logo
Lawmakers propose new bill to lessen crypto industry's impact on households: 'We need to rise to the challenge'

Lawmakers propose new bill to lessen crypto industry's impact on households: 'We need to rise to the challenge'

Yahoo22-05-2025
Cryptocurrency miners and data centers have found a home in Texas because of abundant, cheap electricity.
However, as CCN reported, newly proposed legislation could create stricter standards to limit these activities because they are raising utility rates for households.
Cryptocurrency regulations focus on energy consumption, tax considerations, and environmental impacts. Multiple states have laws to manage the energy demand of crypto mining and to protect miners from regulations that might otherwise treat them like data centers.
Regulations develop frameworks for the cryptocurrency industry and can help prevent legal issues like money laundering and fraud.
Lawmakers in Texas have suggested new regulations on cryptocurrency mining out of concern for residents' energy bill costs.
Mining consumes vast amounts of energy, and Texas has been able to supply that energy through natural gas, wind turbines, and other sources. Major mining operations have built enormous facilities in Texas because of dynamic pricing schemes that offer discounted rates and the opportunity to sell unused power back to the grid.
However, these activities have contributed to strain on the Texas grid.
Proponents of the Texas bill say that large mining operations now require more oversight to stabilize the energy grid. A big reason for this is that while crypto miners generate tens of millions of dollars monthly, ordinary Texas citizens are seeing their utility bills rise.
"I think we need to rise to the challenge of getting the needed generation onto the grid," said bill sponsor Senator Charles Schwertner, per the Texas Tribune. "But there is eventually a prioritization that could be discussed, and obviously Texans — their families, their homes, their businesses — are the most important individuals, the most important clients for electricity."
Laws like the proposed Senate Bill 6 (SB6) in Texas have the potential to keep utility costs affordable for homeowners while ensuring crypto operations are accountable for their energy usage.
Do you think your city has good air quality?
Definitely
Somewhat
Depends on the time of year
Not at all
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Electricity used to power mining and AI data centers affects energy prices for people completely unaffiliated with those industries.
To keep energy affordable in Texas and worldwide, it is crucial to invest in renewable energy, promote energy conservation, and improve energy efficiency.
These goals can be achieved by developing clean energy infrastructure, implementing policies that reward clean energy adoption, and embracing smart grid technologies to minimize energy waste.
Meanwhile, greener digital currencies and eco-friendly blockchains can help reduce excessive energy consumption.
With energy demands growing rapidly due to advancing technology, it is important to balance profits with climate sustainability and people's livelihoods in our communities.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Data Centers Use 50 Billion Gallons of Water as State Faces Drought
Texas Data Centers Use 50 Billion Gallons of Water as State Faces Drought

Newsweek

timea day ago

  • Newsweek

Texas Data Centers Use 50 Billion Gallons of Water as State Faces Drought

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Two data centers in San Antonio have used 463 million gallons of water in the past two years. The Alamo City facilities, owned by Microsoft and the Army Corps, have drained water from the surrounding area despite difficult drought conditions throughout Texas. Newsweek contacted the San Antonio Water System for more information via email. Why It Matters In 2025, data centers across the state are projected to use 49 billion gallons of water, enough to supply millions of households, primarily for cooling massive banks of servers that power generative AI and cloud computing. As Texas attracts tech giants with business-friendly policies and an independent energy grid, water resources have had to keep pace with both population growth and high-technology infrastructure. The surge in the data centers' water use comes as Texas endures prolonged drought, with about a quarter of the state still experiencing dry conditions despite intermittent heavy rain and flooding. Stock Image: A Texas resident surveys land and water flow near a flow meter station in Quemado, Texas, on February 22, 2023. Stock Image: A Texas resident surveys land and water flow near a flow meter station in Quemado, Texas, on February 22, 2023. Getty Images What To Know In San Antonio, data centers operated by Microsoft and the Army Corps consumed 463 million gallons between 2023 and 2024, even as local residents were restricted to watering lawns once per week under Stage 3 drought rules. The Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC) estimated that Texas data centers would use 49 billion gallons of water in 2025, with consumption projected to soar to 399 billion gallons annually by 2030—representing almost 6.6 percent of the state's total water usage. While midsize data centers typically use 300,000 gallons daily, comparable to consumption by 1,000 households, large-scale facilities such as those recently built or planned in Texas can consume as much as 4.5 million gallons daily. Unlike electricity, where Senate Bill 6 granted the Electric Reliability Council of Texas authority to cut power to data centers and other heavy users during emergencies, no analogous state law exists to regulate their water use. Most data centers rely on evaporative cooling, which consumes large volumes of water and results in significant waste lost to evaporation. What People Are Saying Margaret Cook, a water policy analyst at the Houston Advanced Research Center, told Techie + Gamers: "These centers are showing up in places that are very water-stressed. There's no requirement for them to have conversations with communities about how much water they'll use. "So any of these communities that are allowing data centers in their community are gambling against being able to get new water from future state water plans, from future funding cycles. They're using up the water that was allocated to their population for the future." What Happens Next No state legislation limits water usage by Texas data centers, though lawmakers passed new provisions to suspend their power access during grid stress events. The Texas Water Development Board's next State Water Plan is not scheduled for completion until 2027.

Greg Abbott Issues Update on Texas Raising Property Taxes
Greg Abbott Issues Update on Texas Raising Property Taxes

Newsweek

timea day ago

  • Newsweek

Greg Abbott Issues Update on Texas Raising Property Taxes

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has spoken out against a move by the Austin City Council that could see the maximum property tax increase by 25 percent for the next fiscal year, to 60 cents per $100 in valuation. Newsweek contacted Governor Abbott and the Austin City Council for comment on Friday via email and telephone respectively outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Austin City Council is estimated to have a $33 million shortfall for the next fiscal year, which comes against the backdrop of federal funding cuts and additional spending requirements for the police and fire department. Abbott's move to oppose potentially substantial new property taxes is likely to find a favorable audience from Texas Republicans. What To Know On Thursday the 11-strong Austin City Council voted unanimously to set the maximum property tax for the next fiscal year at 60 cents per $100 in valuation, a substantial increase on the current 47.76 cents. This doesn't necessarily mean the council will end up proposing an increase to 60 cents and any such move would have to be approved by voters due to a 2019 state law which requires such a move for any tax increase of more than 3.5 percent over a year. However the move sparked a hostile reaction from Governor Abbott who shared an article from The Austin American-Statesman about Thursday's vote. Hey #txlege- This. Right here. Austin eyes major property tax increase to close growing budget gap. We must stop them from raising property taxes & stop spending increases. via @statesman — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) August 1, 2025 The governor added: "Hey #txlege [Texas Legislature]—This. Right here … We must stop them from raising property taxes & stop spending increases." In 2024 the Austin Firefighters Association was awarded an eight percent pay rise by an arbiter, with negotiations over a new four-year contract having begun this week. Texas Governor Greg Abbott speaking during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025 in Austin, Texas. Texas Governor Greg Abbott speaking during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025 in Austin, Texas. Brandon Bell/GETTY In addition, a draft budget drawn up by City Manager T.C. Broadnax predicts the Austin Police Department's budget will rise by around $92 million between 2024 to 2027, including a six percent pay award to officers as stipulated by their labor contract. Property tax bills in Texas have increased dramatically in recent years, rising by 26 percent between 2019 and 2023 according to Cotality, a property data company. In June Governor Abbott signed two bills that, if approved by Texan voters in November, would grant property tax cuts to many Texans. The measures would raise the existing homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000 for all homeowners while also increasing it to $200,000 for those with disabilities or those aged 65 and above. What People Are Saying Speaking to The Austin American-Statesman Austin Mayor Kirk Watson welcomed Thursday's council vote which he said would provide "flexibility." He added: "We want to avoid being in a situation where we're precluding consideration of where [Council] might want to end up." In a joint statement Mike Siegel and Zohaib Qadri, two progressives on the Austin City Council, wrote: "We knew this time would come. We can no longer rely on an unstable framework of one-time funding and unpredictable revenue streams to fix and sustain core services." What Happens Next According to Mayor Watson the Austin City Council will begin discussions next week on proposed changes to Broadnax's draft budget, before a final vote on a new budget which is expected in mid-August.

Letters: Why would Illinois want to be like Texas? Consider these statistics.
Letters: Why would Illinois want to be like Texas? Consider these statistics.

Chicago Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Letters: Why would Illinois want to be like Texas? Consider these statistics.

The editorial on Texas tax cuts would have us believe everything is bigger in Texas due to its low taxation. Yet, I can name a few basic benefits we should all expect to be afforded in a prosperous society, which are, in fact, very scarce in Texas. Want to live in a state where you're assured of basic quality health care? Don't move to Texas, which, unlike Illinois, refused the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion and, as a result, has the highest uninsured rate in the country, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Want to live in a state that provides your children access to a quality education? Again, don't move to Texas, where, according to the Education Data Initiative, Texas invests one third less in their pupils than Illinois. ACT scores were five points higher in Illinois compared with Texas in 2024, according to the ACT. Want to live in a state that acknowledges the effects of climate change and does all it can to protect you from its pernicious effects? Moving to Texas will put you on a collision course with climate change's dangers, as evidenced by the millions of Texans left without power in the freezing winter during the deadly 2021 energy grid crisis due to a lack of regulatory oversight. Additionally, more than 130 lives may have been saved in the recent flash flood disaster in Texas had its leaders chosen to invest in siren networks and flood alert systems. While the Tribune Editorial Board would have you believe Texas' lower taxation leads to a windfall of savings for its residents, when accounting for the higher median incomes of Illinois residents and Illinois' superior social safety net, this claim turns out to be weak. A 2023 Council for Community and Economic Research report showed that while Texas's nominal cost of living was 7% to 10% lower than Illinois, the difference in effective purchasing power for the average family was only 2% to 3% lower. I know I am willing to pay 2% to 3% more to ensure my family benefits from better health care, stronger educational opportunities and improved disaster readiness to help us live longer and more fulfilling to the Tribune Editorial Board for continuing to promote the Republican Party line: tax cuts good and tax hikes bad ('Texas is talking tax cuts. Illinois? More hikes,' July 23) . It was one of the most tone-deaf editorials the board has done since it endorsed third-party candidate Gary Johnson over Hillary Clinton in 2016. I know we have short attention spans these days, but is the board really going to hold up as a role model the state where 138 people just died from floods because of a lack of infrastructure investment that could have been paid for with taxes? The state where 246 people died in 2021 when its power grid failed, also for lack of investment in infrastructure? The state that ranks second worst in the country for quality of life in 2025, according to CNBC? The CNBC article states that 'according to the United Health Foundation, Texas has the nation's lowest number of primary care doctors per capita, the second-lowest number of mental health providers, and it consistently has the highest rate of people without health insurance. The state has among America's strictest abortion bans, and crime is on the high side.' And regarding the abortion bans, was the editorial board aware of the following statistics? According to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 'between 2021 and 2022, infant deaths in Texas rose from 1,985 to 2,240. … This corresponds to a 12.9 percent increase in infant deaths in Texas versus a 1.8 percent increase in infant deaths in the rest of the U.S. during the same period.' Public education, according to the World Population Review? Texas is 40th; Illinois is 17th. So go ahead, editorial board, continue to glorify tax cuts and encourage Illinois to become more like Texas, a state that chooses policies that kill people by default. Me? I will continue to cheer on our governor and other local and state officials who use the taxes they raise to give Illinois citizens a solid quality of Brandon Johnson has ruled out a property tax increase and instead is looking for 'progressive revenue.' The mayor once was a teacher, but he seems incapable of learning lessons from history. The facts are clear: High taxes drive people out of cities and states. Tens of thousands of residents left Illinois each year from 2019 to 2024, and high taxes were a major reason for many. Illinois only avoided losing population due to immigration, largely people from Venezuela. In the old Soviet Union, the system controlled where people could live and work. China has the system of household registration, severely limiting educational and job opportunities and access to services to residents who do not stay in their assigned permanent residency. Thankfully, in the United States, people are free to choose where to live. The mayor was cagey about what specifically 'progressive revenue' means. It is worth considering what taxes Chicagoans already pay. In addition to federal and state taxes, the sales tax in Chicago, a portion of which goes to the state, is 10.25%, among the highest of American cities. Property taxes are already higher than the national average. There are real estate taxes, utility and telecom taxes, amusement taxes, hotel taxes, restaurant taxes, alcohol taxes, a shopping bag tax and cannabis taxes. Businesses are struggling because of high taxes. Tax the wealthy? Fueling the exodus of wealthy taxpayers will further weaken the tax base. Wealthy corporations? Boeing, Caterpillar, Citadel, Tyson Foods and others have already left. A bailout from Springfield or Washington is a pipe dream. Borrow more money? The debt per taxpayer is already among the highest in the country. There is only one responsible option for Chicago: Cut expenses. Unfortunately, the mayor lacks the nerve to do Harvey grapples with mounting debt, it recently made the difficult — but fiscally responsible — decision to lay off 10% of its workforce. And what has Mayor Brandon Johnson and Gov. JB Pritzker done to address the finances of Chicago and the state, respectively? Johnson has not addressed this city's bloated workforce. Instead, he told the city's contractors to reduce their charges and advocated for the Bring Chicago Home initiative, which would have raised the real estate transfer tax on the wealthy and corporations, spurred their departures and ultimately reduced the city's tax base. Likewise, Pritzker has not addressed this state's dismal pension and financial outlook. He has yet to address this state's number of governmental bodies — more than 8,500 — and attendant costs, which are more than even more populous states. Instead, our governor advocated for a graduated income tax scheme, which would have had the same effect as Bring Chicago Home, and now he simply baits President Donald Trump in national forums. Chicago needs to reduce municipal expenditures by examining and eliminating its bloated workforce, and it further needs to consider the need for 50 wards and aldermen and the attendant expenses. And Illinois needs to get its financial house in order by consolidating and/or eliminating some of its more than 8,500 governmental bodies. The elimination of bloated workforces and governmental bodies would be to the benefit of overburdened and overextended taxpayers and thus would be in the public interest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store