logo
Cambridgeshire Green Party councillors elated to win first seats

Cambridgeshire Green Party councillors elated to win first seats

BBC News03-05-2025
Green Party candidates elected to a county council for the first time said they felt elated and privileged to have won in the local elections.The Greens now have three councillors on Cambridgeshire County Council.Peter Charles Rees was elected in the Newnham division, Elliot Tong in the Abbey division, and Darren James Green in Romsey.Rees said he was "absolutely elated" to be voted in and hoped to "bring the voice for the climate crisis" to decisions made by the county council.
"There was not a single Green in the county council, and bringing that voice to climate solutions is our first priority," he said.
Tong said he felt "very privileged" to have been elected to represent an area he loved."There is a lot of stuff that needs changing around the city," he said. "We are seeing our infrastructure suffer greatly, we are seeing our services suffer greatly, all while taxes get higher and higher every year, which is pushing people further into poverty. "We need to make sure we are getting residents the quality of service they deserve and actually stand up for them."The Liberal Democrats won overall control of the county council, with 31 councillors elected to the authority.The party has run the county council as part of a joint administration with Labour and Independent councillors for the last four years.Lib Dem councillor Alex Beckett said: "We have been working with Labour for the last four years but it is great for us to finally be in control to be able to bring forward our proper Liberal values and make sure that we can really get things going again for all of Cambridgeshire."The Lib Dems gained eight seats, taking their number of councillors to 31, while the Conservatives lost 11 places to now have a total of 10 seats.Reform UK won a total of 10 new seats, with the Greens also winning the three new seats, while Labour halved its number to five. The number of Independents remains at two.
Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stockton Council 'does not want' Shambles businesses to close
Stockton Council 'does not want' Shambles businesses to close

BBC News

time32 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Stockton Council 'does not want' Shambles businesses to close

A council chief says he does not want "any businesses to close" if a redevelopment of a 19th Century market hall is Borough councillor Richard Eglington has said tenants of the Stockton Shambles have had "the first of many opportunities" to get clarity and advice from comes after businesses received a letter telling them of plans to "market the Shambles as a food and beverage opportunity and to lease the entire building".They were told no decisions had been made yet, but if approved, they would have to move. Shop owners previously told the Local Democracy Reporting Service they felt "stuck in limbo" and spoke of their worries about moving the businesses they had built up in the community, with some saying they might have to close altogether if the plans went MPs have responded to the proposals, which will be discussed by council leaders on Thursday. Conservative MP Matt Vickers said "local traders deserve better" and accused the council of "betraying hard-working business owners at The Shambles".Chris McDonald, Labour MP for Stockton North, said the council "must commit" to finding all Shambles traders an affordable, appropriate and accessible new home in the immediate High Street area. 'No decision made' Sharing the speech he will give at Thursday's cabinet meeting, Eglington, cabinet member for regeneration and housing, said the Shambles was a "loved and cherished" Grade II listed building and there were no plans to knock it down."When developing the Central Stockton and North Thornaby Blueprint, The Shambles were identified as an opportunity to develop a food and beverage offering. "It was clear from conversations with interested parties that the whole building would be needed for the proposal to work."Eglington said that current tenants would need to move out if the proposal was approved."No decision has been made, and it will not be made until the cabinet vote on the proposals but if approved the council would need vacant possession."He said "letters outlining the proposals and not eviction notices have been sent to the tenants, and a meeting was offered the next day". "To be clear this is the first of many opportunities that the tenants have to speak to the officers and to get advice and clarity."He said that the council would continue to offer meetings and support to all current tenants."We don't want any businesses to close, and we hope that with the support of the business development team that the businesses will grow and develop further."He added the aim of the redevelopment was to increase footfall in Stockton. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

The UK says thousands of Afghans have been brought to Britain under a secret resettlement program
The UK says thousands of Afghans have been brought to Britain under a secret resettlement program

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

The UK says thousands of Afghans have been brought to Britain under a secret resettlement program

Thousands of Afghans, including many who worked with British forces, have been secretly resettled in the U.K. after a leak of data on their identities raised fears that they could be targeted by the Taliban, the British government revealed Tuesday. The government now plans to close the route, which the media had been barred by a court order from disclosing. 'I have felt deeply concerned about the lack of transparency to Parliament and the public,' Defense Secretary John Healey said in the House of Commons. Healey told lawmakers that a spreadsheet containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to come to Britain after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan was accidentally released in error in 2022 because of a defense official's email error, and extracts were later published online. The then-Conservative government sought a court order barring disclosure of the leak, in an attempt to prevent the personal information being made public. The High Court issued a strict order known as a super injunction that barred anyone from revealing its existence. The government then set up a secret new program to resettle the Afghans. The injunction was lifted on Tuesday in conjunction with a decision by Britain's current Labour Party government to make the program public. It said an independent review had found little evidence that the leaked data would expose Afghans to a greater risk of retribution from the country's Taliban rulers. About 4,500 Afghans – 900 applicants and approximately 3,600 family members — have been brought to Britain under the secret program, and about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the time it closes, at a total cost of 850 million pounds ($1.1 billion). About 36,000 more Afghans have been relocated to the U.K. under other resettlement routes. Critics say that still leaves thousands more people who helped British troops as interpreters or in other roles at risk of torture, imprisonment or death. British troops were sent to Afghanistan as part of a deployment against al-Qaida and Taliban forces in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. At the peak of the operation, there were almost 10,000 British troops in the country, mostly in Helmand province in the south. Britain ended combat operations in 2014, and its remaining troops left Afghanistan in 2021 as the Taliban swept back to power, two decades after they were ousted. The Taliban's return triggered chaotic scenes at Kabul Airport in August 2021 as Western nations rushed to evacuate citizens and Afghan employees. Super injunctions are relatively rare, and their use is controversial. Unlike regular court injunctions, super injunctions bar reporting that they were even ordered The handful of cases in which they have come to light involved celebrities trying to prevent disclosures about their private lives. This is the first known case of a super injunction being sought by the government. Healey said he was not aware of any others in existence. Judge Martin Chamberlain, who ruled that the injunction should be lifted, said Tuesday at the High Court that the gag order had 'given rise to serious free speech concerns." 'The super injunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability, which operate in a democracy," he said. 'This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum.''

Children to be taught how to resist Andrew Tate ‘incel' culture at school
Children to be taught how to resist Andrew Tate ‘incel' culture at school

The Independent

time36 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Children to be taught how to resist Andrew Tate ‘incel' culture at school

Children will be taught to combat misogyny and resist 'incel' culture under new school guidance published on Tuesday. The relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) framework specifically aims to help boys find positive role models, countering the increasing spread of sexist online content from 'manosphere' influencers like Andrew Tate. It also stresses the need to avoid 'stigmatising boys for being boys'. Beyond lessons on 'incel' (involuntary celibate) culture, secondary schools will be required to provide young people with greater awareness of AI, deepfakes, and the links between pornography and misogyny. The guidance comes as the Department for Education (DfE) warned that misogynistic attitudes had reached 'epidemic scale' among young people, with 54 per cent of those aged 11-19 saying they had witnessed misogynist comments. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'Before I was elected to Parliament, I managed a refuge for women and children fleeing domestic violence, so I have seen first-hand the devastating impact when we don't foster healthy attitudes from the youngest age. 'I want our children to be equipped to defy the malign forces that exist online. Schools and parents alike have a vital role to play, helping children identify positive role models and resist the manipulation too often used online to groom impressionable young minds.' In its manifesto last year, Labour pledged to halve the rate of violence against women and girls in 10 years. And earlier in 2025, Sir Keir Starmer praised the Netflix drama Adolescence for highlighting how misogyny had 'taken on a different form' and said he wanted a discussion on what could be done to stop young boys 'being dragged into this whirlpool of hatred and misogyny'. Margaret Mulholland, of the Association of School and College Leaders, welcomed the new guidance and its focus on finding positive male role models for boys, saying it was 'important that we don't simply tell boys what is wrong'. The previous Conservative government proposed changing the guidance on RSHE in May last year, with then-prime minister Rishi Sunak expressing concern children were being exposed to 'inappropriate' content. The draft guidance, which was open to a nine-week consultation, proposed clear age limits on the teaching of certain topics to ensure children were not 'exposed to too much too soon'. It said sex education should be taught no earlier than Year 5, when pupils are aged nine to 10, and that what is described as the 'contested topic of gender identity' should not be taught at all. The proposed guidance said schools should 'at minimum' show parents a representative sample of teaching resources they plan to use and that schools 'should respond positively to requests from parents to see material that has not already been shared'. While Tuesday's revised guidance includes the requirement to provide parents with teaching materials, the new Government has scrapped the proposal to prescribe specific ages at which individual topics are taught. The DfE said there would be a 'strong new emphasis on age-appropriate' teaching, and a 'clear dividing line' between primary and secondary school. But the guidance would allow teachers to 'sensitively respond to topics that children might have seen online or heard from their friends', with research suggesting 22% of primary school-aged girls had seen 'rude images online'. Tuesday's guidance also includes requirements on helping children with their mental health, including working with mental health professionals to discuss suicide prevention 'in an age-appropriate way'. Children will be taught the importance of 'grit and resilience' in order to help them 'feel able to take on challenges and risks'. Andy Airey, Mike Palmer and Tim Owen – who founded suicide prevention charity 3 Dads Walking in memory of their daughters – said: 'Giving schools permission to talk about suicide prevention means more young people can be supported to open up about difficult feelings and know where to find help. 'We know, from painful personal experience, how much this matters. This change will save lives.' Schools will be able to implement the guidance from September this year, and must follow it from September 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store