logo
Senedd passes legislation to protect Welsh communties from disused tips

Senedd passes legislation to protect Welsh communties from disused tips

A Bill that provides a "crucial step forward' in protecting Welsh communities from disused tips, both coal and non-coal, has been passed by the Senedd.
The Disused Mine and Quarry Tips (Wales) Bill, the first legislation of its kind in the UK, will create the Disused Tips Authority for Wales to address safety risks posed by Wales's industrial past.
The new Authority will become a Welsh Government sponsored body with powers to:
Ensure disused coal and non-coal tips no longer pose a threat to communities through instability
Establish a comprehensive system for assessment, registration, monitoring and management of all disused tips
Following the successful vote in the Senedd, Deputy First Minister Huw Irranca-Davies said: "This legislation represents a crucial step forward in protecting Welsh communities.
'We've seen the impact of tip instability following extreme weather events, including the major landslide at Tylorstown during storms Ciara and Dennis in February 2020, and more recently at Cwmtillery in 2024 after storm Bert.
'We now have robust legislation in place and a structured approach to managing disused coal and non-coal tips to ensure they are not a threat to our communities.
'Wales is leading the way in addressing these challenges and ensuring our communities are safe for generations to come."
The Welsh Government said: "Wales has a proud mining heritage, and its legacy is visible across our landscape. There are 2,573 disused coal tips in Wales, and whilst they are predominantly in the South Wales valleys, this issue impacts both West and North Wales, as well as there being an estimated 20,000 other disused tips (i.e. not coal) in Wales.
"Work is already underway towards setting up the Authority, and consideration is being given to its location, systems and governance to ensure all aspects of the Bill are captured and delivered on.
"The appointment process for a Chair and Chief Executive will commence shortly and both will be in post before the Authority is formally established on 1 April 2027.
"In the interim, the Welsh Government's coal tip safety programme of work carries on and continues to work closely with local authorities, Natural Resources Wales and the Mining Remediation Authority to deliver an effective inspection and maintenance regime across Wales."
The Welsh Government said it provides funding to local authorities and Natural Resources Wales to undertake works on disused tips, through the Coal Tip Safety Grant scheme. This includes funding work which the local authority might undertake on privately owned tips.
On March 20 2025, the Deputy First Minister confirmed in 2025-26, the Welsh Government is providing £34 million for public partners to undertake works on 130 coal tips across Wales – to take investment beyond £100m in this Senedd term.
The recently confirmed additional allocation from the UK Government will mean over £220m will have been invested in coal tip safety.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police race action plan for England and Wales could be sidelined, monitor says
Police race action plan for England and Wales could be sidelined, monitor says

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Police race action plan for England and Wales could be sidelined, monitor says

A police race action plan for England and Wales, which was partly a response to the Black Lives Matter movement, is at risk of being deprioritised when central funding finishes, a monitoring group has said. The Independent Scrutiny and Oversight Board (ISOB) fears that local forces have not been adequately prepared to take over responsibility for the plan when central police funding and oversight ends at the end of March next year. It is the ISOB's last year of oversight, raising concerns about whether there will be adequate scrutiny of the plan, which aims to tackle prejudice directed against the public and officers. Abimbola Johnson, the chair of the ISOB, said: '[The plan] was developed by the police itself, which to their credit was done in 2020 under the Conservative government, which didn't prioritise work that looked at anti-racism. But it also meant that there wasn't that central government oversight of the programme and there never has been. 'Without that happening and then without the central [policing] team, there are questions as to how it's going to remain a priority. What's going to be the impetus to continue to invest in this work?' The ISOB's annual report, published on Thursday, says: 'As it stands, the programme is not ready to be handed over to local forces and national police leads.' Among the concerns are that the plan's aims are not clearly understood across policing and forces do not fully understand what is required of them. The report welcomes the development of a 'maturity matrix', a first-of-its-kind public-facing dashboard to track anti-racism delivery against outcomes at force level, by the College of Policing and the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC). But the ISOB expressed concerns that it was not yet operational. 'It makes things more transparent but it's a very, very complex piece of work and that requires them to start training officers on how to use it, making sure that non-police bodies know how to access it, making sure that it speaks for them in a way that helps them with their work around accountability,' Johnson said. Continuing concerns identified by the ISOB include racial disparities in stop and search, use of force and workforce outcomes. They also include poor data collection on ethnicity, limiting the ability to track progress or to spot harm. In the report, the chief constable of Avon and Somerset police, Sarah Crew, says: 'Acknowledging institutional racism is only the starting point. What matters is what we do next, and whether our actions match our intentions.' The ISOB wants the Home Office to take a hands-on approach with local forces to ensure a focus on anti-racism, address data gaps, create an inspection framework to assess compliance with the plan and coordinate expert-led scrutiny of it. The plan's programme director, Alison Heydari, a temporary deputy assistant Met commissioner, said black representation among police officers was up 25%, dismissals for discrimination had quadrupled and race disparity had fallen in relation to a range of police powers since the plan was launched. But she added: 'More must be done, especially as local forces take greater ownership of the plan from next year. The police race action plan is a long-term commitment that policing must continue, which will benefit all the communities we serve.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Racism has no place in policing and it is vital that forces reflect the diverse communities they serve. We support the aims of the police race action plan and are committed to working with police leaders to ensure necessary progress is made.'

Why Starmer's punishment beating won't bring Labour MPs to heel
Why Starmer's punishment beating won't bring Labour MPs to heel

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Why Starmer's punishment beating won't bring Labour MPs to heel

Join the dots and it is not hard to work out what is going on with the punishment announced on Wednesday for seven Labour MPs who voted against the welfare bill. Sir Keir Starmer's personal authority took a major hit a fortnight ago when 127 Labour MPs – one in four – put their names to an amendment blocking his welfare cuts package. A year into power, a Prime Minister who won a House of Commons majority of a similar scale to Sir Tony Blair's was struggling to pass a proposed law he dubbed morally right and fiscally essential. The episode revealed deep failings in Downing Street's political intelligence operation, hubris among the Starmer inner circle and the dangers of rushing through sensitive reforms to save money. Most of it all lit up, in bright technicolour, a newfound willingness of an otherwise pliant Parliamentary Labour Party to speak back to the boss. Something, as they say, had to be done. The 'suspended four' And so we have the first step: four Labour MPs stripped of the whip – meaning they are now forced to sit as independents until further notice – and another three losing trade envoy appointments. Why not action against all 127 Labour MPs who put their name to the rebel amendment? Or all 49 ones who, even after the welfare bill was gutted of almost all savings, still voted against it? The explanation is in the numbers. The former would have wiped out the Government's majority, the latter taken a huge chunk from it. Action on that scale was unthinkable. So a more measured approach was needed, an attempt to show that defying the Prime Minister was not without consequence while also minimising the backlash. And so the four persistent critics of the Government have been singled out and scalped. They had committed 'repeated breaches of party discipline', to use the formal explanation briefed out by the Labour Party. This was true. Rachael Maskell has become one of the most vocal critics of Sir Keir on the Labour backbenches, penning articles about how to rebel and giving interviews about her newfound role as a thorn in the side of No 10. Chris Hinchliff was dubbed 'Nimby-in-Chief' by colleagues, recently leading an amendment to the Government's planning bill – one of Sir Keir's flagship pieces of legislation – to avoid the watering down of environmental protections. He is now tipped to join the Greens. Brian Leishman has hammered ministers over the closure of the Grangemouth oil refinery. Neil Duncan-Jordan challenged many cuts, including pushing to postpone the Winter Fuel Payment reduction. But the argument also gave No 10 cover for why many more rebels have not been reprimanded. Only those who crossed over some unspecified extra threshold got slapped down. We have seen this play before. In fact, just a year ago, when seven Labour MPs were stripped of the whip after voting to end the two-child benefit cap, defying the Government whip. It was a divide and conquer tactic. Four eventually returned to being Labour MPs, two remain on the naughty step as independents and the seventh – Zarah Sultana – has quit the party, vowing to start her own Left-wing movement. The message being sent is not subtle. 'Shoot one to educate thousands', as a former member of Team Starmer put it on Wednesday. But will it really work? PM under threat from Reform The Starmer of July 2024 is not the Starmer of July 2025. The former was at the height of his political power, having swept into office weeks earlier on a wave of anti-Tory sentiment, ending the party's 14 years all at sea in opposition. Now, Downing Street is struggling to show it has a plan for stopping Reform's poll-topping support surge which has got scores of Labour MPs in narrowly won seats jittery. Indeed, the real bite of the welfare rebellion came not from it being the 'usual suspects' but that concerns about the cuts package were so widespread they could be found across Labour's many factions. Will Dame Meg Hillier, the widely respected chairman of the Commons Treasury Select Committee who led the negotiating delegation to discuss the terms of the Government's climbdown, hesitate from rebelling again after this disciplinary action? There is no evidence to suggest the answer is yes – especially given she has escaped any telling off herself. Will Vicky Foxcroft, who was so opposed to the hastily put together welfare plan that she resigned as a Government whip, bite her lip in a repeat scenario because of this whips action on Wednesday? Unlikely. Cabinet overhaul Indeed, there was an immediate backlash from the Left – vows of 'solidarity with the suspended four' and howls of 'outrage' – that suggests in the short-term things will be more, not less, turbulent. More changes to right what went wrong with the welfare package are coming. No 10 is seeking advice and mulling over a summer 'reset'. An overhaul of Downing Street personnel, reforms to the machinery of Government and a ministerial reshuffle are all now widely expected ahead of the September party conference. The breadth, speed and scale of a shake-up – and whose Government careers are left in the bin – is all to be determined. But if the Prime Minister thinks a punishment beating of just seven of the 127 Labour MPs who defied him over welfare will bring this rebellious backbench to heel, he may be in for a nasty surprise.

Jeremy Corbyn to host 'Gaza tribunal' after Labour block inquiry bill
Jeremy Corbyn to host 'Gaza tribunal' after Labour block inquiry bill

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

Jeremy Corbyn to host 'Gaza tribunal' after Labour block inquiry bill

The independent MP and former Labour leader announced the tribunal on Thursday, which aims to establish the full scale of the UK's complicity in the genocide in Gaza. In March, Corbyn first made the call for an inquiry to be established in a letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Jeremy Corbyn MP He then presented the Gaza (Independent Public Inquiry) Bill to Parliament on June 4, which passed its first reading. However, during the second reading on July 4, the UK Government objected to the bill, therefore blocking any further progress. READ MORE: Former top judge says court would 'likely' rule Israel is committing genocide in Gaza The inquiry bill was backed by more than 50 MPs – including all nine SNP MPs and several Labour MPs – as well as 22 human rights organisations. The tribunal will take place over two days in September and will hear from a range of witnesses, international law experts, lawyers and whistle-blowers. The tribunal will look at four different areas: What has happened in Gaza?: Survivors and witnesses will be invited to outline the scale of human suffering, devastation and destruction in Gaza What are Britain's legal responsibilities?: Legal experts will be invited to outline the duties and obligations as set out in domestic and international law What has Britain's role been in the genocide?: The tribunal will establish Britain's involvement in Israeli military operations in Gaza, including - but not limited to - the supply of weapons, surveillance aircraft and the use of RAF bases Has Britain lived up to its legal obligations?: The final section of the tribunal will analyse the evidence presented to conclude whether Britain has fulfilled its legal obligations as set out in domestic and international law Commenting, Corbyn said: 'Just like Iraq, Government ministers are doing everything they can to hide the truth. Just like Iraq, they will not succeed. 'They cannot stop the inevitable: a full and independent inquiry. 'We will uncover the full scale of British complicity in genocide – and we will bring about justice for the people of Palestine.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store