers to Taiwan for what it calls interference in China's internal affairs. Johnson was invited to deliver a speech at a security forum by Taipei-based think tank, the Prospect Foundation, which was also attended by Lai earlier on Tuesday. At the forum, Lai vowed to build a "democratic supply chain" with allies by deepening economic cooperation and said he would boost Taiwan's defence spending to more than 3% of its GDP next year. "I'm confident that if democracies can join hands in creating more robust, more resilient global democratic supply chains, we can spur even more economic prosperity and further consolidate our democracy," Lai said. A British Royal Navy patrol vessel sailed through the sensitive Taiwan Strait in June. (Reporting By Yimou Lee, Angie Teo and Yi-chin Lee; additional reporting by Ryan Woo; Editing by Michael Perry)
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: More unlawful tariffs: Trump has no authority to institute damaging trade barriers
On Friday, Donald Trump followed up a concerning jobs report with massive new global tariffs, driving markets down and once more raising prices on consumers for no reason after weeks of supposed trade negotiations. Like with his first round of import duties, announced in the Rose Garden on his ludicrous April 2 'Liberation Day,' these tariffs are not only chaotic and destructive, but they're illegal. The president is leaning on a 1977 law meant to be invoked for targeted financial actions in certain emergency circumstances to reshape trade globally. Just the day before these newest tariffs were implemented, the administration's lawyers had been grilled by the 11 judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, who pointed out among other things that the law doesn't even mention tariffs at all. If the plaintiffs, made up of states and businesses, need anywhere to look for inspiration and evidence for their legal arguments, they don't have to look much further than Trump's own ramblings and social media feed, where he constantly tells the whole world that he is engaging in the tariff actions for all manner of reasons completely unrelated to any economic objectives. So far, he's threatened tariffs over Brazil's domestic prosecution of its former president Jair Bolsonaro and over Canada's intent to recognize a Palestinian state, among other things. This is a real disparate set of rationales, but what they have in common is that they are ideological battles probably drawn from something Trump saw on TV and have nothing to do with correcting a supposed trade imbalance with those countries, already an incredibly flimsy argument to begin with. Don't just take our word for it; the Manhattan-based U.S. Court of International Trade — you know, the judicial entity set up specifically and explicitly to have expertise on these matters — already struck down most of Trump's tariff regime on the grounds that it was unlawful. That ruling has been stayed for now, but the evidence just keeps piling on that Trump is significantly exceeding his authority. Unfortunately, even if this insanity were to be fully struck down tomorrow, we've had months of chaos that has indelibly damaged trade relationships as well as general diplomatic relations. The world is not going to wait for the U.S. to hash out its chaos, and other countries are already moving to reorient parts of their manufacturing and trade schemes to circumvent an unreliable United States. Of course, this seems like one more issue headed at some point to the U.S. Supreme Court, perhaps the shadow docket where the court these days like to conduct its unsigned pro-Trump business. It's long since become clear that the high court is more interested in ideological outcomes than the uniform application of the law, but even then, siding with Trump here would be farcical. This is the exact same court that just last year ruled that Joe Biden attempting to clear some student debt by invoking emergency powers in the context of the COVID pandemic — a real global catastrophe that killed countless people and crashed the economy while putting millions out of work — was an unlawful exercise of authority. If that's the case, but Trump is in his rights to wildly alter tariff policies at a whim in service to random political grievances around the world, then the law truly means nothing anymore. Let's stop this madness while we still can, before economic forces take it out of our hands. ___


Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Threatens India Over Russian Oil; Aramco & Infineon Report
Bloomberg Daybreak Europe is your essential morning viewing to stay ahead. Live from London, we set the agenda for your day, catching you up with overnight markets news from the US and Asia. And we'll tell you what matters for investors in Europe, giving you insight before trading begins. On today's show, Donald Trump threatens to "substantially" raise tariffs on India for continuing to buy Russian oil. A defiant India hits back, saying the US and Europe are still buying Russian energy too. Meanwhile Switzerland says it's determined to win over the US government, and reduce the shock 39% tariff rate announced last week. Also on the programme, tech stocks and dip-buying power the S&P 500 to its biggest rally since May. And on the earnings front, Aramco profit falls for a 10th straight quarter, as lower oil prices weigh on its balance sheet. While Germany's Infineon says uncertainty around tariffs means sales will be flat. (Source: Bloomberg)